Pass the APMG-International AgilePM AgilePM-Foundation Questions and answers with CertsForce

The DSDM product that reflects the approach to the management of the project as a whole, considering how the project will be organized and planned from a management perspective, is the Management Approach Definition2. This product outlines the overall strategy for managing the project, including aspects such as roles, responsibilities, and processes, ensuring that the project is aligned with its objectives and can be delivered successfully2.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 300 words Explanation From Exact Extract of Agile Project Management (paraphrased with Scrum alignment):

Scrum defines a small set of events within the Sprint to implement empiricism: Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective. Additionally, the Sprint itself is the overarching event—a fixed-length container that sets the cadence for inspection and adaptation, culminating in a usable Increment. By contrast, Sprint Goal is a commitment associated with the Sprint, guiding focus and coherence; Sprint Backlog is an artifact representing the plan for the Sprint; and Product Increment is an artifact representing the latest integrated outcome meeting the Definition of Done. Therefore, among the options, only Sprint is a Scrum Event.

The purpose of the Foundations Summary in AgilePM is to provide enough information to decide whether the project is likely to deliver a return on investment. This document serves as a comprehensive overview of the project's viability, including a high-level understanding of the business case, objectives, scope, and risks. It ensures that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the project's potential value and feasibility before significant resources are committed.

AgilePM’s lifecycle comprises Pre-Project, Feasibility, Foundations, Evolutionary Development (Development), Deployment, and Post-Project. Deployment is executed in the Deployment phase, but AgilePM expects deployment planning to be identified early and progressively elaborated as part of ongoing planning during Evolutionary Development. As timeboxes deliver verified increments, the team refines release content, readiness activities, and transition tasks (training, data migration, cutover, support). Embedding deployment activities into the plans during Development ensures that release preparation progresses continuously—not as a late-stage bolt-on—supporting predictable cadence and benefits enablement. While Foundations establishes the initial approach and high-level plans, the detailed, actionable deployment tasks and their scheduling are added and maintained within the Development phase planning cycles so the upcoming Deployment phase can execute smoothly. Hence, from the options provided, the correct choice is Development phase.

Agility delivers the most benefit when uncertainty is high—when the problem is fuzzy, assumptions are unproven, stakeholders are still learning, and change is inevitable. In these contexts, iterative and incremental delivery, frequent feedback, and tight collaboration reduce risk by turning unknowns into knowns quickly. Timeboxing, continuous prioritization (e.g., MoSCoW), and demonstrable increments enable evidence-based decisions, allowing the team to pivot as understanding improves. Conversely, when the problem and solution are truly stable and well defined, predictive approaches can work adequately because variability is low. Likewise, heavy upfront research or a fully designed/contracted “optimal” solution implies a desire for certainty that may not exist; agile avoids over-investing in speculative plans by validating value early. Therefore, agility is most needed when discovery is paramount and adaptability is crucial—when the problem is unclear and change is inevitable.

Realizing business value often depends on business change enablement—including user training, readiness, and adoption. In AgilePM, the Business Visionary owns the business vision and ensures the evolving solution will deliver the expected benefits in operational use. They coordinate with Business Ambassadors and other stakeholders to prepare the organization (e.g., training, process updates) so that increments translate into realized value. While a Project Manager may help plan logistics and the Scrum Master facilitates the team, accountability for ensuring the business side is prepared to exploit the product sits with the Business Visionary. The Business Sponsor owns investment and justification; they may support funding for training, but the Visionary leads aligning solution capabilities with people and practice changes needed for benefit realization.

Statement 1: Correct. Offering supportive feedback after moments of insight reinforces learning and helps individuals process change more effectively.

Statement 2: Incorrect. While talks from experts may inform, they are less impactful than engaging individuals directly.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Neuroscience in Change Management: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 6, Section 6.2.

The responsibility of the Business Ambassador in AgilePM is to provide day-to-day detail of the requirements during Timeboxes. This role involves representing the interests of the business within the project team, ensuring that the evolving product meets the business needs. The Business Ambassador works closely with the development team to clarify requirements, provide feedback, and make decisions promptly to keep the project on track.

The Project Manager is responsible for the delivery of the project from Foundations through to Deployment1. This role involves high-level coordination of the project, ensuring that both business and technical delivery aspects are managed effectively from the initial phases through to the final deployment1.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (concise, policy-compliant):

Scrum defines four events within the Sprint: Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective. When multiple teams collaborate on a common outcome, coordination frequently benefits from an additional, project-level planning event layered around (not replacing) Scrum’s core events. In Agile project environments, a lightweight project planning event brings Product Owner(s), key stakeholders, and representatives from each team together to align intentions, dependencies, and release objectives across teams before teams finalize their own Sprint Plans. This complements, rather than duplicates, each team’s Sprint Planning by creating a shared understanding of priorities and cross-team impacts, enabling teams to enter Sprint Planning with clearer constraints and collaboration points. The Sprint Retrospective focuses on improvement, not forward planning. Hence, the add-on that facilitates cross-team planning is a Project planning event.