Pass the PeopleCert MSP MSP-Practitioner Questions and answers with CertsForce

Learning from Experience is not classified as a Governance Theme but rather a Programme Management Principle in MSP.

The MSP Practitioner clarifies: “Learning from experience is Programme management principle,” which means it influences how programmes are managed but does not constitute a governance theme.

Governance Themes focus on structural elements such as Leadership and Stakeholder Engagement, Quality Management, and Organization, which provide the framework and controls for programme delivery.

Understanding this distinction aids in correctly applying MSP components to programme design and governance structures.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The 'Evaluate new information' process involves more than just checking budgets; it requires an assessment of the programme's "soft" elements, such as stakeholder engagement and the effectiveness of communication. The End-of-Tranche Report serves as a summary of the programme's health and readiness to proceed.

Option B is the correct answer. MSP 5th Edition emphasizes that for transformation to be successful, stakeholders must understand and accept the change. The fact that engineering staff view the changes as "minor" suggests a failure in the communication strategy or a lack of understanding of the Vision. By noting this in the end-of-tranche report, the Programme Manager is correctly identifying a weakness in the Knowledge Theme (specifically stakeholder communication) that occurred during Tranche 2. Evaluating the effectiveness of how information was shared and received is a key part of this process. This allows the programme to adjust its Stakeholder Engagement Approach for Tranche 3, ensuring that the engineering staff are properly prepared for the upcoming Training Project. Without this evaluation, the programme would risk low engagement and poor benefit realization in the next tranche. The report is the formal mechanism for capturing these "lessons learned" and turning them into actionable governance decisions for the future.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Assurance Theme in MSP 5th Edition emphasizes that assurance should be risk-based and proportional. While independence is a success factor, the framework also recognizes that "internal" assurance—conducted by individuals with the right skills who are not the direct project managers—is a valid and necessary part of the assurance landscape.

In this scenario, the Programme Office Lead (who is a senior member of the portfolio office) is tasked with the health check. Option A is the correct answer because, within the MSP 5th Edition guidance, the Programme Office is responsible for providing standards, support, and "second-line" assurance. Even if the health check was not in the original Assurance Plan, MSP is designed to be flexible; an SRO has the authority to request ad-hoc assurance if they perceive a risk or need to understand the status of a transformation. The Programme Office Lead possesses the specialized knowledge of MSP processes and organizational standards to identify areas of concern. While an external auditor (third-line) offers more independence, the internal lead provides a cost-effective and immediate source of expertise to meet the SRO's needs. The key is that the person conducting the check must have the requisite skills to evaluate the programme against its defined governance and objectives, which a senior portfolio office member is expected to possess.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

MSP 5th Edition advocates for the use of different delivery life cycles depending on the nature of the work. While some projects are best suited to a "linear" (waterfall) approach, others benefit from incremental or continual improvement (agile) approaches. Continual improvement is particularly effective when the outcome can be delivered in stages, allowing for feedback and refinement at each step.

Option D is the correct answer because the physical rollout of smart meters is a repetitive process that provides numerous opportunities for learning. By "installing new water meters gradually," the programme can apply lessons learned from the first set of installations to the next, improving efficiency, customer communication, and technical reliability as the rollout progresses. This is the essence of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle within the transformational flow.

Option A (legal/contractual) usually requires a discrete, linear completion.

Option B (IT systems) often requires complex integration that might be incremental but is less about "continual improvement" of a repetitive rollout.

Option C is a R&D/product development activity.

Option D represents the best fit for an iterative, learning-based approach where the pace and quality of delivery are refined based on real-world operational feedback.

'Leading change' principle in MSP focuses on driving transformation through the right leadership, engaging stakeholders actively, and fostering innovative solutions. However, getting approval from the sponsoring group is not considered part of this principle but rather a responsibility addressed in programme organization under governance themes. Approval processes are formalized separately from the leadership approach.

Analysis of the options available is not typically included in the Programme Brief but is developed during the preparation of the Business Case.

The MSP Practitioner clarifies: “Analysis of options starts while preparing business case,” meaning the Programme Brief sets out the scope, risks, costs, and key resources but does not contain detailed option appraisal.

This distinction helps ensure the Programme Brief remains a focused and concise document outlining programme intent and governance, while the Business Case undertakes the detailed financial and strategic evaluation required for decision-making.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In MSP 5th Edition, the Decisions Theme requires that all significant choices regarding the programme’s direction be made based on a structured analysis of options. This is particularly crucial during the 'Design the outcomes' process, where the Target Operating Model and technical solutions are defined. The framework dictates that for any major decision, the programme team must provide the decision-makers (usually the SRO or Programme Board) with a range of choices to ensure that the best balance of cost, risk, and benefit is achieved.

Option D is the correct answer because MSP 5th Edition explicitly states that an options analysis should typically include:

A "do-nothing" option: This provides a baseline to understand the impact of not proceeding or not changing the current path.

At least two other viable options: This ensures that the board is not "cornered" into a single recommendation (as seen in the scenario) but can weigh different trade-offs.

By only presenting the imported meter option, the R&D team is not allowing the SRO to evaluate whether internal development (despite being slower) might mitigate the security risks mentioned. Presenting multiple options is a safeguard against "groupthink" and ensures that the final decision is robust, well-justified, and aligned with the organization's risk appetite. Providing only one recommendation violates the transparency and rigor required by the MSP Decisions theme.

Gateway reviews are not part of delivering the capability but are governance checkpoints that occur at specific programme milestones, including the beginning of the programme, key decision points, and closure.

The MSP Practitioner explains: “Gateway reviews happen at beginning of programme, Key decision points of programme and closure of programme.” These reviews are formal assessments to validate readiness, progress, and compliance with governance before major transitions, tranche approvals, or programme closure.

Delivering the capability primarily involves initiating projects, managing their delivery under governance frameworks, and ensuring alignment between project outputs and benefit realization. Governance during delivery includes managing risks, issues, and quality controls to ensure outputs are produced to specification.

Gateway reviews are designed to provide independent assurance and decision points but are external to the ongoing activities of capability delivery. Recognizing this distinction helps maintain clarity of roles and processes within programme management, ensuring focused effort on delivery while maintaining appropriate oversight.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The 'Plan progressive delivery' process is the stage where the programme moves from high-level concepts to tangible, resourced plans. A key requirement of this process is to ensure that the resources (people, assets, and funding) required for the first tranche are not just identified, but actually committed by the business owners.

Option A is the correct answer. According to MSP 5th Edition, a programme should not proceed into a delivery tranche (such as Tranche 1) until there is a firm commitment from the functional managers who "own" the resources. The Call Centre Manager is the person who must balance the needs of the programme against the needs of business-as-usual (BAU). If they do not commit the staff during the planning process, the programme risks failing in its first tranche due to resource shortages. The Sponsoring Group (Option C) provides the high-level mandate and funding, but the actual day-to-day commitment of staff must come from the operational line managers. This commitment is a prerequisite for the SRO to "Agree to proceed." Obtaining this commitment early is a critical success factor for programme management, as it reduces the risk of conflict between the programme and the business once delivery starts.

Good budgeting and resource allocation are typically the responsibilities of the Programme Manager or Project Managers, not senior leadership. Senior leadership focuses on strategic and cultural aspects such as vision creation and empowered decision-making. The MSP Practitioner clarifies, "Good budgeting and resource allocation skills ... is done by programme manager/project managers," distinguishing operational financial management from senior leadership duties.