Pass the CIPS CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M5 Questions and answers with CertsForce

In a globalised commercial world characterised by dynamic market and multiple companies competing for business, a positive corporate reputation can be an enormous asset. Reputational strength in one organisation might be based on some or all of the following characteristics:

- Quality of products or services

- Low cost/high value for money

- High ethical standards

- Reliability

- Cutting-edge technology

- Strong customer focus

- Engineering excellence

LO 1, AC 1.4

Dynamic pricing is the practice of dynamically calculating the price of a product or service in order to incorporate real-time market conditions, input costs, and/or competitive perspectives. Dynamic pricing which is based on marginal costing, is used by airlines and many other organisations.

Marginal cost is the cost of producing an additional unit of output. Marginal Costing is a costing technique wherein the marginal cost, i.e. variable cost is charged to units of cost, while the fixed cost for the period is completely written off against the contribution.

Single-sourced relationships often involve exclusivity for a specific product (1) and a high level of trust and collaboration (3) between buyer and supplier. This type of relationship is selected forstrategic procurement purposes, often involving long-term partnerships, which align with CIPS’s relationship spectrum guidelines.

It has been said that most negotiations are won (or lost) at the preparation stage. Success in a negotiation cannot be claimed unless you can refer back to your objectives and show how you have achieve them. In broad terms, negotiation plans/strategies involve 4 key activities:

1. Developing and prioritising your objectives and limits

2. Seeking to understand TOP's objectives

3. Developing concession plans

4. Planning the resources and logistics required and agreeing team roles.

Questions to gain an understanding of why a negotiation failed

Did we collect and make effective use of all information available when preparing for the negotiation?

Did we set objectives for the negotiation that were stretching and achievable and established MIL objectives?

Did we determine a strategy for the negotiation?

Did the other party understand our needs correctly?

Were we aware of the underlying interests of the other party?

Were our proposals convincing enough for acceptance by the other party?

Did we explore different variables in the negotiation?

Did we fully understand all proposals?

Did we give any unplanned concessions and did we check the importance of these?

Did we focus on common interests?

Did we ask a range of questions?

Did we get answers to all our questions?

Could we answer all the questions addressed to us in a proper and positive way?

Did we summarise effectively?

Did we use different methods of persuasion in the negotiations?

Which tactics did we use and what effect did they have?

Did our negotiating team work well as a team?

Did we help to create a co-operative atmosphere

The question asks about negotiation techniques which are not present in the book. In this question, there are only 3 recognised techniques:

- Framing and reframing: A frame is an assumption, or set of assumptions, that guides our attention and behavior. Reframing is the ability to identify and significantly change assumptions or perspectives. Framing has a significant impact on the effectiveness of negotiation outcomes and negotiator working relationships. You can read more on framing and reframing here.

- Anchoring: Anchoring bias is well-known cognitive bias in negotiation and in other contexts. The anchoring bias describes the common tendency to give too much weight to the first number put forth in a discussion and then inadequately adjust from that starting point, or the “anchor.” We even fixate on anchors when we know they are irrelevant to the discussion at hand. You can read more on anchoring here.

- Pacing and leading: Pacing and leading is a two-step lever of persuasion. First – You “match your pace” to the person you want to influence in as many ways as possible. You can do this by mimicking the way the person talks, stands, their appearance, etc. You can also mimic less tangible aspects like the way they act, or their emotional state. Second – Once you’ve set your pace with someone, lead them to whatever decision or behavior you want them to take! You can read more on pacing and leading here.

In most commercial negotiations with monopolistic organisations, one can expect that in general they will have far greater bargaining power - you will need them more than they need you. There BATNA is stronger in the short run, but over time their power can be challenged effectively.

Ways of dealing with monopoly suppliers include the following:

Making yourself an attractive buyer

Seeking out alternatives / substitutes in a private or public manner

Designing out the requirement that forces you to go to the monopoly suppliers, or seek to make the product, or threaten to make it yourself if feasible

Lobbying government or campaigning, as part of an industry or trade body, for a reduction in barriers to entry that support the monopoly

External factors in pricing decisions include Competition in the market (A) and Customer perception of value (D). These factors are outside the supplier's direct control but influence pricing strategies to remain competitive and meet customer expectations:

Competition in the market (A): Market competition dictates how much a supplier can charge without losing business to competitors.

Customer perception of value (D): How customers perceive the product’s worth affects its acceptable price range.

These factors are considered external as they relate to market dynamics rather than internal cost structures, according to CIPS's guidance on pricing influences.

Conflict can arise in procurement negotiations due to a power imbalance, which occurs when one party has more influence than the other, leading to potential exploitation or dissatisfaction. Differences in goals between parties—such as cost minimization for buyers and profit maximization for suppliers—also contribute to tension. Surprisingly, similar motives can lead to conflict as well, particularly when both parties are competing for limited benefits or market share.