Pass the PRINCE2 PRINCE2 Agile PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Questions and answers with CertsForce

Agile Foundation guidance describes co-creation as a collaborative approach where value is created together by people who share common attitudes, values, and goals. This makes option C the correct answer. Co-creation goes beyond simply assigning work or motivating individuals to meet predefined objectives. Instead, it emphasizes collective ownership, shared understanding, and active participation by all relevant stakeholders in shaping outcomes.

In Agile environments, co-creation is rooted in the belief that the best solutions emerge when diverse perspectives work together in an open and trusting environment. Teams, customers, users, and stakeholders collaborate continuously to explore needs, generate ideas, and refine solutions. This shared mindset ensures that everyone involved is aligned on purpose and value, rather than working in isolation or following instructions without context.

Option A focuses on motivation to meet objectives, which reflects performance management rather than co-creation. While motivation is important, it does not necessarily involve shared ownership or joint value creation. Option B, agreeing ways of working, relates to establishing working agreements or team norms, which support collaboration but do not define co-creation itself. Option D, instructing the execution of tasks, represents a command-and-control approach that is contrary to Agile principles and does not encourage shared responsibility or creativity.

Agile Foundation documents emphasize that co-creation strengthens engagement, trust, and innovation. When people share attitudes, values, and goals, they are more likely to challenge assumptions constructively, learn from each other, and adapt solutions based on feedback. This approach supports Agile principles such as collaboration, customer focus, and continuous improvement. Co-creation ensures that value is not simply delivered to stakeholders but created with them, leading to better outcomes, higher satisfaction, and more sustainable Agile ways of working.

A primary benefit of an organization being and doing agile is faster time-to-market. Agile methods emphasize iterative delivery, frequent releases, and continuous feedback, enabling organizations to deliver value sooner and adapt quickly to changes. This benefit directly supports business agility and competitive advantage.

Using agile techniques alone (B) is a means, not a benefit. Focusing solely on tasks (C) ignores value and flow, and setting tolerances to zero (D) is neither practical nor encouraged.

Agile Foundation guidance clearly identifies Scrum as an iterative and timeboxed approach to product delivery, making option A the correct answer. Scrum is built around fixed-length iterations called sprints, which are typically one to four weeks long. These timeboxes create a regular cadence for planning, development, review, and improvement, enabling teams to deliver usable increments of a product frequently and predictably.

Scrum emphasizes iterative delivery by breaking complex work into smaller, manageable pieces that can be completed within a sprint. Each sprint begins with planning, where the team selects work from the product backlog, and ends with a review and retrospective. This structure supports frequent inspection of both the product and the team’s way of working, allowing for continuous adaptation based on feedback and learning. Agile Foundation documents highlight that timeboxing is a key mechanism in Scrum, helping teams focus, limit work in progress, and reduce risk.

Option B, Kanban, is not timeboxed. Kanban focuses on continuous flow, visualizing work, and limiting work in progress rather than delivering in fixed iterations. Option C, the Agilometer, is an assessment tool used to evaluate suitability and risks of Agile adoption, not a delivery approach. Option D, Lean, is a broader philosophy focused on eliminating waste and optimizing value flow; while it can influence Agile delivery, it is not inherently iterative and timeboxed in the way Scrum is.

Agile Foundation materials stress that Scrum’s iterative and timeboxed nature supports transparency, predictability, and early value delivery. By delivering small increments regularly, teams can gather feedback early, reduce uncertainty, and adapt priorities as needs change. This makes Scrum particularly effective in environments where requirements evolve and learning is essential.

The PRINCE2 practices represent the essential aspects of project management that must be applied consistently from start to finish in every project. These practices cover key areas such as managing risks, issues, quality, plans, progress, and change. They provide structured guidance and tools to ensure the project remains viable, controlled, and aligned with business objectives.

While processes define the stages and flow of activities, and the people element refers to roles and skills, practices are the ongoing activities and controls embedded throughout the project lifecycle. The project context shapes how practices and processes are tailored but does not itself define the consistent elements.

This consistent application of practices supports governance, transparency, and control, critical for successful project outcomes.

The Progress Review Workshop is the key forum to assess the current status of the project and address challenges or issues affecting progress. It typically involves reviewing the current stage or release against plan, assessing risks, issues, and dependencies, and agreeing on corrective actions or decisions to keep the project on track.

While retrospectives (B and C) focus on reflecting and improving team practices, and team planning (A) looks ahead to upcoming work, progress reviews are focused on monitoring, control, and decision-making at the project or stage level.

This workshop aligns with PRINCE2’s principle of manage by exception, enabling timely interventions without unnecessary escalation.

In Agile Foundation guidance, the product backlog is the primary artifact that provides a list of user stories, making option C the correct answer. The product backlog is a prioritized, evolving list of all the work needed to deliver and improve a product. User stories are the most common way of expressing requirements within the product backlog because they focus on user needs, value, and desired outcomes rather than detailed technical specifications.

The product backlog is owned and maintained by the product owner, who is responsible for ensuring that the backlog items are clearly defined, ordered by value, and aligned with business goals. User stories within the product backlog describe features, enhancements, fixes, and technical work from the perspective of the user or customer. This supports Agile’s emphasis on delivering value early and continuously while allowing flexibility as requirements change.

Option A, project backlog, is not a standard Agile Foundation artifact. Agile focuses on products and value streams rather than traditional project-centered task lists. Option B, project canvas, is a high-level visual planning tool used to summarize objectives, stakeholders, risks, and constraints, but it does not contain detailed user stories. Option D, release map, outlines planned releases and timelines at a high level, showing when groups of features or increments may be delivered, but it does not provide the detailed list of user stories themselves.

Agile Foundation documents highlight that the product backlog is dynamic and continuously refined through backlog refinement activities. User stories are added, removed, split, or re-prioritized based on feedback, learning, and changing business needs. This adaptability ensures that teams always work on the most valuable items first. By serving as the single, transparent source of requirements, the product backlog enables collaboration, alignment, and effective value delivery, which is why it is the correct artifact for listing user stories.