Pass the PeopleCert MSP MSP-Practitioner Questions and answers with CertsForce

The Quality and Assurance Strategy is a governance document that outlines how quality management and assurance processes will be applied throughout the programme. Governance documents establish controls and frameworks for programme management, ensuring standards and compliance are maintained.

The MSP Practitioner clarifies that strategies—such as Quality Management Strategy—are integral governance documents that help define expectations, responsibilities, and quality assurance mechanisms. While the Blueprint and Project Dossier are boundary and management documents respectively, and the Risk Register is a management tool, governance documents like the Quality and Assurance Strategy provide oversight and control mechanisms essential for programme success.

This strategy ensures that quality is embedded in programme processes and deliverables, aligning with best practices and stakeholder expectations, which is vital for confidence and assurance in transformational change initiatives.

A vision-led programme is one that is undertaken to fulfil political ideas and priorities, such as electoral promises. These programmes are driven by a clear vision for change that aligns with political or societal goals rather than just compliance or operational needs. Public programmes started to fulfil electoral promises fit this definition of vision-led programmes as they reflect a vision for future societal outcomes.

A key attribute for the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) is having access to and credibility with key stakeholders because the SRO plays a pivotal role in stakeholder management and programme accountability. The MSP Practitioner notes, "This attribute is necessary as SRO is also involved in stakeholder management," emphasizing that SRO’s influence and stakeholder credibility are critical to programme success.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Design Theme in MSP 5th Edition is not limited to the technical architecture of the solution; it also encompasses the design of the delivery approach and the path to the future state. According to the MSP 5th Edition guidance, during the 'Design the outcomes' process, the programme must determine the most effective lifecycle for its constituent projects and workstreams. This involves deciding whether a linear, iterative (agile), or hybrid approach is most suitable for the nature of the change.

In this scenario, UU's decision to trial an agile approach is a fundamental design choice. Option D is the correct answer because the Design Theme is responsible for defining how the programme will transition from the current state to the target operating model. By choosing an iterative approach, the programme is "designing" the work to allow for rapid feedback, flexibility, and incremental value delivery. While this decision involves a "choice" (Option B), the MSP framework specifically categorizes the selection of delivery methodologies and lifecycles under the Design Theme because it shapes the entire strategy for how the outcomes will be realized. This alignment ensures that the delivery method matches the complexity and uncertainty of the programme's objectives, which is a key requirement of the Design Theme's focus on creating a viable and effective blueprint for transformation.

Statement

Document

It is assumed that the Utility Oversight regulator will not introduce a policy that caps prices to reduce the overall profitability of the programme

Business case

For each option considered, an estimate of the initial cost of operation was calculated

Programme brief

10-15% increase in gas and electricity customers; assuming that market research analysis is indicative of future performance

Financial plan

Strategic assumptions that underpin the financial viability of the investment belong in the Business Case. High-level options analysis and initial costings are features of the Programme Brief developed during 'Identify the Programme'. Specific growth targets and their financial impact are managed within the Financial Plan

One key output of the 'Identifying the Programme' process is the appointment of the Programme Board and the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO). This formalizes the governance structure needed to provide leadership and oversight for the programme. The MSP Practitioner clearly states: “Programme board is set up by SRO in this process,” highlighting that governance is established early to ensure accountability and decision-making capability is in place before the programme progresses further.

The critical organizational elements in MSP include Corporate strategy, Delivery mechanisms for change, and the Business as usual environment. Delivery mechanisms for change refer to the structures and processes organizations use to implement and manage changes introduced by programmes. These elements are foundational to effective governance and ensure alignment with strategic objectives. Other options like Leading change and Stakeholder engagement are important but classified differently within MSP's framework.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

The Organization Theme in MSP 5th Edition is concerned with defining the governance structure, roles, and responsibilities necessary for the programme to succeed. This includes not just the core programme team (SRO, Programme Manager, BCM), but also how the programme interacts with functional departments and operational managers who will be affected by the change.

In this scenario, the decision to include the Call Centre Manager and the CEngO in future planning meetings is a direct application of the Organization theme. Option A is correct because this action identifies the key individuals needed to provide leadership and operational insight within the programme's governance framework. By including these roles early in the 'Identify the programme' and 'Design the outcomes' phases, the programme manager ensures that the "right people" are involved in shaping the future state. This facilitates better stakeholder engagement and ensures that the design is grounded in operational reality. While their input will certainly affect the "Design" (Option B), the act of defining who is involved in the meetings and clarifying their role in the programme's decision-making structure is an organizational activity. Proper organization ensures that there is clear accountability and that the necessary expertise is embedded within the programme's management team from the outset.

Comprehensive and Detailed 200 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of project-programme-and-portfolio-management of 5th Edition MSP:

In MSP 5th Edition, the Programme Strategy is a high-level document that outlines how the programme will be directed and managed. One of its vital components is the Design Approach. This section defines how the programme will design its future state, which includes the development of the Vision Statement and the Target Operating Model (TOM). The design approach specifies the methods, tools, and consultative processes (such as workshops) that will be used to ensure the design is robust and meets the strategic objectives.

The statement regarding the facilitated workshop for developing and testing the vision statement is a procedural detail of the "design" phase of the programme. Option C is correct because the vision statement is the cornerstone of the programme's design; it describes the "post-transformation" world. Therefore, the methodology for creating it—including who is involved (senior officers) and who approves it (CEO)—belongs in the Design Approach. While this involves stakeholders (Option B) and decisions (Option D), those are broader themes. The specific activity of forming the vision is a design activity. The Design Approach ensures that there is a structured way to move from the initial mandate to a clear, agreed-upon vision that guides all subsequent tranches and projects.

The Sponsoring Group, not the SRO, is accountable for confirming the Programme Mandate. The MSP Practitioner clearly states: "The Sponsoring Group is accountable for confirming the mandate," which means the SRO oversees delivery but does not hold responsibility for initial mandate confirmation. Meanwhile, the Programme Manager has ownership of the Vision Statement and Blueprint, aligning with delivery responsibilities.