Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CISA Questions and answers with CertsForce

 An IS auditor reviewing the threat assessment for a data center would be most concerned if the exercise was completed by local management, because this could introduce bias, conflict of interest, or lack of expertise in the assessment process. A threat assessment is a systematic method of identifying and evaluating the potential threats that could affect the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the data center and its assets. A threat assessmentshould be conducted by an independent and qualified team that has the necessary skills, knowledge, and experience to perform a comprehensive and objective analysis of the data center’s environment, vulnerabilities, and risks1.

The other options are not as concerning as option C for an IS auditor reviewing the threat assessment for a data center. Option A, some of the identified threats are unlikely to occur, is not a problem as long as the likelihood and impact of each threat are properly estimated and prioritized. A threat assessment should consider all possible scenarios, even if they have a low probability of occurrence, to ensure that the data center is prepared for any eventuality2. Option B, all identified threats relate to external entities, is not a flaw as long as the assessment also considers internal threats, such as human errors, malicious insiders, or equipment failures. External threats are often more visible and severe than internal threats, butthey are not the only source of risk for a data center3. Option D, neighboring organizations’ operations have been included, is not a mistake as long as the assessment also focuses on the data center’s own operations. Neighboring organizations’ operations may have an impact on the data center’s security and availability, especially if they share physical or network infrastructure or resources. A threat assessmentshould take into account the interdependencies and interactions between the data center and its external environment4.

 The IS auditor’s primary concern when auditing the proposed acquisition of new computer hardware is that a clear business case has been established. A business case is a document that justifies the need, feasibility, and benefits of a proposed project or investment. A clear business case can help to ensure that the acquisition of new computer hardware is aligned with the organization’s goals, objectives, and requirements, and that it provides value for money and return on investment. The other options are not as important as establishing a clear business case, as they do not address the rationale or justification for acquiring new computer hardware. References: CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 467

AnIT strategymust bealigned with business objectives, not solely based onmarket trends.

Strategic IT Goals Derived Solely from Market Trends (Correct Answer – D)

IT strategy should supportorganizational goals, not justfollow industry trends.

Example:A company investing inAIjust because it’strendy, without considering business needs.

Previous Year’s IT Goals Not Achieved (Incorrect – A)

A concern, butdoes not indicate a fundamental strategy flaw.

Target Architecture Defined at a Technical Level (Incorrect – B)

Technical details are important for implementation.

Financial Estimates Included (Incorrect – C)

Cost transparency is agood practice.

The most importantoutcome of an information security program is to improve the organizational awareness of security responsibilities, as this will foster a culture of security and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of their roles and obligations in protecting the information assets of the organization. An information security program should also aimto achieve other outcomes, such as identifying operating system weaknesses, understanding and accepting emerging security technologies, and reducing the cost to mitigate information security risk, but these are not as important as improving the awareness of security responsibilities, which is the foundation of any effective information security program. *References: According to the ISACA IT Audit and Assurance Standards, Guidelines and Tools and Techniques for IS Audit and Assurance Professionals, section 2402 Planning, “The IS audit and assurance professional should identify and assess risk relevant to the area under review.” 1 One of the risk factors to consider is “the level of awareness of management and staff regarding IT risk management” 1. According to the ISACAIT Audit and Assurance Guideline G13 Information Security Management, “The objective of an information security management audit/assurancereview is to provide management with an independent assessment relating to the effectiveness of information security management within the enterprise.” The guideline also states that “the audit/assurance professional should evaluate whether there is an appropriate level of awareness throughout the enterprise regarding information security policies, standards, procedures and guidelines.” According to a web search result from Microsoft Security, “Information security programs need to: … Support the execution of decisions.” 2 One of the ways to support the execution of decisions is to ensure that everyone in the organization understands their security responsibilities and follows the security policies and procedures.

The best reason to implement a data retention policy is to limit the liability associated with storing and protecting information. A data retention policy is a document that defines how long data should be kept by an organization and how they should be disposed of when they are no longer needed. A data retention policy should comply with the applicable laws and regulations that govern the data retention requirements and obligations of organizations, such as tax laws, privacy laws, or industry standards4. Implementing a data retention policy can help to limit the liability associated with storing and protecting information by reducing the amount of data that need to be stored and secured, minimizing the risk of data breaches or leaks, ensuringcompliance with legal or contractual obligations, and avoiding potential fines or penalties for non-compliance5. The other options are less relevant or incorrect because:

B. Documenting business objectives for processing data within the organization is not a reason to implement a data retention policy, as it is more related to data governance than data retention. Data governance refers to the policies, procedures, and controls that define how data are collected, used, managed, and shared within an organization. Data governance helps to ensure that data are aligned with business objectives and support decision making6.

C. Assigning responsibility and ownership for data protection outside IT is not a reason to implement a data retention policy, as it is more related to data accountability than data retention. Data accountability refers to the identification and assignment of roles and responsibilities for data protection among different stakeholders within an organization. Data accountability helps to ensure that data are handled appropriately and securely by authorized parties7.

D. Establishing a recovery point objective (RPO) for disaster recovery procedures is not a reason to implement a data retention policy, as it is more related to data backup than data retention. Data backup refers to the process of creating copies of data that can be restored in case of data loss or corruption. Data backup helps to ensure that data are available and recoverable in case of disaster8. RPO is a measure of the maximum amount of data that canbe lost or acceptable in case of disaster9. References: Data Retention Policy - ISACA, Data Retention - ISACA, Data Governance - ISACA, Data Accountability - ISACA, Data Backup - ISACA, Recovery Point Objective - ISACA

The best test to provide assurance that a health care organization is handling patient data appropriately is compliance with local laws and regulations, as these are the primary sources of authority and obligation for data protection and privacy. Compliance with action plans, industry standards, or organizational policies and procedures are also important, but they may not cover all the legal requirements or reflect the currentbest practices for handling patient data. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 2, Section 2.3

 The most significant risk associated with a new health records system that replaces a legacy system is data not being converted correctly, resulting in inaccurate patient records. Data conversion is the process of transferring data from one format or system to another. Data conversion is a critical step in implementing a new health records system, as it ensures that the patient data are consistent, complete, accurate, and accessible in the new system. Data not being converted correctly may cause errors, discrepancies, or losses in patient records, which may have serious implications for patient safety, quality of care, legal compliance, and privacy protection. Staff not being involved in the procurement process, creating user resistance to the new system; the deployment project experiencing significant overruns, exceeding budget projections; and the new system having capacity issues, leading to slow response times for users are also risks associated with a new health records system implementation, but they are not as significant as data not being converted correctly. References: [ISACA CISA Review Manual 27th Edition] , page 281.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

An integrated audit combines IT, operational, and financial audits into a single coordinated review. The primary benefit is the optimization of audit efforts across functions, eliminating duplication and providing a holistic risk perspective.

Option A: QA enhancement is a byproduct but not the primary benefit.

Option C: Skills improvement occurs, but it’s not the main objective.

Option D: Applicability to different areas is true, but not the primary benefit.

???? ISACA Reference: CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, Domain 1, section on integrated audit benefits and efficiencies.

The success rate of social engineering attacks directly measures the behavioral changes resulting from an information security awareness program. Employees who are aware and informed are better equipped to identify and thwart such attacks.

Reduction in Reported Incidents (Option A):This may indicate underreporting rather than program effectiveness.

Reduction in Cost of Maintaining the Program (Option C):This reflects cost efficiency, not program effectiveness.

Reduction in Number of Attacks (Option D):The number of attacks is beyond the control of awareness programs and does not reflect their impact.

The most important validation point is whether the VM replication process is periodically tested to confirm that recovery will actually work. ISACA guidance on backup and recovery states that when using new backup methodologies or technologies, management should test the data afterward to ensure the process is reliably recording all required data, and auditors should ensure periodic health checks are performed.

Option B is correct because recovery adequacy is not proven by the mere existence of replication. ISACA specifically warns that replication alone can increase risk, since corruption can be replicated as well, and it emphasizes validating the reliability of the backup or replication process through testing and health checks.

Option A is important for resilience, but offsite location alone does not prove recoverability. A replica that is never tested may still fail when needed.

Option C is not the most important factor for evaluating recovery procedures. Load balancing supports performance and availability, but it is not the key evidence that replicated systems can be recovered successfully.

Option D is a useful security precaution. ISACA does note that VM backup administrators should not have Internet access to reduce ransomware exposure, but that is a security-hardening issue, not the primary validation of recovery adequacy.

Therefore, B is the best answer because periodic testing is the most important way to validate that VM replication will support actual recovery.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Journal, IS Audit Basics: Backup and Recovery — replication can increase risk if corruption is copied; auditors should ensure backup/recovery processes are tested and health checks are performed.

ISACA Journal, A Five-Layer View of Data Center Systems Security — disaster recovery design should consider criticality and RPO/RTO.

The change management process is the set of procedures and activities that ensure that changes to the information system are authorized, tested, documented, and implemented in a controlled manner12. A defect in a recent release indicates that there may be issues with the quality assurance, testing, or approval of the changes, which could affect the reliability, security, and performance of the system3 . Therefore, the auditor’s next step should be to evaluate the change management process and identify the root cause of the defect, as well as the impact and remediation of the incident.

References

1: Change Management - CISA

2: What is Change Management? - Definition from Techopedia

3: How to Audit Change Management - ISACA Journal

The Business Case for Security | CISA

The best way to mitigate the risk associated with unintentional modifications of complex calculations in end-user computing (EUC) is to execute copies of EUC programs out of a secure library. This will ensure that the original EUC programs are protected from unauthorized changes and that thecopies are run in a controlled environment. A secure library is a repository of EUC programs that have been tested, validated, and approved by the appropriate authority. Executing copies of EUC programs out of a secure library can also help with version control, backup, and recovery of EUC programs. Having an independent party review the source calculations, implementing complex password controls, and verifying EUC results through manual calculations are not as effective as executing copies of EUC programs out of a secure library, as they do not prevent or detect unintentional modifications of complex calculations in EUC. References: End-User Computing (EUC) Risks: A Comprehensive Guide, End User Computing (EUC) Risk Management

 The IS auditor’s first action after discovering an option in a database that allows the administrator to directly modify any table should be to determine whether the audit trail is secured and reviewed. This is because direct modification of database tables can pose a significant risk to data integrity, security, and accountability. An audit trail is a record of all changes made to database tables, including who made them, when they were made, and what was changed. An audit trail can help to detect unauthorized or erroneous changes, provide evidence for investigations or audits, and support data recovery or restoration. The IS auditor should assess whether the audit trail is protected from tampering or deletion, and whether it is regularly reviewed for anomalies or exceptions.

 The business process supported by the system is the most important factor for an IS auditor to understand when planning an audit to assess application controls of a cloud-based system. An IS auditor should have a clear understanding of the business objectives, requirements, and risks of the process, as well as the expected outputs and outcomes of the system. This will help the IS auditor to determine the scope, objectives, and criteria of the audit, as well as to identify and evaluate the key application controls that ensure the effectiveness, efficiency, and reliability of the process. The other options are less important factors that may provide additional information or context for the audit, but not its primary focus. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 5,Section 5.31

CISA Review Questions, Answers and Explanations Database, Question ID 212

 Recounting the transaction records to ensure no records are missing provides assurance that the best transactions were recovered successfully from a snapshot copy. This is because recounting the transaction records can verify that the number of records in the restored database matches the number of records in the snapshot copy, which represents the state of the database before the deletion occurred. Recounting the transaction records can also detect any data corruption or inconsistency that may have occurred during the restore process1.

Reviewing transaction recovery logs to ensure no errors were recorded is not the best answer, because transaction recovery logs may not capture all the details or issues that may affect the data quality or integrity. Transaction recovery logs are mainly used to monitor and troubleshoot the restore process, but they may not reflect the actual content or accuracy of the restored data2.

Rerunning the process on a backup machine to verify the results are the same is not the best answer, because rerunning the process may introduce additional errors or inconsistencies that may affect the data quality or integrity. Rerunning theprocess may also consume more time and resources than necessary, and it may not guarantee that the results are identical to the original data3.

Comparing transaction values against external statements to verify accuracy is not the best answer, because external statements may not be available or reliable for all transactions. External statements are documents or reports that provide information about transactions from a third-party source, such as a bank, a vendor, or a customer. However, external statements may not cover all transactions, or they may have differentformats, standards, or timeliness than the internal data

Access controls for source libraries are the features of a library control software package that would protect against unauthorized updating of source code. Access controls are the mechanisms that regulate who can access, modify, or delete the source code stored in the source libraries. Source libraries are the repositories that contain the source code files and their versions. By implementing access controls for source libraries, the library controlsoftware package can prevent unauthorized or malicious users from tampering with the source code and compromising its integrity, security, or functionality1.

The other options are not as effective as access controls for source libraries in protecting against unauthorized updating of source code. Option A, required approvals at each life cycle step, is a good practice but may not be sufficient to prevent unauthorized updates if the approval process is bypassed or compromised. Option B, date and time stamping of source and object code, is a useful feature but may not prevent unauthorized updates if the date and time stamps are altered or ignored. Option D, release-to-release comparison of source code, is a helpful feature but may not prevent unauthorized updates if the comparison results are not reviewed or acted upon.

A concern associated with virtualization is that performance issues with the host could impact the guest operating systems, which are the operating systems that run on virtual machines within the host. For example, if the host has insufficient memory, CPU, disk space, or network bandwidth, it could affect the performance and availability of the guest operating systems and the applications running on them. The physical footprint of servers could decrease within the datacenter, processingcapacity may be shared across multiple operating systems, and one host may have multiple versions of the same operating system are not concerns associated with virtualization, but rather benefits or features of virtualization that can help reduce costs, improve efficiency, and enhance flexibility. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4: Information Systems Operations and Business Resilience, Section 4.2: IT Service Delivery and Support

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In Zero Trust architecture (ZTA), the principle is “never trust, always verify.” The most important aspect for an IS auditor to evaluate is whether access control policies are properly designed, aligned with industry standards, and consistently enforced. These policies define how identities, devices, and contexts are authenticated and authorized before gaining access.

Option A: Perimeter firewalls are less relevant in Zero Trust, which minimizes reliance on network boundaries.

Option C: Access reviews are important but are periodic, not continuous enforcement.

Option D: Secure remote protocols are necessary but part of broader access policy enforcement.

Option B: Correct — policies are the foundation of Zero Trust security.

???? ISACA Reference: ISACA’s “Zero Trust and Audit Considerations” guidance; CISA Review Manual 27th Edition, Domain 5, section on identity, access, and authentication controls.

The most critical factor for the success of an information security program is management’s commitment to information security. Management’s commitment to information security means that the senior management supports, sponsors, funds, monitors and enforces the information security program within the organization. Management’s commitment to information security also demonstrates leadership, sets the tone and culture, and establishes the strategic direction and objectives for information security. User accountability for information security, alignment of information security with IT objectives, and integration of business and information security are also important factors for the success of an information security program, but they are not as critical as management’s commitment to information security, as they depend on or derive from it. References: Info Technology and Systems Resources | COBIT, Risk, Governance … - ISACA, IT Governance and Process Maturity

The most helpful thing for an IS auditor to review when evaluating an organization’s business processes that are supported by applications and IT systems is the enterprise architecture (EA). EA is the practice of designing a business with a holistic view, considering all of its parts and how they interact. EA defines the overall goals, the strategies that support those goals, and the tactics that are needed to execute those strategies. EA also outlines the ways various components of IT projects interact with one another and with the business processes. By reviewing the EA, an IS auditor can gain a comprehensive understanding of how the organization aligns its IT efforts with its overall mission, business strategy, and priorities. An IS auditor can also assess the effectiveness, efficiency, agility, and continuity of complex business operations.

The other options are not as helpful as option B. A configuration management database (CMDB) is a database that stores and manages information about the components that make up an IT system. A CMDB tracks individual configuration items (CIs), such as hardware, software, or data assets, and their attributes, dependencies, and changes over time. A CMDB can help an IS auditor to monitor the performance, availability, and configuration of IT assets, but it does not provide a holistic view of how they support the business processes. IT portfolio management is the practice of managing IT investments, projects, and activities as a portfolio. IT portfolio management aims to optimize the value, risk, and cost of IT initiatives and align them with the business objectives. IT portfolio management can help an IS auditor to evaluate the return on IT investments and the alignment of IT projects with the business strategy, but it does not provide a detailed view of how they support the business processes. IT service management (ITSM) is the practice of planning, implementing, managing, and optimizing IT services to meet the needs of end users and customers. ITSM focuses on delivering IT as a service using standardized processes and best practices. ITSM can help an IS auditor to review the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of IT service delivery and support, but it does not provide a comprehensive view of how they support the business processes. References: What is enterprise architecture (EA)? - RingCentral, What is a configuration management database (CMDB)? - Red Hat, IT Portfolio Management Strategies | Smartsheet, What is IT service management (ITSM)? | IBM

 When an IS audit reveals that a firewall was unable to recognize a number of attack attempts, the auditor’s best recommendation is to place an intrusion detection system (IDS) between the firewall and the Internet, as this would provide an additional layer of security and alert the organization of any malicious traffic that bypasses or penetrates the firewall. Placing an IDS between the firewall and the demilitarized zone (DMZ), the organization’s web server, or the organization’s network would not be as effective, as it would only monitor the traffic that has already passed through the firewall. References: CISA Review Manual (DigitalVersion), Chapter 5, Section 5.4.3

A comprehensive asset inventory is the most important factor for the successful establishment of a security vulnerability management program. A security vulnerability management program is a systematic process of identifying, assessing, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities in the organization’s IT environment1. A comprehensive asset inventory is a complete and accurate record of all the hardware, software, and network components that the organization owns or uses2. A comprehensive asset inventory helps the organization to:

Know what assets are in scope for vulnerability scanning and assessment3.

Identify the vulnerabilities that affect each asset and their severity level4.

Prioritize the remediation of vulnerabilities based on the criticality and value of each asset.

Track the status and progress of vulnerability remediation for each asset.

Measure the effectiveness and maturity of the vulnerability management program.

A robust tabletop exercise plan is a simulated scenario that tests the organization’s preparedness and response capabilities for a potential cyberattack or incident. A tabletop exercise plan is useful for validating and improving the organization’s incident response plan, but it is not essential for establishing a security vulnerability management program.

A tested incident response plan is a documented process that defines the roles, responsibilities, and actions of the organization’s personnel in the event of a cyberattack or incident. A tested incident response plan is important for minimizing the impact and restoring normal operations after a security breach, but it is not critical for establishing a security vulnerability management program.

An approved patching policy is a set of rules and guidelines that governs how the organization applies patches and updates to its IT systems and applications. An approved patching policy is a key component of the remediation phase of the vulnerability management program, but it is not sufficient for establishing a security vulnerability management program.

A BCP must stay current with organizational changes to ensure its effectiveness during a disruption. Personnel changes and environmental updates are directly relevant to how the BCP would be executed.

References

ISACA CISA Review Manual (Current Edition) - Chapter on Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Industry Standards (e.g., ISO 22301, NIST SP 800-34) - Guidelines for maintaining and updating a Business Continuity Plan

The best answer is C.

ISACA’s glossary defines DNS poisoning as a cyberattack that alters DNS records to redirect users to fraudulent websites. Since the attack mechanism is DNS manipulation, the strongest control among the choices is DNS server security hardening. That directly addresses the infrastructure being targeted.

Option A can reduce user susceptibility but does not directly prevent redirection attacks. Option B can help at the endpoint, but it does not address poisoned or compromised DNS infrastructure as directly as DNS hardening. Option D is designed mainly to protect web applications from HTTP-layer attacks, not to stop DNS-based traffic redirection.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Glossary, Domain name system (DNS) poisoning.

 The most reliable way for an IS auditor to evaluate the operational effectiveness of an organization’s data loss prevention (DLP) controls is to verify that confidential files cannot be transmitted to a personal USB device. This is because DLP controls are designed to prevent the loss, leakage or misuse of sensitive data through breaches, ex-filtration transmissions and unauthorized use1. A personal USB device is a common way for data to be stolen or compromised, as it can bypass network security measures and allow unauthorized access to confidential files. Therefore, testing the DLP controls by attempting to copy or transfer confidential files to a personal USB device can provide a direct and objective evidence of whether the DLP controls are working as intended or not.

The other options are less reliable ways for an IS auditor to evaluate the operational effectiveness of an organization’s DLP controls. Reviewing data classification levels based on industry best practice is a way to assess the adequacy of the organization’s data protection policies, but it does not measure how well the DLP controls are implemented or enforced in practice. Verifying that current DLP software is installed on all computer systems is a way to check the technical configuration of the DLP solution, but it does not test how well the DLP software detects and prevents data loss incidents in real scenarios. Conducting interviews to identify possible data protection vulnerabilities is a way to gather qualitative information from stakeholders, but it does not provide quantitative or empirical data on the actual performance of the DLP controls.

The IS auditor’s best recommendation is to ensure that programmers cannot access code after the completion of program edits. This is because programmers who have access to code after editing may introduce unauthorized or malicious changes that could compromise the security, functionality, or performance of the application. By restricting access to code after editing, the organization can ensure that only authorized and tested code is released into production, and prevent any tampering or reoccurrence of the same issue.

The best answer is A. Release management.

In continuous delivery, code moves frequently from development toward production, but the key control point that connects development output to live production deployment is release management. ISACA explains that continuous delivery takes integration output that has met release criteria and updates the application in production. That means the practical bridge between development and production is the release process that governs packaging, approval, timing, and movement into production.

Option C. DevOps is closely related, but it is broader than the specific connector. ISACA describes DevOps as focusing on automation and integration of processes before and after software release into production. That makes DevOps the broader operating model, while release management is the specific connector between development and production in the delivery pipeline.

Option B. Log management is important for monitoring and troubleshooting, but it does not connect development to production.

Option D. Data management is also important, but it is not the delivery bridge in this context.

Therefore, the correct answer is A, because release management is the function that controls and enables the movement of approved changes from development into production.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA Journal, Speeding Up Software Delivery With Effective Change Management — continuous delivery updates production with integration output meeting release criteria.

ISACA Journal, Three Strategies for a Successful DevSecOps Implementation — DevOps is broader automation/integration around release into production.

 The best control for detecting unauthorized data changes in an IT organization where many responsibilities are shared is to have data changes independently reviewed by another group. This is because an independent review can provide an objective and unbiased verification of the data changes and ensure that they are authorized, accurate, and complete. An independent review can also help to detect any errors, fraud, or malicious activities that may have occurred during the data changes. An independent review can also provide assurance that the data integrity and security are maintained. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 4, Section 4.31

CISA Online Review Course, Domain 1, Module 4, Lesson 22

The most important factor when defining the IS audit scope is to understand the relationship between IT and business risks, as this helps to identify the areas that have the most potential impact on the organization’s objectives, performance, and value. By understanding the IT and business risks, the IS auditor can focus the audit scope on the key processes, systems, controls, and issues that need to be assessed and addressed.

References

ISACA CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 256

Ten Factors to Consider when Setting the Scope of an Internal Audit

What Is an Audit Scope? | Auditing Basics | KirkpatrickPrice

 A weakness in change management is the most likely cause of an incorrect version of source code being amended by a development team. Change management is the process of controlling and documenting changes to IT systems and software. It ensures that changes are authorized, tested, and implemented in a controlled manner. If change management is weak, there is a risk of using outdated or incorrect versions of source code, which can lead to errors, defects, or security vulnerabilities in the software. 

The best answer is B.

A quality assurance and improvement program is meant to evaluate whether the audit function is performing effectively and independently. ISACA’s candidate guide explicitly includes evaluating audit processes as part of QA and improvement programs, and ISACA peer-review guidance states that a peer review process assessing internal audit is essential to ensure it is appropriately carrying out its role. The absence of independent periodic external review is therefore the most serious concern because it weakens objective assessment of audit quality itself.

Option A is a weakness, but tracking improvement opportunities centrally is secondary to having independent validation that the function meets expected quality standards. Option C is not the best answer because substantive testing during an assessment phase may vary by engagement design. Option D matters for governance communication, but it is still less central to QA than the lack of external independent review.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA, Certification Exam Candidate Guide.

ISACA Journal, A Standardized Approach for Peer Review of Internal Audit.

The IS auditor should review the organization’s patch management policy to determine the expected frequency and scope of patching, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the patch management team. This will help the auditor assess the severity and impact of the non-compliance, and identify the root cause and possible remediation actions12.

References

1: How to Create a Patch Management Policy: Complete Guide 2: Free Patch Management Policy Template (+Examples)

The concept of materiality is most important for an IS auditor to apply when planning an audit engagement, because it helps the auditor to determine the scope, objectives, procedures and resources of the audit. Materiality is the degree to which an omission or misstatement of information could affect the users’ decisions or the achievement of the audit objectives. By applying the concept of materiality, the auditor can focus on the most significant and relevant areas of the audit and avoid wasting time and effort on trivial or immaterial matters. The other options are not as important as planning an audit engagement, because they are either based on or affected by the materiality assessment done during the planning phase. References:

ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, chapter 1, section 1.31

ISACA, IT Audit and Assurance Standards, Guidelines and Tools and Techniques forIS Audit and Assurance Professionals, section 12022

The evidence collected during a digital forensic investigation would not be admissible in court if the logs failed to identify the person handling the evidence. This would violate the chain of custody principle, which requires that the evidence be properly documented, secured, and tracked throughout the investigation process. The chain of custody ensures that the evidence is authentic, reliable, andtrustworthy, and that it has not been tampered with or altered. The person who collected the evidence, whether qualified or not, is not relevant to the admissibility of the evidence, as long as they followed the proper procedures and protocols. The evidence collected by the internal forensics team can be admissible in court, as long as they are independent, objective, and competent. The evidence does not need to be fully backed up using a cloud-based solution prior to the trial, as long as it is preserved and protected from damage or loss. References: ISACA Journal Article: Digital Forensics: Chain of Custody

This means that the organization should obtain the source code from the escrow agent and compare it with the current version of the application that they are using. The organization should then identify and apply any changes or updates that are missing or different in the escrow version, so that it matches the current version. This way, the organization can ensure that they have a complete and accurate copy of the source code that reflects their current needs and requirements.

Bringing the escrow version up to date can help the organization to avoid or reduce the risks and costs associated with using an outdated or incompatible version of the source code. For example, an older version of the source code may have bugs, errors, or vulnerabilities that could affect the functionality, security, or performance of the application. An older version of the source code mayalso lack some features, enhancements, or integrations that could improve the usability, efficiency, or value of the application. An older version of the source code may also not comply with some standards, regulations, or contracts that could affect the quality, reliability, or legality of the application1.

The other options are not as good as bringing the escrow version up to date for the organization. Option A, analyzing a new application that meets the current requirements, is a possible option but it may be more time-consuming, expensive, and risky than updating the existing application. The organization may have to go through a complex and lengthy process of selecting, acquiring, implementing, testing, and migrating to a new application, which could disrupt their operations and performance. The organization may also have to deal with compatibility, interoperability, or data quality issues when switching to a new application2. Option B, performing an analysis to determine the business risk, is a necessary step but not a recommendation for the organization. The organization should already be aware of the business risk of using an application whose vendor has gone out of business and whose escrow has an older version of the source code. The organization should focus on finding and implementing a solution to mitigate or eliminate this risk3. Option D, developing a maintenance plan to support the application using the existing code, is not a feasible option because it assumes that the organization has access to the existing code. However, this is not the case because the vendor has gone out of business and the escrow has an older version of the source code. The organization cannot support or maintain an application without having a complete and accurate copy of its source code.

Separate authorization for input of transactions. This control would have best prevented this type of fraud in a retail environment by ensuring that the warehouse employee who handles the inventory items does not have the authority to enter adjustments to the inventory system. This would create a segregation of duties that would reduce the risk of collusion and concealment of theft.

The other options are not as effective as option A in preventing this type of fraud. Option B, statistical sampling of adjustment transactions, is a detective control that may help identify fraudulent transactions after they have occurred, but it does not prevent them from happening in the first place. Option C, unscheduled audits of lost stock lines, is also a detective control that may reveal discrepancies between the physical and recorded inventory, but it does not address the root cause of the fraud. Option D, an edit check for the validity of the inventory transaction, is a preventive control that may help verify the accuracy and completeness of the transaction data, but it does not prevent unauthorized or fraudulent adjustments.

The most effective control for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of data stored unencrypted on virtual machines is to monitor access to stored images and snapshots of virtual machines. Images and snapshots are copies of virtual machines that can be used for backup, restoration, or cloning purposes. If data stored on virtual machines are unencrypted, they may be exposed or compromised if unauthorized or malicious users access or copy the images or snapshots. Therefore, monitoring access to stored images and snapshots can help detect and prevent any unauthorized or suspicious activities, and provide audit trails for accountability and investigation.

Restricting access to images and snapshots of virtual machines, limiting creation of virtual machine images and snapshots, and reviewing logical access controls on virtual machines regularly are not the most effective controls for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of data stored unencrypted on virtual machines. These controls may help reduce the risk or impact of data exposure or compromise, but they do not provide sufficient visibility or assurance of data protection. Restricting access to images and snapshots may not prevent authorized users from abusing their privileges or credentials. Limiting creation of virtual machine images and snapshots may not address the existing copies that may contain sensitive data. Reviewing logical access controls on virtual machines regularly may not reflect the actual access activities on images and snapshots.

The DRP is a set of procedures and resources that enable an organization to restore its critical IT functions and operations in the event of a disaster or disruption. The DRP should be tested regularly to ensure its effectiveness, validity, and readiness. Testing the DRP can help to identify and resolve any gaps, issues, or weaknesses in the plan, as well as to evaluate the performance and capability of the recovery team and resources. If the DRP has not been tested during the past three years, it may not reflect the current IT environment, business requirements, or recovery objectives, and it may fail to meet the expectations and needs of the stakeholders.

References

ISACA CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 255

Disaster Recovery Plan Testing: The Ultimate Checklist

What is a Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) and How Do You Write One?