Unauthorized code changesand lack ofindependent verificationare directly mitigated bycode signing, which ensures that code is from a trusted source and has not been altered.
While digital signatures are part of code signing, the broader practice of code signing encompasses signature management, version integrity, and trusted sources.
Lightweight cryptography is irrelevant in this context; it's more about efficiency in constrained devices.
Non-repudiation is a benefit of digital signatures but doesn't directly solve the verification/integrity concerns alone.
FromCAS-005 Guide, Domain 4: Security Architecture, Tools, and Technologies:
“Code signing ensures that the code has not been tampered with and originates from a trusted developer.”
[Reference:CAS-005 Official Study Guide, Chapter 10: Secure Development Operations, pg. 201–204, , , , , , , ]
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit