Pass the Microsoft Microsoft Certified: Security Operations Analyst Associate SC-200 Questions and answers with CertsForce

In Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (formerly Microsoft Cloud App Security), the impossible travel and sign-in from risky IP addresses anomaly detection policies automatically analyze user activity patterns and compare sign-in locations to detect suspicious behavior. However, when legitimate corporate IPs are not correctly identified as trusted, these policies may generate excessive false positives.

According to Microsoft’s official documentation on managing IP address ranges:

“To reduce false positive alerts from trusted network locations, define your organization’s known IP address ranges in the Defender for Cloud Apps portal. Tagging these as Corporate ensures that sign-ins originating from these IPs are treated as safe and excluded from anomaly detection alerts.”

To implement this properly:

Add the IP addresses to the Corporate address range category (Option B) — This explicitly identifies these ranges as trusted corporate networks. Once defined, Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) automatically suppresses anomaly alerts (like impossible travel or risky IP alerts) from these known sources.

Override automatic data enrichment (Option A) — Automatic data enrichment uses Microsoft’s threat intelligence and geolocation services to classify IPs. When you override it, the system respects your manual classification (Corporate, VPN, Risky, etc.) rather than reclassifying based on Microsoft’s enrichment data. This ensures that your defined corporate IPs remain categorized correctly, avoiding repeated alerting on known legitimate sign-ins.

The other options are not appropriate:

C. Increase sensitivity level would actually make alerts even more frequent rather than reduce them.

D. Add IPs to “other” category does not stop alerts; only the Corporate category suppresses impossible travel alerts.

E. Activity policy exclusion is not used for anomaly detection tuning; it applies to specific custom activity conditions.

Therefore, the correct configuration to suppress legitimate corporate alerts and follow best practice for false positive reduction is to override automatic data enrichment (A) and add corporate IPs to the Corporate address range category (B).

In Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is used to ensure that users and groups have only the permissions required to perform their specific security or management tasks. Microsoft provides several built-in roles designed specifically for Defender for Cloud operations.

Security Admin:This role provides full management permissions for security policies, recommendations, and alerts within Defender for Cloud. A Security Admin can configure policies, suppress or dismiss alerts, enable or disable Defender plans, and manage settings at the subscription or management group level. According to Microsoft documentation, the Security Admin role “has all permissions of the Security Reader role plus the ability to update security policies and dismiss alerts and recommendations.” Therefore, Group1, which likely needs administrative control to manage and remediate findings, should be assigned Security Admin.

Security Assessment Contributor:This role is more limited and focuses on providing access for security posture assessment without granting the ability to change or modify configurations. The Security Assessment Contributor role allows viewing security recommendations and assessment data but not altering Defender for Cloud configurations or dismissing alerts. This makes it ideal for compliance or audit groups who need read and assess access. Hence, Group2 should be assigned Security Assessment Contributor.

These assignments ensure the right balance between operational control (Group1) and read-only assessment or compliance duties (Group2), aligning with Microsoft’s least-privilege and separation-of-duties best practices.

✅ Final Answer:

Group1 → Security Admin

Group2 → Security Assessment Contributor

When integrating Microsoft Sentinel with an Azure Logic App to automate workflows—such as creating or syncing incidents to an on-premises ITSM system—you must configure the Sentinel connector authentication method. Microsoft’s official guidance emphasizes using Managed Identity wherever possible because it provides automatic credential management, Azure-native security, and requires no secret rotation or manual key storage, which minimizes administrative effort.

A Managed Identity is the recommended authentication method for Logic Apps and other Azure services connecting to Microsoft Sentinel. It eliminates the need for manually creating and maintaining service principals or user accounts. The managed identity is automatically trusted by Azure AD and can be granted the required role directly in the Sentinel workspace’s resource group or subscription. This aligns with the requirement to minimize administrative effort.

Among the Sentinel-specific roles:

Microsoft Sentinel Reader: Read-only access to view incidents and data.

Microsoft Sentinel Responder: Can view and update incidents, run playbooks on incidents, and close incidents—exactly what’s required to raise or synchronize incidents externally.

Microsoft Sentinel Automation Contributor: Used when the Logic App triggers or manages automations, not when it only updates incidents.

Since the playbook needs to raise incidents (perform incident-level actions) but not configure automation at scale, the least privilege role that satisfies the requirement is Microsoft Sentinel Responder.

✅ Final Configuration:

Connector Authentication: A managed identity (low admin overhead)

Assigned Role: Microsoft Sentinel Responder (least privilege sufficient for incident operations)

Microsoft Sentinel Notebooks integrate with Azure Machine Learning and Jupyter Notebooks to provide advanced investigation, data visualization, and threat-hunting capabilities using Python and KQL.

For scenarios with massive IoT data or complex security events (such as from 10,000+ devices), notebooks are ideal because they allow security analysts to:

Create custom visualizations to simplify investigation.

Apply machine learning models for anomaly detection, correlation, and prediction.

Perform deeper analytics than standard dashboards or built-in queries.

Microsoft documentation clearly states:

“Use notebooks in Microsoft Sentinel for advanced hunting, machine learning, and visualization. Notebooks help you extend Sentinel’s analytics with AI-driven threat detection.”

Therefore, the correct recommendation is C. Notebooks.

To determine whether a device is being accessed remotely by an attacker, analysts must inspect active network connections collected from the investigation package.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint investigation packages contain a NetworkConnections.txt file that includes all established, listening, and closed network sessions, including remote IP addresses, ports, and associated processes.

Microsoft’s official Defender for Endpoint documentation states:

“The investigation package includes a list of active network connections at the time of collection, helping analysts identify potential remote access activity or suspicious outbound connections.”

By reviewing the network connections folder/file, you can check for any live sessions to external IPs, RDP, SSH, or other remote-control tools indicating an attacker’s presence.

Data Point 2: When was File1.exe first executed?

✅ Verified Answer = Prefetch files

To find when a file was first executed, you use Prefetch files.

Windows Prefetch is a forensic artifact that records metadata about executables that have been launched, including:

The first and last execution timestamps

The number of times executed

The path and hash of the executable

Microsoft’s forensic analysis guidance for Defender investigation packages specifies:

“Prefetch files provide information on when applications were first and last executed, which assists in establishing file execution timelines during investigations.”

Therefore, to determine when File1.exe was first executed, you should analyze the Prefetch files contained within the investigation package.

✅ Final Verified Answers:

Forensic Data Point

Folder/File to Review

Is an attacker currently accessing Device1 remotely?

Network connections

When was File1.exe first executed?

Prefetch files

Summary:

Network connections → Identify active remote sessions (possible attacker access)

Prefetch files → Determine first execution time of suspicious executable

These answers align with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint investigation package structure and Microsoft 365 E5 SecOps documentation.

To monitor and detect higher-than-normal volumes of password resets, you need to gather password reset event data both from Azure Active Directory (cloud identities) and from on-premises Active Directory (domain accounts). Microsoft’s official Defender XDR and Sentinel integration guidance describes that:

Azure AD Password Protection enforces and monitors password policies in both cloud and hybrid environments. It can detect weak, commonly used, or compromised passwords and logs related password change/reset activities. Deploying Azure AD Password Protection extends password reset visibility to on-premises domain controllers through the Password Protection proxy and DC agent. This makes it the correct choice for implementing monitoring at the identity environment level.

In Microsoft Sentinel, to ingest and analyze password reset activities from on-premises servers (e.g., domain controllers), you must use the Windows Security Events via AMA connector. This connector collects Event ID 4723 (password change), 4724 (password reset), and related security logs directly from Windows Servers into the Sentinel Log Analytics workspace through the Azure Monitor Agent (AMA). Once the events are available in Sentinel, they can be correlated with other identity or behavioral analytics to detect abnormal reset volumes or potential compromise attempts.

The other options are not suitable:

Microsoft Defender for Identity focuses on identity compromise detection, not specifically on password reset volume monitoring.

Smart lockout protects against brute-force sign-in attempts but doesn’t generate detailed reset event telemetry.

Microsoft security rule and UEBA are higher-level analytic configurations, not data ingestion mechanisms.

Therefore, to meet the Sentinel requirements for monitoring password reset anomalies:

✅ Implement in the identity environment: Azure AD Password Protection

✅ Configure in Microsoft Sentinel: The Windows Security Events via AMA connector

Microsoft Sentinel playbooks can be triggered by different types of events—alerts, incidents, or entities. Since the requirement specifies “incidents generated by rulequery1” and asks for automatic processing of those incidents, the correct approach is to use a playbook with an incident trigger.

According to Microsoft Sentinel automation documentation:

“When you want automation to start after an incident is created or updated, use the incident trigger. This allows you to automate workflows such as closing incidents, adding comments, or sending notifications.”

This trigger type works with automation rules that specify when and how to execute playbooks based on incident state or severity. Using a playbook with an incident trigger meets the need for post-incident automation (e.g., auto-closing incidents if they match certain conditions).

✅ Answer for Question 8: A. a playbook with an incident trigger

The Sentinel requirement states:

“Ensure that multiple alerts generated by rulequery1 in response to a single user launching Azure Cloud Shell multiple times are consolidated as a single incident.”

This behavior is controlled by the event grouping setting in the analytics rule configuration.

Microsoft Sentinel documentation explains:

“Event grouping determines how alerts generated from the same rule are grouped into incidents. Selecting ‘Group all alerts triggered by this rule into a single incident’ allows all related alerts to be combined.”

Hence, configuring event grouping ensures that all alerts from rulequery1 related to the same user are consolidated into one incident, satisfying the requirement.

✅ Answer for Question 10: C. event grouping

To monitor Windows Security events from Server1 using the Windows Security Events via AMA connector, the first object you must create is a Data Collection Rule (DCR). With the Azure Monitor Agent (AMA) model used by Microsoft Sentinel, data flow is controlled by DCRs, not by the legacy MMA/OMS workspace settings. A DCR defines what to collect (e.g., the Security event log, specific event IDs or XPath queries), from where (the target machines or machine groups), and where to send it (the Sentinel/Log Analytics workspace). After creating the DCR, you associate it with Server1 (Arc-enabled), and the connector will begin streaming Security events to your Sentinel workspace. Creating a Sentinel scheduled rule or an automation rule does not enable collection; those features act after data is already ingested. Event Grid topics are unrelated to Windows event collection. Therefore, the correct first step for meeting the Sentinel requirement to monitor Server1’s Security log via AMA is to create a DCR, then assign it to Server1 and the Sentinel workspace.

In Microsoft Sentinel, Hunting queries are used to proactively search for threats and anomalies across collected security data. The requirement states that HuntingQuery1 must run automatically when the Hunting page of Microsoft Sentinel is accessed. According to Microsoft’s official Sentinel documentation, this behavior is achieved by adding the hunting query to “Favorites.”

When a query is marked as a favorite in the Sentinel Hunting blade, Sentinel automatically runs it every time the Hunting page is opened. This provides updated results without the need for manual execution, ensuring analysts always see the most current data for that query. This configuration also adheres to the organization’s requirement to minimize administrative effort, since it eliminates the need for scheduling, automation, or manual refresh actions.

Other options do not meet this functional requirement:

A. Add to a livestream is used to monitor near-real-time data streams, not to auto-run queries upon accessing the Hunting page.

B. Create a watchlist is used for referencing static external data sets (like IPs, users, or devices) inside KQL queries, not for automating hunting query execution.

C. Create an automation rule applies to incident management workflows, not hunting query execution.

Therefore, as per Microsoft Sentinel’s hunting documentation and best practices, the correct and verified answer is:

D. Add HuntingQuery1 to favorites.