Pass the Google Machine Learning Engineer Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

Deploying the model on GKE with a custom YAML manifest allows maximum control over infrastructure and latency, aligning with the need for low inference time and internal model use. Vertex AI ' s one-click deployment (Option A) limits control, and deploying on Vertex AI (Option C) doesn’t allow for as much customization as a GKE setup.

=================

 The best options for adjusting the training parameters in AutoML to improve model performance are to decrease the score threshold and add more positive examples to the training set. These options can help increase the detection rate of fraudulent transactions, which is the priority for this use case. The score threshold is a parameter that determines the minimum probability score that a prediction must have to be classified as positive. Decreasing the score threshold can increase the recall of the model, which is the proportion of actual positive cases that are correctly identified. Increasing the recall can help reduce the number of false negatives, which are fraudulent transactions that are missed by the model. However, decreasing the score threshold can also decrease the precision of the model, which is the proportion of positive predictions that are actually correct. Decreasing the precision can increase the number of false positives, which are legitimate transactions that are flagged as fraudulent by the model.  Therefore, there is a trade-off between recall and precision, and the optimal score threshold depends on the business objective and the cost of errors 1 . Adding more positive examples to the training set can help balance the data distribution and improve the model performance. Positive examples are the instances that belong to the target class, which in this case are fraudulent transactions. Negative examples are the instances that belong to the other class, which in this case are legitimate transactions. Fraudulent transactions are usually rare and imbalanced compared to legitimate transactions, which can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class and fail to learn the characteristics of the minority class.  Adding more positive examples can help the model learn more features and patterns of the fraudulent transactions, and increase the detection rate 2 .

The other options are not as good as options B and C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Increasing the score threshold would decrease the detection rate of fraudulent transactions, which is the opposite of the desired outcome. Increasing the score threshold would decrease the recall of the model, which is the proportion of actual positive cases that are correctly identified. Decreasing the recall would increase the number of false negatives, which are fraudulent transactions that are missed by the model. Increasing the score threshold would increase the precision of the model, which is the proportion of positive predictions that are actually correct. Increasing the precision would decrease the number of false positives, which are legitimate transactions that are flagged as fraudulent by the model.  However, in this use case, the cost of false negatives is much higher than the cost of false positives, so increasing the score threshold is not a good option 1 .

Option D: Adding more negative examples to the training set would not improve the model performance, and could worsen the data imbalance. Negative examples are the instances that belong to the other class, which in this case are legitimate transactions. Legitimate transactions are usually abundant and dominant compared to fraudulent transactions, which can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class and fail to learn the characteristics of the minority class.  Adding more negative examples would exacerbate th is problem, and decrease the detection rate of the fraudulent transactions 2 .

Option E: Reducing the maximum number of node hours for training would not improve the model performance, and could limit the model optimization. Node hours are the units of computation that are used to train an AutoML model. The maximum number of node hours is a parameter that determines the upper limit of node hours that can be used for training. Reducing the maximum number of node hours would reduce the training time and cost, but also the model quality and accuracy.  Reducing the maximum number of node hours wo uld limit the number of iterations, trials, and evaluations that the model can perform, and prevent the model from finding the optimal hyperparameters and architecture 3 .

The best way to operationalize your training process is to use Vertex AI Pipelines, which allows you to create and run scalable, portable, and reproducible workflows for your ML models. Vertex AI Pipelines also integrates with Vertex AI Metadata, which tracks the provenance, lineage, and artifacts of your ML models. By using a Vertex AI CustomTrainingJobOp component, you can train your model using the same code as in your Jupyter notebook. By using a ModelUploadOp component, you can upload your trained model to Vertex AI Model Registry, which manages the versions and endpoints of your models. By using Cloud Scheduler and Cloud Functions, you can trigger your Vertex AI pipeline to run weekly, according to your plan. References:

Vertex AI Pipelines documentation

Vertex AI Metadata documentation

Vertex AI CustomTrainingJobOp documentation

ModelUploadOp documentation

Cloud Scheduler documentation

[Cloud Functions documentation]

Option A is incorrect because using AI Platform notebooks to perform a Lasso regression analysis on your model, which will eliminate features that do not provide a strong signal, is not a suitable way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model.  Lasso regression is a method of feature selection that applies a penalty to the coefficients of the linear model, and shrinks them to zero for irrelevant features 1 . However, this method assumes that the model is linear and additive, which may not be the case for a TensorFlow model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.

Option B is incorrect because streaming prediction results to BigQuery, and using BigQuery’s CORR(X1, X2) function to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between each feature and the target variable, is not a valid way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model.  The Pearson corr elation coefficient is a measure of the linear relationship between two variables, ranging from -1 to 1 2 . However, this method does not account for the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model. Moreover, this method does not provide feature attributions for each prediction, but rather for the entire dataset.

Option C is correct because using the AI Explanations feature on AI Platform, and submitting each prediction request with the ‘explain’ keyword to retrieve feature attributions using the sampled Shapley method, is the best way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model.  AI Explanations is a service that allows you to get feature attributions for your deployed models on AI Platform 3 .  Feature attributions are values that indicate how much each feature contributed to the prediction for a given instance 4 .  The sampled Shapley method is a technique that uses the Shapley value, a game-theoretic concept, to measure the contribution of each feature to the prediction 5 . By using AI Explanations, you can get feature attributions for each prediction request, and identify the most important features for each customer.

Option D is incorrect because using the What-If tool in Google Cloud to determine how your model will perform when individual features are excluded, and ranking the feature importance in order of those that caused the most significant performance drop when removed from the model, is not a practical way to determine which customer attribute has the most predictive power for each prediction served by the model. The What-If tool is a tool that allows you to visualize and analyze your ML models and datasets. However, this method requires manually editing or removing features for each instance, and observing the change in the prediction. This method is not scalable or efficient, and may not capture the interactions between features or the non-linearity of the model.

Vertex AI Feature Store is a service that allows you to store and manage your ML features on Google Cloud. You can use Vertex AI Feature Store to store features such as parcels delivered and truck locations over time, and retrieve them with low latency for online prediction. Online prediction is a type of prediction that provides low-latency responses to individual or small batches of input data. You can also use Vertex AI Feature Store to retrieve historical data at a specific point in time for model training. Model training is a process of learning the parameters of a ML model from data. By using Vertex AI Feature Store, you can store the features with minimal effort, and avoid the complexity of managing your own data storage and serving system.  References :

Vertex AI Feature Store documentation

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

 Transfer learning is a technique that leverages the knowledge and weights of a pre-trained model and adapts them to a new task or domain 1 .  Transfer learning can save time and resources by avoiding training a model from scratch, and can also improve the performance and generalization of the model by using a larger and more diverse dataset 2 .  AI Platform provides several established text classification models that can be used for transfer learning, such as BERT, ALBERT, or XLNet 3 .  These models are based on state-of-the-art natural language p rocessing techniques and can handle various text classification tasks, such as sentiment analysis, topic classification, or spam detection 4 . By using one of these models on AI Platform, you can customize the model’s code, serving, and deployment, and use Kubeflow pipelines for the ML platform. Therefore, using an established text classification model on AI Platform to perform transfer learning is the best option for this use case.

 According to the official exam guide 1 , one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “track the lineage of pipeline artifacts”.  Vertex ML Metadata 2  is a service that allows you to store, query, and visualize metadata associated with your ML workflows, such as datasets, models, metrics, and executions. Vertex ML Metadata helps you track the provenance and lineage of your ML artifacts and understand the relationships between them.  Vertex AI Experiments 3  is a service that allows you to track and compare the results of your model training runs. Vertex AI Experiments automatically logs metadata such as hyperparameters, metrics, and artifacts for each training run. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to train your custom model using TensorFlow, PyTorch, XGBoost, or scikit-learn.  Vertex AI TensorBoard 4  is a service that allows you to visualize and monitor your ML experiments using TensorBoard, an open source tool for ML visualization. Vertex AI TensorBoard helps you track the model’s training parameters and the metrics per training epoch, and compare the performance of each version of the model. Therefore, option C is the best way to determine which Vertex AI services to include in the workflow for the given use case. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario.  References :

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Vertex ML Metadata

Vertex AI Experiments

Vertex AI TensorBoard

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

Batch prediction is the process of using an ML model to make predictions on a large set of data points. Batch prediction is suitable for scenarios where the predictions are not time-sensitive and can be done in batches, such as digitizing scanned customer forms at the end of each day. Batch prediction can also handle large volumes of data and scale up or down the resources as needed. AI Platform provides a batch prediction service that allows users to submit a job with their TensorFlow model and input data stored in Cloud Storage, and receive the output predictions in Cloud Storage as well. This service requires minimal manual intervention and can be automated with Cloud Sched uler or Cloud Functions. Therefore, using the batch prediction functionality of AI Platform is the best option for this use case.

Option A is not the best answer because it requires storing the pickled model in Cloud Storage, which may incur additional cost and latency for loading the model. It also requires building a Flask-based app, which may not be necessary for a simple data preprocessing step.

Option B is not the best answer because it requires building a Flask-based app, which may not be necessary for a simple data preprocessing step. It also requires packaging the app and the pickled model in a custom container image, which may increase the size and complexity of the image.

Option C is not the best answer because it requires packaging the pickled model in a custom container image, which may increase the size and complexity of the image. It also does not leverage the Vertex built-in container image, which may provide some optimizations and integrations for XGBoost models.

Option D is the best answer because it leverages the Vertex built-in container image, which may provide some optimizations and integrations for XGBoost models. It also allows storing the pickled model in Cloud Storage, which may reduce the size and complexity of the image. It also allows building a custom predictor class based on XGBoost Predictor from the Vertex AI SDK, which may simplify the data preprocessing step and the prediction logic.

 This answer is correct because it uses Firebase, a platform that provides a scalable and reliable notification system for mobile and web applications. Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) allows you to send messages and notifications to users across different devices and platforms. By registering each user with a user ID on the FCM server, you can target specific users based on their account balance predictions and send them personalized notifications when their balance is likely to drop below the $25 threshold. This way, you can provide a useful and timely feature for your customers and increase their engagement and retention.  References:

[Firebase Cloud Messaging]

[Firebase Cloud Messaging: Send messages to specific devices]