Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CISA Questions and answers with CertsForce

Data migration is the process of moving data from one system to another, which may involve changes in storage, database, or application. To perform a successful data migration, it is essential to understand the data structure of the new system, which defines how the data is organized, stored, and accessed. Understanding the new system’s data structure will help determine the following aspects of the data migration project:

The scope and requirements of the data migration, such as what data needs to be migrated, how much data needs to be migrated, and what are the quality and performance expectations.

The data mapping and transformation rules, such as how the data elements from the source system correspond to the data elements in the target system, and what transformations or conversions are needed to ensure compatibility and consistency.

The data validation and testing methods, such as how to verify that the migrated data is accurate, complete, and functional in the new system, and how to identify and resolve any errors or issues.

Therefore, understanding the new system’s data structure is a crucial first step in a data migration project, as it lays the foundation for the subsequent steps of data extraction, transformation, loading, validation, and testing.

The best testing approach to facilitate rapid identification of application interface errors is automated testing. Automated testing is the use of software tools or scripts to execute predefined test cases, compare expected and actual outcomes, and report any discrepancies. Automated testing can help to speed up the testing process, increase test coverage, reduce human errors, and improve test accuracy and consistency. Automated testing can also help to detect interface errors that may occur due to incompatible data formats, communication protocols, or system configurations. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3, Section 3.3.11

CISA OnlineReview Course, Domain 2, Module 2, Lesson 1

 The greatest risk of using a reciprocal site for disaster recovery is the inability to utilize the site when required. A reciprocal site is an agreement between two organizations to provide backup facilities for each other in case of a disaster. However, this arrangement may not be reliable or enforceable, especially if both organizations are affected by the same disaster or have conflicting priorities. Therefore,the IS auditor should recommend that management consider alternative options for disaster recovery, such as dedicated sites or cloud services12. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition,page 3381

CISA Review Questions, Answers and Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription

The most important action before the audit work begins is to establish control objectives. Control objectives are the specific goals or outcomes that the audit intends to achieve or verify in relation to the information protection in the application1. Control objectives provide the basis for designing and performing the audit procedures, evaluating the audit evidence, and reporting the audit findings and recommendations2. Control objectives also help to align the audit scope and criteria with the business needs and expectations, and to ensure that the audit is relevant, reliable, and efficient3.

Some examples of control objectives for an information protection audit are:

To ensure that the information stored in the application is classified according to its sensitivity, value, and regulatory requirements

To ensure that the information stored in the application is encrypted, masked, or anonymized as appropriate

To ensure that the information stored in the application is accessible only by authorized users and processes

To ensure that the information stored in the application is backed up, restored, and retained according to the business continuity and retention policies

To ensure that the information stored in the application is monitored, logged, and audited for any unauthorized or anomalous activities

Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

Option A is not correct because reviewing remediation reports is not the most important action before the audit work begins. Remediation reports are documents that describe how previous audit findings or issues have been resolved or addressed by the auditee4. While reviewing remediation reports may be useful for understanding the current state of information protection in the application, it is not a prerequisite for defining the control objectives of the audit.

Option C is not correct because assessing the threat landscape is not the most important action before the audit work begins. The threat landscape is the set of potential sources, methods, and impacts of cyberattacks or data breaches that may affect the information stored in the application5. While assessing the threat landscape may be helpful for identifying and prioritizing the risks and vulnerabilities of information protection in the application, it is not a prerequisite for defining the control objectives of the audit.

Option D is not correct because performing penetration testing is not the most important action before the audit work begins. Penetration testing is a technique that simulates real-world cyberattacks or data breaches to test the security and resilience of information systems or applications. 

Threat modeling is an approach that enables IS auditors to identify, analyze, and mitigate potential security vulnerabilities within an application by understanding the threats, attacks, vulnerabilities, and countermeasures. This proactive technique helps in designing secure applications.

References

ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, Page 276-277 (Threat Modeling)

A post-implementation review (PIR) is a process to evaluatewhether the objectives of the project were met, determine how effectively this wasachieved, learn lessons for the future, and ensure that the organisation gets the most benefit from the implementation of projects1. A PIR is an important tool for assessing the success and value of a project, as well as identifying the areas for improvement and best practices for future projects.

One of the key elements of a PIR is to measure the benefits of the project against the expected outcomes and benefits that were defined at the beginning of the project. Measurable benefits are the quantifiable and verifiable results or outcomes that the project delivers to theorganisation or its stakeholders, such as increased revenue, reduced costs, improved quality, enhanced customer satisfaction, or compliance with regulations2. Measurable benefits should be aligned with the organisation’s strategy, vision, and goals, and should be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound).

The finding that measurable benefits were not defined is of greatest significance among the four findings, because it implies that:

The project did not have a clear and agreed-upon purpose, scope, objectives, and deliverables

The project did not have a valid and realistic business case or justification for its initiation and implementation

The project did not have a robust and effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism to track its progress, performance, and impact

The project did not have a reliable and transparent way to demonstrate its value proposition and return on investment to the organisation or its stakeholders

The project did not have a meaningful and actionable way to learn from its achievements and challenges, and to improve its processes and practices

Therefore, an IS auditor should recommend that measurable benefits are defined for any project before its implementation, and that they are reviewed and reported regularly during and after the project’s completion.

The other possible findings are:

A lessons-learned session was never conducted: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A lessons-learned session is a process of capturing and documenting the knowledge, experience, and feedback gained from a project, both positive and negative. A lessons-learned session helps to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the project management process, as well as the best practices and lessons for future projects. A lessons-learned session should be conducted at the end of each projectphase or milestone, as well as at the end of the project. However, even without a formal lessons-learned session, some learning may still occur informally or implicitly among the project team members or stakeholders.

The projects 10% budget overrun was not reported to senior management: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A budget overrun is a situation where the actual cost of a project exceeds its planned or estimated cost. A budget overrun may indicate poor planning, estimation, or control of the project resources, or unexpected changes or risks that occurred during the project implementation. A budget overrun should be reported to senior management as soon as possible, along with the reasons for it and the corrective actions taken or proposed. However, a budget overrun may not necessarily affect the quality or value of the project deliverables or outcomes if they are still within acceptable standards or expectations.

Monthly dashboards did not always contain deliverables: This is a significant finding, but not as significant as the lack of measurable benefits. A dashboard is a visual tool that displays key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics related to a project’s progress, status, or results. A dashboard helps to monitor and communicate the performance of a project to various stakeholders in a concise and clear manner. A dashboard should include deliverables as one of its components, along with other elements such as schedule, budget, quality, risks, issues, or benefits. However, even without deliverables in monthly dashboards, some information about them may still be available from other sources such as reports or documents.

The primary purpose of a post-implementation audit or post-implementation review is to determine whether the system implementation achieved what it was supposed to achieve. In CISA terms, this means confirming whether the project deliverables, controls, and requirements were met. ISACA’s CISA exam content explicitly states that a post-implementation review is conducted to determine whether project deliverables, controls, and requirements are met, which directly aligns with option B.

Option A (“Address lessons learned from the project”) is important, but it is secondary, not the most important objective. ISACA material recognizes that lessons learned may be documented as part of a post-implementation review, but this is presented as a useful activity, not the core audit objective. The central audit question remains whether the implementation delivered what was required.

Option C (“Develop a process for continuous improvement”) is also valuable, but that is a broader management and quality-improvement outcome. It is not the main objective of a post-implementation audit. An auditor’s primary focus is assessment and verification, not designing the organization’s continuous improvement process. ISACA’s audit guidance emphasizes that audit objectives are commonly phrased as determining whether something is adequate or achieved, which supports the selection of option B over improvement-oriented options.

Option D (“Seek approval for the next implementation phase”) is not an audit objective. Approval for the next phase is a project governance or management decision, while the audit function is concerned with whether implemented controls, requirements, and deliverables were achieved.

So, the best answer is B, because ISACA ties post-implementation review directly to confirming that the implementation met its required objectives, deliverables, controls, and requirements.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA, CISA Exam Content Outline — “Conduct post-implementation reviews of systems to determine whether project deliverables, controls, and requirements are met.”

ISACA, Certification Exam Candidate Guide — same task statement for post-implementation reviews.

ISACA, CISA Certification Application / Task Statements — confirms the same post-implementation review objective.

ISACA Journal, Plan for Successful System Implementations — notes lessons learned may be documented as part of post-implementation review, supporting why this is important but not primary.

ISACA Journal, IS Audit Basics: The Components of the IT Audit Report — supports how audit objectives are framed as determining whether requirements/objectives are met.

The IS auditor’s first course of action should be to verify the results of the critical automatic calculations made by the system to determine the validity of user concerns. This is because the IS auditor needs to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the audit findings and conclusions. By verifying the results, the IS auditor can assess whether there are any errors or discrepancies in the system’s calculations that could affect the accuracy and reliability of the financial data. The IS auditor can use various techniques to verify the results, such as re-performing the calculations, comparing them with expected values, or tracing them to source documents. 

The best recommendation for improving IT governance within the organization is to implement key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs are measurable values that show how effectively the organization is achieving its key business objectives. KPIs can help the organization tomonitor and evaluate the performance, efficiency, and alignment of its IT processes and resources with its business goals and strategies1.

The other options are not as effective as implementing KPIs for improving IT governance. Option B, implementing annual third-party audits, is a good practice but may not be sufficient or timely to identify and address the issues or gaps in IT governance. Option C, benchmarking organizational performance against industry peers, is a useful technique but may not reflect the specific needs and expectations of the organization’s stakeholders. Option D, requiring executive management to draft IT strategy, is a necessary step but not enough to ensure that IT governance is implemented and monitored throughout the organization.

A demilitarized zone (DMZ) is a network segment that is separated from the internal network and the external network, such as the internet, by firewalls or other security devices. A DMZ provides an extra layer of security for the organization’s internal network by isolating the servers and services that need to be accessible to external users, such as a file server, from the rest of the network. A DMZ also prevents external users from accessing the internal network directly, as they have to go through two firewalls to reach it. Therefore, setting up a DMZ is an IS auditor’s best recommendation to protect anorganization from attacks when its file server needs to be accessible to external users12.

The other possible options are:

Enforce a secure tunnel connection: This means that the organization requires external users to establish a secure and encrypted connection, such as a virtual private network (VPN), to access its file server. This can provide some level of security and privacy for the data transmission, but it does not protect the file server or the internal network from attacks if the connection is compromised or if the external users are malicious. Therefore, enforcing asecuretunnel connection is not an IS auditor’s best recommendation to protect an organization from attacks when its file server needs to be accessible to external users3.

Enhance internal firewalls: This means that the organization improves the security and performance of its internal firewalls, which are devices that filter and control the network traffic between different segments of the network. This can provide some level of protection for the internal network from unauthorized or malicious access, but it does not protect the file server or the external network from attacks if the file server is exposed to the internet or if the external network is compromised. Therefore, enhancing internal firewalls is not an IS auditor’s best recommendation to protect an organization from attacks when its file server needs to be accessible to external users4.

Implement a secure protocol: This means that the organization uses a secure and standardized protocol, such as Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) or Secure Shell (SSH), to transfer files between its file server and external users. This can provide some level of security and integrity for the data transmission, but it does not protect the file server or the internal network from attacks if the protocol is exploited or if the external users are malicious. Therefore, implementing a secure protocol is not an IS auditor’s best recommendation to protect an organization from attacks when its file server needs to be accessible to external users5. References: 1: What Is a DMZ Network and Why Would You Use It? | Fortinet 2: Demilitarised zone (DMZ) | Cyber.gov.au 3: What Is VPN Tunneling? | Fortinet 4: Firewall - Wikipedia 5: Secure Shell - Wikipedia

 The most important factor to consider when developing a service level agreement (SLA) is the description of the services from the viewpoint of the client organization, because the SLA shouldreflect the needs and expectations of the client and specify the measurable outcomes and performance indicators that the provider must deliver34. The description of the services from the viewpoint of the provider, the detailed identification of work to be completed, and the provisions for regulatory requirements that impact the end users’ businesses are also important elements of an SLA, but not as crucial as the client’sperspective. References: 3: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5, Section 5.3.1 4: CISA Online Review Course, Module 5, Lesson 3

A mesh configuration provides the greatest fault tolerance. ISACA’s glossary explicitly defines mesh topology as “a fault-tolerant topology in which network nodes and endpoints are mostly, if not fully, interconnected.” That directly answers the question.

Option D is correct because a mesh topology provides multiple alternate communication paths. If one link or node fails, traffic can often be rerouted through other paths, making the network more resilient than star, ring, or bus topologies.

Option A is less fault tolerant because the central hub or switch can become a single point of failure.

Option B is less fault tolerant because failure in the ring can disrupt communication unless specialized redundancy exists.

Option C is the least fault tolerant among these common topologies because the shared backbone can become a major single point of failure.

Therefore, D is the best answer, and ISACA’s glossary directly supports it.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Glossary, Mesh topology — “A fault-tolerant topology...”

 Configuring each authentication server as belonging to a cluster of authentication servers is the best way to minimize performance degradation of servers used to authenticate users of an e-commerce website. A cluster is a group of servers that work together to provide high availability, load balancing, and fault tolerance. If one server fails or becomes overloaded, another server in the cluster can take over its workload without disrupting the service. A single server as a primary authentication server and a second server as a secondary authentication server is not as effective as a cluster, because the secondary server is only used when the primary server fails, which means it is idle most of the time and does not improve performance. Configuring each authentication server and ensuring that each disk of its RAID is attached to the primary controller does not address the issue of performance degradation, but rather the issue of data redundancy and reliability. RAID (redundant array of independent disks) is a technology that combines multiple disks into a logical unit that can tolerate disk failures and improve data access speed. Configuring each authentication server and ensuring that the disks of each server form part of a duplex does not address the issue of performance degradation, but rather the issue of data backup and recovery. A duplex is a pair of disks that store identical copies of data, so that if one disk fails, the other disk can be used to restore the data. References: ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, page 310

The first action that an IS auditor should take when finding a high-risk vulnerability in a public-facing web server used to process online customer payments is to identify compensating controls. Compensating controls are alternative or additional controls that provide reasonable assurance of mitigating the risk of exploiting the vulnerability. The IS auditor should assess the effectiveness of the compensating controls and determine whether they reduce the risk to an acceptable level. If not, the IS auditor should recommend remediation actions to address the vulnerability. Documenting the exception in an audit report is an important action, but it should not be the first action, as it does not address the urgency of the situation. Reviewing security incident reports is a useful action, but it should not be the first action, as it does not provide assurance of preventing future incidents. Notifying the audit committee is a necessary action, but it should not be the first action, as it does not involve taking any corrective measures. References:

CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, pages 295-2961

CISA Review Questions, Answers and Explanations Database, Question ID: 260

The best recommendation is to place an intrusion detection system (IDS) between the firewall and the Internet. An IDS is a device or software that monitors network traffic for malicious activity and alerts the network administrator or takes preventive action. By placing an IDS between the firewall and the Internet, the IS auditor can enhance the security of the network perimeter and detect any attack attempts that the firewall was unable to recognize.

The other options are not as effective as placing an IDS between the firewall and the Internet:

Placing an IDS between the firewall and the organization’s web server would not protect the web server from external attacks that bypass the firewall. The web server should be placed in a demilitarized zone (DMZ), which is a separate network segment that isolates public-facing servers from the internal network.

Placing an IDS between the firewall and the demilitarized zone (DMZ) would not protect the DMZ from external attacks that bypass the firewall. The DMZ should be protected by twofirewalls, one facing the Internet and one facing the internal network, with an IDS monitoring both sides of each firewall.

Placing an IDS between the firewall and the organization’s network would not protect the organization’s network from external attacks that bypass the firewall. The organization’s network should be protected by a firewall that blocks unauthorized traffic from entering or leaving the network, with an IDS monitoring both sides of the firewall.

 A network firewall is a device or software that monitors and controls the incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined rules. A network firewall can help reduce the risk of denial of service (DoS) attacks, which are attempts to overwhelm a system or network with excessive requests or traffic, by filtering or blocking unwanted or malicious packets. A SQL injection attack is a type of code injection attack that exploits a vulnerability in a web application’s database query, by inserting malicious SQL statements into the input fields. A phishing attack is a type of social engineering attack that attempts to trick users into revealing sensitive information or installing malware, by sending fraudulent emails or messages that impersonate legitimate entities. An insider attack is a type of malicious activity that originates from within an organization, such as employees, contractors, or partners, who abuse their access privileges or credentials to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information systems or data. A network firewall cannot prevent these types of attacks, as they rely on exploiting human or application weaknesses rather than network vulnerabilities.

 The primary reason for an IS auditor to conduct post-implementation reviews is to determine whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved. A post-implementation review is an audit activity that evaluates whether a project has delivered its expected outcomes or benefits in accordance with its objectives, scope, budget, and schedule. A business case is a document that defines and justifies the need, value, and feasibility of a project. A post-implementation review can help assess whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved by comparing actual results with planned expectations and identifying any gaps or deviations. The other options are not primary reasons for conducting post-implementation reviews, as they do not measure whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved. Ensuring key stakeholder sign-off has been obtained is a project closure activity that confirms that all project deliverables have been completed and accepted by key stakeholders, but it does not evaluate whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved. Aligning project objectives with business needs is a project initiation activity that ensures that the project is aligned with the organization’s strategy, goals, and priorities, but it does not evaluate whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved. Documenting lessons learned to improve future project delivery is a project learning activity that captures and shares the knowledge, experience, and feedback gained from the project, but it does not evaluate whether project objectives in the business case have been achieved. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3, Section 3.3

The best answer is A. To ensure the appropriate level of protection to assets.

ISACA guidance explains that asset categorization indicates the level of concern that should be given to an asset, and that identifying and classifying critical assets is done to avoid adverse effects from theft, loss, compromise, or misuse. In other words, classification tells the organization how much protection a given asset requires.

Option B may be a by-product, but alignment to standards is not the primary reason. Option C is broader than the specific purpose of classification. Option D may follow from classification, but classification is primarily about matching protection strength to asset importance and sensitivity.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Journal, IT Asset Valuation, Risk Assessment and Control Implementation Model

ISACA Journal, Effective Reporting to the BoD on Critical Assets

 An IS auditor is conducting a review of a data center. An observation that could indicate an access control issue is muddy footprints directly inside the emergency exit. Access control is a process that ensures that only authorized entities or individuals can access or use an information system or resource, and prevents unauthorized access or use. Access control can be implemented using various methods or mechanisms, such as physical, logical, administrative, etc. Muddy footprints directly inside the emergency exit could indicate an access control issue, as they could suggest that someone has entered the data center through the emergency exit without proper authorization or authentication, and potentially compromised the security or integrity of the data center. Security cameras deployed outside main entrance is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could enhance access control, as security cameras are devices that capture and record video footage of the surroundings, and can help monitor and deter unauthorized access or activity. Antistatic mats deployed at the computer room entrance is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could prevent static electricity damage, as antistatic mats are devices that dissipate or reduce static charges from people or objects, and can help protect electronic equipment from electrostatic discharge (ESD). Fencing around facility is two meters high is not an observation that could indicate an access control issue, but rather a control that could improve physical security, as fencing is a barrier that encloses or surrounds an area, and can help prevent unauthorized entry or intrusion. 

 A network vulnerability assessment is a process of identifying and evaluating the weaknesses and exposures in a network that could be exploited by attackers to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the network or its resources. A network vulnerability assessment typically involves scanning the network devices, such as routers, switches, firewalls, servers, and workstations, using automated tools that compare the device configurations, software versions, and patch levels against a database of known vulnerabilities. A network vulnerability assessment can also include manual testing and verification of the network architecture, design, policies, and procedures. One of the main objectives of a network vulnerability assessment is to detect and report any misconfiguration and missing updates in the network devices that could pose a security risk1. Misconfiguration refers to any deviation from the recommended or best practice settings for the network devices, such as weak passwords, open ports, unnecessary services, default accounts, or incorrect permissions. Missing updates refer toany outdated or unsupported software or firmware that has not been patched with the latest security fixes or enhancements from the vendors2. Misconfiguration and missing updates are common sources of network vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access, executemalicious code, causedenial of service, or escalate privileges on the network devices3. Therefore, an IS auditor should expect to see misconfiguration and missing updates in a network vulnerability assessment. The other options are less relevant or incorrect because:

B. Malicious software and spyware are not usually detected by a network vulnerability assessment, as they are more related to the content and behavior of the network traffic rather than the configuration and patch level of the network devices. Malicious software and spyware are programs that infect or monitor the network devices or their users for malicious purposes, such as stealing data, displaying ads, or performing remote commands. Malicious software and spyware can be detected by other security tools, such as antivirus software, firewalls, or intrusion detection systems4.

C. Zero-day vulnerabilities are not usually detected by a network vulnerability assessment, as they are unknown or undisclosed vulnerabilities that have not been reported or patched by the vendors or the security community. Zero-day vulnerabilities are rare and difficult to discover, as they require advanced techniques and skills to exploit them. Zero-day vulnerabilities can be detected by other security tools, such as intrusion prevention systems, anomaly detection systems, or artificial intelligence systems5.

D. Security design flaws are not usually detected by a network vulnerability assessment, as they are more related to the logic and functionality of the network rather than the configuration and patch level of the network devices. Security design flaws are errors or weaknesses in the network architecture, design, policies, or procedures that could compromise the security objectives of the network. Securitydesign flaws can be detected by other security methods, such as security reviews, audits, or assessments6. References: Network VulnerabilityAssessment - ISACA, Network Vulnerability Scanning - NIST, Network Vulnerabilities - SANS, Malware - ISACA, Zero-Day Attacks - ISACA, Security Design Principles - NIST

A digital signature is a cryptographic technique that uses the sender’s private key to generate a unique code for a message or document. The receiver can use the sender’s public key to verify the authenticity and integrity of the message or document. A digital signature can prevent unauthorized change, as any modification to the message or document will invalidate the signature and alert the receiver of tampering.

References

What is a digital signature?

Digital Signature - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

ISACA CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 253

A digital envelope combines the strengths of symmetric and asymmetric cryptography. The message itself is encrypted using a fast symmetric algorithm. The session key used for symmetric encryption is then encrypted using the recipient’s public key. This ensures efficiency (large data encrypted quickly with symmetric keys) and security (session key securely transmitted using asymmetric encryption). Options A, C, and D describe other cryptographic processes (compression, hashing, or digital signatures) but do not correctly represent a digital envelope. ISACA training materials and CISA manuals highlight this hybrid approach as the standard method for secure data transmission.

References (ISACA): CISA Review Manual – Cryptography Concepts; ISACA Glossary.

 A top-down maturity model process is a method of assessing and improving the maturity level of a process or a set of processes within an organization. A maturity level is a measure of how well-defined, controlled, measured, and optimized a process is. A top-down maturity model process starts with defining the desired maturity level and then identifying the gaps and improvement opportunities for each process. This helps prioritize the processes that need the most attention and improvement. Therefore, a result of utilizing a top-down maturity model process is identification of processes with the most improvement opportunities.

A means of benchmarking the effectiveness of similar processes with peers, a means of comparing the effectiveness of other processes within the enterprise, and identification of older, more established processes to ensure timely review are not results of utilizing a top-down maturity model process. These are possible benefits or objectives of using other types of maturity models or assessment methods, but they are not specific to a top-down approach.

The best way to validate that appropriate security controls are in place to prevent data loss is to review compliance with data loss and applicable mobile device user acceptance policies. This will ensure that the organization has established clear rules and guidelines for employees to follow when connecting their personal devices to company-owned computers. A walk-through, a DLP tool configuration, and a security awareness training are not sufficient to validate the effectiveness of the controls, as they may not cover all possible scenarios and risks. References: IT Audit Fundamentals Certificate Resources

The primary reason an IS auditor should discuss observations with management before delivering a final report is A. Validate the audit observations. This is because discussing the observations with management can help the auditor to ensure that the findings are accurate, complete, and supported by sufficient evidence1. It can also help the auditor to obtain management’s perspective and feedback on the issues and risks identified, and to avoid any misunderstandings or surprises when the final report is issued2.

 The best recommendation to mitigate the risk of eavesdropping associated with an API integration implementation is to implement Transport Layer Security (TLS). TLS is a cryptographic protocol that provides secure communication over a network by encrypting the data in transit and authenticating the parties involved. TLS can prevent unauthorized parties from intercepting, modifying or tampering with the data exchanged between the API endpoints. Encrypting the XML file, implementing SOAP, and masking the API endpoints are not sufficient to mitigate the risk of eavesdropping, as they do not provide end-to-end encryption or authentication for the API communication. References: IS Auditand Assurance Tools and Techniques, CISA Certification | Certified Information Systems Auditor | ISACA

Validation of rules by the business is the most helpful in establishing a baseline for measuring data quality because it ensures that the rules reflect the business needs and expectations. Validation of rules by the business also helps to identify and resolve any inconsistencies or conflicts among different data sources or stakeholders. Input from customers, industry standard business definitions and built-in data error prevention application controlsare useful for improving data quality, but they are not sufficient for establishing a baseline. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.1

The best source of information for an IS auditor to use as a baseline to assess the adequacy of an organization’s privacy policy is the local privacy standards and regulations. Privacy standards and regulations are legal requirements that specify how personal data should be collected, processed, stored, shared, and disposed of by organizations. By using local privacy standards and regulations as a baseline, the IS auditor can ensure that the organization’s privacy policy complies with the applicable laws and protects the rights and interests of data subjects. Historical privacy breaches and related root causes, globally accepted privacy best practices, and benchmark studies of similar organizations are useful sources of information for improving an organization’s privacy policy, but they are not as authoritative and relevant as local privacy standards and regulations. References: CISAReview Manual (Digital Version): Chapter 2 - Governance and Management of Information Technology

Before issuing the final audit report, the auditor should confirm factual findings with the auditee. ISACA audit guidance emphasizes that findings should be vetted, communicated, and reviewed with client management prior to final publication so that the report is factually accurate and misunderstandings are resolved.

Option B is correct because confirming factual findings with the auditee is a key step just before final issuance. ISACA guidance notes that findings may be discussed with auditees as they are gathered and should be verified with them where possible. ISACA also stresses that draft reports should be reviewed by client management before publication to ensure factual accuracy.

Option A is incorrect because the audit committee is generally a report recipient or governance body, not the party with whom the auditor first validates factual accuracy of detailed findings. The auditee is in the best position to confirm whether the facts, context, and operational details are accurate before the report becomes final.

Option C is an important audit responsibility, but it should already have been completed during fieldwork and evidence-gathering. By the conclusion of the audit, the auditor should already possess sufficient, appropriate evidence to support findings. The question asks what should be done at the conclusion of the audit, but before issuing the final report, which points to factual confirmation with the auditee.

Option D is not the best answer because management is responsible for developing action plans. While auditors may discuss recommendations, they should not take ownership of management’s corrective action plan in a way that compromises independence. The more immediate and proper pre-issuance step is confirming the factual accuracy of findings.

Thus, in classic CISA logic, the auditor should first ensure that the report is factually correct by validating findings with the auditee before the final report is issued. That makes B the correct answer.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA, The Top-Five Audit Essentials for Driving Efficiency and Value — findings should be vetted and communicated with the client; draft report reviewed by client management prior to final publication.

ISACA Journal, Agile Audit — findings may be shared and verified with auditees before the final report.

ISACA Journal, Future Ready: Toward a Sound Agile Audit Framework — auditee feedback at the final reporting stage is important.

ISACA Journal case study — draft report sent to auditee and comments/amendments accepted before issuing report.

The best way to enforce the principle of least privilege on a server containing data with different security classifications is to apply access controls determined by the data owner. The principle of least privilege states that users should only have the minimum level of access required to perform their tasks. The data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility to classify, label, and protect the data according to its sensitivity and value. The data owner can define the access rightsand permissions for each user or role based on the data classification policy and the business needs. This will ensure that only authorized and appropriate users can access the data and prevent unauthorized or excessive access that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)

CISA Questions, Answers and Explanations Database

The best answer is B. It provides a timeline and schedule for deploying new releases into production.

ISACA release and change guidance explains that successful deployment requires scrutiny over change and release, including scheduling, coordination among parties, and validation before implementation. That aligns directly with the role of a release plan: organizing when and how releases move into production.

Option A is more closely related to configuration management. Option C is too narrow because release plans cover much more than database integration. Option D is more closely associated with change evaluation and impact assessment before approval. The release plan’s main function is the coordinated timeline and schedule for production rollout.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Journal, Implementing Emerging Technologies

ISACA Journal, Speeding Up Software Delivery With Effective Change Management

 Change control is the process of managing and documenting changes to an information system or its components. Change control aims to ensure that changes are authorized, tested, approved, implemented, and reviewed in a controlled and consistent manner. Change control is an essential part of ensuring the security, reliability, and quality of an information system.

One of the key elements of change control is testing and approval from quality assurance (QA). QA is the function that verifies that the changes meet the requirements and specifications, comply with the standards and policies, and do not introduce any errors or vulnerabilities. QA testing and approval provide assurance that the changes are fit for purpose, function as expected, and do not compromise the security or performance of the system.

An organization that has recently moved to an agile model for deploying custom code to its in-house accounting software system should still follow change control procedures, including QA testing and approval. Agile development methods emphasize flexibility, speed, and collaboration, but they do not eliminate the need for quality and security checks. In fact, agile methods can facilitate change control by enabling frequent and iterative testing and feedback throughout the development cycle.

However, if change control does not include testing and approval from QA, this poses a significant security concern for the organization. Without QA testing and approval, the changes may not be properly validated, verified, or evaluated before being deployed to production. This could result in introducing bugs, defects, or vulnerabilities that could affect the functionality, availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the accounting software system. For example, a change could cause data corruption, performance degradation, unauthorized access, or data leakage. These risks could have serious consequences for the organization’s financial operations, compliance obligations, reputation, or legal liabilities.

Therefore, change control that does not include testing and approval from QA is the most significant security concern to address when reviewing the procedures in place for production code deployment in an agile model.

The best answer is C. To provide an organized view of configuration items and their relationships.

ISACA guidance on configuration management explicitly refers to the definition of services with configuration items and their relationships, and also notes that a CMDB should include dependency data on the business processes supported by those capabilities. That is the core reason a CMDB exists: to maintain a structured understanding of configuration items (CIs), their attributes, dependencies, and relationships so that change, incident, problem, and risk management can be performed effectively.

Option A is incorrect because incident and service request tracking belongs more to service desk or IT service management tooling, not the primary purpose of the CMDB itself. Option B is incorrect because performance metrics may be associated with items, but that is not the main reason for implementing a CMDB. Option D is incorrect because a CMDB is not a backup repository.

Therefore, the correct answer is C, because the CMDB’s main value is giving the organization a reliable, organized view of configuration items and how they relate to one another.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Journal, Configuration Management Using COBIT 5 — includes “configuration items and their relationships.”

ISACA, Five Key Considerations for Improving IT Supply Chain Security — CMDB as a repository of technical details and dependency data.

ISACA Journal, Cyberresilience in a Societal Context — a CMDB helps know where everything is once implemented.

Unauthorized modifications to scripts (D) pose the greatest risk because they can lead to unintended processing errors, security vulnerabilities, or fraudulent activities. Change management controls should be in place to prevent unauthorized script changes.

Other options:

Minor overrides not authorized (A) is a concern but does not pose as much risk as unauthorized script changes.

Bots incapable of learning (B) is a limitation but not a security risk.

Recording user interactions (C) raises privacy concerns but is not as critical as unauthorized script modifications.

When verifying the accuracy and completeness of migrated data for a new application system replacing a legacy system, it is most effective for an IS auditor to review data analytics findings. Data analytics is a technique that uses software tools and statistical methods to analyze large volumes of data and identify patterns, anomalies, errors or inconsistencies. Data analytics can help to compare the source and target data sets, validate the data quality and integrity, and detect any data loss or corruption during the migration process. The other options are not as effective, because audit trails only record the actions performed on the data, acceptance testingresults only verify the functionality of the new system, and rollback plans only provide contingency measures in case of migration failure. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.6

Audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function by providing direction and information regarding the performance of audits. Audit frameworks are sets of standards, guidelines, and best practices that help IS auditors plan, conduct, and report on their audit engagements. Audit frameworks can help IS auditors ensure the quality, consistency, and professionalism of their audit work, as well as comply with the expectations and requirements of the stakeholders and regulators. Audit frameworks can also help IS auditors address the specific challenges and risks of auditing information systems and technology.

Defining the authority and responsibility of the IS audit function is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the IS audit charter can assist the IS audit function. The IS audit charter is a document that defines the purpose, scope, objectives, and authority of the IS audit function within the organization. The IS audit charter can help IS auditors establish their role and position in relation to other functions and departments, as well as clarify their rights and obligations.

Providing details on how to execute the audit program is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the audit methodology can assist the IS audit function. The audit methodology is a set of procedures and techniques that guide IS auditors in performing their audit tasks and activities. The audit methodology can help IS auditors apply a systematic and structured approach to their audit work, as well as use appropriate tools and methods to collect and analyze evidence.

Outlining the specific steps needed to complete audits is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the audit plan can assist the IS audit function. The audit plan is a document that describes the scope, objectives, timeline, resources, and deliverables of a specific audit engagement. The audit plan can help IS auditors organize and manage their audit work, as well as communicate their expectations and responsibilities to the auditees.