Pass the PMI PMI Agile PMI-ACP Questions and answers with CertsForce

Planning Poker is a well-known estimation technique where team members use numbered cards (usually Fibonacci series) to estimate story point values based on relative size. It’s a consensus-based estimation method, as described in the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.2: Estimation Techniques) and Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Estimating Techniques).

Option D is correct: Planning Poker is explicitly designed for estimating stories in terms of points.

Option A (Parametric) is more common in traditional (predictive) planning.

Option B (One-to-one comparison) refers to relative sizing without collaboration.

Option C (Affinity) is another agile technique but typically used for grouping stories into size buckets, not direct story point consensus estimation.

Before the workshop, the team members should read and identify relevant user stories from the product backlog that directly contribute to the goal of developing the feature for receiving and resolving customer complaints. This ensures that the stories being worked on are well-understood and aligned with the release goal.

The team should also consider the possible risks associated with each selected user story, such as technical challenges or dependencies. Additionally, they should evaluate the value each story adds to the final user (customer), ensuring that the team focuses on delivering maximum value in the release.

In an agile environment, even a chaotic one, a release plan should focus on providing a high-level view of the product ' s objectives, the key features to be developed, and the iteration timelines. Including dependencies and specifying the responsible teams for each component ensures that expectations are set clearly for stakeholders while also providing the flexibility needed to adapt to changes. By outlining both the objectives and iteration details, the product owner ensures transparency and alignment with stakeholders while maintaining the iterative nature of agile development. This approach allows for informed decision-making without locking the team into overly rigid plans.

The correct answer is B – Retrospective meeting.

The retrospective is a key Agile ceremony dedicated to continuous improvement. It provides a safe space for the team to reflect on what went well, what didn’t, and how to improve. When morale is low or conflicts arise, retrospectives help surface issues and co-create solutions.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Retrospectives are a vital part of continuous improvement. They are used to inspect team processes, relationships, and interactions to find ways to work more effectively.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.7 – Continuous Improvement)

Mike Griffiths emphasizes:

“The retrospective is the heartbeat of improvement. It is where the team reflects, adjusts, and grows. Conflict and low morale are ideal triggers for a meaningful retrospective.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Other options explained:

A (Standup) is for daily coordination, not reflection.

C (Demo) is customer-facing and not a morale tool.

D (Offsite) may help later, but is not a formal Agile method for resolving internal team issues.

Answer: B

Pair programming is a proven agile technique for improving quality, sharing knowledge, and ramping up less experienced developers. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.5: Quality and Engineering Practices) and Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance) recommend using pair programming to improve team cohesion and performance when skill gaps are affecting velocity.

Option A is correct: pair programming supports learning and improves delivery quality.

Option B misuses the retrospective—it’s not for backlog prioritization.

Option C may be helpful, but estimation changes don’t directly address the skill gap.

Option D may reduce risk short-term but doesn’t help the team improve or grow.

Velocity is a tool for internal team improvement and forecasting, not external benchmarking. According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.4: Velocity and Estimation) and Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance), tracking velocity over time helps teams assess the impact of process changes, refine estimates, and validate their continuous improvement efforts.

Option C is correct: it focuses on team-level improvement.

Option A uses velocity inappropriately for performance review, which goes against agile principles.

Option B promotes unhealthy comparisons across teams.

Option D is partially true, but stakeholder communication is secondary to internal use.

The correct answer is A – Send the member to training. Agile encourages cross-functional teams and continuous improvement. When a team member identifies a skill gap that affects delivery, addressing it promptly through training or mentoring increases team capability and autonomy.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams strive for cross-functionality. When skill gaps hinder progress, organizations support learning to reduce dependencies and improve throughput.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 4.3 – Continuous Learning and Team Development)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Empowering team members through skill development enhances flexibility and velocity. Encouraging proactive learning improves team performance.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Incorrect options:

B defers ownership of the solution.

C unnecessarily delays action.

D delays learning due to unnecessary constraints.

Answer: A

────────────────────────────────────

The agile lead is emphasizing the importance of creating a safe environment for disagreement, which encourages constructive conflict. In Agile, this is crucial because it allows team members to openly express differing opinions and perspectives. Such discussions often lead to better decision-making by surfacing various viewpoints and potential solutions. When teams feel safe to disagree, it fosters creativity, innovation, and problem-solving without fear of retribution. This aligns with Agile principles of collaboration, transparency, and continuous improvement.

In Agile, it ' s important to maintain focus on the current sprint ' s goals and scope. Since the sprint deadline is approaching, adding additional features may compromise the team ' s ability to deliver the planned work on time. The best approach is to explain to the client that the new features can be considered for the next sprint, ensuring that the team can finish the current work and deliver value on time. This also allows the team to properly plan for the new features in the next iteration without overloading the current sprint.

The correct answer is C – The users can help the team understand if the feature adds value, avoiding the risk of building the wrong product.

Prototyping in agile serves as a lightweight modeling technique that supports discovery and stakeholder validation. It helps clarify uncertain requirements, encourages collaboration, and ensures that the solution being developed meets user needs and delivers value.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Prototypes allow teams to explore solutions before committing to full development. They support value delivery by engaging users early to verify what is needed.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Exploring and Confirming Requirements)

Also:

“Engaging stakeholders in early solution validation through techniques such as wireframes or mockups reduces the risk of developing the wrong product.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.4 – Delivering Value Frequently)

Mike Griffiths reinforces this approach:

“Prototyping enhances discovery. It supports feedback loops that validate whether a feature adds value before it ' s built—especially useful when requirements are unclear.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Why other options are less correct:

A is a secondary benefit but not the primary goal of prototyping.

B is speculative and does not reflect the sponsor ' s actual recommendation.

D misrepresents the purpose of prototyping, which is for discovery, not accelerated deployment.

Answer: C

══════════════════════════════════════════════════