Pass the PMI PMI Professional in Business Analysis PMI-PBA Questions and answers with CertsForce

The business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project or program. It describes the business problem or opportunity, the benefits and costs of the proposed solution, and the risks and assumptions involved. The business case also includes the intangible costs and benefits associated with the change, such as the disruption and short-term loss of productivity that the client anticipates. The business analyst can use the business case to communicate the value proposition of the project or program to the stakeholders and decision makers. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 4.

Interface analysis is a technique that involves identifying and describing how a system or product interacts with other systems, products, or users. Interface analysis can help the business analyst to analyze the complex, in-house processes that are being converted into the new system by defining the inputs, outputs, functions, features, behaviors, and performance of each interface. Interface analysis can also help to ensure compatibility, interoperability, usability, and security of each interface. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

The requirements sign-off is a process that involves obtaining the formal approval and acceptance of the requirements from the customer and other stakeholders. The requirements sign-off confirms that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the customer’s needs and expectations. The requirements sign-off also establishes a baseline for the development and testing of the solution, and serves as a reference point for managing changes and resolving issues. The business analyst should first facilitate the requirements sign-off with the customer before the developers start development, to ensure that the requirements are agreed upon and validated by all parties, and to avoid rework, delays, and conflicts later in the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 The project life cycle is a key factor that drives the selection of business analyst activities to be included in the project. The project life cycle is the sequence of phases or stages that the project goes through from initiation to closure. The project life cycle can be selected based on various factors, such as the nature, complexity, size, and uncertainty of the project, the stakeholder preferences, the organizational culture, and the industry standards. The project life cycle can influence the approach that the business analyst and the project team use to plan, execute, monitor, and control the project, and to deliver the product or service. The project life cycle can also affect the type, level, and timing of the business analysis activities, such as elicitation, analysis, documentation, validation, and management of the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 84.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a critical design review is a formal review that occurs after the completion of the design phase of a project. The purpose of a critical design review is to verify that the design specification meets the requirements and that the solution is feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to the customer. A critical design review can help to establish an approved requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

A business rule is a statement that defines or constrains some aspect of the business and always resolves to either true or false. Business rules are intended to assert business structure or to control or influence the behavior of the business. Business rules describe the operations, definitions and constraints that apply to an organization. Business rules can apply to people, processes, corporate behavior and computing systems in an organization, and are put in place to help the organization achieve its goals. By documenting a business rule, the business analyst can ensure that the business need can be validated against the criteria that govern the business operations and outcomes. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 19; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

An interview is a technique that involves a structured or unstructured conversation between the business analyst and one or more stakeholders to elicit information, opinions, or feedback about a topic. An interview can be conducted face-to-face, over the phone, or through other communication channels. An interview can be prepared in advance with a list of questions or topics to cover, or it can be spontaneous and flexible. An interview can be used to explore the needs, expectations, preferences, or concerns of the stakeholders, as well as to clarify, verify, or validate the requirements. An interview is suitable for a project involving a low number of stakeholders, as it allows the business analyst to establish rapport, ask probing questions, and obtain detailed and specific information from each stakeholder. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

Business rules are statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business, such as policies, standards, procedures, regulations, or constraints. Business rules can be uncovered by asking about the reasons for choosing a particular course of action when modeling processes or analyzing tasks. By asking why a certain decision is made, what criteria are used, what conditions are applied, or what consequences are expected, the business analyst can elicit the business rules that govern the behavior or outcome of the process or task. Asking about tasks that overlap with each other, work that may be performed out of sequence, or task transitions that hinder organizational performance may help to identify issues or opportunities for improvement in the process or task, but they may not reveal the business rules that underlie them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.