Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CGEIT Questions and answers with CertsForce

The first thing that a new CIO should do to set the strategic direction for IT is to review the existing enterprise strategic objectives. The enterprise strategic objectives are the high-level goals and priorities that guide the organization’s vision, mission, and value creation. The CIO should understand the current state and desired state of the enterprise, as well as the opportunities, challenges, and risks that it faces. The CIO should also assess how IT supports and enables the enterprise strategic objectives, and identify any gaps, issues, or areas for improvement.

The other options are not the first thing that a new CIO should do to set the strategic direction for IT. Developing well-defined business cases that include strategic outcomes is part of the IT investment management process, which involves selecting, prioritizing, approving, and funding IT projects and initiatives that deliver value to the enterprise. Remapping stakeholder analysis and desired expectations is part of the stakeholder engagement process, which involves identifying, communicating, and managing the needs and expectations of the internal and external stakeholders of IT. Redesigning detailed RACI charts of the IT function is part of the IT organizational design process, which involves defining and assigning the roles, responsibilities, authorities, and accountabilities of the IT staff and units.

A maturity assessment evaluates the current state of IT governance processes to identify gaps in capability that need improvement. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition states that the primary purpose of a maturity assessment is to identify capability gaps to guide governance framework enhancements.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT):"The primary purpose of a maturity assessment is to identify gaps in IT governance capabilities, such as processes, skills, or controls, relative to desired maturity levels. This enables the enterprise to prioritize improvements and enhance governance effectiveness." (Approximate reference: Domain 1, Section on Maturity Assessment)

Identifying gaps in capability (option D) focuses on assessing the maturity of governance processes and determining where enhancements are needed to achieve desired outcomes.

Why not the other options?

A. Benchmark IT performance: Benchmarking compares performance, not capability maturity.

B. Identify gaps in performance: Performance gaps are a secondary outcome, while capability gaps are the primary focus.

C. Support impact analysis: Impact analysis is not the primary purpose of maturity assessments.

The best approach to ensure global regulatory compliance when implementing a new business process is to ensure the appropriate involvement of the legal department. The legal department is the function that provides legal advice and guidance to the organization on various matters, such as contracts, transactions, disputes, regulations, and compliance. By involving the legal department in the implementation of a new business process, the organization can ensure that the business process complies with the relevant laws, policies, and standards that apply in different countries and jurisdictions. The legal department can also help to identify and mitigate any legal risks or issues that may arise from the new business process, such as liability, litigation, or sanctions.

The other options are not as effective as ensuring the appropriate involvement of the legal department for ensuring global regulatory compliance when implementing a new business process. Using a balanced scorecard to track the business process is a good practice for measuring and evaluating the performance and value of the business process, but it does not guarantee compliance with global regulations. Reviewing and revising the business architecture is a necessary step for designing and aligning the business process with the business strategy and objectives, but it does not address the legal aspects of the business process. Seeking approval from the change management board is a relevant procedure for implementing a new business process, but it does not ensure that the change management board has the expertise or authority to assess and approve the global regulatory compliance of the business process.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Governance of Enterprise IT domain, emphasizes monitoring IT resource performance to ensure alignment with business expectations. Performance monitoring requires clear, measurable criteria tied to service delivery.

Option D: Service level requirements is the most important to consider. These requirements, often defined in service level agreements (SLAs), specify performance metrics (e.g., uptime, response time) that IT resources must meet to support business operations. Monitoring against these requirements ensures IT delivers expected value. For example, if an SLA requires 99.9% system availability, performance monitoring focuses on this metric. The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s APO09-Managed Service Agreements, which prioritizes service level monitoring.

Option A: Business impact analysis (BIA) assesses disruption impacts, not ongoing performance.

Option B: End-user feedback is valuable but subjective and less precise than service level metrics.

Option C: Centralized log analysis supports security and troubleshooting, not direct performance monitoring.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s APO09 and the CGEIT domain’s focus on service management. Service level requirements are the primary benchmark for IT performance in ISACA’s frameworks.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT (focus on service performance monitoring).

COBIT 2019, APO09-Managed Service Agreements.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of service level requirements), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

Developing an IT strategy to leverage AI requires a clear understanding of business needs and objectives to ensure alignment. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that the first step in strategic IT planning is to identify and document business requirements, as these drive the development of an IT strategy that supports enterprise goals.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 4: Strategic Management):"The development of an IT strategy begins with a thorough understanding of business requirements and objectives. Documenting requirements mapped to business functions ensures that the IT strategy is aligned with enterprise goals and delivers value." (Approximate reference: Domain 4, Section on Strategic Alignment)

Documenting requirements mapped to each business function (option A) ensures that the AI strategy is tailored to specific business needs, such as improving customer experience, optimizing operations, or enhancing decision-making. This step precedes technical or operational considerations, as it establishes the foundation for the strategy.

Why not the other options?

B. Benchmark how other IT organizations are leveraging AI: Benchmarking is useful for gaining insights but is a secondary step that should follow the identification of business requirements. Without clear requirements, benchmarking may lead to irrelevant comparisons.

C. Define the IT infrastructure requirements for AI implementation: Infrastructure requirements are technical details that come after understanding business needs and defining the scope of AI use cases.

D. Define an operational level agreement (OLA) between IT and business functions: OLAs are operational agreements that support implementation, not strategy development. They are premature at this stage.

Monitoring the adoption of a new IT strategy requires measurable indicators that track progress and alignment with strategic objectives. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition highlights that key performance indicators (KPIs) are the primary tool for monitoring strategy implementation, as they measure performance against defined goals.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 4: Strategic Management):"Key performance indicators (KPIs) are essential for monitoring the implementation and adoption of an IT strategy. KPIs provide measurable data on progress toward strategic objectives, enabling the IT steering committee to assess effectiveness and make informed adjustments." (Approximate reference: Domain 4, Section on Strategy Monitoring)

Establishing KPIs (option B) allows the IT steering committee to track the strategy’s success, identify gaps, and ensure alignment with enterprise goals, making it the best approach for monitoring adoption.

Why not the other options?

A. Implement service level agreements (SLAs): SLAs are operational agreements for service delivery, not strategic monitoring tools.

C. Schedule ongoing audit reviews: Audits provide assurance but are periodic and not designed for ongoing strategy monitoring.

D. Establish key risk indicators (KRIs): KRIs focus on risk exposure, not on measuring strategy adoption or performance.

Performing a gap analysisis the first step in understanding whether existing IT capabilities and resources are sufficient to meet the demands of a new enterprise strategy. A gap analysiscompares current capabilities with the strategic requirements, identifying shortfalls in skills, infrastructure, processes, and other resources.

Only after identifying the gaps can appropriate planning (e.g., capacity management, capability strategy, resource management) be effectively initiated.

Upon learning that business units have been independently procuring cloud services, the IT steering committee's best course of action is to define a procurement strategy based on business unit needs. This approach ensures that cloud service procurement aligns with the enterprise's overall IT strategy and governance policies while still addressing the specific requirements of individual business units. It fosters collaboration between IT and business units, ensuring that cloud services are vetted for compliance, security, and interoperability. Requiring cancellation, including business unit leadership in the EA review board, or limiting usage to open-source solutions may address aspects of the issue but do not provide a comprehensive strategy that aligns business needs with IT governance.

Effective IT governance ensures that IT aligns with enterprise objectives, and a key indicator is the active involvement of executive management in IT decision-making. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that executive management’s engagement in IT decisions demonstrates strong governance, as it ensures strategic alignment, accountability, and oversight.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT):"Effective IT governance is best indicated by the active involvement of executive management in important IT decisions and activities. This engagement ensures that IT initiatives are aligned with business objectives, risks are managed appropriately, and value is delivered to the enterprise." (Approximate reference: Domain 1, Section on Governance Roles and Responsibilities)

Executive management’s involvement (option B) reflects a governance structure where IT is integrated into strategic planning, ensuring decisions support business goals and foster accountability at the highest levels.

Why not the other options?

A. Regulatory authorities have given a favorable report on IT controls: While a favorable regulatory report indicates compliance, it is a narrow measure and does not encompass the broader aspects of governance, such as strategic alignment or value delivery.

C. The chief information security officer (CISO) reports to a board member: The CISO’s reporting structure is a specific governance element but not the best indicator of overall IT governance effectiveness, as it focuses only on security.

D. IT management is proactive in reporting IT project status to executive management: Proactive reporting is a good practice but is a subset of governance activities, less critical than executive management’s direct involvement in decision-making.

In an international, multi-division enterprise, a consistent risk management methodology ensures that risks are analyzed uniformly across divisions, enabling comparability and enterprise-wide prioritization. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes the importance of a standardized approach to risk management in complex organizations.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 3: Risk Optimization):"In multi-division or international enterprises, a consistent risk management methodology is critical to ensure that risks are assessed and prioritized uniformly across the organization. This enables aggregation of risks and alignment with enterprise-wide objectives." (Approximate reference: Domain 3, Section on Enterprise Risk Management)

Using a consistent risk management methodology (option D) ensures that all divisions apply the same criteria, processes, and tools, facilitating a cohesive risk profile and effective decision-making.

Why not the other options?

A. Risk management methodologies are aligned with local best practices: Local alignment may lead to inconsistencies across divisions, undermining enterprise-wide risk management.

B. IT senior managers perform the analysis: While senior managers may be involved, the methodology itself is more important than who performs the analysis.

C. Risk scenarios are compartmentalized by division: Compartmentalization may prevent a holistic view of enterprise risks, reducing effectiveness.

 The frequency of IT services risk profile updates is a metric that measures how often the IT organization assesses and updates the risks associated with its services. This metric is useful to ensure that IT services meet business requirements, as it helps to identify and mitigate potential threats and vulnerabilities that could affect the availability, performance, reliability, and security of the services. A high frequency of IT services risk profile updates indicates that the IT organization is proactive and responsive to changing business needs and expectations. A low frequency of IT services risk profile updates suggests that the IT organization is reactive and complacent, and may not be aware of or prepared for emerging risks that could impact the business. References := Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance - ISACA, The 8 IT service management metrics that matter most

Incorporating IT planning into the enterprise strategic planning processensures that IT initiatives are aligned from the beginning with enterprise goals. This proactive alignment allows IT to anticipate future business needs, allocate resources in advance, and reduce reaction time to strategic shifts.

While portfolio management and representation in reviews improve execution and oversight, true proactive value comes fromstrategic integration—ensuring IT is part of the planning conversation rather than reacting post-factum.

This is because SLAs are contractual agreements that specify the expectations, responsibilities, and performance standards for both the service provider and the customer. SLAs can help to define controls that mitigate the risks of outsourcing, such as data security, quality, availability, reliability, compliance, and contingency. SLAs can also help to monitor and measure the performance and value of the outsourced services, as well as to establish mechanisms for reporting, escalation, and resolution of any issues or disputes.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to create a social media governance plan that covers the key elements of a social media policy, compliance management, security and risk mitigation, decision-making and approval workflow, and crisis management. It mentions that SLAs are one of the tools that can help to manage the risks of outsourcing social media activities to third parties.

2: This source discusses the gaps, risks, and opportunities of social media governance in the context of Australian public communication. It suggests that SLAs are one of the best practices for developing and implementing a social media strategy that aligns with the organizational goals and values, as well as the legal and ethical obligations.

3: This source explores the benefits and challenges of outsourcing IT services in the public sector. It emphasizes the importance of SLAs for defining the scope, quality, and cost of the outsourced services, as well as for managing the performance and accountability of the service providers.

4: This source presents a framework for managing IT outsourcing risks based on ISO 31000. It recommends that SLAs should include risk-related clauses that specify the roles and responsibilities of both parties, the risk identification and assessment methods, the risk response and treatment options, and the risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms.

In a small, newly established organization, the foundation of IT governance lies in clearly defining roles and responsibilities to ensure accountability and decision-making clarity. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that assigning roles and responsibilities is a critical first step in governance, especially for organizations with limited resources.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT):"In small or newly established organizations, the primary consideration for IT governance is to assign clear IT roles and responsibilities. This establishes accountability, clarifies decision-making authority, and lays the foundation for effective governance processes." (Approximate reference: Domain 1, Section on Governance Structure)

Assigning IT roles and responsibilities (option D) ensures that the organization has a clear structure for IT decision-making, which is essential before addressing budgets, methodologies, or architectures.

Why not the other options?

A. Assigning a budget for IT governance applications: Budgeting is important but secondary to establishing governance roles, as roles define who manages the budget.

B. Defining IT project management methodology: Methodologies are operational and follow the establishment of governance structures.

C. Approving enterprise architecture (EA) and standards: EA is a subsequent step that requires governance roles to be in place for effective decision-making.

When a regulatory change significantly affects an ongoing project, thefirst step should be to perform an impact analysis and update the business case.This helps the organization understand how the change influences cost, timelines, compliance, and value delivery.

Only after understanding the impact should actions such as seeking reapproval, changing scope, or applying for exemptions be considered. This aligns with the principle of informed decision-making in IT governance.