What are two reasons why a typical MuleSoft customer favors a MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform runtime plane over a customer-hosted runtime for its Mule application deployments? (Choose two.)
MuleSoft customers often favor a MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform runtime plane over a customer-hosted runtime for the following reasons:
Reduced time-to-market for the first application (C): Using a MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane accelerates the deployment process because MuleSoft manages the infrastructure, allowing customers to focus on developing and deploying their applications quickly. This leads to faster time-to-market for the initial application and subsequent updates.
Reduced IT operations effort (E): By leveraging a MuleSoft-hosted environment, customers offload the operational responsibilities, such as infrastructure maintenance, updates, and scalability management, to MuleSoft. This reduces the IT operations workload and allows internal teams to focus on more strategic initiatives.
In contrast, other options like reduced application latency and increased application throughput are not directly influenced by whether the runtime plane is MuleSoft-hosted or customer-hosted.
References
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Documentation
MuleSoft Hosted vs. Customer Hosted Deployment Guides
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit