Pass the CIPS CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M4 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Explanation

The CIPS Code of Conduct says to adhere to all laws of countries in which I practice. So if you're in the UK and procure stuff from China, you need to abide by both UK and Chinese laws, not just UK laws.

There's no international procurement laws- these are all different for different countries.

ILO doesn't publish laws.

Single sourcing can be appropriate when set-up costs are high, making it impractical to involve multiple suppliers. This aligns with responsible sourcing principles, particularly for high-value or specialised items, where relationship management and collaboration with one supplier can enhance quality and efficiency.

Accepting an invitation under such circumstances would violate ethical standards, as it could create a conflict of interest. Ethical sourcing and procurement practices require impartiality, and any perceived favoritism or bias can harm the organisation's integrity.

Explanation

The correct answer is 'yes- the public sector should advertise as a call for competition'. They do this in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). Public Sector has to be transparent abouteverything and treat all suppliers equally. So they can't just approach the ones they like.

In the study guide it says OIEU and this is a typo. It's OJEU.

What is The OJEU in 2 minutes or less (trackerintelligence.com)

The gross profit margin ratio is calculated by subtracting the cost of goods sold (COGS) from income from sales, then dividing by income from sales. This ratio indicates the profitability of a supplier, a critical factor in assessing financial health, which helps buyers ensure reliable supply continuity.

Explanation

Robert should look at the supplier's ESG policy. This stands for Environmental Social Governance. So covers both his requirements for community (social) and environmental factors.

ISO 9001 is about Quality Management and ISO27000 about Information Security so these are in-correct answers. An Anti-Slavery Policy would not discuss the environment.

Including ESG criteria in tender analysis helps ensure suppliers align with the buyer’s sustainability initiatives (1) and helps identify risks within the supply chain (4), such as unethical labour practices or environmental harm. Improving workflow (2) and spend monitoring (3) are operational concerns but not ESG drivers. Responsible sourcing requires procurement professionals to integrate ESG into decision-making, ensuring not only cost-efficiency but also ethical compliance, resilience, and long-term value. This reflects the growing importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and stakeholder expectations.

Explanation

The correct answers are; lead times, product competition and changes in the marketplace.

You wouldn't expect to receive samples or costings from a Request for Information - rather, these should be expected as part of the Tender Competition

Outsourcing critical functions like cybersecurity can lead to a loss of in-house expertise, which is a strategic cost. This loss may impact the organization's ability to respond swiftly to security threats, innovate, and maintain control over sensitive operations. Retaining core competencies is vital for sustaining competitive advantage and ensuring long-term resilience.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"Outsourcing core activities risks – loss of in-house skill, loss of key staff to competitors, risk that supplier cannot be found, loss of control over operating activities, risk of loss of control over confidential information/IP.

Clearly defined timescales are essential to ensurefairness and consistencyin the tendering process. They help buyers plan appropriatelead-times for purchase orders (1)and ensure thatall bidders are treated equally (3)by being given the same deadlines. Timescales are not intended to rank bidders by speed, nor do they ensure correct bid formatting. Ethical and responsible sourcing places strong emphasis on transparency and equal treatment, particularly in competitive tendering, ensuring no supplier gains an unfair advantage due to ambiguous or inconsistent deadlines.