Pass the PRMIA PRM Certification 8008 Questions and answers with CertsForce

The economic capital required to avoid insolvency is just the asset VaR, ie $100. This means that if the worst case losses are realized, the institution would need to have a buffer equivalent to those losses which in this case will be $100, and this buffer is the economic capital.

The actual value of liabilities is not relevant as they are considered 'riskless' from the institution's point of view, ie they will be taken at full value. In this particular case, the institution has $200 in capital which is more than the economic capital required.

Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

Generally, stress tests consider a shock or a severe scenario in order to determine the 'what-if' that circumstance were to materialize. They focus on the outcome based upon a set of shocks. In a reverse stress test, the outcome is assumed to be known (generally something as severe as bankruptcy, non-compliance with capital requirements etc), and the test is intended to work out what shocks or events would lead to such an outcome.

Reverse stress tests therefore start from a known stress test outcome (such as breaching regulatory captial ratios, illiquidity or insolvency) and then asking what events could lead to such an outcome for the bank. This can be quite a challenging task. Principle 9 laid out in the BCBS document on stress testing (May 2009) (which is part of the PRM syllabus effective March 1, 2010) lays down the expectations relating to reverse stress tests.

Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer. All the other choices are nonsensical.

Statement I is true as expected losses are the 'cost of doing business' and charged against the P&L of the unit holding the exposure. When evaluating the business unit, expected losses are taken into account. Unexpected losses however require risk capital reserves to be maintained against them.

Statement II is not true. Credit portfolio loss distributions are not symmetrical, in fact they are highly skewed and have heavy tails.

Statement III is true. The notional, or the face value of a defaulted debt is the basis for a claim in bankruptcy court, and not the market value.

Statement IV is false. In the case of over the counter instruments, the replacement value of the contract represents the amount of the claim, and not the notional amount (which can be very high!).

Economic capital is often calculated with a view to maintaining the credit ratings for a firm. It is the capital available to absorb unexpected losses, and credit ratings are also based upon a certain probability of default. Economic capital is often calculated at a level equal to the confidence required for the desired credit rating. For example, if the probability of default for a AA rating is 0.02%, and the firm desires to hold an AA rating, then economic capital maintained at a confidence level of 99.98% would allow for such a rating. In this case, economic capital set at a 99.8% level can be thought of as the level of losses that would not be exceeded with a 99.8% probability, and would help get the firm its desired credit rating.

Choice 'c' is the correct answer. Economic capital does not target minimizing the cost of capital, nor is it a provision for losses arising from market risk. The concept of economic capital is unrelated to where an institution or firm is based, therefore Choice 'a' is incorrect as well.

The immediate impact of the default would be to improve the liquidity available in the short term due to the pay out from the CDSs.

It is also important to consider the impact on liquidity from the occurence of a default even in situations where CDS protection may not have been purchased. In such cases, there may be a nearer term payout in the form of the recovery rate. Of course, recovery payments are generally not realized for longer periods of time as court cases linger on, but there is a good likelihood that a payment, albeit lower in total, is likely to be realized sooner than the maturity of the bond in cases where the bond is a longer term bond. At the same time, any interest payments, and the final principal payment, which may have been included in liquidity projections, will not occur.

Where a historical shock factor does not exist for a security, for example because the security is new or was only thinly traded earlier, or because a particular emerging market was immature at the time of the historical scenario being considered, it is inappropriate to leave the position unshocked. By and large, the general rule to be followed when carrying out stress testing is to leave no position unshocked. Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

Choice 'd', Choice 'a' and Choice 'c' all represent valid approaches to estimating a shock factor in such cases.

EDFs are derived from the distance to default. The distance to default is the number of standard deviations that expected asset values are away from the default point, which itself is defined as short term debt plus half of the long term debt. Therefore debt levels affect the EDF. Similarly, asset values are estimated using equity prices. Therefore market capitalization affects EDF calculations. Asset volatilities are the standard deviation that form a place in the denominator in the distance to default calculations. Therefore asset volatility affects EDF too. The risk free rate is not directly factored in any of these calculations (except of course, one could argue that the level of interest rates may impact equity values or the discounted values of future cash flows, but that is a second order effect). Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

If the marginal probability of default of two securities A and B is P(A) and P(B), then the probability of both of them defaulting together is affected by the default correlation between them. Marginal probability of default means the probability of default of each security on a standalone basis, ie, the probability of default of one security without considering the other security.

The relationship that expresses the probability of joint default of the two is given by the following expression:

It is easy to see that in a situation where the Default Correlation of A & B = 0, ie, the defaults are independent, the combined probability of default is P(A)*P(B), exactly what we would intuitively expect. Also in the other extreme case where the default correlation is equal to 1 and P(A) = P(B) = p, ie the securities behave in an identical way, the expression resolves to just p, which is what we would expect.

From the above relationship, it is clear that the probability of joint default of A and B is the greatest when default correlation between the two is equal to 1, ie the securities behave in an identical way. Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

The stresses on liquidity that happened as part of the credit crisis beginning 2007-08 led to drying up of trading and liquidity crisis in the corporate bond markets, the auction rate securities markets, the wholesale (interbank lending) markets, the money markets, the markets for structured products, and even the otherwise liquid futures and forwards markets (as there was no liquidity available to fund the financing of futures). The one market that was not affected was the market for treasuries, in fact the flight to quality ensured that this market was very liquid (even though stressed from a pricing perspective as yields plummetted).

Therefore Choice 'a' is the correct answer.

Refer to the detailed loss event type classification under Basel II (see Annex 9 of the accord). You should know the exact names of all loss event types, and examples of each.