Pass the CIPS CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M4 Questions and answers with CertsForce

The Pareto principle, or the 80/20 rule, is a tool used in procurement to identify that approximately 80% of an organisation's spend is typically with 20% of its suppliers. Applying this principle helps in:

Identifying Strategic Suppliers:Recognising which suppliers account for the majority of spend allows organisations to focus on managing and nurturing these key relationships.

Optimising Supplier Relationships:Understanding spend distribution can highlight opportunities to renegotiate terms, consolidate suppliers, or adjust sourcing strategies for better efficiency and cost savings.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"The Pareto Principle is used to identify that 80% of spend is typically with 20% of suppliers, enabling procurement to focus on strategic supplier management and optimise commercial relationships."

In an open tender process, any supplier can submit a bid, and there is no pre-qualification stage. This approach is suitable when the requirements are well-defined, and there is a sufficient number of suppliers in the market to ensure competition. However, if too many suppliers respond, it can lead to an overwhelming number of bids to evaluate. Therefore, it's essential to consider the number of potential suppliers in the market before opting for an open tender.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"Open procedure – used for well-specified requirements and there is no pre-qualification of bidders. Many suppliers could submit a bid, which could result in lots of bids to assess, so the open procedure is normally only used where the number of potential bidders is expected to be relatively low."

Implementing full anti-bribery training, policies, and procedures demonstrates a proactive stance against bribery and corruption. Ethical sourcing principles encourage organisations to institutionalise comprehensive anti-bribery measures to ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance within the supply chain, reducing the risk of corrupt practices.

Explanation

Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) is the Public Sector's go to evaluation criteria.

NOTE that this is changing from October 2023. Public Sector Procurement is currently based on legislation called PCR 2015 which itself is based on EU Procurement Directives. Now the UK has officially Brexited, we're making our own laws and the new Procurement Bill will be coming into effect in November 2024. One of the major changes is that MEAT is changing to MAT (most ad-vantageous tender - without the economical bit).

If you're sitting this exam until July 2024- you're fine- learn what the study guide says. If you're taking the exam from November 2024 I'm not sure what students are expected to do. The entire section on public sector procurement is incorrect for you. My best guess is CIPS may removequestions this section as the study guide will be wrong, but I really don't know how they plan to handle this.

The new Procurement Bill - MEAT to MAT - Hempsons - Hempsons

Explanation

When single sourcing, you should aim to have a collaborative relationship with the supplier. They're the only ones who provide you with glass, which is a vital part of windows. So you need to make sure you have a good relationship with them and work with them to overcome any issues such as supply chain disruptions. If not- you've got no windows to sell!

Advertising tenders is crucial for achieving value for money by encouraging competitive bids, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings. It also provides insights into the market by revealing the capabilities and innovations of various suppliers, aiding in informed decision-making.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"Inviting suppliers to take part in a competitive tender may reduce the potential for the biased selection of a supplier. Time, money and resource could be saved..."

Explanation

ABC should do a 'root cause analysis' to find out where the issue has come about, and why. From there, once they know what the breach is and how serious it is, they can suggest corrective action.

They can't jump straight to terminating the contract or seeking damages as it's not the supplier itself but rather the subcontractor. Also that would be really hasty considering we don't know what the issue is and what the market conditions are like. That supplier may be the only one who can provide the product. We also don't know if the supplier knows about the issue themselves.

Explanation

Coercion is not a type of fraud. The other three are.

Competitive bidding is most appropriate when there is asufficient number of capable suppliersto create genuine competition and whenadequate timeis available to conduct the process fairly and transparently. These conditions allow suppliers to prepare robust bids and enable buyers to evaluate proposals properly. Competitive bidding is less suitable where specifications are unstable or urgent decisions are required. Ethical and responsible sourcing emphasises proportionality and fairness, ensuring competition is used where it adds value and does not compromise delivery, governance, or stakeholder needs.

Strategic sourcing focuses onlong-term value creation, alignment with organisational objectives, and cross-functional stakeholder involvement. Reviewing product design modifications with stakeholders directly influences cost, sustainability, quality, and supply risk over the product lifecycle. Similarly, evaluating quotations for major systems such as accounting software represents a high-value, long-term sourcing decision with strategic impact. In contrast, sourcing office chairs and routine stationery purchases are low-value, repetitive activities and are therefore classified as tactical sourcing. Ethical and responsible sourcing requires procurement professionals to prioritise strategic activities that affect long-term performance, risk management, and sustainability outcomes.