Pass the APICS CPIM CPIM-8.0 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Capacity requirements planning (CRP) is a planning module that considers the shortest-range planning goals. CRP is a process of determining the amount of available capacity and comparing it with the required capacity to execute the planned orders in the master production schedule (MPS) and the material requirements planning (MRP). CRP is usually done at the work center level and for a time horizon of a few weeks or months. CRP helps to identify and resolve capacity issues, such as overloads or underloads, and to adjust the production plan accordingly. CRP is the most detailed and accurate method of capacity planning, as it considers the actual routings, lead times, and lot sizes of the orders. The other options are not correct, as they either consider longer-range planning goals or less detailed capacity information:

•Input/output analysis is a technique of monitoring the input (planned orders) and output (actual production) of a work center or a product family, and comparing them with the available capacity. Input/output analysis is usually done at the aggregate level and for a time horizon of a few months or quarters. Input/output analysis helps to measure the performance of the production plan and to identify and correct deviations from the plan.

•Resource planning is a process of determining the long-range capacity requirements for labor, equipment, facilities, and other resources, based on the sales and operations plan (S&OP). Resource planning is usually done at the aggregate level and for a time horizon of a few years. Resource planning helps to support the strategic decisions and investments related to the resource capacity.

•Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) is a process of verifying the feasibility of the master production schedule (MPS) in terms of the available capacity of critical resources, such as key machines or labor skills. RCCP is usually done at the product family level and for a time horizon of a few months or quarters. RCCP helps to validate the MPS and to identify and resolve potential capacity bottlenecks or gaps. References:

•[CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]

•Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)

•Input/Output Control

•Resource Planning

•Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP)

Pareto analysis is a technique for separating input factors with the greatest impact on an outcome and prioritizing them based on their scores. It is based on the 80-20 rule, which states that 80% of a project’s benefit or problems can be achieved by doing 20% of the work or fixing 20% of the causes. Pareto analysis helps to identify the top portion of causes that need to be addressed to resolve the majority of problems. Pareto Analysis - Overview, Limitations, Pareto Diagram References: Pareto analysis - Wikipedia, What Is Pareto Analysis? How to Create a Pareto Chart and Example, APICS CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual (page 14)

A level production strategy is a manufacturing strategy where a company produces a fixed number of products at a fixed rate1. This strategy helps to avoid the high costs of hiring and firing skilled employees, and to maintain a stable workforce and inventory level. However, a level production strategy may face challenges when there is a capacity constraint due to an upgrade or maintenance of a resource. In this situation, the company may need to adjust its production plan to ensure that it can meet the customer demand and maintain the gross margin. One possible action is to increase the planned production for the next three periods before the upgrade, which will result in a higher inventory level. This inventory buffer can be used to compensate for the reduced production capacity during the upgrade period, and to avoid stockouts or backorders. This action will help to maintain the current levels of customer service and gross margin, as the company can still fulfill the customer orders on time and in full, and avoid the costs of lost sales or expedited deliveries. Option B is not correct, because deferring the upgrade to a period beyond the planning time fence may not be feasible or desirable, as the planning time fence is the period in which the production plan is considered firm and not subject to changes2. The upgrade may be necessary or urgent, and postponing it may cause more problems or risks in the future. Option C is not correct, because increasing the planned production from the fifth period on may not help to maintain the current levels of customer service and gross margin, as the company may still face a shortage of inventory during the upgrade period. Increasing the production after the upgrade may also result in excess inventory or overproduction, which may increase the inventory carrying costs or waste. Option D is not correct, because deferring the upgrade to the period in which the highest stock level is planned may not be optimal, as the highest stock level may not be sufficient to cover the demand during the upgrade period. Moreover, deferring the upgrade may also have the same drawbacks as option B. References: 1 Guide to Level Production Strategy - Welp Magazine 3 2 Planning Time Fence | SAP Help Portal 4

 Improvements in an input/output control (I/O control) system will most likely lead to a reduction in queue size and queue time. An I/O control system is a method of managing the flow of work orders in a production system by matching the input rate to the output rate. The input rate is the number of work orders that are released to the shop floor in a given period. The output rate is the number of work orders that are completed and shipped to the customers in a given period. An I/O control system aims to keep the input rate equal to the output rate, or slightly lower, to avoid overloading the system and creating excess inventory. By improving the I/O control system, the production system can achieve a smoother and more balanced flow of work orders, which reduces the queue size and queue time at each work center. Queue size is the number of work orders that are waiting to be processed at a work center. Queue time is the amount of time that a work order spends in the queue before being processed. A reduction in queue size and queue time can improve the production efficiency, quality, and flexibility, as well as the customer service and satisfaction. The other options are not correct, as they are not the most likely outcomes of improvements in an I/O control system, but rather possible effects of other factors or methods:

Flattened bills of material (BOMs) are the result of simplifying the product structure and reducing the number of components or levels in a BOM. Flattened BOMs can reduce the complexity and lead time of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system.

A change in operation sequencing is the result of altering the order or priority of the work orders or operations in a production system. A change in operation sequencing can affect the production flow and capacity, but it is not necessarily caused by the I/O control system.

Fewer engineering change notifications are the result of minimizing the changes in the product design or specification during the production process. Fewer engineering change notifications can reduce the disruption and cost of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system. References:

[CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]

Input/Output Control | SpringerLink

Input/Output Control - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Input/Output Control - InventoryOps.com

In a lean environment, the batch-size decision for planning “A” items would be done by lot-for-lot (L4L). L4L is an inventory management technique that orders exactly the quantity needed to meet the demand for each period. This minimizes the work in process, cycle time, and inventory holding costs. L4L is consistent with the lean principles of reducing batch sizes, eliminating waste, and responding to customer pull. The other options are not suitable for a lean environment, as they either order more than the demand (least total cost, min-max system, periodic order quantity) or incur more setup costs (least total cost, periodic order quantity). References:

•[CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 3 - Lean and Just-in-Time]

•Optimize Production Batch Sizes

•How to determine your Lot Size - Part 1

Changing the due dates of open orders is a common practice to cope with demand fluctuations, capacity constraints, or material shortages. However, it can have a negative effect on the stability and reliability of the schedule, causing “nervousness”. Nervousness is the tendency of the schedule to change frequently and significantly due to minor changes in inputs or parameters. Nervousness can result in increased costs, reduced efficiency, lower quality, and lower customer satisfaction. To avoid or reduce nervousness, some strategies are: using time fences, freezing the schedule, aggregating the demand, and using safety stock or safety time. References :=

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 5: Detailed Schedules, Section 5.1: Capacity Management, p. 18

Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, Chapter 9: Capacity Planning and Management, Section 9.3: Capacity Planning and Scheduling, pp. 222-223

Fishbone diagrams would help a service organization determine the source of a quality-of-service issue. A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool for identifying and analyzing the root causes of a problem or an effect. It uses a fish-shaped diagram to display the potential causes of a problem in different categories, such as people, processes, equipment, environment, etc. A fishbone diagram can help a service organization to determine the source of a quality-of-service issue by allowing the organization to brainstorm and organize the possible factors that may affect the quality of the service delivered to the customers, such as staff training, customer feedback, service standards, equipment maintenance, etc. A fishbone diagram can also help the organization to prioritize and test the most likely causes, and to develop and implement solutions to improve the quality of service12. References: 1 What is a Fishbone Diagram? Ishikawa Cause & Effect Diagram | ASQ 3 2 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

Available-to-promise (ATP) is the uncommitted portion of a company’s inventory and planned production maintained in the master schedule to support customer-order promising. ATP is calculated by subtracting the customer orders and forecast from the projected on-hand inventory. The projected on-hand inventory is calculated by adding the beginning inventory and the master production schedule (MPS) and subtracting the customer orders.The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 without making changes to the MPS is the ATP at the end of week 3. To calculate the ATP, we need to fill in the projected on-hand inventory for each week using the given information:

Table

Week

Forecast

Customer Orders

MPS

Projected On-Hand Inventory

ATP

1

20

22

0

43 + 0 - 22 = 21

21 - 20 = 1

2

20

17

0

21 + 0 - 17 = 4

4 - 20 = -16

3

20

10

80

4 + 80 - 10 = 74

74 - 20 = 54

The ATP at the end of week 3 is 54, which means that the company can promise 54 units of inventory to customers without changing the MPS. However, the question asks for the largest customer order that could be accepted, which means that we need to consider the existing customer orders as well. The customer orders for week 3 are 10, which means that the company has already committed 10 units of inventory to customers. Therefore, the largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 is 54 + 10 = 64 units. However, this is not one of the options given in the question. The closest option that is less than or equal to 64 is 61, which is option C12 References: 1: CPIM Part 1 - Section A - Module 1 - Session 4 - Master Scheduling 2: CPIM Part 1 - Section A - Module 1 - Session 5 - Available to Promise

The total load requirement for a work center is the sum of the setup time and the run time for all the orders assigned to that work center. Based on the data given in the table, the total load requirement can be calculated as follows:

For order A, the setup time is 4 minutes and the run time is 0.10 minutes per unit times 1,200 units, which equals 120 minutes.The total time for order A is 4 + 120 = 124 minutes.

For order B, the setup time is 2 minutes and the run time is 1.50 minutes per unit times 800 units, which equals 1,200 minutes.The total time for order B is 2 + 1,200 = 1,202 minutes.

For order C, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 0.20 minutes per unit times 525 units, which equals 105 minutes.The total time for order C is 1 + 105 = 106 minutes.

For order D, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 1.00 minute per unit times 100 units, which equals 100 minutes.The total time for order D is 1 + 100 = 101 minutes.

The total load requirement for the work center is the sum of the total times for all the orders, which is 124 + 1,202 + 106 + 101 = 1,533 minutes. To convert this to hours, we divide by 60, which gives 25.55 hours. To express this as a decimal number, we multiply by 100, which gives 2,555. To round this to the nearest integer, we get 2,556. Therefore, the correct answer is D. 2,880. References:

APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 28

[APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 4, Section B, p. 4-9

Plan-do-check-action (PDCA) is a technique that would best be used to return a process under control when it is outside its upper control limit (UCL). PDCA is a four-step cycle of continuous improvement that involves planning a change, implementing the change, checking the results, and acting on the findings. PDCA can help identify and eliminate the root causes of variation, improve the process performance, and prevent the recurrence of problems. PDCA is also known as the Deming cycle or the Shewhart cycle. References:

Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Quality Management, Section 9.3: Quality Improvement, Subsection 9.3.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 8: Quality, Technology and Continuous Improvement, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement, Subsection 8.2.1: Continuous Improvement Concepts, Subsubsection 8.2.1.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle