Pass the AACE International Professional Level Certifications PSP Questions and answers with CertsForce

 To eliminate Activity B from the critical path, its dependencies must change so that its delay no longer impacts the path's completion time.

 Replacing the A → B relationship with a Finish-to-Finish with Offset (FFO) and adding an FSO (Finish-to-Start with Offset) relationship from A → C allows Activity C to proceed independently of Activity B.

 References: PSP Study Guide, Section 2.2.4 – Relationships and Calculations, explains how relationship types can influence critical path determination.

 Role of Constraints:

Constraints impose specific conditions on schedule events or activities, such as fixed start dates or imposed milestones.

These are external to the natural logic relationships established in a network (e.g., predecessor-successor relationships).

 PSP Study Guide References:

The guide describes constraints as independent factors that override logic-based sequencing when necessary​.

 Analysis of Options:

Option A and C: Constraints impact both forward and backward passes, not exclusively one.

Option D: Constraints supersede activity logic rather than being overruled by it.

 Conclusion: The correct answer is B, as constraints operate independently of project logic relationships.

 Analyze the Data and Logic:

Activity 9004 ("Valve House Embankment"): This activity has a direct Finish-to-Start (FS) relationship with Activity 10002, with a lag of 7 days.

Late Start (LS) and Late Finish (LF): In backward pass calculations, the late finish of the successor activity is adjusted for lag and task duration to determine the late start of the predecessor activity.

 Formula for Late Finish (LF):

The Late Finish of Activity 9004 is derived by taking the Late Start (LS) of Activity 10002, subtracting the lag of 7 days, and subtracting 1 day to calculate the exact finish date.

 Correct Date Calculation:

Given the Late Start (LS) of Activity 10002:

LS.10002 = 11-28-03.

Apply the formula:LF.9004 = LS.10002 - Lag.7 - 1 day = 11-28-03 - 7 days - 1 day = 11-20-03.

 Cross-Verification with Answer Options:

Option A: Incorrect. Misrepresents the formula.

Option B: Incorrect. Incorrect application of logic and lag adjustments.

Option C: Incorrect. Omits the correct lag consideration.

Option D: Correct. Matches both formula and calculated date.

Industry-recognized methodologies for quantifying critical delays include:

Periodic Windows Analysis, which evaluates delays in defined time periods.

Collapsed As-Built Analysis, comparing completed work to a hypothetical as-built schedule without delays.

Time Impact Analysis, assessing the impact of delays based on scheduled activities​​.

A Gantt Chart (Option A) is a scheduling visualization tool, not a methodology for delay analysis. It lacks the analytical rigor and methodology required for critical delay quantification.

The number of workdays between two milestones, such as Product Testing and Product Available, is calculated by considering the activity durations, dependencies, and any calendar constraints (PSP Study Guide, Subchapter 2.2.3, "Durations"). If the activities are continuous and there are no interruptions such as holidays, the total duration would sum to 100 days based on the provided schedule.