Pass the PMI Project-Management-Professional PMP Questions and answers with CertsForce

The project manager should first try to address the issue of team members not following the ground rules by scheduling a meeting with the project team to reinforce the ground rules. This is the most proactive and collaborative approach to resolve the problem and ensure team adherence to the ground rules. The project manager should also use this opportunity to listen to the team members’ feedback and concerns, and make any necessary adjustments to the ground rules to suit the project context and team dynamics. This is consistent with the agile principles of self-organizing teams, frequent communication, and continuous improvement. The other options are not the best choices, as they involve escalating the issue to external parties, such as the project sponsor, human resources, or the functional manager, without first trying to resolve it within the team. These options may also create a negative impact on the team morale, trust, and performance, and undermine the project manager’s leadership and authority. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 9: Project Team Management, Section 9.2.2: Team Charter

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 5: Elicitation and Collaboration, Section 5.3.1: Ground Rules

Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: An Introduction to Agile, Section 2.3: Agile Teams

A project manager who is using an agile approach should be able to respond to changes and issues quickly and effectively. One of the principles of agile project management is to collaborate with stakeholders and customers frequently and openly. Therefore, when the project manager discovers that another company has patented a very similar tool, the best course of action is to schedule a meeting with the critical stakeholders, such as the product owner, the sponsor, the legal team, and the development team, to review the issue and decide on the next steps. This way, the project manager can communicate the impact of the issue, seek feedback and input from the stakeholders, and explore possible solutions or alternatives. The meeting should also result in clear action items and responsibilities for resolving the issue and mitigating the risk. References:

Agile Practice Guide, page 11

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), page 47

Agile problems, challenges, & failures - Project Management Institute, page 4

 The correct answer is C. According to the PMBOK® Guide, project artifacts are any documents or deliverables that are produced as part of the project management processes1. These artifacts can include project plans, reports, baselines, metrics, lessons learned, and other outputs that show the performance and progress of the project and the project team. The project manager should gather these artifacts to provide evidence of the team member’s high performance and contribution to the project success. This will help the project manager to make a strong case for the team member’s promotion to senior management. Compiling key highlights from meeting minutes, asking the team member to write a biography, or calculating the health of the projects are not sufficient or relevant to demonstrate the team member’s skills and competencies as a potential project manager. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, page 89

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.4, one of the tools and techniques for performing qualitative risk analysis is risk categorization. This involves grouping potential risks by common root causes or other criteria, such as project phases, sources, or effects. The project manager should use this technique to identify the most significant risks that are affecting the project performance, and prioritize them for further analysis or action. The project manager should then develop appropriate risk responses to mitigate or avoid the negative impacts of the risks, or exploit or enhance the positive impacts of the opportunities. The project manager should also update the risk register and other project documents accordingly. The other options are not the first steps to take, as they do not address the root causes of the risks, and may not be feasible or effective in the given situation. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 11.4; PMP Practice Exam, question 94.

Technical debt is the term used to describe the consequences of poor quality or incomplete work in software development projects. It refers to the implied cost of rework or maintenance that will be required in the future due to skipping or compromising on testing, documentation, design, or other best practices. Technical debt can negatively affect the project velocity, quality, performance, reliability, security, and customer satisfaction. According to the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials1, technical debt can be classified into four types:

Deliberate and reckless: This is when the team intentionally chooses to skip testing or other quality measures, knowing that it will create problems later, but without a plan to address them. This is the most harmful type of technical debt, as it can lead to major defects, failures, or breaches that can jeopardize the project or the organization.

Deliberate and prudent: This is when the team intentionally chooses to skip testing or other quality measures, knowing that it will create problems later, but with a plan to address them as soon as possible. This is a common type of technical debt, as it can help the team meet urgent deadlines, deliver minimum viable products, or respond to changing requirements. However, this type of technical debt still requires careful management and prioritization, as it can accumulate over time and become unmanageable.

Inadvertent and reckless: This is when the team unintentionally creates technical debt due to lack of skills, knowledge, or experience, and without realizing the impact of their actions. This is a dangerous type of technical debt, as it can result in poor quality products, low customer satisfaction, and high maintenance costs. This type of technical debt can be prevented by investing in training, coaching, mentoring, and peer reviews.

Inadvertent and prudent: This is when the team unintentionally creates technical debt due to unavoidable factors, such as evolving technologies, standards, or customer needs, and with a plan to address them as part of continuous improvement. This is an inevitable type of technical debt, as it reflects the dynamic nature of software development. This type of technical debt can be managed by adopting agile practices, such as frequent feedback, retrospectives, and refactoring.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. Increased technical debt. By skipping testing, the project manager and the team are creating deliberate and reckless technical debt, which can have severe consequences for the project and the organization. The project manager will need to focus on identifying, measuring, and reducing the technical debt as soon as possible, and avoid making such decisions in the future.

According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, a change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline. A change request should include a clear description of the change, the rationale for the change, the impact of the change on the project, and the alternatives considered. A change request should also be evaluated for its feasibility, benefits, risks, and alignment with the project objectives and scope. In this scenario, the project manager should have assessed the change’s overall impact to the project before submitting it to the CCB. This would have helped the project manager to determine if the change was necessary, beneficial, and feasible, and to communicate the pros and cons of the change to the SME and the CCB. This would have also helped the project manager to avoid or mitigate any potential conflicts or resistance from the SME or the CCB. Requesting that the sponsor approved the change request first, ensuring that the change request was aligned with the project scope, or submitting the change request directly to the CCB are actions that should be taken after the change’s impact assessment, not before. These actions do not address the root cause of the situation, which is the lack of a proper impact analysis of the change request. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.4.1.1

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.2.2.1

Creating internal projects to provide internships for the students is a change in the project scope that requires approval from the customer and other stakeholders. Therefore, the project manager should create a change request with the scope of the new internal projects and submit it to the Perform Integrated Change Control process1. The change request should include the rationale, benefits, risks, and impacts of the proposed change on the project objectives, deliverables, schedule, cost, quality, and resources. The project manager should also update the project management plan and other relevant documents to reflect the change in scope.

To plan and execute the new internal projects, the project manager should create a work breakdown structure (WBS) of the new scope with the internal projects2. A WBS is a hierarchical decomposition of the project scope into manageable deliverables and work packages. A WBS helps the project manager to define, organize, and monitor the project work, as well as to allocate resources, assign responsibilities, and estimate costs and durations. The project manager should involve the project team and the interns in creating the WBS to ensure their buy-in and commitment.

To ensure that the internal projects meet the customer’s expectations and the project’s quality standards, the project manager should manage the quality of the delivery3. Quality management involves planning, implementing, and controlling quality activities to ensure that the project deliverables conform to the requirements and specifications. The project manager should use quality tools and techniques, such as quality checklists, audits, inspections, testing, and reviews, to measure and improve the quality of the internal projects. The project manager should also document and communicate the quality results and feedback to the project team, the interns, the customer, and other stakeholders.

A minimum viable product (MVP) is a concept from Lean Startup that stresses the impact of learning in new product development. It is the simplest version of a product that allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort. An MVP can help a project manager to deliver value to the customer faster, test the market demand, and reduce the risk of failure. To create an MVP, the project manager needs to review the project backlog and prioritize the features that are essential to solve the customer’s problem or satisfy their need. The project manager can use agile methods such as user stories, story mapping, and MoSCoW prioritization to identify and rank the features. The project manager can then plan and execute the development of the MVP within the expected timeline and gather feedback from the customer and stakeholders to validate the product and make improvements. References:

MVP Definition and Examples | Project Management Glossary - Jexo

What is a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)? | Agile Alliance

MVPs and MBIs - Project Management Institute

The project manager should take two actions to deal with the situation of the neighbors resisting the project and threatening legal action. One action is to publish information on the city’s website about the benefits that the new tram station will bring, such as improved transportation, reduced traffic, increased safety, and enhanced economic development. This action can help to inform and educate the public about the project’s value proposition and address any misconceptions or concerns that the neighbors may have. The project manager can also use other communication channels, such as social media, newsletters, or press releases, to reach a wider audience and increase awareness and support for the project12.

Another action is to register this situation as a risk and develop a mitigation plan. A risk is an uncertain event or condition that can have a positive or negative effect on the project’s objectives. The situation of the neighbors opposing the project and threatening legal action is a negative risk that can potentially cause delays, cost overruns, reputation damage, or even project cancellation. The project manager should identify and document this risk in the risk register, along with its probability, impact, and priority. The project manager should also develop a mitigation plan to reduce the likelihood or severity of the risk. The mitigation plan may include actions such as engaging with the neighbors, negotiating with them, offering them compensation, or seeking legal advice34. References: = PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 376-377, 414-415; 8 Steps for Better Issue Management, Step 5: Communicate with the team; PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 395-396, 443-444; Project Risk Management - A Quick Guide, Step 3: Plan Risk Responses.

A project manager who has team members around the world in different time zones should plan and schedule the tasks and work packages in a way that minimizes the dependency and communication gaps between the offices. This can be done by using techniques such as rolling wave planning, agile methods, or critical chain method, which allow for more flexibility and adaptability in the project schedule. The project manager should also consider the cultural differences, working hours, holidays, and availability of the team members when planning and scheduling the project work. This way, the project manager can avoid delays, conflicts, and misunderstandings caused by the geographical and time zone challenges. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.2: Schedule Performance, pp. 55-56

Project Management Professional (PMP) Handbook, Section 2.2: PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 2: Plan and manage project schedule, pp. 15-16

Managing Projects Across Time Zones, by ProjectManager.com, published on July 9, 2019

 the one that reflects the best practice of managing stakeholder expectations and communication, based on the project management plan and the stakeholder engagement plan. Reference: PMP Exam Set F – Q83 - This is a similar question with the same answer choices and a detailed explanation of why each option is correct or incorrect. It also provides a reference to the PMBOK Guide, Sixth Edition, page 518.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline. It is used to request changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or any other aspect of the project. A change request should include the following information: the reason for the change, the impact of the change, the alternatives considered, the recommendation, and the approval status. A change request should be initiated whenever there is a deviation from the agreed-upon project scope or plan, or when there is a need to accommodate new or modified requirements. A change request should be submitted to the appropriate authority for review and approval, such as the project sponsor, the change control board, or the steering committee. A change request should also be communicated to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project team, the customer, the PMO, or the operations function. A change request should be aligned with the project objectives, the business needs, and the stakeholder expectations. A change request should be evaluated based on the criteria established by the project governance, such as the business value, the feasibility, the risk, the urgency, and the alignment with the project charter. A change request should be implemented only after it has been approved and authorized by the appropriate authority. A change request should be monitored and controlled throughout the project life cycle to ensure that the expected benefits and outcomes are achieved.

In this situation, the project manager should initiate a change request to modify the scope and adjust the timelines, because there are scope changes and a delay in the delivery of critical tasks that affect the project performance and the stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager should document the rationale and the impact of the change request, and submit it to the appropriate authority for approval. The project manager should also communicate the change request to the relevant stakeholders, and update the project plan and the project baselines accordingly. This way, the project manager can ensure that the project is aligned with the business needs and the stakeholder expectations, and that the project delivers the expected value and benefits. References:

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 6: Traceability and Monitoring, Section 6.4: Manage Changes to Requirements

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 7: Traceability and Monitoring, Section 7.4: Manage Changes to Requirements

 A hybrid approach is a combination of two or more project management methodologies, such as Waterfall and Agile, that aims to create a better fit for the project and the organization123. A hybrid approach allows for flexibility and adaptability, but also requires alignment and communication among the project stakeholders. One of the key aspects of a hybrid approach is benefits management, which is the identification, definition, planning, tracking and realization of benefits4. Benefits are the positive outcomes and value that the project delivers to the organization and the customers5. A benefits management plan is a document that outlines how the benefits will be identified, measured, tracked and realized throughout the project lifecycle46.

In this scenario, the product owner, who is the person responsible for defining and prioritizing the product requirements and ensuring the delivery of value, stated that the product does not deliver any value, despite meeting the specifications. This indicates a misalignment between the product owner’s expectations and the project’s benefits. The project manager, who is the person responsible for leading and managing the project team and delivering the project objectives, believes that the product meets the specifications and is confused by the product owner’s statement. The development team, who is the group of people responsible for designing, building and testing the product, is also confused by the product owner’s statement.

The best course of action for the project manager in this situation is to review the project’s benefits management plan with the product owner. This will help to clarify the benefits that the project aims to achieve, how they align with the product owner’s expectations and the organization’s strategic objectives, how they will be measured and tracked, and how they will be realized. By reviewing the benefits management plan, the project manager and the product owner can identify any gaps, issues or changes that need to be addressed, and agree on the next steps to ensure the delivery of value. This will also help to improve the communication and collaboration among the project stakeholders, and increase the chances of project success.

The other options are not the best choices for the project manager in this situation. Escalating the matter to the executive board (option A) may be premature and unnecessary, as it may create more confusion and conflict, and undermine the trust and authority of the project manager and the product owner. Prioritizing the project backlog and asking the development team to fix the issues (option B) may be ineffective and inefficient, as it may not address the root cause of the problem, and may waste time and resources on unnecessary or irrelevant changes. Asking the product owner to terminate the project (option D) may be drastic and detrimental, as it may result in the loss of value, investment and reputation, and damage the relationship between the project manager and the product owner.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the schedule performance index (SPI) and the cost performance index (CPI) are two key indicators of the project performance measurement1. The SPI measures how efficiently the project team is using the time allocated for the project, while the CPI measures how efficiently the project team is using the resources allocated for the project1. An SPI or CPI value greater than 1 indicates that the project is ahead of schedule or under budget, respectively. An SPI or CPI value less than 1 indicates that the project is behind schedule or over budget, respectively1. In this question, the project manager notices that the SPI is 1.8 and the CPI is 0.1, which means that the project is ahead of schedule but over budget. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed as soon as possible, as it may jeopardize the project viability and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager should not ignore the project sponsor’s concern, as the project sponsor is the person who provides the financial resources and support for the project2. The project manager should also not assume that it is normal to spend more money in the design phase of a project, as this may indicate poor planning, estimation, or control of the project costs3. The project manager should not stop crashing the schedule, as this may affect the project scope, quality, or risk. The project manager should not use a resource-levelling technique, as this may delay the project completion and increase the project costs. The best option for the project manager is to manage the project sponsor closely and revise the project’s resource management plan to improve indicators. This means that the project manager should communicate frequently and transparently with the project sponsor, explain the reasons for the cost overrun, and seek their input and approval for any corrective actions. The project manager should also review and update the project’s resource management plan, which is the document that describes how the project resources will be estimated, acquired, managed, and controlled. The project manager should identify and implement strategies to reduce the project costs, such as optimizing the resource allocation, negotiating better rates, or eliminating unnecessary activities or resources. By managing the project sponsor closely and revising the project’s resource management plan, the project manager can improve the project performance indicators and increase the chances of delivering the project within the approved budget. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 7, Section 7.4.2.1, Page 267

2: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 13, Section 13.1.2.1, Page 518

3: 5 Essential Tips for Schedule Control in Project Management

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.6.2.5, Page 215

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.4.2.5, Page 201

: Guide to Project Budgeting & Scheduling

: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 9, Section 9.1.3.1, Page 313

: How to Make a Project Budget: Project Budgeting Basics

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the principles of project management is to collaborate with stakeholders. This means that the project manager should identify, analyze, and engage the project stakeholders throughout the project life cycle, using various communication methods and tools. The level and frequency of stakeholder engagement may vary depending on the stakeholder’s interest, influence, expectations, and needs. A member of the board of directors who is the sponsor of a project that is important to the organization but has many other priorities and is not currently engaged in the project activities should be kept informed and consulted with based on their needs. This will help to ensure that the sponsor is aware of the project status, issues, risks, and changes, and can provide support and guidance when needed. The project manager should also consult with the sponsor to understand their expectations, preferences, and feedback, and to involve them in governance and decision making as appropriate. Keeping the stakeholder informed and consulted with based on their needs will help to maintain a positive and trusting relationship with the sponsor and increase the likelihood of project success. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 9, Principle 2: Collaborate with Stakeholders; page 31, Section 2.3.1, Project Stakeholders; page 41, Section 2.5.1.1, Stakeholder Analysis; page 42, Section 2.5.2.2, Stakeholder Engagement Plan.

Diagram, rectangle Description automatically generated

 A sprint planning meeting is an event in scrum that kicks off the sprint. The purpose of sprint planning is to define what can be delivered in the sprint and how that work will be achieved. Sprint planning is done in collaboration with the whole scrum team1.

Sprint planning addresses the following topics1:

Topic One: Why is this Sprint valuable? The Product Owner proposes how the product could increase its value and utility in the current Sprint. The whole Scrum Team then collaborates to define a Sprint Goal that communicates why the Sprint is valuable to stakeholders. The Sprint Goal must be finalized prior to the end of Sprint Planning.

Topic Two: What can be Done this Sprint? Through discussion with the Product Owner, the Developers select items from the Product Backlog to include in the current Sprint. The Scrum Team may refine these items during this process, which increases understanding and confidence. Selecting how much can be completed within a Sprint may be challenging. However, the more the Developers know about their past performance, their upcoming capacity, and their Definition of Done, the more confident they will be in their Sprint forecasts.

Topic Three: How will the chosen work get done? For each selected Product Backlog item, the Developers plan the work necessary to create an Increment that meets the Definition of Done. This is often done by decomposing Product Backlog items into smaller work items of one day or less. How this is done is at the sole discretion of the Developers. No one else tells them how to turn Product Backlog items into Increments of value.

The Sprint Goal, the Product Backlog items selected for the Sprint, plus the plan for delivering them are together referred to as the Sprint Backlog1.

Therefore, the two pieces of information that the project manager needs in order to make the sprint planning meeting productive and effective are the Product Backlog and the Sprint Goal. The Product Backlog is the source of the work items that the Developers will select and commit to deliver in the Sprint. The Sprint Goal is the outcome that the Scrum Team wants to achieve in the Sprint and that guides their work.

The other options are not essential for the sprint planning meeting. A Sprint Charter is not a scrum artifact and is not required for sprint planning. A Burndown Chart is a tool to track the progress of the Sprint, but it is not needed for planning the Sprint. The Company Mission and Vision are important for the overall product strategy, but they are not specific enough for the Sprint planning.

According to the PMBOK guide, one of the principles of agile project management is to empower the team to self-organize and make decisions about how to best accomplish their work. Self-organizing teams are more likely to be motivated, creative, and productive, as they have a sense of ownership and autonomy over their work. Self-organizing teams also have the ability to inspect and adapt their processes and practices based on feedback and learning. Therefore, when a team faces recurring issues, the project lead should not intervene or impose solutions, but rather facilitate the team’s reflection and improvement. The project lead can use techniques such as retrospectives, which are meetings where the team reviews their performance and identifies what went well, what did not go well, and what actions they can take to improve. The project lead can also help the team to update their team working agreement, which is a document that defines the team’s norms, values, and expectations. A team working agreement can help the team to align on their goals, roles, responsibilities, and communication methods, as well as to resolve conflicts and issues. The project lead should not notify senior management, challenge the team, or post the agreements, as these actions may undermine the team’s trust, autonomy, and accountability. References:

PMBOK guide, page 18, section 1.2.3, Agile Considerations in Project Management

PMBOK guide, page 437, section 11.2.2.3, Meetings

Creating a Team Working Agreement

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should manage stakeholder expectations by communicating and working with stakeholders to meet their needs and address issues as they occur. This includes understanding the stakeholder’s concerns, interests, and expectations, and providing timely and accurate information to keep them informed and satisfied. By working to understand the key stakeholder’s concerns and providing feedback in regular project status reports, the project manager can maintain a positive relationship with the stakeholder and avoid unnecessary interruptions and conflicts. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 540-541, section 13.3.2.4 Manage Stakeholder Engagement: Data Analysis.

According to the PMBOK Guide, project closure is the process of finalizing all activities across all of the project management process groups to formally complete the project or phase1. Project closure involves verifying that all the project deliverables have been completed and accepted by the customer or sponsor, confirming that all the contractual obligations have been met, documenting the project performance and lessons learned, releasing the project resources, and archiving the project records2.

In this question, the project manager is faced with a problem that the client will not agree to closure, claiming that the project team has not performed the code inspections mandated in the development contract. The project team has performed the code inspections, however the records are not complete. This indicates that there is a discrepancy between the contractual requirements and the project documentation, which can lead to disputes, claims, or litigation. The project manager should approach this problem by holding a meeting with the project team, project sponsor, and the client to agree to the further work required to close the project and add to lessons learned. This way, the project manager can facilitate a constructive dialogue among the key stakeholders, clarify the expectations and obligations of each party, negotiate a mutually acceptable solution, and document the agreed actions and outcomes. This will also help to maintain the relationship with the client, ensure customer satisfaction, and capture the lessons learned for future projects.

The other options are not the best actions to take to solve this problem. Seeking expert legal advice on the interpretation of the clauses in the contract is a possible option, but it should be done after trying to resolve the issue amicably with the client and the sponsor. Seeking legal advice may also escalate the conflict and damage the trust and goodwill with the client. Closing the project and handing over the deliverables to the client is not advisable, as it may violate the contract terms and expose the project to legal risks. Holding a lessons learned workshop with the project team and project sponsor to avoid contractual compliance issues arising in future projects is a good practice, but it does not address the current issue with the client and the project closure.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should collect requirements from all stakeholders, using various techniques such as interviews, focus groups, surveys, etc. The project manager should also document the stakeholder requirements, expectations, and assumptions in the requirements traceability matrix. If some stakeholders are not available for a meeting, the project manager should use other communication methods to reach out to them and gather their input. This will ensure that the project requirements are complete, accurate, and aligned with the stakeholder needs and expectations. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 140-141, 152-153.

A change request is a formal document that proposes a modification to some aspect of the project, such as the user requirements, the deliverables, the schedule, the budget, or the quality standards123. Change requests can originate from various sources, such as the stakeholders, the project team, the customer, or the environment12. Change requests need to be evaluated and approved before they can be implemented, as they may have significant impacts on the project performance, scope, cost, time, quality, and risk123.

The project scope statement is a document that defines and documents the project objectives, deliverables, requirements, assumptions, constraints, and acceptance criteria12. The project scope statement is the basis for making project decisions and controlling changes12. Therefore, the project manager should evaluate the change request against the project scope statement to determine if the change is necessary, feasible, and beneficial for the project123. The project manager should also consider the impact of the change on the other project components, such as the schedule, the budget, the quality, and the risk123.

The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to take next. Discussing approval of the change request in the next project meeting (A) may delay the decision-making process and cause confusion among the project team and stakeholders. Performing a risk assessment on the required change request (B) is an important step, but it should be done after evaluating the change request against the project scope statement, as the risk assessment may depend on the scope implications of the change. Asking the sponsor for more funds to cover the change request (D) is not appropriate, as the project manager should first determine if the change is justified and aligned with the project scope statement, and then explore alternative ways to accommodate the change within the existing budget or negotiate a trade-off with the sponsor. References: 123

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key activities of the project manager is to tailor the project delivery approach based on the project characteristics, context, and environment. This means that the project manager should select the appropriate tools, techniques, methods, and artifacts that best suit the project needs and objectives. If the project manager realizes that the project will benefit from using adaptive tools, such as agile or hybrid methods, then the project manager should update the project documents accordingly and plan the first iterative session. This will enable the project team to deliver value incrementally and iteratively, and to respond to changes and feedback more effectively. Option A is the best answer for this question.

Option B is not the best answer because contacting the project sponsor and requesting new team members who are familiar with adaptive projects is not the first thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the current team lacks the skills or experience to work with adaptive tools, but it is not a necessary or immediate action. Moreover, requesting new team members may not always be feasible or desirable, as it may increase the project costs and risks, and may disrupt the team dynamics and performance.

Option C is not the best answer because confirming team capabilities before introducing adaptive tools and artifacts to the project is not the first thing that the project manager should do. It is a good practice to assess the team’s readiness and ability to work with adaptive tools, but it is not a prerequisite or a determinant for tailoring the project delivery approach. The project manager should base the decision on the project characteristics, context, and environment, not on the team capabilities. Moreover, confirming team capabilities may not always be accurate or reliable, as the team may have different levels of familiarity and confidence with adaptive tools.

Option D is not the best answer because freezing the design stage and looking for an external resource to run iterative design at extra cost is not the first thing that the project manager should do. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the project is too complex or uncertain to be handled by the internal team, but it is not a recommended or proactive action. Freezing the design stage may delay the project delivery and may not reflect the current or future state of the project requirements or stakeholder needs. Looking for an external resource may increase the project costs and risks, and may reduce the project control and quality. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 9-10, 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, 49-50.

 Design thinking is a human-centered approach to problem-solving that involves empathy, ideation, prototyping, and testing. It helps project managers and teams to understand the needs, preferences, and pain points of the end users and stakeholders, and to create solutions that are desirable, feasible, and viable. By incorporating design thinking practices into the project life cycle, the project manager can avoid missing the mark on many features and deliver a product that meets or exceeds the stakeholder’s expectations. Some of the design thinking practices that can be applied in the project life cycle are:

Stakeholder mapping: This is a technique to identify and analyze the key stakeholders of the project, their roles, interests, expectations, and influence. It helps to align the project objectives with the stakeholder needs and to plan the communication and engagement strategies. Stakeholder mapping can be done at the initiation stage of the project and updated throughout the project as needed.

Persona creation: This is a technique to create fictional characters that represent the typical end users of the product. Personas help to empathize with the users and to design the product features and functions that suit their needs, goals, and behaviors. Persona creation can be done at the planning stage of the project and validated with real users during the execution stage.

User journey mapping: This is a technique to visualize the steps and interactions that the users go through when using the product. User journey mapping helps to identify the pain points, opportunities, and emotions of the users and to design the product features and functions that enhance their experience. User journey mapping can be done at the planning stage of the project and refined with user feedback during the execution stage.

Prototyping and testing: This is a technique to create and test low-fidelity or high-fidelity versions of the product with the users and stakeholders. Prototyping and testing help to validate the assumptions, gather feedback, and improve the product features and functions. Prototyping and testing can be done iteratively at the execution stage of the project and finalized at the closing stage. References:

1: Stakeholder analysis 101: a project manager’s guide - Office Timeline

2: 4 Reasons Project Stakeholder Feedback is Important

3: How to Gather and Control Stakeholder Feedback and Reaction

4: Overcoming the Challenges of Collecting Stakeholder Feedback for Project Management

[5]: Design Thinking for Project Managers - PMI

[6]: Design Thinking for Project Management - ProjectManager

According to the PMBOK Guide, the first process in the Project Integration Management knowledge area is Develop Project Charter. This process authorizes the project and defines the high-level scope, objectives, and stakeholders of the project. The project charter is based on the business case, which is the document that justifies the need and value of the project. The business case is usually prepared by the project sponsor or initiator, not the project manager. Therefore, option A is incorrect. Option B is also incorrect, because a SWOT analysis is a technique used to identify the project risks, assumptions, and constraints, which are part of the project planning process, not the initiating process. Option C is incorrect, because engaging stakeholders and allocating resources are also part of the project planning and executing processes, not the initiating process. Option D is the correct answer, because gathering requirements from stakeholders is a key activity in the initiating process group, as it helps to define the scope and objectives of the project, as well as the expectations and needs of the stakeholders. The project manager should gather requirements from stakeholders before developing the project charter, as the charter should reflect the stakeholder requirements and align with the business case. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 30-33, 75-77, 123-125, 135-137.

The project manager should meet with the entire team to review the ground rules about safe environments, as this is an important aspect of creating a high-performing team and fostering trust and collaboration among team members1. The project manager should also contact the team member who shared the negative details to explain what information can be shared outside the team and what information should be kept confidential, as this is part of managing the team’s communication and ensuring ethical behavior2. Contacting the team member’s functional manager and inviting them to the next retrospective (option A) may not be appropriate, as it could violate the privacy of the other team member and create more conflict. Meeting with the product owner to talk about the situation (option C) may not be relevant, as the product owner is not directly involved in the issue and may not have the authority or responsibility to resolve it. Meeting with the sponsor to review the situation (option E) may not be necessary, as the sponsor is not directly involved in the issue and may not have the interest or availability to address it. References:

1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017, p. 336.

2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., 2017, p. 379.

According to the PBA Guide, the project manager should facilitate the resolution of issues and conflicts that arise during the project, such as interruptions and requests for help from other teams1. This involves identifying the root causes of the problem, such as unclear roles and responsibilities, competing priorities, or lack of communication2. The project manager should then define the ground rules with all project team members to minimize interferences, such as setting boundaries for availability, delegating tasks, or using technology to avoid distractions34. This is also consistent with the PMBOK Guide, which states that the project manager should establish the team ground rules as part of the team development process5. By identifying the problem’s root causes and defining the ground rules, the project manager can help the project team members avoid interruptions and requests for help from other teams, and focus on completing their tasks during the iterations. References:

1: PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.4.3, Page 66

2: PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.4.3.1, Page 67

3: A Plan for Managing (Constant) Interruptions at Work

4: 6 Secrets for Avoiding Interruptions at Work

5: PMBOK Guide, Chapter 9, Section 9.3.2.3, Page 318

According to the PMBOK® Guide, one of the key skills of a project manager is to manage stakeholder engagement, which includes facilitating collaboration among stakeholders1. Collaboration is essential for global projects, as it enables effective communication, efficiency, decision-making, and creativity among team members from different regions, cultures, and backgrounds2. However, collaboration can also be challenging due to factors such as time zones, language barriers, and cultural differences3. Therefore, the project manager should coordinate a meeting to understand the situation and resolve any conflicts that may arise among the team members. By doing so, the project manager can foster trust, respect, and mutual understanding among the team, and ensure that they are aligned with the project objectives and expectations2. The project manager can use various techniques to facilitate the meeting, such as active listening, brainstorming, negotiation, and problem-solving1. References:

1: PMBOK® Guide – 4th Edition, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Management

2: The Global Project Management Framework

3: Advantages and Challenges of Global Team Collaboration

The project manager should take two actions to deal with the situation of the neighbors not being satisfied with the project and resisting it. One action is to set up a meeting with neighborhood representatives to win their cooperation. This action can help the project manager to communicate with the neighbors, listen to their concerns and complaints, and explain the benefits and value of the project. The project manager can also use this opportunity to negotiate with the neighbors, offer them some incentives or compensation, and seek their support and feedback for the project. By engaging with the neighbors, the project manager can build trust and rapport with them, and reduce the potential for conflict and disruption12.

Another action is to analyze the situation and find out what is causing the neighborhood’s negative attitude. This action can help the project manager to identify the root causes of the problem, such as lack of information, misunderstanding, fear of change, or dissatisfaction with the project’s impact. The project manager can use tools such as stakeholder analysis, SWOT analysis, or force field analysis to assess the situation and the factors influencing it. By understanding the problem, the project manager can devise appropriate solutions and strategies to address it34. References: = 12 Project Management Challenges and How To Solve Them, Challenge 11: Stakeholder resistance; 8 Steps for Better Issue Management, Step 5: Communicate with the team; PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, pages 513-515, 395-396; 4 Phases of the Project Management Lifecycle Explained, Phase 2: Planning.

The resource management plan is a subplan of the project management plan that describes how the project resources will be acquired, allocated, managed, and controlled. It also defines the roles and responsibilities of the project team members and the skills required for the project activities. The project manager should review the resource management plan with the new team member to clarify their expectations and provide guidance on how to perform their assigned tasks. Additionally, the project manager should provide mentoring to the new team member if necessary, to help them develop their skills and competencies, and to integrate them into the project team. This is part of the Develop Team process, which aims to improve the team members’ performance and interaction. The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the root cause of the new team member’s confusion, which is the lack of familiarity with the project and their role. Advising the new team member to enroll in project management training (option A) may be helpful, but it is not specific to the project and may not cover the skills and knowledge needed for the project activities. Instructing the new team member to review the RACI matrix before asking for help (option B) may be seen as dismissive and unhelpful, and it does not provide enough information about the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and stakeholders. Advising the new team member to review the project charter and stakeholder engagement plan (option C) may be useful, but it is not sufficient to explain the resource management plan and the expectations for the new team member’s role and performance. References:

Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, pp. 313-372

Project Resource Management According to the PMBOK

Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) Reference Materials:

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Needs Assessment, pp. 41-42

Resource Management Plan - PMP TIPS

According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, an impediment is anything that prevents the team from delivering value or achieving its goals. An impediment can be internal or external, technical or non-technical, and can affect the quality, scope, schedule, cost, or risk of the project. In this scenario, the product owner has presented the backlog to the team, and the team has raised concerns over implementing some of the features due to various impediments. The project manager should suggest that the product owner ensure that the impediments are captured and prioritized based on the highest valued features. This would help the product owner to address the most critical impediments first, and to align the backlog with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. This would also help the team to focus on delivering the most valuable features, and to overcome the impediments with the support of the product owner and the project manager. Estimating the financial impact of the impediments and requesting additional funding, beginning to remove the impediments starting with the easiest ones first, or capturing the impediments and informing management that their assistance is needed are actions that should be taken after the impediments are captured and prioritized, not before. These actions do not address the root cause of the situation, which is the misalignment between the backlog and the team’s capabilities. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.1.2

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.2.2.2

The Standard for Project Management – Seventh Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2.2

Creating prototypes is a technique to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements by providing a working model of the expected product or service. Prototypes can help reduce ambiguity, resolve conflicts, and obtain feedback from the stakeholders and the development team. Prototypes can also facilitate communication and collaboration across different locations and cultures, and improve the quality and efficiency of the development process. By creating prototypes with the development team, the project manager can ensure that the client’s needs are understood and met, and that the rework and delays are minimized. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 5.2.2.4, p. 154

PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 7, p. 9

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Section 4.3.3, p. 93

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should get commitment from the team to include all of the required regulations in the MVP when there is no consensus to do so. This is because the MVP is the version of the product that delivers the most value to the customer while meeting the minimum requirements and constraints1. If the project manager identifies some mandatory regulations that are essential for the product to be viable, compliant, and safe, then they should be included in the MVP, regardless of the impact on the project duration2. The project manager should explain the importance and rationale of the regulations to the team and stakeholders, and seek their agreement and support to incorporate them in the MVP3. The other options, A, C, and D, are not appropriate actions for the project manager to take. Training the team on the new regulations as requested by management may not resolve the lack of consensus or commitment from the team and stakeholders, and may delay the MVP definition process. Asking the project sponsor to add more time to the project may not be feasible or necessary, and may not address the root cause of the disagreement. Sharing with participants the need to focus only on product functionality may ignore the regulatory requirements and risks, and may compromise the quality and value of the product. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 4.1.2, "Minimum Viable Product". 2: How to Define a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) - ProjectManager.com, Section "What Is a Minimum Viable Product?". 3: How to use Consensus Decision-Making for Project Management, Section "The 6 Stages of Consensus Decision-Making".

Obstacles are any factors that hinder the progress or success of a project. They can be internal or external, technical or human, predictable or unforeseen1. Obstacles can cause delays, cost overruns, quality issues, scope changes, stakeholder dissatisfaction, and even project failure2. Therefore, it is essential for project managers to identify, analyze, and resolve obstacles as soon as possible.

One of the best practices for managing obstacles is to prioritize them for resolution. This means that the project manager should evaluate the impact and urgency of each obstacle, and rank them according to their importance and severity3. Prioritizing obstacles helps the project manager to focus on the most critical ones first, and allocate the appropriate resources and actions to address them. Prioritizing obstacles also helps the project manager to communicate the status and progress of obstacle resolution to the project team and stakeholders, and to manage their expectations and feedback4.

The other options are not the best choices for the project manager in this situation. Having the project team work on other activities (option A) may be a temporary workaround, but it does not solve the underlying problem. It may also create more confusion, waste, and rework, and reduce the team’s motivation and productivity5. Implementing plans to remove the obstacles (option B) may be a necessary step, but it should be done after prioritizing the obstacles. Otherwise, the project manager may spend too much time and effort on less important obstacles, and neglect the more critical ones6. Escalating to the project steering committee (option C) may be appropriate in some cases, especially when the obstacles are beyond the project manager’s authority or influence. However, it should not be the first or only option, as it may indicate a lack of initiative, responsibility, or problem-solving skills from the project manager. The project manager should try to resolve the obstacles at their level first, and only escalate when necessary7.

An implementation strategy is a document that describes the necessary steps for the execution of a project1. An implementation strategy enables the project manager to manage the changes required with minimum disruption to the organization and its various stakeholders, also addressing the concerns of stakeholders outside the project team2. Before developing an implementation strategy, the project manager should review the business case and consider the environmental and regulatory factors that may affect the project in the new country, such as political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental aspects3. The project manager should also identify the high-level risks and assumptions that may impact the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and resources4. These factors will help the project manager to define the project objectives, deliverables, scope, and requirements, as well as to select the appropriate project management methodology, tools, and techniques for the project.

Evaluating the environmental and regulatory factors and identifying high-level risks and assumptions should be considered first when developing an implementation strategy, as they provide the foundation for the project planning and execution. Acquiring project resources from the new country, monitoring the risks closely, and ensuring the project sponsors’ agreement are important activities, but they should be done after the initial assessment of the project environment and context.

Fast-tracking is a schedule compression technique that involves performing activities in parallel that were originally planned to be done sequentially. This can reduce the overall project duration by overlapping the start and finish of different activities, but it also increases the risk of rework and errors due to dependencies and uncertainties. Fast-tracking is one of the tools and techniques for the Develop Schedule process, which is part of the Project Schedule Management knowledge area. The other tools and techniques are schedule network analysis, critical path method, critical chain method, resource optimization, data analysis, leads and lags, schedule compression, and project management information system. The other options are not schedule compression techniques, although they may be used in other project management processes or activities. Analyzing both projects to determine the most effective use of common resources is a way of managing multiple projects and optimizing resource allocation. Using resource optimization to justify requesting more resources for the critical project is a way of balancing the demand and supply of resources and resolving resource conflicts. Providing schedule optimization training to the project teams to improve their skills is a way of enhancing the team’s competencies and performance. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 201-202, 215-216, 718

Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification Handbook, page 9

5 Methods for Shortening A Project Schedule, section “Fast Tracking”

 These two actions can help prevent the team from being unqualified, because they can enhance the skills and competencies of the team members who lack the technical skill needed to build the product. Encouraging working in pairs and knowledge sharing can foster collaboration and learning among the team members, and allow the team member who has the technical skill to transfer it to others through coaching, mentoring, or feedback. Facilitating a training event with an external trainer can provide a formal and structured way of teaching the team members the technical skill, and ensure that they have the necessary knowledge and practice to apply it to the project. These actions can also improve the team performance, morale, and confidence, and reduce the dependency on one team member. The other options are not effective actions to prevent the team from being unqualified, because they may not address the skill gap or the project requirements, or they may create more problems or risks. Excluding the activities from the roadmap may not be possible or desirable, and it may affect the scope, quality, or benefits of the project. Teaching the entire team the new skill may not be feasible or efficient, and it may overload the project manager or the team member who has the skill. Increasing the time estimates on the activities that require such abilities may not be realistic or accurate, and it may delay the project schedule or increase the project cost. References: Project Resource Management - PMBOK Guide, What Actions Can the Project Manager Take to Ensure Effective Teamwork?

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should manage stakeholder expectations and engagement throughout the project life cycle. The project manager should also support the product owner’s decisions and authority regarding the product scope and releases. The product owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product and ensuring that it meets the customer needs and expectations. Therefore, the project manager should support the product owner’s decision to launch the product with the MVP and seek better alignment with the marketing vice president in order to avoid this type of issue in the future. The project manager should also communicate the benefits and risks of the product launch and solicit feedback from the stakeholder. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 37, 51-52, 286-287.

According to the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, a change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline. A change request should be submitted when there is a need to change the approved scope, schedule, cost, quality, or any other aspect of the project. In this scenario, the project manager and the team have identified a potential design problem that requires a revision of the approved design. Therefore, the project manager should inform the client of the problem and follow the change request process to obtain the necessary approvals and update the project documents accordingly. This will ensure that the client is aware of the issue and its impact, and that the project is aligned with the client’s expectations and requirements. Conducting a proof of concept, amending the design specifications, or passing them to the development team are actions that should be taken after the change request is approved, not before. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Guide, Chapter 6, Section 6.4.1.1

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.2.2.1

The project manager should do first to manage the budget is to meet with the project team to analyze the actual cost to determine deviations. This is the first step in the control cost process, which involves monitoring the status of the project to update the project costs and manage changes to the cost baseline2. By analyzing the actual cost, the project manager can identify the causes and sources of the cost variance, and evaluate the impact and implications on the project performance and objectives. The project manager can also use various tools and techniques, such as earned value analysis, forecasting, and variance analysis, to measure and report the cost performance and status2. Based on the analysis, the project manager can then decide on the appropriate actions and responses to bring the project back on track, such as requesting additional funds, reducing scope, adjusting resources, or implementing corrective or preventive actions2.

Option A is not a good choice, because it is premature and passive. The project manager should not ask the project sponsor for assistance in getting the budget back on track before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first understand the nature and extent of the cost variance, and then present the facts and data to the project sponsor, along with possible solutions and recommendations. The project manager should also demonstrate their own initiative and responsibility in managing the budget, rather than relying on the project sponsor to solve the problem.

Option C is not a good choice, because it is pessimistic and irresponsible. The project manager should not inform the stakeholders that the project will be finished over budget before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first assess the situation and explore the options to improve the cost performance and meet the budget expectations. The project manager should also communicate the cost status and issues to the stakeholders in a timely and transparent manner, and seek their feedback and support, rather than delivering bad news without any justification or action plan.

Option D is not a good choice, because it is hasty and presumptuous. The project manager should not issue a change request including the analysis to increase the budget before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first verify the accuracy and validity of the cost data, and evaluate the feasibility and necessity of increasing the budget. The project manager should also consider the impact of the change request on the project scope, schedule, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction, and obtain the approval of the change control board before implementing the change2.

According to the Agile Practice Guide, one of the roles of the project manager in an agile environment is to facilitate collaboration and decision making among the team members1. The project manager should not delegate the decision to the product owner or impose a solution based on a majority vote. Instead, the project manager should help the team evaluate the different ideas and reach a consensus that satisfies everyone. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, page 27

The project manager should collaborate with the compliance team member to review and prioritize the requirement’s delivery, as this is a way to manage the change request and ensure that the project meets the compliance standards and expectations. The project manager should also communicate the impact of the change on the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality to the project sponsor and other stakeholders, and obtain their approval and support. The project manager should not ask the team to include the compliance requirement in the current sprint and deliver it (choice A), as this would disrupt the sprint planning and execution, and create scope creep and quality issues. The project manager should not add the new compliance requirement to the backlog as the technical team does not have any capacity (choice B), as this would delay the delivery of the compliance requirement and expose the project to legal and regulatory risks. The project manager should not include the compliance lead in the stakeholders list and wait for the next status meeting (choice C), as this would not address the urgency and importance of the compliance requirement, and it would not involve the compliance lead in the decision-making and problem-solving process. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 115: “A change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline.”

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 119: “The project manager should review all change requests, assess their impact on the project, and either approve them or submit them to the change control board (CCB) or other decision-making authority for approval or rejection.”

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 120: “The project manager should communicate the approved change requests to the project team and other stakeholders, and update the project management plan and other project documents accordingly.”

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 39: “Compliance requirements are the set of standards or regulations that the project must adhere to, such as health, safety, security, performance, environmental, or quality standards.”

The project manager should inform the sponsor and document the request in the stakeholder engagement plan, as this is the best way to handle the situation without compromising the project scope, budget, or schedule. The sponsor can then decide how to deal with the key stakeholder’s request, and the project manager can update the stakeholder engagement plan accordingly. This will also help the project manager to maintain a positive relationship with the key stakeholder and avoid any potential conflicts or misunderstandings.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key activities of the project manager is to monitor and evaluate the project performance and outcomes, and to use the data and information collected to support decision making and adaptation. This is especially important for projects that operate in a dynamic and uncertain environment, where agility, market adaptation, and a quick response to market offerings are critical success factors. The project manager should conduct periodical reviews of the project plans, objectives, and deliverables to ensure that they are aligned with the changing needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and to identify and address any issues or risks that may affect the project value delivery. Option C is the best answer for this question.

Option A is not the best answer because reviewing the project objectives with the project sponsor is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a good practice to have a clear and shared understanding of the project objectives with the project sponsor, but it is not sufficient to ensure the project’s agility, market adaptation, and responsiveness. The project manager should also engage other stakeholders, such as the customers, users, and team members, and review the project objectives with them as well.

Option B is not the best answer because requesting more funding from the project sponsor to hire additional skilled resources and to incorporate additional quality in the project delivery approach and outcome is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a possible action that the project manager may take if the project scope, schedule, or quality are affected by the changes in the market or the stakeholder needs, but it is not a proactive or adaptive activity that the project manager should perform regularly. Moreover, requesting more funding may not always be feasible or desirable, as it may increase the project costs and risks, and may not guarantee the project value delivery.

Option D is not the best answer because creating a business case after performing a market review, and then submitting it to the sponsor to modify the project deliverable to meet the newly defined objectives is not a key activity that the project manager should undertake to ensure company success. It is a possible activity that the project manager may perform if the project deliverable is no longer aligned with the business needs or the market opportunities, but it is not a frequent or iterative activity that the project manager should do to ensure the project’s agility, market adaptation, and responsiveness. Moreover, creating a business case may not always be necessary or appropriate, as it may delay the project delivery and may not reflect the current or future state of the market or the stakeholder needs. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 9-10, 15-16, 25-26, 35-36, 49-50.

 Feedback is the process of providing constructive and timely information to the project team members about their performance, behaviour, and contribution to the project. Feedback can help the project team to improve their skills, knowledge, and motivation, and to achieve the project goals and deliverables. According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials1, feedback can be given in various ways, such as:

Formal or informal: Formal feedback is planned and structured, and follows a specific format, criteria, and frequency. Informal feedback is spontaneous and flexible, and does not follow a predefined format or schedule.

Positive or negative: Positive feedback is praise or recognition for doing something well, and aims to reinforce and encourage the desired performance or behaviour. Negative feedback is criticism or correction for doing something poorly, and aims to address and improve the undesired performance or behaviour.

Individual or group: Individual feedback is given to one person at a time, and focuses on their specific performance or behaviour. Group feedback is given to a team or a group of people at the same time, and focuses on their collective performance or behaviour.

In this scenario, the team is working on a critical project deliverable and the project manager is concerned about meeting the deadline. There have been complaints from some stakeholders about some of the team members’ performance. The project manager wants to understand the situation and provide feedback to the team as soon as possible. Therefore, the best three actions that the project manager should take to address this situation are:

Define team ground rules: Team ground rules are the agreed-upon norms and expectations that guide the team’s work and interactions. They can help the team to establish a common vision, purpose, and values, and to define their roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities. They can also help the team to communicate effectively, collaborate efficiently, and resolve conflicts constructively. By defining team ground rules, the project manager can ensure that the team members are aware of and aligned with the project goals and deliverables, and that they respect and support each other’s performance and behaviour.

Perform a retrospective session: A retrospective session is a meeting that allows the team to reflect on their past performance and behaviour, and to identify what went well, what went wrong, and what can be improved. It can help the team to learn from their experiences, celebrate their achievements, and address their challenges. It can also help the team to generate ideas and action plans for future improvement and innovation. By performing a retrospective session, the project manager can provide formal and group feedback to the team, and involve them in the feedback process.

Implement daily team meetings: Daily team meetings are short and frequent meetings that allow the team to share their progress, issues, and plans for the day. They can help the team to stay on track, coordinate their tasks, and solve their problems. They can also help the team to communicate regularly, transparently, and collaboratively. By implementing daily team meetings, the project manager can provide informal and individual feedback to the team members, and monitor and support their performance and behaviour.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Request a manager performance review: A manager performance review is a formal and individual feedback that is given by the team member’s direct manager, and focuses on their overall performance, behaviour, and career development. It is usually done annually or semi-annually, and follows a specific format and criteria. While a manager performance review can be useful and beneficial for the team member, it is not the responsibility of the project manager, unless they are also the team member’s direct manager. Moreover, it is not the most appropriate or timely feedback for the situation, as it does not address the specific project deliverable, deadline, or stakeholder complaints.

Conduct an annual review: An annual review is a formal and group feedback that is given by the project manager, and focuses on the team’s overall performance, behaviour, and achievements for the year. It is usually done at the end of the year or the project, and follows a specific format and criteria. While an annual review can be useful and beneficial for the team, it is not the most appropriate or timely feedback for the situation, as it does not address the specific project deliverable, deadline, or stakeholder complaints.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should plan, manage, and monitor the communication activities throughout the project life cycle. The project manager should also consider the stakeholder needs, preferences, and expectations when choosing the communication methods, tools, and technologies. The project manager should also update the communications management plan as needed to reflect any changes in the communication requirements or approach. Therefore, the project manager should update the communications management plan based on the product owner’s preferences and distribute it to the team. This will ensure that the communication is effective, timely, and consistent among the project stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 361-362, 368-369.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, one of the key skills of a project manager is to apply appropriate leadership styles to the needs and demands of various situations1. Leadership styles can range from directive to supportive, depending on the level of authority and involvement of the project manager1. Micromanagement is a type of directive leadership style that involves close supervision and control over the work of the team members2. While micromanagement may be suitable for some situations, such as when the team is new or inexperienced, it can be detrimental for others, such as when the team is senior or skilled2. Micromanagement can cause frustration, demotivation, and resentment among the team members, and hinder their performance and creativity23. Therefore, the project manager should adjust their management style to better fit senior team members, who may prefer more autonomy, trust, and feedback23. The project manager can use various techniques to adapt their management style, such as situational leadership, emotional intelligence, and coaching1 . References:

1: PMBOK® Guide – 4th Edition, Chapter 3: The Role of the Project Manager

2: Micromanager Definition: 25 Signs and How To Deal With One

3: What is micromanaging? 6 warning signs

: 4 Signs You’re a Micromanager in Your Projects