Pass the ECCouncil CCISO 712-50 Questions and answers with CertsForce

 Layered Security (Defense in Depth):

Adding a secondary authentication process strengthens security by creating multiple layers of defense, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

 Why This is Correct:

Layered security ensures that if one control fails, additional measures are in place to mitigate the risk.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Administrator with too much time: Not a relevant observation.

B. Undue time commitment: Secondary authentication supports security, not unnecessary work.

D. Network segmentation: Refers to isolating parts of a network, unrelated to authentication layers.

 References:

EC-Council emphasizes the importance of layered security to address multifaceted threats and enhance defense mechanisms.

Extracting information from affected systems without altering original data occurs during the investigation phase, which focuses on evidence collection and analysis.

Purpose of Investigation Phase:

Collect forensic data from affected systems.

Ensure data integrity by using tools and processes that prevent changes to the original state.

Key Activities:

Create forensic images of systems and devices.

Use write-protected tools to analyze data.

Other Phases:

Response: Focuses on containment.

Recovery: Restores normal operations.

Follow-up: Implements lessons learned.

Forensic Investigation Guidelines: Highlights methods to extract and analyze data without altering the original.

Incident Response Best Practices: Emphasizes thorough investigation for actionable insights.

Scenario4

 Change Requests in Risk Management:

Corrective actions are steps taken to address and rectify existing deviations or issues. These actions often lead to change requests to ensure systems align with organizational policies or frameworks.

 Why This is Correct:

Corrective actions inherently involve changes to existing processes, configurations, or systems to address gaps or issues.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Preventive actions: Aim to avoid issues, not correct existing ones.

B. Inspection: Identifies issues but doesn’t directly result in change requests.

C. Defect repair: May lead to changes but is typically specific to fixing defects, not broad corrective actions.

 References:

EC-Council emphasizes the importance of corrective actions in managing deviations, aligning them with the need for formal change management processes.

 Nature of Constraint:

International projects involving encryption technologies are often subject to regulatory requirements that vary by country. Import/export laws for encryption can impose significant restrictions, such as requiring permits, compliance audits, or outright bans on certain encryption technologies.

 Why Other Options Are Less Significant:

A. Time zone differences: While they may cause logistical challenges, they are manageable with proper planning.

B. Compliance to local hiring laws: These are typically handled by local HR teams and are not a major constraint compared to regulatory issues.

D. Local customer privacy laws: These are critical but generally address data usage rather than the implementation of encryption technology.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:

The CISO body of knowledge stresses the importance of understanding and complying with international laws and regulations when deploying encryption technologies. This ensures compliance and avoids legal complications.

 SSAE 16 Report Overview:

SSAE 16 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements) reports are used to assess a vendor's control environment and its alignment with security and compliance requirements.

 Annual Review as Best Practice:

Most vendors update their SSAE 16 reports annually, which reflects a complete cycle of operational and security practices.

Reviewing the report annually ensures that the organization evaluates updated controls and addresses any identified risks.

 Why Not Other Options:

Quarterly (A) or semi-annual (B) reviews are excessive unless dictated by a high-risk environment.

Bi-annual (D) review intervals may result in oversight of critical updates.

 EC-Council Guidance:

Annual review aligns with standard compliance practices and maintains oversight of vendor security controls.

When discovering that a selected solution no longer meets the organization's scalability needs, the most logical course of action is to review the original solution set to find an alternative that aligns with the organization's risk appetite, budget, and compliance requirements.

Issue Identification:

Scalability issues mean the solution is not fit for purpose.

Proceeding with the implementation risks wasting resources and failing to meet organizational needs.

Best Approach:

Reassess the available options from the original evaluation.

Ensure the alternative solution meets both functional and regulatory requirements.

Other Options:

B & C: Continuing the implementation with unresolved scalability issues could lead to operational failures.

D: Canceling the project based solely on internal requirements disregards the broader business context.

Risk-Based Decision Making: Encourages reassessing alternatives when new risks are identified.

Project Management Principles: Stresses alignment of solutions with business needs and compliance requirements.

 Post-BIA Step:

After conducting a Business Impact Analysis (BIA), the next logical step is to create recovery plans for critical applications based on the identified impacts.

 Why Recovery Plans are Critical:

Define the steps to restore critical applications and services after a disruption.

Align with organizational recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO).

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Determine ALE: Not directly relevant to recovery planning.

B. Create a crisis management plan: Addresses broader organizational crises, not application recovery.

D. Build a hot site: A tactical measure that follows recovery planning.

 References:

EC-Council underscores the importance of technology recovery plans as a direct output of the BIA process.

 Definition of Security Certification

Security certification is the systematic process of evaluating technical and non-technical security controls to ensure that an IT system meets specified security requirements. This process is a key step in validating the security posture of a system before deployment.

 Purpose and Scope

Technical Controls: Includes encryption, firewalls, access control mechanisms, etc.

Non-Technical Controls: Policies, procedures, and organizational standards.

Certification ensures that the implementation aligns with security frameworks and regulations.

 Comparison of Options

B. Security system analysis: A broader term for examining IT systems, not specifically tied to security requirement validation.

C. Security accreditation: Focuses on management approval, which follows certification.

D. Alignment with business practices and goals: Pertains to strategic alignment, not security validation.

 EC-Council References

Security certification aligns with phases of system development life cycles (SDLC) and is critical for ensuring compliance and risk management as per EC-Council CISO training.