Pass the Google Machine Learning Engineer Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

The best option for resolving the training-serving skew alert is to update the model monitoring job to use the more recent training data that was used to retrain the model. This option can help align the baseline distribution of the model monitoring job with the current distribution of the production data, and eliminate the false positive alerts. Model Monitoring is a service that can track and compare the results of multiple machine learning runs. Model Monitoring can monitor the model’s prediction input data for feature skew and drift. Training-serving skew occurs when the feature data distribution in production deviates from the feature data distribution used to train the model. If the original training data is available, you can enable skew detection to monitor your models for training-serving skew. Model Monitoring uses TensorFlow Data Validation (TFDV) to calculate the distributions and distance scores for each feature, and compares them with a baseline distribution. The baseline distribution is the statistical distribution of the feature’s values in the training data. If the distance score for a feature exceeds an alerting threshold that you set, Model Monitoring sends you an email alert. However, if you retrain the model with more recent training data, and deploy it back to the Vertex AI endpoint, the baseline distribution of the model monitoring job may become outdated and inconsistent with the current distribution of the production data. This can cause the model monitoring job to generate false positive alerts, even if the model performance is not deteriorated. To avoid this problem, you need to update the model monitoring job to use the more recent training data that was used to retrain the model. This can help the model monitoring job to recalculate the baseline distribution and the distance scores, and compare them with the current distribution of the production data. This can also help the model monitoring job to detect any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade1.

The other options are not as good as option B, for the following reasons:

Option A: Updating the model monitoring job to use a lower sampling rate would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could reduce the accuracy and reliability of the model monitoring job. The sampling rate is a parameter that determines the percentage of prediction requests that are logged and analyzed by the model monitoring job. Using a lower sampling rate can reduce the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job, but also the quality and validity of the data. Using a lower sampling rate can introduce sampling bias and noise into the data, and make the model monitoring job miss some important features or patterns of the data. Moreover, using a lower sampling rate would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data2.

Option C: Temporarily disabling the alert, and enabling the alert again after a sufficient amount of new production traffic has passed through the Vertex AI endpoint, would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could expose the model to potential risks and errors. Disabling the alert would stop the model monitoring job from sending email notifications when the distance score for a feature exceeds the alerting threshold, but it would not stop the model monitoring job from calculating and comparing the distributions and distance scores. Therefore, disabling the alert would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data. Moreover, disabling the alert would prevent the model monitoring job from detecting any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade. This can expose the model to potential risks and errors, and affect the user satisfaction and trust1.

Option D: Temporarily disabling the alert until the model can be retrained again on newer training data, and retraining the model again after a sufficient amount of new production traffic has passed through the Vertex AI endpoint, would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could cause unnecessary costs and efforts. Disabling the alert would stop the model monitoring job from sending email notifications when the distance score for a feature exceeds the alerting threshold, but it would not stop the model monitoring job from calculating and comparing the distributions and distance scores. Therefore, disabling the alert would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data. Moreover, disabling the alert would prevent the model monitoring job from detecting any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade. This can expose the model to potential risks and errors, and affect the user satisfaction and trust. Retraining the model again on newer training data would create a new model version, but it would not update the model monitoring job to use the newer training data as the baseline distribution. Therefore, retraining the model again on newer training data would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could cause unnecessary costs and efforts1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 4: Evaluation

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.3 Monitoring ML models in production

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.3: Monitoring ML Models

Using Model Monitoring

Understanding the score threshold slider

Sampling rate

 In this scenario, the goal is to speed up model training for a CNN-based architecture on Google Cloud. The code does not include any manual device placement and has not been wrapped in Estimator model-level abstraction. Given these constraints, the best environment to train the model on would be a Deep Learning VM with an n1-standard-2 machine and 1 GPU with all libraries pre-installed. Option C is the correct answer.

Option C: A Deep Learning VM with an n1-standard-2 machine and 1 GPU with all libraries pre-installed. This option is the most suitable for the scenario because it provides a ready-to-use environment for deep learning on Google Cloud. A Deep Learning VM is a specialized VM image that is pre-installed with popular deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, and more. A Deep Learning VM also comes with NVIDIA GPU drivers and CUDA libraries that enable GPU acceleration for model training. A Deep Learning VM can be easily configured and launched from the Google Cloud Console or the Cloud SDK. An n1-standard-2 machine is a general-purpose machine type that provides 2 vCPUs and 7.5 GB of memory. This machine type can be sufficient for running a CNN-based architecture. A GPU is a specialized hardware accelerator that can speed up the computation of matrix operations and convolutions, which are common in CNN-based architectures. By using a Deep Learning VM with an n1-standard-2 machine and 1 GPU, the model training can be significantly faster than on an on-premises CPU-only infrastructure.

Option A: A VM on Compute Engine and 1 TPU with all dependencies installed manually. This option is not suitable for the scenario because it requires manual installation of dependencies and device placement. A TPU is a custom-designed ASIC that can provide high performance and efficiency for TensorFlow models. However, to use a TPU, the code needs to include manual device placement and be wrapped in Estimator model-level abstraction. Moreover, to use a TPU, the dependencies such as TensorFlow, Cloud TPU Client, and Cloud Storage need to be installed manually on the VM. This option can be complex and time-consuming to set up and may not be compatible with the existing code.

Option B: A VM on Compute Engine and 8 GPUs with all dependencies installed manually. This option is not suitable for the scenario because it requires manual installation of dependencies and may not be cost-effective. While using 8 GPUs can provide high parallelism and speed for model training, it also increases the cost and complexity of the environment. Moreover, to use GPUs, the dependencies such as NVIDIA GPU drivers, CUDA libraries, and deep learning frameworks need to be installed manually on the VM. This option can be tedious and error-prone to set up and may not be necessary for the scenario.

Option D: A Deep Learning VM with more powerful CPU e2-highcpu-16 machines with all libraries pre-installed. This option is not suitable for the scenario because it does not leverage GPU acceleration for model training. While using more powerful CPU machines can provide more compute resources and memory for model training, it may not be as fast and efficient as using GPU machines. CPU machines are not optimized for matrix operations and convolutions, which are common in CNN-based architectures. Moreover, using more powerful CPU machines can also increase the cost of the environment. This option can be suboptimal and wasteful for the scenario.

References:

Deep Learning VM Image documentation

Compute Engine documentation

Cloud TPU documentation

Machine types documentation

GPUs on Compute Engine documentation

 Vertex AI Workbench is an integrated development environment (IDE) that allows you to create and run Jupyter notebooks on Google Cloud. Vertex AI Pipelines is a service that allows you to create and manage machine learning workflows using Vertex AI components. To submit a Vertex AI Pipeline job from a Vertex AI Workbench instance, you need to have the appropriate permissions to access the Vertex AI resources. The Identity and Access Management (IAM) Vertex AI User role is a predefined role that grants the minimum permissions required to use Vertex AI services, such as creating and deploying models, endpoints, and pipelines. By assigning the Vertex AI User role to the Vertex AI Workbench instance, you can ensure that the instance has sufficient permissions to submit a Vertex AI Pipeline job. You can assign the role to the instance by using the Cloud Console, the gcloud command-line tool, or the Cloud IAM API. References: The answer can be verified from official Google Cloud documentation and resources related to Vertex AI Workbench, Vertex AI Pipelines, and IAM.

Vertex AI Workbench | Google Cloud

Vertex AI Pipelines | Google Cloud

Vertex AI roles | Google Cloud

Granting, changing, and revoking access to resources | Google Cloud

The most likely problem is that the tables that you created to hold your training and validation records share some records, and you may not be using all the data in your initial table. This is because the RAND() function generates a random number between 0 and 1 for each row, and the probability of a row being in both the training and validation tables is 0.2 * 0.8 = 0.16, which is not negligible. This means that some of the records that you use to validate your model are also used to train your model, which can lead to overfitting and poor generalization. Moreover, the probability of a row being in neither the training nor the validation table is 0.2 * 0.2 = 0.04, which means that you are wasting some of the data in your initial table and reducing the size of your datasets. A better way to split your data into training and validation sets is to use a hash function on a unique identifier column, such as the following queries:

CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.training‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) < 8); CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.validation‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) >= 8);

This way, you can ensure that each row has a fixed 80% chance of being in the training table and a 20% chance of being in the validation table, without any overlap or omission.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

BigQuery ML: Splitting data for training and testing

BigQuery: FARM_FINGERPRINT function

The best option to stabilize the pipeline without downgrading the evaluation quality while minimizing infrastructure overhead is to use Dataflow as the runner for the evaluation step. Dataflow is a fully managed service for executing Apache Beam pipelines that can scale up and down according to the workload. Dataflow can handle large-scale, distributed data processing tasks such as model evaluation, and it can also integrate with Vertex AI Pipelines and TensorFlow Extended (TFX). By using the flag -runner=DataflowRunner in beam_pipeline_args, you can instruct the Evaluator component to run the evaluation step on Dataflow, instead of using the default DirectRunner, which runs locally and may cause out-of-memory errors. Option A is incorrect because adding tfma.MetricsSpec() to limit the number of metrics in the evaluation step may downgrade the evaluation quality, as some important metrics may be omitted. Moreover, reducing the number of metrics may not solve the out-of-memory error, as the evaluation step may still consume a lot of memory depending on the size and complexity of the data and the model. Option B is incorrect because migrating the pipeline to Kubeflow hosted on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) may increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to provision, manage, and monitor the GKE cluster yourself. Moreover, you need to specify the appropriate node parameters for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal configuration. Option D is incorrect because moving the evaluation step out of the pipeline and running it on custom Compute Engine VMs may also increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to create, configure, and delete the VMs yourself. Moreover, you need to ensure that the VMs have sufficient memory for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal machine type. References:

Dataflow documentation

Using DataflowRunner

Evaluator component documentation

Configuring the Evaluator component

The best option for handling missing values in a categorical feature is to replace them with a placeholder category indicating a missing value. This is a type of imputation, which is a method of estimating the missing values based on the observed data. Imputing the missing values with a placeholder category preserves the information that the data is missing, and avoids introducing bias or distortion in the feature distribution. It also allows the machine learning model to learn from the missingness pattern, and potentially use it as a predictor for the target variable. The other options are not suitable for handling missing values in a categorical feature, because:

Removing the rows with missing values and upsampling the dataset by 5% would reduce the size of the dataset and potentially lose important information. It would also introduce sampling bias and overfitting, as the upsampling process would create duplicate or synthetic observations that do not reflect the true population.

Replacing the missing values with the feature’s mean would not make sense for a categorical feature, as the mean is a numerical measure that does not capture the mode or frequency of the categories. It would also create a new category that does not exist in the original data, and might confuse the machine learning model.

Moving the rows with missing values to the validation dataset would compromise the validity and reliability of the model evaluation, as the validation dataset would not be representative of the test or production data. It would also reduce the amount of data available for training the model, and might introduce leakage or inconsistency between the training and validation datasets. References:

Imputation of missing values

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How to Handle Missing Values of Categorical Variables?

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Vertex AI Endpoint is a service that allows you to serve your ML models online and scale them automatically. You can use Vertex AI Endpoint to deploy the custom ML model that you developed for recommending recipes to the users. You can maintain the same machine type on the endpoint, which is a single machine with 8 vCPUs and no accelerators. This machine type can optimize the costs by using the queries per second (QPS) that the model can serve. You can also configure the endpoint to enable autoscaling based on vCPU usage. Autoscaling is a feature that allows the endpoint to adjust the number of compute nodes based on the traffic demand. By enabling autoscaling based on vCPU usage, you can ensure that the endpoint can scale efficiently to the increased demand during the holiday season, without overprovisioning or underprovisioning the resources. You can also set up a monitoring job and an alert for CPU usage. Monitoring is a service that allows you to collect and analyze the metrics and logs from your Google Cloud resources. You can use Monitoring to monitor the CPU usage of your endpoint, which is an indicator of the load and performance of your model. You can also set up an alert for CPU usage, which is a feature that allows you to receive notifications when the CPU usage exceeds a certain threshold. By setting up a monitoring job and an alert for CPU usage, you can keep track of the health and status of your endpoint, and detect any issues or anomalies. If you receive an alert, you can investigate the cause by using the Monitoring dashboard, which provides a graphical interface for viewing and analyzing the metrics and logs from your endpoint. You can also use the Monitoring dashboard to troubleshoot and resolve the issues, such as adjusting the autoscaling parameters, optimizing the model, or updating the machine type. By using Vertex AI Endpoint, autoscaling, and Monitoring, you can ensure that the model can scale efficiently to the increased demand during the holiday season, and handle any issues or alerts that might arise. References:

[Vertex AI Endpoint documentation]

[Autoscaling documentation]

[Monitoring documentation]

[Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate]

 The best option for monitoring the model to determine when retraining is necessary is to schedule a weekly query in BigQuery to compute the success metric. This option has the following advantages:

It allows the model performance to be evaluated regularly, based on the actual outcome of the recommendations. By computing the success metric, which is the percentage of articles that are opened within two days and read for at least one minute, you can measure how well the model is achieving its objective and compare it with the acceptable baseline.

It leverages the scalability and efficiency of BigQuery, which is a serverless, fully managed, and highly scalable data warehouse that can run complex queries over petabytes of data in seconds. By using BigQuery, you can access and analyze all the information needed to compute the success metric, such as the newsletter publication date, the article opening date, and the user reading time, without worrying about the infrastructure or the cost.

It simplifies the model monitoring and retraining workflow, as the weekly query can be scheduled and executed automatically using BigQuery’s built-in scheduling feature. You can also set up alerts or notifications to inform you when the success metric falls below the acceptable baseline, and trigger the model retraining process accordingly.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Using Vertex AI Model Monitoring to detect skew of the input features with a sample rate of 100% and a monitoring frequency of two days introduces additional complexity and overhead. This option requires setting up and managing a Vertex AI Model Monitoring service, which is a managed service that provides various tools and features for machine learning, such as training, tuning, serving, and monitoring. However, using Vertex AI Model Monitoring to detect skew of the input features may not reflect the actual performance of the model, as skew is the discrepancy between the distributions of the features in the training dataset and the serving data, which may not affect the outcome of the recommendations. Moreover, using a sample rate of 100% and a monitoring frequency of two days may incur unnecessary cost and latency, as it requires analyzing all the input features every two days, which may not be needed for the model monitoring.

Option B: Scheduling a cron job in Cloud Tasks to retrain the model every week before the newsletter is created introduces additional cost and risk. This option requires creating and running a cron job in Cloud Tasks, which is a fully managed service that allows you to schedule and execute tasks that are invoked by HTTP requests. However, using Cloud Tasks to retrain the model every week may not be optimal, as it may retrain the model more often than necessary, wasting compute resources and cost. Moreover, using Cloud Tasks to retrain the model before the newsletter is created may introduce risk, as it may deploy a new model version that has not been tested or validated, potentially affecting the quality of the recommendations.

Option D: Scheduling a daily Dataflow job in Cloud Composer to compute the success metric introduces additional complexity and cost. This option requires creating and running a Dataflow job in Cloud Composer, which is a fully managed service that runs Apache Airflow pipelines for workflow orchestration. Dataflow is a fully managed service that runs Apache Beam pipelines for data processing and transformation. However, using Dataflow and Cloud Composer to compute the success metric may not be necessary, as it may add more steps and overhead to the model monitoring process. Moreover, using Dataflow and Cloud Composer to compute the success metric daily may not be optimal, as it may compute the success metric more often than needed, consuming more compute resources and cost.

References:

[BigQuery documentation]

[Vertex AI Model Monitoring documentation]

[Cloud Tasks documentation]

[Cloud Composer documentation]

[Dataflow documentation]

Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and managing machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. It provides various services and tools for different stages of the machine learning lifecycle, such as data preparation, model training, deployment, monitoring, and experimentation. Vertex AI Data Labeling Service is a service that allows you to create and manage human-labeled datasets for machine learning. You can use Vertex AI Data Labeling Service to label the images of semiconductors with binary labels, such as “pass” or “fail”, based on the quality criteria. You can also use Vertex AI AutoML Image Classification, which is a service that allows you to create and train custom image classification models without writing any code. You can use Vertex AI AutoML Image Classification to train an image classification model on the labeled images of semiconductors, and optimize the model for accuracy. You can also use Vertex AI to deploy the model to an endpoint, which is a service that allows you to serve online predictions from your model. You can configure Pub/Sub, which is a service that allows you to publish and subscribe to messages, to publish a message when an image is categorized into the failing class by the model. You can use the message to trigger an action, such as alerting the quality control team or stopping the production line. This solution can help you create a real-time application that automates the quality control process of semiconductors, and maximizes the model accuracy. References: The answer can be verified from official Google Cloud documentation and resources related to Vertex AI, Vertex AI Data Labeling Service, Vertex AI AutoML Image Classification, and Pub/Sub.

Vertex AI | Google Cloud

Vertex AI Data Labeling Service | Google Cloud

Vertex AI AutoML Image Classification | Google Cloud

Pub/Sub | Google Cloud

One-hot encoding is a technique that converts categorical variables into numerical variables by creating dummy variables for each possible category. Each dummy variable has a value of 1 if the original variable belongs to that category, and 0 otherwise1. One-hot encoding can help linear regression models to capture the effect of different categories on the target variable without imposing any ordinal relationship among them2. Dataprep is a service that allows you to explore, clean, and transform your data for analysis and machine learning. You can use Dataprep to apply one-hot encoding to your city name variable and make each city a column with binary values3. This way, you can prepare your data using the least amount of coding while maintaining the predictive variables. Therefore, using Dataprep to transform the state column using a one-hot encoding method is the best option for this use case.

References:

One Hot Encoding: A Beginner’s Guide

One-Hot Encoding in Linear Regression Models

Dataprep documentation