Pass the FIDIC Contract Manager CCM Questions and answers with CertsForce

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Option C is correct: The Contractor must revise the programme whenever it no longer accurately reflects progress or obligations.

Option D is correct: The Contractor must also revise the programme upon formal request if it fails contract compliance or progress reflection.

Option A is incorrect; the Contractor has ongoing obligations beyond formal requests.

Option B is incorrect; no 42-day threshold applies in the contract for revision.

This statement is true. The FIDIC suite of contracts, including Red, Yellow, and Silver Books, have evolved from earlier editions and contract models, but they retain a common structure, terminology, and approach to risk allocation. This familiarity allows professionals who know one FIDIC contract to adapt more easily to other FIDIC contracts or updated editions. For example, common terms like Engineer, Employer, Contractor, Variation, and Claims exist across editions with consistent meaning.

The modular and familiar structure supports easier contract administration, negotiation, and interpretation. However, differences in clauses, obligations, and procedures between editions (e.g., 1999 vs. 2017) require careful review. Nevertheless, the shared foundations mean prior experience provides valuable understanding, streamlining learning and application.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

According to the FIDIC Silver Book, 1999 Edition (The Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects), the Contractor is required under Sub-Clause 8.3 (“Programme”) to submit a time programme that illustrates the sequence and timing of the works, including milestones and key events. The intended order of the works (Option A), sequence and timing of inspections and tests (Option B), and review periods (Option D) related to contract management processes such as approval of design or submissions (Sub-Clause 5.2) are integral to effective scheduling and coordination.

However,remedial work instructed under Sub-Clause 7.6, which concerns remedying defects or damage, is generally not part of the initial or revised programme. Instead, remedial works are typically handled as separate tasks or incorporated into specific defect liability or rectification schedules after the main programme has been executed. Such remedial works arise from defects liability obligations and do not belong to the original or revised time programme used to plan the main construction phases.

This distinction is important because the programme reflects planned works execution, whereas remedial work is reactive and may be scheduled separately under defects liability clauses or final project close-out arrangements.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Under the FIDIC Red Book 2017 (similar principles apply in other editions), Sub-Clause 4.1 (“Contractor’s General Obligations”) and Sub-Clause 3.4 (“Delay Damages”) require both Employer and Contractor to notify the Engineer in advance about any events or circumstances which maydelay the worksoradversely affect the Contractor’s personnel or progress. This early notification ensures proper management and mitigation of risks that could impact the project timeline or quality.

Option A (Delay the execution of the Works or a Section)is a core reason for notification since delays affect the critical path and programme, requiring possible extensions or adjustments.

Option C (Adversely affect the work of the Contractor's Personnel)is also a valid reason because issues affecting workforce productivity or availability can impact project delivery.

On the other hand:

Option B (Decrease the Contract Price)isnota reason to notify. Changes in contract price usually arise from variations or claims but are not a “known or future event” requiring prior notification unless linked to a variation or compensation event.

Option D (Increase the performance of the Works when completed)is positive and does not negatively affect project progress or cost; therefore, it is not a reason for advance notification under these contract provisions.

Thus, the twonot applicablereasons are B and D.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The Contractor may submit Value Engineering proposals to improve efficiency or reduce costs; however, it is not an absolute contractual obligation to submit such proposals. Also, the preparation of these proposals is generally at the Contractor’s own cost initially. If the proposal is accepted and results in a Variation, then adjustments to the Contract Price may occur, potentially reimbursing the Contractor.

Thus, both statements are false.

This statement is true. Under FIDIC Silver Book 1999, Sub-Clause 8.6, the Employer can instruct the Contractor to submit a revised programme to meet the contractual Time for Completion. If, after such instruction, the revised programme still shows the Works will not complete on time, the Employer may claim additional costs (such as delay damages or compensation) due to continued delay.

Thus, the Employer’s right to claim additional costs is contingent on the revised programme not enabling timely completion.

mprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Option D correctly captures the difference between Yellow and Silver Books (1999):

In the Yellow Book, the Contractor may raise concerns after contract close.

In the Silver Book, the Contractor must scrutinize and report on Employer’s Requirements during the tender period, and after contract close this duty lapses.

Other options misunderstand timing or scope of scrutiny.

Option B is correct: The Contractor must obtain approval from the Engineer/Employer before making design changes.

Option C is correct: The Contractor can submit Value Engineering proposals to improve efficiency or reduce costs.

Option A is incorrect; unilateral changes are not allowed.

Option D is incorrect; Value Engineering can be proposed even after initial submission.

Under FIDIC Red Book (1999), the Value Engineering Clause requires the Contractor to notify the Engineer with full details and cost implications when proposing Value Engineering changes. The Engineer then follows the Variation procedure in Sub-Clause 3.5 to agree or determine the cost adjustment, which will be reflected in the Contract Price.

This ensures transparent handling of Value Engineering proposals and proper contractual adjustments.

Under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 1999 editions, the Engineer acts as the Employer's representative with authority delegated under the contract. When an instruction requires the Employer’s prior approval, it is primarily the Engineer’s responsibility to obtain that approval before issuing the instruction to the Contractor.

The Contractor isnot contractually required to verifywhether the Engineer has obtained the Employer’s approval. The Contractor is generally entitled to rely on the Engineer’s instructions as valid and binding unless there is clear evidence to the contrary.

This principle avoids placing an undue administrative burden on the Contractor and maintains the hierarchical contract administration structure, where the Engineer is the primary point of contact and decision-maker.