Pass the IIA CIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Questions and answers with CertsForce

A router and a switch serve different functions in a network.

A router is responsible for connecting multiple networks together and directing data packets between them. It determines the best path for data to travel using IP addresses.

A switch, on the other hand, operates within a single network and connects devices like computers, printers, and servers. It uses MAC addresses to forward data within the local network (LAN).

A. A router operates at layer two, while a switch operates at layer three of the OSI model – Incorrect. A switch operates at Layer 2 (Data Link Layer), while a router operates at Layer 3 (Network Layer).

B. A router transmits data through frames, while a switch sends data through packets – Incorrect. Switches use frames at Layer 2, while routers use packets at Layer 3.

C. A router connects networks, while a switch connects devices within a network (Correct Answer) – This correctly differentiates their functions.

D. A router uses a media access control (MAC) address during the transmission of data, while a switch uses an internet protocol (IP) address – Incorrect. A switch uses MAC addresses, and a router uses IP addresses.

IIA GTAG 17 – Auditing IT Governance discusses network security and the role of routers and switches.

COBIT 2019 – DSS01 (Managed Operations) emphasizes secure and efficient network management.

NIST SP 800-53 – Security Controls for IT Systems includes guidelines on network architecture and device functionality.

Explanation of Each Option:IIA References:

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Data analytics in internal auditing provides quantitative, evidence-based insights, enhancing audit conclusions and decision-making.

Option B (Reduces report preparation time) – While efficiency is a benefit, the main advantage is improved accuracy and factual support.

Option C (Prevents overlooking risks) – While true, data analytics primarily strengthens evidence collection.

Option D (Monitoring controls) – Auditors assess controls, but data analytics enhances findings through data-driven validation.

Thus, Option A is correct, as data analytics strengthens audit conclusions with factual evidence.

Understanding the "Something You Have" Concept:

Access control methods are classified into three main authentication factors:

Something You Know – Passwords, PINs, security questions.

Something You Have – Physical devices like keycards, smart cards, or security tokens.

Something You Are – Biometrics such as fingerprints, retina scans, or voice recognition.

Why a Card-Key Scanner is the Correct Answer:

A card-key scanner verifies access using a physical card, which aligns with the "something you have" authentication factor.

Users must possess the key card to gain entry, making it a classic example of physical token-based security.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. A retina characteristics reader – Incorrect, as retina scans fall under "something you are" (biometrics), not "something you have".

B. A PIN code reader – Incorrect, as PIN codes are "something you know", not a physical possession.

D. A fingerprint scanner – Incorrect, as fingerprints are biometric ("something you are"), not a physical object.

IIA’s Perspective on Physical Security Controls:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance emphasizes the importance of using multi-factor authentication to enhance security.

IIA GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) on Access Control recommends the use of physical security devices like card-key scanners to prevent unauthorized access.

ISO 27001 Information Security Standard identifies "something you have" authentication methods as critical components of access control.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance & IT Security

IIA GTAG – Physical Security & Access Controls

ISO 27001 Information Security Standard – Multi-Factor Authentication

Thus, the correct and verified answer is C. A card-key scanner.

To efficiently protect business data from corruption and errors, the best approach is proactive detection through validation controls. Batch total calculations help verify data integrity before approval, ensuring errors are caught early.

(A) Controls to ensure data is unable to be accessed without authorization.

Incorrect: Access controls prevent unauthorized access, but they do not detect or prevent data corruption/errors.

(B) Controls to calculate batch totals to identify an error before approval. (Correct Answer)

Batch control totals ensure that data entries match expected values before processing, helping detect errors before approval.

IIA GTAG 3 – Continuous Auditing recommends automated validation and reconciliation checks for data integrity.

(C) Controls to encrypt the data so that corruption is likely ineffective.

Incorrect: Encryption protects data confidentiality, but it does not prevent or detect errors or corruption.

(D) Controls to quickly identify malicious intrusion attempts.

Incorrect: Intrusion detection systems focus on cybersecurity, not data corruption or errors.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Recommends controls for error prevention and early detection.

IIA GTAG 3 – Continuous Auditing: Suggests automated validation processes like batch totals to detect errors before approval.

Analysis of Each Option:IIA References Supporting the Answer:Thus, the correct answer is (B) because batch total calculations effectively detect errors before approval, ensuring data integrity.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Job rotation involves periodically moving employees between different tasks, roles, or departments to increase engagement, reduce boredom, and enhance skill development.

Option A (Job specification) – Defines job responsibilities but does not address boredom.

Option B (Job objectives) – Focuses on performance goals rather than task variety.

Option D (Job description) – Simply documents job roles without changing daily tasks.

Thus, job rotation (Option C) is the most effective strategy for overcoming monotony and job-related boredom.

Social engineering is a psychological manipulation technique used by attackers to trick individuals into divulging sensitive information. Instead of exploiting technical vulnerabilities, it targets human weaknesses such as trust, fear, or urgency.

Manipulates Human Behavior – The attacker impersonates a trusted entity (a bank representative) to deceive the employee.

Leads to Unauthorized Information Disclosure – The employee unknowingly provides sensitive financial data.

Results in Fraud – The stolen information is misused, causing financial loss.

A. Shoulder Surfing – This occurs when an attacker physically observes someone entering sensitive data (e.g., watching a person type a password).

B. Pharming – This involves redirecting users to a fraudulent website to steal their credentials, not direct impersonation.

C. Phishing – This is a broad category of social engineering that typically involves emails or fake websites, whereas this scenario describes a direct impersonation attack.

IIA’s GTAG on Cybersecurity – Discusses social engineering as a key risk for organizations.

NIST SP 800-61 (Incident Handling Guide) – Identifies social engineering as a common attack vector.

COBIT 2019 (IT Governance Framework) – Highlights human-related cybersecurity risks.

Why Social Engineering is the Correct Answer?Why Not the Other Options?IIA References:

The executive summary of the final audit report is intended for senior management and the board, who require a high-level overview of critical matters. Therefore, it should focus on significant observations that represent key risks, issues, or deficiencies.

Option A (all observations) makes the summary cluttered. Option B is incomplete since some significant issues may not yet have action plans. Option D would suppress important issues that management disagreed with.

A root cause-based recommendation addresses the underlying problem rather than symptoms. In this case, the real issue is the spider infestation, which attracts the birds, which in turn leads to droppings that require harsh cleaning. By enhancing cleaning and displacement of spiders, the organization eliminates the root cause and prevents recurrence.

Options A, B, and C treat symptoms but do not address the true root cause.

The internal audit procedures manual provides detailed policies, methodologies, and processes to guide the internal audit function. This includes the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP), which ensures engagement performance and overall conformance with the Standards.

Option A (charter) defines authority and purpose but is not part of procedures. Option B (annual plan) is a planning document, not methodology. Option C (engagement results) are outputs, not procedures.

When conducting a cybersecurity risk assessment, an internal auditor must evaluate the most significant threats based on their potential impact on the organization. In the pharmaceutical industry, intellectual property (IP), such as research and development (R&D) data, is one of the most valuable and sensitive assets.

(A) Cybercriminals hacking into the organization's time and expense system to collect employee personal data:While the loss of employee personal data is a serious concern due to privacy and regulatory implications (e.g., GDPR, CCPA), it does not pose as critical a threat as the loss of proprietary pharmaceutical research.

(B) Hackers breaching the organization's network to access research and development reports (Correct Answer):R&D reports contain proprietary drug formulas, clinical trial results, and patent-pending innovations, making them highly valuable to competitors and cybercriminals. A breach could lead to intellectual property theft, financial losses, loss of competitive advantage, and regulatory non-compliance (e.g., FDA, EMA requirements). This is considered the most significant threat because:

It could result in billions of dollars in lost revenue.

Competitors or state-sponsored hackers could exploit stolen research.

It could disrupt drug development and approval processes.

(C) A denial-of-service (DoS) attack that prevents access to the organization's website:While DoS attacks can damage an organization's reputation and disrupt operations, they generally do not cause the same level of financial or strategic harm as the loss of critical R&D data. Most organizations have cybersecurity measures (e.g., load balancers, CDNs) to mitigate DoS risks.

(D) A hacker accessing the financial information of the company:Unauthorized access to financial data can be serious, leading to fraud or reputational damage. However, publicly traded companies already disclose much of their financial data, and financial breaches typically have a lower long-term impact compared to intellectual property theft.

IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 15: Information Security Governance: Recommends that internal auditors prioritize risks that impact strategic assets, such as intellectual property.

IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management: Requires internal auditors to evaluate the organization’s risk management processes, emphasizing risks with significant financial and operational consequences.

IIA Practice Advisory 2110-2: Assessing the Adequacy of Risk Management Processes: Highlights that internal auditors must identify risks that could threaten the organization’s long-term objectives, such as IP theft.

COSO ERM Framework: Encourages prioritization of risks that have high impact on an organization’s value and strategic objectives, such as cyber threats to proprietary research.

Analysis of Each Option:IIA References:Conclusion:Given the pharmaceutical industry's reliance on proprietary R&D, a breach compromising research reports represents the most significant cyber threat. Therefore, option (B) is the correct answer.

When an organization integrates governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) activities into a centralized technology-based resource, enterprise governance must ensure that the system:

Supports strategic decision-making by the board and senior management.

Provides accurate, reliable, and quality information to demonstrate an effective governance framework.

Aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which requires auditors to assess whether the organization’s governance structure supports accountability, transparency, and effective decision-making.

(A) The board should be fully satisfied that there is an effective system of governance in place through accurate, quality information provided. (Correct Answer)

Governance is about ensuring that stakeholders, particularly the board, have confidence in the organization's control environment and decision-making process.

IIA Standard 2110 (Governance) states that internal auditors must evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of governance structures.

A GRC system should ensure transparency, accountability, and quality reporting to enable strategic governance oversight.

(B) Compliance, audit, and risk management can find and seek efficiencies between their functions through integrated information reporting.

While improving efficiency is a benefit of a GRC system, it is a secondary objective, not a primary enterprise governance concern.

(C) Key compliance and risk metrics can be tracked and compared throughout the enterprise, aiding in identifying problem departments.

Tracking risk metrics is useful but does not directly address governance at the board level, making this answer incomplete.

(D) Data analytics can be utilized for trending of the data to ensure that patterns and ongoing monitoring occurs throughout the organization.

Analytics support monitoring, but the core governance concern is ensuring the board’s confidence in the system.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance: Internal auditors must assess whether governance processes are effective.

GTAG 1 – Information Technology Risks and Controls: IT governance must provide quality, reliable information for decision-making.

COSO ERM Framework: Emphasizes governance as a key driver of enterprise risk management.

Analysis of Each Option:IIA References Supporting the Answer:Thus, the correct answer is (A) because effective enterprise governance relies on accurate and high-quality information for strategic decision-making.

Understanding the Project Life Cycle:

The project life cycle consists of initiation, planning, execution, and closure.

Early stages involve planning and defining scope, while later stages focus on execution and completion.

Why Change Costs Increase Over Time:

In early stages, changes are relatively inexpensive as they mainly involve planning adjustments.

As the project progresses, modifications require rework, additional resources, and schedule delays, increasing costs.

Near project completion, changes can be very costly, requiring significant time and effort to correct.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Risk and uncertainty increase over time – Incorrect; risk and uncertainty decrease as the project moves forward and becomes more defined.

B. Costs and staffing levels are high at project close – Incorrect; they are usually highest during execution, not closure.

D. Project life cycle = product life cycle – Incorrect; they are separate concepts. A product may exist long after the project ends.

IIA GTAG 12 – Auditing IT Projects: Discusses project life cycle and cost implications.

IIA Practice Guide on Project Risk Management: Highlights cost escalation risks in later project phases.

PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowledge) Framework: Defines cost increase trends in project management.

Relevant IIA References:✅ Final Answer: Costs related to making changes increase as the project approaches completion (Option C).

The internal rate of return (IRR) is a measure used to evaluate the profitability of an investment. The project is considered acceptable if its IRR is greater than or equal to the required rate of return (RRR), which is the minimum return an organization expects from an investment.

Correct Answer (C - Compare to the Required Rate of Return)

The required rate of return (RRR) represents the minimum acceptable return for the project.

If IRR ≥ RRR, the project is acceptable. If IRR < RRR, the project is rejected.

The IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Capital Investments suggests comparing IRR to the RRR to ensure financial feasibility.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Compare to the annual cost of capital):

The cost of capital (WACC - Weighted Average Cost of Capital) is an important factor, but RRR is the direct benchmark for IRR comparison.

Option B (Compare to the annual interest rate):

Interest rates do not determine project feasibility—they only affect financing costs.

Option D (Compare to the net present value - NPV):

NPV and IRR are related, but they serve different purposes.

IRR is compared against RRR, while NPV measures absolute profitability in dollar terms.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Capital Investments – Discusses IRR, RRR, and investment decision-making.

IIA GTAG 3: Business Case Development – Explains how financial metrics like IRR and RRR are used in decision-making.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, C is the correct answer because IRR should be compared to the required rate of return to determine project acceptability.