Pass the Construction Specifications Institute CDT Certification CDT Questions and answers with CertsForce

From a CSI / CDT lifecycle perspective, the project does not end when construction is complete. CSI emphasizes the full facility life cycle, which includes:

Planning and design

Construction

Operation and maintenance

Eventual renovation, repurposing, or decommissioning

The phase during which a building is operated, maintained, and supported so that it continues to perform its intended function is typically referred to as facility management (or “facilities management”). CSI’s project delivery guidance characterizes facility management as including:

Allocating resources (staff, budget, utilities, maintenance contracts, equipment, etc.) to keep the facility functioning as intended

Planning and managing maintenance, repairs, replacements, and upgrades

Overseeing operations, safety, and performance of building systems

Coordinating with design and construction teams when future renovation or major maintenance projects are needed

Because the question specifically highlights “allocating resources for the continued performance of a building’s intended function”, this aligns directly with the responsibilities of facility management.

Why the other options do not fit this definition:

A. BudgetingBudgeting is the process of planning and assigning financial resources for a specific period or scope (project budgeting, department budgeting, etc.). It is a financial planning activity, not the overall ongoing process of managing and operating the facility to ensure it continues to function as intended.

B. CommissioningCommissioning is a quality-focused process performed around the end of construction and the start of operation to verify that building systems are planned, installed, tested, and capable of being operated and maintained in conformity with the design intent and owner’s project requirements. It is primarily a start-up and verification process, not the ongoing allocation of resources over the life of the facility.

D. Project closeoutProject closeout is the process of finishing all project work, completing punch lists, submitting record documents, warranties, training, and formally closing the contract. While closeout transitions the facility to the owner’s operations and facility management, it does not itself describe the ongoing management for continued performance.

In CSI’s project delivery model, once the project is closed out, the responsibility for keeping the building performing as intended shifts to facility management, making Option C the correct answer.

Per CSI’s Construction Specifications Practice Guide and Division 01 (General Requirements), the contractor is required to maintain record documents (as-built drawings, annotated specifications, and related data) at the jobsite.

CSI defines “record documents” as:

“A set of drawings, specifications, and other documents kept current during construction that show all changes and deviations from the original contract documents.”

Reasons:

They must be readily accessible to field supervisors, inspectors, and the A/E.

They serve as the source for preparation of final “as-built” documents submitted at project closeout.

Why others are incorrect:

A / B. Contractor’s office – does not satisfy accessibility requirements for site coordination.

C. Owner’s office – owner receives the final record documents at closeout, not during construction.

CSI Reference:

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide, “Construction Phase Documentation”; Division 01 – 01 78 39 Project Record Documents.

CSI, in alignment with standard general conditions (such as AIA A201 and EJCDC documents, which CDT relies on), defines submittals as including three primary types:

Shop drawings – Drawings, diagrams, schedules, and other data specifically prepared by the contractor, subcontractors, or suppliers to illustrate how a portion of the work will be fabricated, assembled, or installed.

Product data – Manufacturer’s printed information such as catalog cuts, performance charts, instructions, and brochures.

Samples – Physical examples that illustrate materials or workmanship.

Key points from these definitions:

Shop drawings are not contract documents. They do not change the requirements of the drawings and specifications; instead, they show how the contractor proposes to meet those requirements.

Standard conditions explicitly state that the contract documents are not modified by submittals, even when reviewed by the architect/engineer.

The contractor must review shop drawings first; they are then submitted to the architect/engineer for review for conformance with design intent, but this does not make them contract documents.

Now, compare to the options:

A. They are contract documents.This is explicitly incorrect. Shop drawings are submittals and do not have the status of contract documents.

B. They illustrate some portion of the work.This is the standard CSI-aligned definition: shop drawings are created to illustrate portions of the work (fabrication, installation, layout, connections, etc.). This is correct.

C. They are reviewed only by the architect/engineer.Incorrect. The contractor is required to review and approve shop drawings before submitting them; the architect/engineer then reviews them. Sometimes others (e.g., consultants, certifying authorities) may also review them.

D. They include performance charts, instructions, and brochures.This describes product data, not shop drawings. Product data submittals often are manufacturer literature with performance charts, brochures, and instructions.

Therefore, the correct choice, consistent with CSI definitions and standard general conditions, is Option B – They illustrate some portion of the work.

CSI references (by name only, no links):

CSI Construction Specifications Practice Guide – “Submittals: shop drawings, product data, and samples”

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – “Construction Phase – Submittal Procedures and Responsibilities”

CSI’s project delivery and CDT materials distinguish clearly between public and private procurement:

Public work (funded and contracted by government entities) is typically governed by statutes and regulations that require:

Formal advertisement,

Clearly defined bidding procedures,

Sealed bids opened publicly at a specified time and place, and

Award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, except where law allows other defined selection methods.

Private work, by contrast, is not generally bound by these public procurement statutes. CSI explains that private owners have significantly more flexibility, including:

Not being required to publicly open bids,

Being able to negotiate with one or more bidders,

Rejecting any or all bids, and

Awarding the contract to any responsive and responsible bidder they choose, based on value, qualifications, schedule, or other criteria—not solely lowest price.

Because of this flexibility, CSI emphasizes that a private owner may select a bidder other than the lowest as long as the bidder is responsive (submits a bid per the requirements) and responsible (qualified, capable, and reliable). This matches Option D exactly.

Why the other options are incorrect or misleading:

A. A private owner may waive any informality in the bidding, except for the performance bond.While private owners often can waive bid informalities, CSI does not state any universal rule that the performance bond is a special exception in private bidding. Performance bonds are typically part of the contract requirements after award, not a fixed “unwaivable informality” in bid receipt; treatment of bonding is governed by the owner’s requirements and any applicable law, not a CSI rule unique to private work.

B. Private bids may be opened in private, but the results must be published in a reasonable time.Publication of bid results is a hallmark of public work (transparency and accountability). CSI does not require private owners to publish bid results; private owners may keep them confidential if they wish, unless other obligations apply (e.g., corporate policies).

C. The laws and regulations for private bidding are the same as for public bidding.CSI specifically distinguishes between public and private owners: public owners are constrained by statutes and regulations, whereas private owners have much more discretion. The laws governing public bidding and private bidding are not the same, and this is a key CDT concept.

Thus, the CSI-consistent distinction is that private owners are free to award the contract to a responsive and responsible bidder who is not the lowest, making Option D the correct choice.

Key CSI-aligned references (no links):

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – procurement and bidding chapters comparing public and private practice.

CSI CDT Body of Knowledge – sections on bidding requirements, “responsive and responsible bidder,” and differences between public and private construction procurement.

Under the typical CSI-aligned project delivery framework, additional time and money are generally justified when:

The owner (or A/E as owner’s agent) changes the work or otherwise causes delay (e.g., active interference, late decisions, design changes).

There are unforeseen conditions beyond the control of both owner and contractor, where the contract documents anticipated “normal” conditions instead.

Other compensable events defined in the Conditions of the Contract occur (e.g., certain force majeure events, if provided for).

However, the contractor is responsible for correcting defective or nonconforming work at no increase in contract sum or time (except where the defect is caused by others). CSI-based guidance on construction phase services and contract administration explains that:

Defective work (work not in accordance with the contract documents) must be removed, replaced, or corrected by the contractor at the contractor’s expense.

Any extra time and cost arising from correcting such defective work is not a valid basis for a change order or a claim for increased compensation or time extension.

If the contractor’s own documentation shows that the extra cost and time are due to defective work needing repair, the A/E has a clear basis—consistent with the Conditions of the Contract—to reject the claim. That aligns directly with Option D.

Why the other options do not support rejecting the claim:

A. Active interference by the owner – Owner-caused interference is typically a valid ground for a time and possibly cost adjustment, not grounds for rejection.

B. Conditions beyond the control of the contractor or owner – Unforeseen conditions are exactly the type of situation that may justify a claim, depending on the contract language.

C. The A/E modified the contract documents – A/E-issued changes (such as change orders or certain clarifications) often result in compensable changes if they add work or cause delay.

CSI-aligned references (no URLs):

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – Construction Phase and Claims/Changes discussions.

CSI Construction Specifications Practice Guide – responsibilities for defective work and changes.

CSI CDT Body of Knowledge – construction phase administration and evaluation of claims.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (CSI-based)

In CSI’s project delivery model, the level of development of specifications increases as the project moves through the design phases:

Project Conception – programming, needs assessment, feasibility; little or no formal specifications.

Schematic Design (SD) – conceptual design, basic systems and relationships; CSI now emphasizes Preliminary Project Descriptions (PPDs) as early, performance-oriented spec tools at this stage.

Design Development (DD) – selection and refinement of specific systems and assemblies; this is where outline specifications or expanded PPDs are used as a structured checklist for developing detailed requirements.

Construction Documents (CD) – full, coordinated section-by-section specifications in MasterFormat order, fully detailed to support bidding and construction.

CSI’s Construction Specifications Practice and CDT materials explain that outline specifications (or expanded PPDs) in the Design Development phase play a key role as a checklist and coordination tool. They:

List major assemblies, systems, and products by specification section.

Identify key performance and quality requirements in a concise format.

Help ensure that nothing is overlooked when moving into full specification writing in the Construction Documents phase.

Support coordination between disciplines (architectural, structural, MEP, etc.) by providing a common list of systems and materials.

Therefore, the phase where “outline specifications are created in order to be used as a checklist for further development of the project documents” is the Design Development phase (Option C).

Why the others are not the best fit:

A. Project Conception phaseAt this early stage, work is focused on needs, scope, feasibility, and budgeting. Specifications are generally not yet developed to the “outline” level; instead, information is more conceptual and programmatic.

B. Schematic Design phaseCSI increasingly promotes Preliminary Project Descriptions (PPDs) during Schematic Design, which are even higher-level and more performance-based than traditional outline specs. While some offices may start outline specs during SD, CSI’s standardized view places the checklist-style outline specifications more firmly in Design Development, when system choices are better defined.

D. Construction Documents phaseBy this phase, specifications are typically developed into full, detailed sections (Part 1–General, Part 2–Products, Part 3–Execution) rather than simple outline checklists. The outline specs or expanded PPDs created earlier in DD have already served their purpose in guiding the development of these full specifications and coordinated drawings.

CSI reference concepts:

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – chapters describing the design phases and the evolution from PPDs/outline specifications to full specifications.

CSI Construction Specifications Practice Guide – sections on preliminary specifying, PPDFormat, and the role of outline specifications during the Design Development phase.

CSI uses the term value analysis or value engineering to describe a structured, function-oriented process that examines the relationship between:

The functions a building element or system must perform, and

The cost of achieving those functions

The objective is to improve value, which can mean:

Reducing initial cost without reducing required performance or quality

Reducing life-cycle cost (operation, maintenance, replacement)

Improving performance, quality, durability, or maintainability for a similar cost

Therefore, value analysis can be used:

“To enhance project value or reduce initial or long-term cost.” (Option B)

CSI stresses that value analysis is not simply “cheapening” the project; it is a disciplined decision-making process that balances cost and function to achieve the best overall value for the owner.

Why the other options are not correct in CSI terms:

A. To provide the owner with the lowest construction cost.The lowest first cost is not the sole or primary goal under CSI’s view. An excessively low first cost may sacrifice performance or significantly increase operation and maintenance costs. Value analysis focuses on best value, not just cheapest construction.

C. A phase for future work to allow higher quality items up front.Value analysis is a process or technique, not merely a “phase for future work.” It also does not inherently mean you always choose higher quality up front; sometimes it leads to lower initial cost, sometimes to better performance, sometimes a balance.

D. To change the perceived value by owner and stakeholder.While owner and stakeholder perception matters, CSI presents value analysis as a technical, function-and-cost-based method, not just a way to change perceptions. The goal is objective improvement of value, not merely altering how the project is perceived.

Key CSI-aligned references (no URLs):

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – sections on Value Analysis/Value Engineering in design and preconstruction phases.

CSI CDT Body of Knowledge – topics on cost, value, life-cycle thinking, and decision-making.

CSI-related discussions of life-cycle cost and value in project decision processes.

CSI’s treatment of bidding and pricing mechanisms distinguishes between:

Alternates – for defined variations in scope or quality.

Allowances – for items not fully defined at bid time.

Unit prices – for work where quantities are uncertain or may change.

The question mentions:

Equal consideration and transparency during award

Flexibility while awarding

Managing cost during execution for undefined and unforeseen conditions

This language directly aligns with allowances and unit prices:

Allowances are used when the exact nature or selection of certain items (e.g., finishes, special equipment, or yet-to-be-selected products) is not fully defined at bid time. An allowance amount is stated in the documents so all bidders include the same amount, ensuring comparable bids and transparency. Actual cost is reconciled during construction.

Unit prices are used when work items have uncertain quantities (e.g., rock excavation, unsuitable soil replacement). The unit rate is bid up front, and final payment is based on actual measured quantities, which allows the owner to manage cost fairly during execution when unforeseen conditions arise.

Together, allowances and unit prices (Option C) ensure that:

All bidders base their bids on the same assumptions, supporting equal consideration and fairness.

The contract can adapt to undefined or unforeseen conditions without renegotiating basic pricing structures.

Why the others are not correct:

A. Bid security and substitutionBid security protects the owner if the bidder fails to execute the contract; substitution deals with product changes. These do not primarily address managing costs for undefined or unforeseen conditions nor set flexible price structures like allowances or unit prices.

B. Add and deduct alternativesAlternates provide flexibility in award (selecting add or deduct options), but they deal with defined scope options, not ongoing management of undefined or unforeseen conditions during execution.

D. Liquidated damages and combined bidsLiquidated damages relate to time and schedule risk, not unknown scope or quantities; combined bids are procedural. Neither is the primary mechanism CSI associates with managing cost for undefined/unforeseen work.

Relevant CSI-aligned references (no URLs):

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – sections on bidding, pricing, alternates, allowances, and unit prices.

CSI Construction Specifications Practice Guide – discussion of Division 01 provisions for allowances and unit prices.

CSI CDT Body of Knowledge – topics on bid forms, pricing mechanisms, and managing unknown quantities.

In CSI and CDT terminology, the process of reaching out to potential or prequalified bidders to obtain bids or proposals is called “solicitation.”

The procurement (bidding) phase includes preparing procurement documents and then soliciting bids or proposals from interested or qualified firms.

“Solicitation” covers all methods used to notify and invite participation: advertisements, invitations to bid, requests for proposals (RFPs), and notices to prequalified bidders.

CSI’s Project Delivery Practice Guide and CDT study materials describe the sequence in the procurement stage roughly as:

Preparation of procurement documents (including Instructions to Bidders/Offerors, bid forms, proposed contract forms, etc.).

Solicitation of bids or proposals – announcement or direct issuance to prospective bidders.

Receipt, opening, and evaluation of bids/proposals.

Recommendation and award of contract.

Within that structure, “solicitation” is clearly identified as the step where the owner/AE issues the invitation to bid or request for proposals. The other answer choices refer to documents or requests that are part of the process, but not the process itself:

B. Instructions for Procurement – The CDT/CSI terminology is usually “Instructions to Bidders” or “Instructions to Offerors,” which are sections within the procurement documents explaining how to submit bids (time, place, format, required forms, etc.). They are not the act of announcing or inviting; they are a part of the documents used once solicitation has begun.

C. Instructions to Bidders – This is a specific document or section that sets the rules for bidding (bid security, withdrawal of bids, opening procedures, etc.). It is not the overall process of broadcasting the opportunity; instead it governs bidder behavior after solicitation has occurred.

D. Request for Scope of Work – This is not a standard CSI/CDT term. Scope of work is normally defined in the drawings, specifications, and sometimes in a statement of work, but “request for scope of work” is not used as the formal label for the invitation stage.

Because the question asks specifically for “the process of notifying prospective or qualified bidders requesting proposals for a specific project or an invitation to bid,” the correct CSI-aligned term is “Solicitation” (Option A).

Relevant CSI references (no URLs):

CSI Project Delivery Practice Guide – Procurement phase and terminology for solicitation of bids/proposals.

CSI Construction Specifications Practice Guide – Sections on procurement and bidding documents.

CSI CDT Body of Knowledge – Topic: Procurement (solicitation and receipt of bids/proposals).

CSI’s various classification and formatting standards serve different purposes, and CDT content draws clear distinctions between them:

The United States National CAD Standard (NCS) and the AIA CAD Layer Guidelines (now part of NCS) define graphic conventions, sheet organization, layering, and symbols for CAD drawings.

The CSI Uniform Drawing System (UDS) (now integrated into the NCS) provides consistent formats and conventions for construction drawings, including sheet organization, drawing set organization, schedules, notation, and symbols.

All three—NCS, AIA CAD Layer Guidelines, and CSI UDS—are associated with graphical and organizational standards for construction drawings.

By contrast:

MasterFormat® is CSI’s specification and work-results classification system, which organizes information primarily into Divisions and Sections for specifications and other written documents, not drawings. CDT materials repeatedly emphasize that MasterFormat is used to organize project manual content and other written construction information, not the graphical content of the drawings.

Therefore, the one item not used as a graphical format for organizing drawings is:

D. MasterFormat®

Why the other options are correct as “graphical” or drawing-related formats:

A. United States National CAD Standard – Provides a nationally coordinated standard for CAD drawing presentation, including layering, symbols, and sheet organization.

B. AIA CAD Layer Guidelines – Define standard layer naming and structure for CAD drawings; these are explicitly about how graphical information is organized in electronic drawings.

C. CSI Uniform Drawing System – Developed to standardize the organization and graphical conventions of drawings, later integrated into NCS.

Thus, from a CSI standpoint, MasterFormat® is the outlier here: it organizes written construction information, not graphical drawing formats, making Option D the correct choice.