Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CDPSE Questions and answers with CertsForce

A data processor that handles personal data for multiple customers has decided to migrate its data warehouse to a third-party provider. The processor is obligated to seek approval from all in-scope data controllers prior to implementation. A data controller is an entity that determines the purposes and means of processing personal data. A data processor is an entity that processes personal data on behalf of a data controller. A third-party provider is an entity that provides services or resources to another entity, such as a cloud service provider or a hosting provider.

According to various privacy laws and regulations, such as the GDPR or the CCPA, a data processor must obtain explicit consent from the data controller before engaging another processor or transferring personal data to a third country or an international organization. The consent must specify the identity of the other processor or the third country or international organization, as well as the safeguards and guarantees for the protection of personal data. The consent must also be documented in a written contract or other legal act that binds the processor to respect the same obligations as the controller.

Seeking approval from all in-scope data controllers can help ensure that the processor complies with its contractual and legal obligations, respects the rights and preferences of the data subjects, and maintains transparency and accountability for its processing activities.

Obtaining assurance that data subject requests will continue to be handled appropriately, implementing comparable industry-standard data encryption in the new data warehouse, or ensuring data retention periods are documented are also good practices for a data processor that migrates its data warehouse to a third-party provider, but they are not obligations prior to implementation. Rather, they are requirements or recommendations during or after implementation.

Obtaining assurance that data subject requests will continue to be handled appropriately is a requirement for a data processor that processes personal data on behalf of a data controller. Data subject requests are requests made by individuals to exercise their rights regarding their personal data, such as access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, or objection. A data processor must assist the data controller in fulfilling these requests within a reasonable time frame and without undue delay.

Implementing comparable industry-standard data encryption in the new data warehouse is a recommendation for a data processor that transfers personal data to another system or location. Data encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm. Data encryption can help protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data by preventing unauthorized access, disclosure, or modification.

Ensuring data retention periods are documented is a requirement for a data processor that stores personal data on behalf of a data controller. Data retention periods are the durations for which personal data are kept before they are deleted or anonymized. Data retention periods must be determined by the purpose and necessity of processing personal data and must comply with legal and regulatory obligations.

The best way to validate that privacy practices align to the published enterprise privacy management program is to conduct an audit. An audit is an independent and objective examination of evidence to provide assurance that privacy practices are effective and compliant with the enterprise privacy management program. An audit can also identify any gaps or weaknesses in the privacy practices and provide recommendations for improvement. An audit can be conducted internally or externally, depending on the scope, objectives, and standards of the audit. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 83

The strategic goals of the organization should be established first before a privacy office starts to develop a data protection and privacy awareness campaign, because they provide the direction, purpose, and scope of the campaign. The strategic goals of the organization reflect its vision, mission, values, and objectives, as well as its alignment with the relevant privacy laws and regulations, stakeholder expectations, and industry best practices. The privacy office should design and implement the awareness campaign in a way that supports and promotes the strategic goals of the organization, as well as measures and evaluates its effectiveness and impact.

The primary purpose of a privacy audit framework is to confirm and demonstrate effectiveness of the privacy program in achieving objectives and regulatory compliance. Historical breaches (B) and benchmarking (D) are by-products; maximizing staff effort (C) is about audit efficiency, not program assurance.

“Privacy audits validate the effectiveness and compliance of the privacy program.”

Reviewing proposed privacy rules that govern the processing of personal data is the most useful action to help define the scope of the project because it helps identify the legal and regulatory requirements, the data protection principles and the privacy objectives that the information security controls need to support. Reviewing recent audit reports, identifying databases that contain personal data or do not have encryption in place are helpful actions to assess the current state of privacy and security, but they do not provide a clear direction for the project scope.

Performing a full wipe and reimage of the laptops is the best control to prevent the exposure of personal information when redeploying laptops within an organization. This is because a full wipe and reimage ensures that all data, including personal information, is securely erased from the laptops and replaced with a fresh installation of the operating system and applications. This reduces the risk of data leakage, unauthorized access, or data recovery by malicious actors or unauthorized users. The other options are not as effective or sufficient as a full wipe and reimage, as they do not guarantee the complete removal of personal information from the laptops.

Classifying sensitive unstructured data should be done first to address the situation of the proliferation of personal data held as unstructured data, as it helps to identify the types, locations, and owners of the data, and to apply the appropriate privacy controls and measures based on the data classification level. Classifying sensitive unstructured data also facilitates the data discovery, data minimization, data retention, and data disposal processes. References: 2 Domain 3, Task 2; 5 Page 9

Continuous monitoring dashboards provide ongoing, real-time visibility into privacy posture, allowing senior management to track performance trends and risk levels over time. PIAs (B) are project-specific and point-in-time; metadata inventories (A) document assets but are not monitoring tools; vulnerability results (C) are technical and periodic, not enterprise-level posture tracking.

“Dashboards provide ongoing, measurable insights into privacy compliance and posture for executive oversight.”

Privacy threat modeling is a methodology for identifying and mitigating privacy threats in a software architecture. It helps to ensure that privacy is considered in the design and development of software systems, and that privacy risks are minimized or eliminated. Privacy threat modeling typically involves the following steps: defining the scope and context of the system, identifying the data flows and data elements, identifying the privacy threats and their sources, assessing the impact and likelihood of the threats, and applying appropriate countermeasures to mitigate the threats. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 97