Pass the Google Machine Learning Engineer Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

Option A is incorrect because Cloud SQL is a relational database service that is not designed for storing and comparing model performance statistics. It would require writing complex SQL queries to perform the comparison, and it would not provide any visualization or analysis tools.

Option B is incorrect because Vertex AI does not support creating versions of models for each season per year. Vertex AI models are versioned based on the training data and hyperparameters, not on external factors such as seasonality or holidays. Moreover, the Evaluate tab of the Vertex AI UI only shows the performance metrics of a single model version, not across multiple versions.

Option C is incorrect because Kubeflow is a different platform than Vertex AI, and it does not integrate well with Vertex AI Pipelines. Kubeflow experiments are used to group pipeline runs that share a common goal or objective, not to compare performance statistics across different seasons or years. Kubeflow UI does not provide any tools to compare the results across the experiments, and it would require switching between different platforms to access the data.

Option D is correct because Vertex ML Metadata is a service that allows storing and tracking metadata associated with machine learning workflows, such as models, datasets, metrics, and events. Events are user-defined labels that can be used to group or slice the metadata for analysis. By using seasons and years as events, you can easily store and compare the performance statistics of each version of your models across different time periods. Vertex ML Metadata also provides tools to visualize and analyze the metadata, such as the ML Metadata Explorer and the What-If Tool.

Option A is incorrect because using AI Platform to run distributed training jobs with checkpoints does not reduce the compute costs, but rather increases them by using more resources and storing the checkpoints.

Option B is incorrect because using AI Platform to run distributed training jobs without checkpoints may reduce the compute costs, but it also risks losing the progress of the training if the job fails or is interrupted.

Option C is correct because migrating to training with Kubeflow on Google Kubernetes Engine, and using preemptible VMs with checkpoints can reduce the compute costs significantly by using cheaper and more scalable resources, while also preserving the state of the training with checkpoints.

Option D is incorrect because using preemptible VMs without checkpoints may reduce the compute costs, but it also risks losing the training progress if the VMs are preempted.

References:

Kubeflow on Google Cloud

Using preemptible VMs and GPUs

Saving and loading models

Data leakage is a problem where information from outside the training dataset is used to create the model, resulting in an overly optimistic or invalid estimate of the model performance. Data leakage can occur in time series data when the temporal order of the data is not preserved during data preparation or model evaluation. For example, if the data is shuffled before splitting into train and test sets, or if future data is used to impute missing values in past data, then data leakage can occur.

One way to address data leakage in time series data is to apply nested cross-validation during model training. Nested cross-validation is a technique that allows you to perform both model selection and model evaluation in a robust way, while preserving the temporal order of the data. Nested cross-validation involves two levels of cross-validation: an inner loop for model selection and an outer loop for model evaluation. The inner loop splits the training data into k folds, trains and tunes the model on k-1 folds, and validates the model on the remaining fold. The inner loop repeats this process for each fold and selects the best model based on the validation performance. The outer loop splits the data into n folds, trains the best model from the inner loop on n-1 folds, and tests the model on the remaining fold. The outer loop repeats this process for each fold and evaluates the model performance based on the test results.

Nested cross-validation can help to avoid data leakage in time series data by ensuring that the model is trained and tested on non-overlapping data, and that the data used for validation is never seen by the model during training. Nested cross-validation can also provide a more reliable estimate of the model performance than a single train-test split or a simple cross-validation, as it reduces the variance and bias of the estimate.

References:

Data Leakage in Machine Learning

How to Avoid Data Leakage When Performing Data Preparation

Classification on a single time series - prevent leakage between train and test

According to the web search results, Reduction Server is a faster GPU all-reduce algorithm developed at Google that uses a dedicated set of reducers to aggregate gradients from workers12. Reducers are lightweight CPU VM instances that are significantly cheaper than GPU VMs2. Therefore, the third worker pool should not have any accelerators, and should use a machine type that has high network bandwidth to optimize the communication between workers and reducers2. TPUs are not supported by Reduction Server, so the first two worker pools should have GPUs and use a container image that contains the training code12. The reduction-server container image is provided by Google and should be used for the third worker pool2.

 BigQuery ML allows you to build and run machine learning models using SQL queries directly within BigQuery, which is one of the simplest approaches because it doesn't require setting up an external environment like Vertex AI or managing infrastructure.

 AutoML regression is more appropriate for predicting customer lifetime value (CLV) compared to ARIMA, which is typically used for time series forecasting (e.g., sales over time, stock prices, etc.). CLV prediction involves understanding complex relationships between customer behavior and value, which is best captured by a regression model.

 Using BigQuery Studio and running a CREATE MODEL statement to build an AutoML regression model offers the simplicity you're looking for because it automates much of the feature engineering, model selection, and hyperparameter tuning.

 The other options involving ARIMA models (A and B) are not appropriate for CLV, and setting up a Vertex AI Workbench notebook (D) introduces unnecessary complexity for this task.

You are implementing a batch inference ML pipeline in Google Cloud. The model was developed by using TensorFlow and is stored in SavedModel format in Cloud Storage. You need to apply the model to a historical dataset that is stored in a BigQuery table. You want to perform inference with minimal effort. What should you do?

A. Import the TensorFlow model by using the create model statement in BigQuery ML. Apply the historical data to the TensorFlow model.

B. Export the historical data to Cloud Storage in Avro format. Configure a Vertex Al batch prediction job to generate predictions for the exported data.

C. Export the historical data to Cloud Storage in CSV format. Configure a Vertex Al batch prediction job to generate predictions for the exported data.

D. Configure and deploy a Vertex Al endpoint. Use the endpoint to get predictions from the historical data in BigQuery.

Answer: B

 Vertex AI batch prediction is the most appropriate and efficient way to apply a pre-trained model like TensorFlow’s SavedModel to a large dataset, especially for batch processing.

 The Vertex AI batch prediction job works by exporting your dataset (in this case, historical data from BigQuery) to a suitable format (like Avro or CSV) and then processing it in Cloud Storage where the model is stored.

 Avro format is recommended for large datasets as it is highly efficient for data storage and is optimized for read/write operations in Google Cloud, which is why option B is correct.

 Option A suggests using BigQuery ML for inference, but it does not support running arbitrary TensorFlow models directly within BigQuery ML. Hence, BigQuery ML is not a valid option for this particular task.

 Option C (exporting to CSV) is a valid alternative but is less efficient compared to Avro in terms of performance.

 Option D suggests deploying a Vertex AI endpoint, which is better suited for real-time inference rather than batch inference. Since the question asks for batch inference, B is the best answer.

According to the official exam guide1, one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “configure and optimize model monitoring jobs”. The Vertex AI Model Monitoring documentation states that “to reduce the cost of model monitoring, you can configure the sample rate of the requests that are logged and analyzed by model monitoring”. Therefore, decreasing the sample_rate parameter in the Randomsampleconfig of the monitoring job would reduce the model monitoring cost while continuing to quickly detect drift. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

[Vertex AI Model Monitoring]

 Overfitting occurs when a model tries to fit the training data so closely that it does not generalize well to new data. Overfitting can be caused by having a model that is too complex for the data, such as having too many parameters or layers. Overfitting can lead to poor performance on the validation data, which reflects how the model will perform on unseen data1

To prevent overfitting, one strategy is to use regularization techniques that penalize the complexity of the model and encourage it to learn simpler patterns. Two common regularization techniques for deep neural networks are L2 regularization and dropout. L2 regularization adds a term to the loss function that is proportional to the squared magnitude of the model’s weights. This term penalizes large weights and encourages the model to use smaller weights. Dropout randomly drops out some units in the network during training, which prevents co-adaptation of features and reduces the effective number of parameters. Both L2 regularization and dropout have hyperparameters that control the strength of the regularization effect23

Another strategy to prevent overfitting is to use hyperparameter tuning, which is the process of finding the optimal values for the parameters of the model that affect its performance. Hyperparameter tuning can help find the best combination of hyperparameters that minimize the validation loss and improve the generalization ability of the model. AI Platform provides a service for hyperparameter tuning that can run multiple trials in parallel and use different search algorithms to find the best solution.

Therefore, the best strategy to use when retraining the model is to run a hyperparameter tuning job on AI Platform to optimize for the L2 regularization and dropout parameters. This will allow the model to find the optimal balance between fitting the training data and generalizing to new data. The other options are not as effective, as they either use fixed values for the regularization parameters, which may not be optimal, or they do not address the issue of overfitting at all.

References: 1: Generalization: Peril of Overfitting 2: Regularization for Deep Learning 3: Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting : [Hyperparameter tuning overview]

 Entity extraction is a natural language processing (NLP) task that involves identifying and extracting specific types of information from text, such as names, dates, locations, etc. Entity extraction can help you analyze a corpus of recipes and extract each ingredient and cookware mentioned in them. Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and managing machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. It provides a service for AutoML entity extraction, which allows you to create and train custom entity extraction models without writing any code. You can use Vertex AI to create a text dataset for entity extraction, and label your data with two entities: “ingredient” and “cookware”. You need to label at least 200 examples of each entity type to train an AutoML entity extraction model. You can also use a holdout dataset to evaluate the performance of your model, such as precision, recall, and F1-score. This solution can help you build a machine learning model to scan a corpus of recipes and extract each ingredient and cookware mentioned in them, and use the results to help users with meal planning. References:

AutoML Entity Extraction | Vertex AI

Preparing data for AutoML Entity Extraction | Vertex AI

 The Cloud DLP API is a service that allows users to inspect, classify, and de-identify sensitive data. It can be used to scan data in Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Cloud Datastore, and Cloud Pub/Sub. The best way to ensure that the PII is not accessible by unauthorized individuals is to use a quarantine bucket to store the data before scanning it with the DLP API. This way, the data is isolated from other applications and users until it is classified and moved to the appropriate bucket. The other options are not as secure or efficient, as they either expose the data to BigQuery before scanning, or scan the data after writing it to a non-sensitive bucket. References:

Cloud DLP documentation

Scanning and classifying Cloud Storage files

Developing ML models with AI Platform for image segmentation on CT scans requires a lot of computation and experimentation, as image segmentation is a complex and challenging task that involves assigning a label to each pixel in an image. Image segmentation can be used for various medical applications, such as tumor detection, organ segmentation, or lesion localization1

To minimize the computation costs and manual intervention while having version control for the code, one should use Cloud Build linked with Cloud Source Repositories to trigger retraining when new code is pushed to the repository. Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Cloud Build can import source code from Cloud Source Repositories, Cloud Storage, GitHub, or Bitbucket, execute a build to your specifications, and produce artifacts such as Docker containers or Java archives2

Cloud Build allows you to set up automated triggers that start a build when changes are pushed to a source code repository. You can configure triggers to filter the changes based on the branch, tag, or file path3

Cloud Source Repositories is a service that provides fully managed private Git repositories on Google Cloud Platform. Cloud Source Repositories allows you to store, manage, and track your code using the Git version control system. You can also use Cloud Source Repositories to connect to other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Build, Cloud Functions, or Cloud Run4

To use Cloud Build linked with Cloud Source Repositories to trigger retraining when new code is pushed to the repository, you need to do the following steps:

Create a Cloud Source Repository for your code, and push your code to the repository. You can use the Cloud SDK, Cloud Console, or Cloud Source Repositories API to create and manage your repository5

Create a Cloud Build trigger for your repository, and specify the build configuration and the trigger settings. You can use the Cloud SDK, Cloud Console, or Cloud Build API to create and manage your trigger.

Specify the steps of the build in a YAML or JSON file, such as installing the dependencies, running the tests, building the container image, and submitting the training job to AI Platform. You can also use the Cloud Build predefined or custom build steps to simplify your build configuration.

Push your new code to the repository, and the trigger will start the build automatically. You can monitor the status and logs of the build using the Cloud SDK, Cloud Console, or Cloud Build API.

The other options are not as easy or feasible. Using Cloud Functions to identify changes to your code in Cloud Storage and trigger a retraining job is not ideal, as Cloud Functions has limitations on the memory, CPU, and execution time, and does not provide a user interface for managing and tracking your builds. Using the gcloud command-line tool to submit training jobs on AI Platform when you update your code is not optimal, as it requires manual intervention and does not leverage the benefits of Cloud Build and its integration with Cloud Source Repositories. Creating an automated workflow in Cloud Composer that runs daily and looks for changes in code in Cloud Storage using a sensor is not relevant, as Cloud Composer is mainly designed for orchestrating complex workflows across multiple systems, and does not provide a version control system for your code.

References: 1: Image segmentation 2: Cloud Build overview 3: Creating and managing build triggers 4: Cloud Source Repositories overview 5: Quickstart: Create a repository : [Quickstart: Create a build trigger] : [Configuring builds] : [Viewing build results]