Pass the ISM CPSM LEAD Questions and answers with CertsForce

Given the uncertainty about the sustainability of the new supply chain and the potential strain on current IT resources, the best approach is to consider outsourcing the new supply chain. Outsourcing can provide the necessary expertise and infrastructure without overburdening the company's existing IT resources. Leadership and transformation management documents highlight the strategic use of outsourcing to manage risks and leverage external capabilities. This approach allows the firm to capitalize on the profitable market opportunity while mitigating the risks associated with market instability and IT resource constraints. References also point to the importance of flexibility and adaptability in supply chain management, which can be achieved through strategic partnerships with third-party providers.

In this scenario, the supply manager’s primary mistake was failing to communicate with the user departments to assess the impact of the defective shipment before terminating the purchase order. Leadership and transformation management documents emphasize the importance of stakeholder communication and impact assessment in decision-making processes. The supply manager should have validated the defect and discussed potential solutions with the affected departments to understand the full impact of the issue and to explore possible remediation steps, such as requesting a replacement shipment or working with the supplier to resolve the quality issue. Immediate termination without such consultation could lead to unnecessary disruptions and a lack of alignment with organizational needs. References from leadership literature highlight the importance of cross-functional communication and collaborative problem-solving in supply chain management.

Issue Identification:

Increased sole source purchases due to inexperience of the sourcing team.

Noncompliance with competitive solicitation policies leading to increased costs.

Rectifying the Situation:

Training Staff: Provides the sourcing team with necessary knowledge and skills to understand and follow solicitation policies, reducing the likelihood of noncompliance.

Reporting Noncompliance: Addresses the issue after it occurs but does not prevent future occurrences.

Improving Audit Procedures: Helps identify issues sooner but does not directly address the root cause (lack of training).

Making Sole Source Review a KPI: Encourages monitoring but does not equip the team with the knowledge to comply.

Conclusion: Training staff in solicitation policies and practices addresses the root cause by ensuring the sourcing team is well-informed and capable of complying with competitive solicitation requirements.

References:

Procurement training programs and resources from the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP)

Best practices in procurement and supply chain management from the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The cost of $0.05 each for tamper-evident bottle closures is best described as variable and direct.

Variable Cost:This cost varies with the production volume. As the number of bottles produced increases, the total cost of closures increases proportionally.

Direct Cost:This cost can be directly attributed to the production of each bottle. It is a specific, identifiable expense that is incurred per unit of output.

References:

Horngren, C.T., Datar, S.M., & Rajan, M. (2014). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.

Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.

Audit Recommendation: The audit suggests that the supply management organization could benefit from using electronic signatures, indicating a need to modernize and potentially streamline processes.

First Step – Security Evaluation: Before any implementation, it is crucial to ensure that electronic signatures are secure. This involves evaluating their security features, compliance with legal requirements, and potential vulnerabilities.

Importance of Security: Electronic signatures must meet legal standards and protect the integrity and authenticity of documents to be a viable replacement for handwritten signatures.

References: Security evaluation is a fundamental step in implementing any new technology, as emphasized in IT governance and management frameworks such as COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) guidelines.

Next Steps: Once security is assured, the organization can proceed to assess costs and benefits, research industry practices, and work with IT for implementation.

For a retail chain looking to gain a competitive edge by enhancing visibility and supply performance, E-Systems integration is the most effective solution. E-Systems integration involves the use of advanced technology systems to integrate various functions of the supply chain, such as demand forecasting, inventory management, and transportation. This integration facilitates real-time data sharing, improved coordination, and better decision-making, leading to enhanced efficiency and responsiveness. Leadership and transformation management principles emphasize the role of technology in transforming supply chain operations, highlighting the benefits of integrated e-systems in achieving competitive advantage and operational excellence. References from these documents demonstrate how integrated systems lead to better visibility and performance across the supply chain.

The buyer’s statement can best be described as slander. Here’s a detailed explanation:

Slander Defined:

Verbal Defamation:Slander involves making false and damaging statements about someone verbally. In this case, the buyer's verbal claim about Supplier X’s product quality fits this definition.

Damage to Reputation:The false statement about Supplier X’s product quality was intended to harm the supplier’s reputation, fulfilling the criteria for slander.

Why Not Other Options?

Extortion (A):Extortion involves obtaining something through force or threats, which is not applicable here.

Libel (C):Libel refers to written defamation, whereas the buyer’s statement was verbal.

Disparagement (D):Disparagement involves making false statements about the quality of a product or service. While similar, slander is the more specific term for verbal defamation.

References:

Legal definitions and distinctions between slander and libel (Black’s Law Dictionary).

Principles of ethical communication in supply chain management (Institute for Supply Management, Ethics in Supply Management).

The most likely reason for the deal being put on hold is that executive-level support was not obtained in the beginning stages.

Executive Buy-In:Successful projects, especially those involving significant strategic partnerships or new product development, require buy-in from senior management early in the process to ensure alignment with corporate strategy and priorities.

Strategic Alignment:Lack of executive support can lead to conflicts or misalignment with the organization's broader goals, resulting in delays or cancellations of agreements that do not meet executive expectations.

Decision-Making:Without initial executive-level approval, there is a risk that the terms or strategic importance of the deal may be questioned, leading to the need for further evaluation before proceeding.

References:

Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.

Northouse, P.G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

For a new supply manager with little experience in procure-to-pay (P2P) systems, reviewing third-party research on current P2P solutions is the best course of action. This approach provides an objective overview of available options, features, and industry best practices. Leadership and transformation management documents stress the importance of informed decision-making and leveraging external expertise when evaluating new systems. By consulting third-party research, the supply manager can gain insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different P2P systems, ensuring a well-informed recommendation. References emphasize the value of using independent research to support strategic procurement decisions.

Establishing legal plans to address potential lawsuits due to food poisoning is a mitigation step for operational risk. Operational risk refers to the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events. In the context of a fast food chain, the risk of legal action due to food poisoning is a significant operational risk, as it directly impacts the company's ability to operate safely and maintain its reputation.

References:

Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to Controls. Wiley.

Hopkin, P. (2017). Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating, and Implementing Effective Risk Management. Kogan Page Publishers.