Pass the The Open Group Enterprise Architecture OGEA-101 Questions and answers with CertsForce

The statement illustrates iteration and the ADM. Iteration is the technique of repeating a process or a phase with the aim of improving or refining the outcome. Iteration allows for feedback loops and adaptations at any point in the architecture development and transition process. Separate projects may operate their own ADM cycles concurrently, with relationships between the different projects, to address different aspects or levels of the architecture in an iterative manner. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.1 Introduction to the ADM.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Gap Analysis is an ADM technique used in Phases B, C, and D of the TOGAF ADM (Business, Information Systems, and Technology Architectures).

Its main purpose is to validate the target architecture by comparing the Baseline Architecture with the Target Architecture and identifying:

Gaps (building blocks or capabilities present in the target but missing in the baseline).

Overlaps (building blocks duplicated across architectures).

Conflicts (inconsistencies between baseline and target).

The output of Gap Analysis provides:

A validated Target Architecture.

A set of identified gaps that must be addressed by future work packages in Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions.

Therefore, the purpose of Gap Analysis is best expressed as to validate the architecture (Answer D).

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Establish quality metrics for the architecture: This is part of performance management and governance, not Gap Analysis.

B. Identify non-functional requirements: Non-functional requirements are captured through requirements management and stakeholder analysis, not Gap Analysis.

C. Determine service levels: Service levels are typically defined in SLAs and operational models, not through Gap Analysis.

References

The Open Group, TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines & Techniques — Gap Analysis.

The Open Group, TOGAF® 9 Certified Study Guide — explains the role of Gap Analysis in validating architectures and identifying work package inputs.

(ADM Inputs/Outputs for early phases include Business Scenario/Architecture Vision content, with “Risks and issues” explicitly listed.) — “Business Scenario / Architecture Vision… Risks and issues …” www.opengroup.org

The TOGAF ADM uses Gap Analysis during Phases B, C, and D (Business, Information Systems, and Technology Architectures) to identify building block gaps—the differences between the Baseline Architecture and the Target Architecture. However, simply identifying gaps does not complete the process.

The association of gaps with work packages happens later in the cycle:

Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions is where the identified gaps are analyzed and translated into work packages, projects, or initiatives that will deliver the required changes.

In Phase E, architects also determine whether Transition Architectures are needed, and they generate the initial Architecture Roadmap.

This is the phase where gaps become actionable, linked with specific work packages that can be executed to close them.

Phase F (Migration Planning) takes this further by finalizing the roadmap and building the detailed Implementation and Migration Plan, but the initial association of gaps with work packages occurs in Phase E.

The Architecture Landscape is divided into levels known as Segment Strategic and Capability Architectures. These levels correspond to different scopes and purposes of architectures within an enterprise. Segment Architectures are architectures that address specific business units, functions, or processes within an enterprise. Strategic Architectures are architectures that provide a high-level view of the enterprise’s vision, goals, and direction. Capability Architectures are architectures that address specific business capabilities or services that span multiple segments or domains. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 2.4 Architecture Repository.

Architecture partitioning is not the same as architecture levels (so 1 is incorrect).

It allows different teams of architects to work on different parts of the architecture in parallel (2 is correct).

TOGAF does not prescribe a fixed partitioning model; it provides guidance (so 3 is incorrect).

Partitioning is used to simplify management of Enterprise Architecture in large or complex organizations (4 is correct).

Risk is defined as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, according to the ISO 31000 standard, which provides principles and guidelines for risk management1 Risk can be positive or negative, depending on whether the uncertainty affects the achievement or the failure of the objectives. Risk can also be expressed in terms of likelihood and impact, which indicate the probability and the consequence of the risk occurrence. Risk management is the coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk. Risk management is an integral part of the TOGAF standard, as it helps to identify, assess, and treat the risks that may affect the architecture development and implementation2 References: 1: ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines, Clause 3.1 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 32: Risk Management

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From documents:

The Architecture Repository in TOGAF provides a structured model for storing architectural output. It contains six classes of architectural information:

Architecture Metamodel – defines the structure of architectural content and relationships.

Architecture Capability – contains parameters, structures, and processes supporting the governance of the repository and the Architecture Board.

Architecture Landscape – architectural views at different levels (Strategic, Segment, Capability).

Standards Information Base (SIB) – standards to guide architecture development and solution building.

Reference Library – reference materials such as patterns, templates, guidelines.

Governance Log – record of governance activity, compliance assessments, waivers, and approvals.

Focusing on Architecture Capability:

Defined by TOGAF as: “The parameters, structures, and processes that support governance of the Architecture Repository.”

It provides the framework for ensuring that the repository is managed, controlled, and aligned with the enterprise’s architecture governance practices.

It includes organizational roles, responsibilities, and processes that ensure architecture practices are sustainable and repeatable.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. This describes the Architecture Metamodel, not Architecture Capability.

C. This describes the Governance Log, which holds the record of governance activity.

D. This describes the Reference Library, which contains patterns, templates, and guidelines.

References (official TOGAF materials, no links):

The Open Group, TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, Part V: Enterprise Continuum and Tools — Architecture Repository.

The Open Group, TOGAF® 9 Certified Study Guide — detailed breakdown of the six classes in the Architecture Repository and their purpose.

According to the TOGAF standard, the two statements provided refer to different scopes within which architecture can be developed:

Groups of countries, governments, or governmental organizations working together typically align with broader, often international, scopes of architecture that transcend individual enterprise boundaries.

Partnerships and alliances of businesses working together, such as a consortium or supply chain, refer to collaborative efforts that can define architecture at a scope involving multiple enterprises.

In both cases, the term "Architectures Scopes" is appropriate because it reflects the varying levels and contexts in which architectures can be defined, ranging from single business units to collaborative inter-organizational efforts.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From documents:

In TOGAF, a Business Scenario is an ADM technique used to capture and structure business requirements in a way that directly informs the development and validation of architectures. It frames a specific business problem (or opportunity) and articulates the desired outcomes/objectives, along with the business and technical context, the involved actors and roles (human and system), and the measures of success. This makes option A correct because it concisely captures the essence of a Business Scenario: a well-defined business problem coupled with the outcomes the business seeks to achieve.

A good Business Scenario typically includes:

The business problem/opportunity and drivers.

The business and technical environment/context in which the problem exists.

The desired outcomes/objectives and measures of success (how success will be recognized).

Actors and roles (both human and system) and their interactions.

Capabilities and high-level requirements implied by the scenario.

Business Scenarios are especially valuable in Phase A: Architecture Vision to validate scope, objectives, and business value, and they continue to be used throughout Phases B–D to test and validate the target architectures and to maintain requirements traceability via Requirements Management. They promote shared understanding among stakeholders and provide a concrete basis for evaluating solution options and assessing architecture fitness-for-purpose.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. A use-case for developing a business model. While Business Scenarios and use-cases are related, a Business Scenario is broader. It provides context, problem, objectives, and measures of success; use-cases are often derived from or complement Business Scenarios to specify interactions, but a Business Scenario is not merely a use-case.

C. A method to quantify readiness for change. This describes Business Transformation Readiness Assessment, a separate TOGAF technique used to gauge an organization’s readiness to execute change. It is not what TOGAF defines as a Business Scenario.

D. A technique to identify differences between a baseline and a target architecture. That is Gap Analysis, another distinct ADM technique used to determine what needs to change to move from the current state to the desired future state.

References (official TOGAF materials; no links):

The Open Group, TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines & Techniques — Business Scenarios; also Requirements Management, and Phase A: Architecture Vision (Part II) for where Business Scenarios are applied.

The Open Group, TOGAF® Series Guide: Business Scenarios — definition, structure, and usage of Business Scenarios across the ADM.

The Open Group, TOGAF® 9 Foundation Study Guide (latest edition) — coverage of Business Scenarios as an ADM technique and their relationship to use-cases.

The Open Group, TOGAF® 9 Certified Study Guide (latest edition) — contrasts with related techniques (Gap Analysis; Business Transformation Readiness Assessment) and explains use within Phase A and Requirements Management.===========