Pass the Salesforce Salesforce MuleSoft MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Questions and answers with CertsForce

To securely handle sensitive properties in a Mule application deployed through a CI/CD pipeline, the properties should be encrypted and stored as global configuration properties. This ensures that sensitive data is not visible in cleartext in Runtime Manager or any other configuration files. The steps are:

Encrypt Sensitive Properties: Use a tool or process to encrypt sensitive property values.

Global Configuration Properties: Store these encrypted values as global configuration properties within the Mule application.

Configuration in Runtime Manager: Ensure that these properties are referenced correctly so that administrators with proper permissions can manage them in Runtime Manager without exposing the sensitive values.

This approach aligns with security best practices and complies with the requirement to hide sensitive properties while allowing administrative control.

References

MuleSoft Documentation on Secure Property Placeholder

Best Practices for Handling Sensitive Data in MuleSoft

Explanation

Context of the question is about managing and governing mule applications deployed on Anypoint platform.

Anypoint API Manager (API Manager) is a component of Anypoint Platform that enables you to manage, govern, and secure APIs. It leverages the runtime capabilities of API Gateway and Anypoint Service Mesh, both of which enforce policies, collect and track analytics data, manage proxies, provide encryption and authentication, and manage applications.

Mule Ref Doc : https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/getting-started-proxy

Explanation

Correct answer is Federated Identity Management As the Anypoint Platform organization administrator, you can configure identity management in Anypoint Platform to set up users for single sign-on (SSO). Configure identity management using one of the following single sign-on standards: OpenID Connect: End user identity verification by an authorization server including SSO SAML 2.0: Web-based authorization including cross-domain SSO Where as Client Management is where Anypoint Platform acts as a client provider by default, but you can also configure external client providers to authorize client applications. As an API owner, you can apply an OAuth 2.0 policy to authorize client applications that try to access your API. You need an OAuth 2.0 provider to use an OAuth 2.0 policy

Explanation

3xx HTTP status codes indicate a redirection that the user agent (a web browser or a crawler) needs to take further action when trying to access a particular resource.

To enable package-specific debugging for the org.apache.cxf package, you need to update the logging configuration in the Mule application's log4j2.xml file. The steps are as follows:

Open the log4j2.xml file in your Mule application.

Add an AsyncLogger element with the name property set to org.apache.cxf and the level set to DEBUG. This configuration specifies that only the logs from the org.apache.cxf package should be logged at the DEBUG level.

Save the changes to the log4j2.xml file.

Redeploy the updated Mule application to the CloudHub production environment to apply the new logging configuration.

This approach ensures that only the specified package's logging level is changed to DEBUG, minimizing the potential performance impact on the application.

References

MuleSoft Documentation on Configuring Logging

Log4j2 Configuration Guide

Explanation

Correct answer is Application A accesses the persistent object store via the Object Store REST API Application B uses the Object Store connector to access a persistent object * Object Store v2 lets CloudHub applications store data and states across batch processes, Mule components and applications, from within an application or by using the Object Store REST API. * On-premise Mule applications cannot use Object Store v2. * You can select Object Store v2 as the implementation for Mule 3 and Mule 4 in CloudHub by checking the Object Store V2 checkbox in Runtime Manager at deployment time. * CloudHub Mule applications can use Object Store connector to write to the object store * The only way on-premises Mule applications can access Object Store v2 is via the Object Store REST API. * You can configure a Mule app to use the Object Store REST API to store and retrieve values from an object store in another Mule app.

To meet the requirements of enriching logging with more context and improving throughput while reducing latency, the customer should use an asynchronous logging approach. Here's why option B is correct:

Async Logger: Asynchronous logging helps in improving the performance by decoupling the logging from the main thread of execution. This reduces the latency of message processing since logging operations are offloaded to a separate thread.

Logging Level Greater than INFO: Logging at levels such as WARN, ERROR, or FATAL ensures that only essential logs are written asynchronously, further enhancing performance. Avoiding DEBUG or TRACE levels unless necessary reduces the overhead of logging.

Pattern Layout with [%MDC]: Using the pattern layout with [%MDC] in the log4j2.xml configuration file allows the inclusion of mapped diagnostic context in the logs. MDC is a feature that provides context-specific information, such as transaction IDs or user IDs, which helps in tracing and debugging.

Example configuration in log4j2.xml:

This configuration ensures that the logs are enriched with context information provided by MDC and processed asynchronously to maintain high throughput and low latency.

References

Log4j2 Asynchronous Logging

Mapped Diagnostic Context (MDC) in Log4j2

MuleSoft customers often favor a MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform runtime plane over a customer-hosted runtime for the following reasons:

Reduced time-to-market for the first application (C): Using a MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane accelerates the deployment process because MuleSoft manages the infrastructure, allowing customers to focus on developing and deploying their applications quickly. This leads to faster time-to-market for the initial application and subsequent updates.

Reduced IT operations effort (E): By leveraging a MuleSoft-hosted environment, customers offload the operational responsibilities, such as infrastructure maintenance, updates, and scalability management, to MuleSoft. This reduces the IT operations workload and allows internal teams to focus on more strategic initiatives.

In contrast, other options like reduced application latency and increased application throughput are not directly influenced by whether the runtime plane is MuleSoft-hosted or customer-hosted.

References

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Documentation

MuleSoft Hosted vs. Customer Hosted Deployment Guides

Explanation

Key to this question lies in the fact that Process API are not meant to be accessed directly by clients. Lets analyze options one by one. Client ID enforcement : This is applied at process API level generally to ensure that identity of API clients is always known and available for API-based analytics Rate Limiting : This policy is applied on Process Level API to secure API's against degradation of service that can happen in case load received is more than it can handle Custom circuit breaker : This is also quite useful feature on process level API's as it saves the API client the wasted time and effort of invoking a failing API. JSON threat protection : This policy is not required at Process API and rather implemented as Experience API's. This policy is used to safeguard application from malicious attacks by injecting malicious code in JSON object. As ideally Process API's are never called from external world , this policy is never used on Process API's Hence correct answer is JSON threat protection MuleSoft Documentation Reference : https://docs.mulesoft.com/api-manager/2.x/policy-mule3-json-threat

Explanation

We need to note few things about the scenario which will help us in reaching the correct solution.

Point 1 : The APIs are all publicly available and are associated with several mobile applications and web applications. This means Apply an IP blacklist policy is not viable option. as blacklisting IPs is limited to partial web traffic. It can't be useful for traffic from mobile application

Point 2 : The organization does NOT want to use any authentication or compliance policies for these APIs. This means we can not apply HTTPS mutual authentication scheme.

Header injection or removal will not help the purpose.

By its nature, JSON is vulnerable to JavaScript injection. When you parse the JSON object, the malicious code inflicts its damages. An inordinate increase in the size and depth of the JSON payload can indicate injection. Applying the JSON threat protection policy can limit the size of your JSON payload and thwart recursive additions to the JSON hierarchy.

Hence correct answer is Apply a JSON threat protection policy to all APIs to detect potential threat vectors