Pass the IIA CIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Reliance on external auditors’ work is possible if the CAE has sufficient access to review their programs and workpapers to evaluate the scope, quality, and results. This ensures internal audit can confirm the appropriateness of relying on their work.

Option B is not required—external and internal audit can use different methodologies. Options C and D represent governance involvement but do not substitute for CAE’s independent evaluation of audit work.

When the CAE disagrees with local management’s acceptance of a risk, the next step is to escalate the issue to higher management responsible for the risk—in this case, the bank’s chief security officer. If senior management also accepts the risk and the CAE still considers it unacceptable, the matter should then be reported to the board.

Option A (direct to the board) skips the escalation chain. Option B is ineffective if the security manager has already decided. Option C alone does not address the CAE’s responsibility to escalate unacceptable risks.

Meaningful recommendations are those that address the root cause of the condition by comparing it to the established criteria and propose sustainable, long-term solutions. This ensures that the identified issue will not recur and strengthens the control environment.

Option A relates to symptoms (condition vs. consequence), not root causes. Option B identifies the correct gap (criteria vs. condition) but offers only short-term fixes. Option C incorrectly compares criteria to consequence, which is not a valid basis for audit recommendations.

Thus, Option D is correct.

The Global Internal Audit Standards require unrestricted access to records, personnel, and information. If access is restricted in such a way that audit results are compromised, the CAE cannot claim conformance with the Standards in any report until the issue is resolved.

Options A, B, and C are all in alignment with the Standards and do not affect conformance. Only restriction of access (Option D) requires immediate discontinuation of conformance claims.

When disagreements occur regarding risk management or audit findings, the CAE should first escalate the matter within management levels to attempt resolution. Only if the disagreement remains unresolved after discussion with senior management should the CAE report the matter to the board or audit committee.

Options B and C are premature: the charter does not grant internal audit supremacy over management’s decisions, and documenting disagreement in the audit report should occur only after reasonable attempts at resolution. Option A (escalating immediately to the board) should occur only if discussion with management does not resolve the issue.

The CAE must ensure transparency with stakeholders when there are significant budget or resource limitations that may prevent completion of the audit plan. Communicating the risk of incomplete coverage to senior management and the board allows them to make informed decisions, such as adjusting the budget or revising the plan.

Options A and B are inappropriate because reducing coverage or scope without board approval undermines risk-based planning. Option D is not feasible since resources are limited.

Even when outsourcing the internal audit function, the organization retains responsibility for ensuring the internal audit activity complies with the Standards. This includes maintaining a QAIP to assess effectiveness and quality. The provider executes the function, but the CAE and the organization’s oversight bodies remain accountable for quality.

Options B and C are incorrect since internal and external assessments may be performed by the provider, but ultimate responsibility rests with the organization. Option D (postponement) would violate the Standards.

When executive compensation is tied to financial results, there is a strong incentive to manipulate financial reporting or focus solely on short-term performance at the expense of stakeholders’ interests.

Potential for Unethical Behavior:

Executives may prioritize profit-driven decisions (e.g., cost-cutting, aggressive revenue recognition) over long-term sustainability.

As per IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, incentive structures should align with ethical business practices and stakeholder interests.

Increased Risk of Fraud and Misrepresentation:

The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Fraud Risk Management Guide highlights how executive incentives can lead to financial statement manipulation.

This could result in actions like aggressive revenue recognition, improper expense deferrals, or overstating earnings to boost compensation.

Misalignment with Stakeholder Interests:

Employees, customers, and investors suffer if executive compensation encourages short-term gains over long-term stability.

IIA GTAG 3: Continuous Auditing supports monitoring financial reporting risks to detect such inconsistencies.

A. The organization reports inappropriate estimates and accruals due to poor accounting controls. (Incorrect)

Reason: While poor controls can contribute to misstatements, the root cause in this scenario is compensation structure, not control weakness.

B. The organization uses an unreliable process for gathering and reporting executive compensation data. (Incorrect)

Reason: This issue relates to HR and payroll data integrity, not the impact of performance-based compensation on behavior.

C. The organization experiences increasing discontent of employees, if executives are eligible for compensation amounts that are deemed unreasonable. (Incorrect)

Reason: While excessive executive pay may cause employee dissatisfaction, the question focuses on behavioral impacts on stakeholders, making D the more relevant choice.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance – Ensures executive compensation aligns with organizational ethics and stakeholder interests.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management – Covers the risks associated with incentive-based compensation.

COSO Fraud Risk Management Guide – Discusses financial fraud linked to executive compensation.

IIA GTAG 3: Continuous Auditing – Supports risk-based monitoring of financial statements.

Why is Answer D Correct?Analysis of Incorrect Answers:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is D. The organization encourages employee behavior that is inconsistent with the interests of relevant stakeholders.

Working capital management focuses on short-term assets and liabilities to ensure a business has enough cash and liquid assets to meet its short-term obligations. Effective management of working capital directly impacts liquidity, allowing an organization to maintain operational stability.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Liquidity.

Correct.

Liquidity refers to an organization’s ability to meet its short-term obligations, such as payroll, supplier payments, and operational expenses.

Working capital management ensures sufficient cash flow and current assets to cover immediate liabilities, making liquidity the primary concern.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess financial risk by evaluating liquidity management and cash flow strategies. (IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Liquidity Risk Management)

Option B: Profitability.

Incorrect.

While working capital impacts profitability (e.g., through cost control and investment decisions), profitability is more related to revenue and cost management, not just liquidity.

Option C: Solvency.

Incorrect.

Solvency refers to a company's long-term financial stability and its ability to meet debts over time.

Working capital is a short-term financial measure and does not directly determine solvency.

Option D: Efficiency.

Incorrect.

Efficiency relates to resource utilization and operational effectiveness, which are indirectly affected by working capital management but are not its primary focus.

Thus, the verified answer is A. Liquidity.

The auditor likely omitted the data normalization step, which is crucial when integrating multiple datasets from different sources (e.g., human resources (HR) and payroll). Without normalization, inconsistencies in formatting, naming conventions, or unique identifiers (e.g., employee ID vs. full name) can result in incorrect mismatches.

Standardization of Data Formats:

Employee names or IDs may be stored differently across systems (e.g., "John A. Doe" in HR vs. "Doe, John" in payroll).

Normalization ensures uniform formatting to enable accurate comparisons.

Removal of Duplicates & Inconsistencies:

Employee records could have multiple variations due to typos, abbreviations, or missing fields.

Proper cleaning and transformation of data ensures better accuracy.

Use of Unique Identifiers:

Instead of matching by name, the auditor should have used a unique identifier (e.g., Employee ID), which remains constant across systems.

A. Data analysis (Incorrect)

Reason: The auditor did attempt data analysis (matching employee records) but without proper preparation (normalization), the results were flawed.

B. Data diagnostics (Incorrect)

Reason: Data diagnostics refers to evaluating data quality issues, but it does not involve transforming data to a common format, which was the missing step.

C. Data velocity (Incorrect)

Reason: Data velocity relates to the speed at which data is processed, which is not relevant to the issue of incorrect matching.

IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 16: Data Analysis Technologies – Covers data quality, normalization, and audit data preparation.

IIA GTAG 3: Continuous Auditing – Discusses the importance of accurate data extraction and transformation.

IIA Standard 2320 – Analysis and Evaluation – Ensures appropriate data validation before concluding audit findings.

Why is Data Normalization Important?Analysis of Incorrect Answers:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is D. Data normalization.

Data and system backups are a critical part of business continuity and disaster recovery (BC/DR) strategies, ensuring that organizations can restore data and systems to a prior state in the event of system failure, cyberattacks, or disasters.

Primary Purpose of Backup Systems:

The core objective of data and systems backup is to restore data and systems to a previous point in time in case of an unexpected incident.

According to IIA GTAG on Business Continuity Management, backups enable organizations to recover lost, corrupted, or compromised data from an earlier state.

Why Not Other Options?

A. To restore all data and systems immediately after the occurrence of an incident:

This is a misconception because restoration times depend on the Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and the complexity of the incident.

B. To set the maximum allowable downtime to restore systems and data after the occurrence of an incident:

This describes RTO, which is part of business continuity planning but not the primary purpose of backups.

C. To set the point in time to which systems and data must be recovered after the occurrence of an incident:

This describes the Recovery Point Objective (RPO), which determines the acceptable amount of data loss but does not define the main goal of backups.

IIA GTAG – Business Continuity Management

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management and IT Controls

Step-by-Step Justification:IIA References:Thus, the correct and verified answer is D. To restore data and systems to a previous point in time after the occurrence of an incident

A spear phishing attack is a highly targeted email-based attack where an attacker impersonates a trusted individual (e.g., the CEO) to trick recipients into providing sensitive information.

In this scenario, an intruder posed as the CEO and deceived payroll staff into sharing employees' private tax information.

Spear phishing is more targeted than general phishing, often using personal details to make the fraudulent request seem legitimate.

A. Boundary attack. (Incorrect)

A boundary attack refers to attempts to breach an organization’s network perimeter defenses, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems.

This scenario describes a social engineering attack, not a technical boundary attack.

B. Spear phishing attack. (Correct)

Spear phishing attacks are highly personalized email attacks, usually targeting specific employees within an organization.

Attackers research their targets and use realistic messages to trick them into divulging sensitive data.

This fits the scenario, as the attacker impersonated the CEO to steal tax information.

C. Brute force attack. (Incorrect)

A brute force attack involves systematically guessing passwords to gain unauthorized access to systems.

This attack was based on deception, not password cracking.

D. Spoofing attack. (Incorrect, but closely related)

Email spoofing is a technique where an attacker falsifies the sender’s email address.

While spear phishing often includes spoofing, the broader technique used here is spear phishing, as it involved social engineering and deception.

IIA GTAG 16 – Security Risk: IT and Cybersecurity discusses phishing and social engineering threats, emphasizing internal controls to mitigate them.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management highlights the need for risk assessments in cybersecurity, including employee awareness training for phishing attacks.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-61 classifies spear phishing as a high-risk cyber threat to organizations.

Explanation of Answer Choices:IIA References:

Relevant cost refers to costs that will change depending on a specific business decision. It is crucial for decision-making as it helps management assess the financial impact of alternatives.

Relevant costs focus on future costs that differ between decision alternatives.

They help management analyze how different choices impact profitability.

This supports decision-making in areas such as pricing, outsourcing, and product discontinuation.

A. It explains the assumption that both costs and revenues are linear through the relevant range → Incorrect. While linear cost behavior is often assumed, it is not the primary purpose of relevant cost analysis.

B. It enables management to calculate a minimum number of units to produce and sell without having to incur a loss → Incorrect. This describes break-even analysis, not relevant cost analysis.

C. It enables management to predict how costs such as the depreciation of equipment will be affected by a change in business decisions → Incorrect. Depreciation is a sunk cost and is not considered relevant for decision-making.

The IIA’s Practice Guide: Financial Decision-Making and Internal Audit’s Role outlines how relevant cost analysis aids business strategy.

International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) Standard 2120 states that internal auditors should assess management’s cost-analysis techniques.

Managerial Accounting Concepts (by IMA and COSO) emphasize relevant costs in strategic decision-making.

Why Option D is Correct?Explanation of the Other Options:IIA References & Best Practices:Thus, the correct answer is D. It enables management to make business decisions, as it explains the cost that will be incurred for a given course of action.

Centralized authority refers to decision-making being concentrated at the top levels of an organization, ensuring uniform policies and procedures across departments.

Let's analyze each option:

A. Fraud committed through collusion is more likely when authority is centralized.

Incorrect. Centralized authority reduces the chances of fraud by enforcing strict oversight and controls. Decentralized structures may create more opportunities for fraud due to inconsistent policies.

B. Centralized managerial authority typically enhances certainty and consistency within an organization. ✅ (Correct Answer)

Correct. Centralized authority ensures consistent decision-making, standardized processes, and clear policies, reducing uncertainty.

For example, in a multinational company, a centralized governance structure ensures compliance with financial reporting standards across all subsidiaries.

C. When authority is centralized, the alignment of activities to achieve business goals typically is decreased.

Incorrect. Centralized authority actually helps in aligning business activities toward strategic goals by ensuring uniform direction and coordination.

D. Using separation of duties to mitigate collusion is reduced only when authority is centralized.

Incorrect. Separation of duties (SoD) is a key internal control mechanism that exists regardless of centralization. Organizations implement SoD through policies, not just governance structures.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance – Emphasizes the importance of clear governance structures in organizations.

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework – Discusses centralization and its impact on risk management and control effectiveness.

IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) – Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) – Highlights the role of centralized authority in aligning corporate strategies.

ISO 37000:2021 – Governance of Organizations – Outlines how centralized governance improves organizational consistency and decision-making.

IIA References:

User-Developed Applications (UDAs) are software tools, typically spreadsheets or small databases, created by business users rather than IT professionals. These applications often lack formal security, documentation, and control measures, increasing the risk of data errors, unauthorized access, and compliance failures.

UDAs are often created quickly to meet immediate business needs, without following IT governance, security controls, or development standards.

Unlike traditional IT applications, UDAs lack structured testing, change management, and formal documentation.

The IIA’s GTAG 14 – Auditing User-Developed Applications states that UDAs present higher risks because they are not subject to the same controls as IT-managed applications.

A. UDAs and traditional IT applications typically follow a similar development life cycle → Incorrect. Traditional IT applications follow a formal Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), whereas UDAs are developed informally by end-users.

B. A UDA usually includes system documentation to illustrate its functions, and IT-developed applications typically do not require such documentation. → Incorrect. IT applications require extensive documentation, whereas UDAs often lack documentation entirely.

D. IT testing personnel usually review both types of applications thoroughly to ensure they were developed properly. → Incorrect. IT applications undergo rigorous testing and quality assurance, while UDAs often bypass IT reviews altogether.

IIA GTAG 14 – Auditing User-Developed Applications highlights the risks of UDAs and emphasizes the need for internal controls.

COBIT Framework (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) recommends IT governance measures for all business-critical applications.

ISO 27001 (Information Security Management System) warns against uncontrolled user-developed applications due to security risks.

Why Option C is Correct?Explanation of the Other Options:IIA References & Best Practices:Thus, the correct answer is C. Unlike traditional IT applications, UDAs typically are developed with little consideration of controls.