Pass the Scrum SAFe Certification SAFe-Practitioner Questions and answers with CertsForce

 WIP stands for work in process, which is the amount of work that is currently being done in a system. One way to understand WIP is to make it visible to all stakeholders, using tools such as Kanban boards, cumulative flow diagrams, or burn-up charts. By making WIP visible, we can see the current state of the work, identify bottlenecks, limit WIP to match capacity, and improve flow efficiency. References: Principle #6 – Visualize and limit WIP, reduce batch sizes, and manage queue lengths, Make Value Flow without Interruptions, SAFe Principle 6: Visualise and limit WIP, reduce batch sizes, and manage queued lengths

 = WIP limits are necessary in the ART Kanban to ensure large queues are not forming, which would slow down the flow of value and increase the lead time. WIP limits are a way of applying the Lean principle of reducing waste and optimizing the system for the whole. By limiting the amount of work that can be in progress at any stage of the Kanban system, the ART can balance the demand and capacity, avoid overloading the system, and focus on completing the work rather than starting new work. WIP limits also help to expose bottlenecks, dependencies, and impediments that need to be resolved to improve the flow efficiency and quality of the work. References: = ART Flow - Scaled Agile Framework, ART and Solution Train Backlogs - Scaled Agile Framework, Kanban And The Importance Of Work In Progress (WIP) Limits

 Transparency is one of the four core values of SAFe that represents the foundational beliefs that are key to SAFe’s effectiveness. Transparency means making all the work visible, along with its priorities, status, dependencies, and outcomes. Transparency also means being honest and open about the challenges, risks, failures, and learnings that occur during the development process. By stating the reason for the release failure and sharing their improvement plan, Team B is demonstrating transparency to the other teams and stakeholders in the System Demo. Transparency helps to build trust, collaboration, alignment, and continuous learning in the ART and the Solution Train. References: = Core Values - Scaled Agile Framework, System Demo - Scaled Agile Framework, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner

Iteration goals are short, specific, and measurable statements that describe what the Agile team intends to accomplish in an Iteration. They are derived from the team backlog, the PI objectives, and the team vision. Iteration goals help to align the team to a common vision of work in the Iteration, and provide clarity, focus, and motivation. Iteration goals also enable the team to communicate their progress and dependencies to other teams and stakeholders, and to demonstrate value delivery in the system demo. References: Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner, Iteration GoalsQUESTION NO: 41

Which situation should use the Large Solution SAFe configuration?

A. Organizations that need to have System Demos after each Iteration

B. Organizations that operate in an environment that requires compliance for complex, high-assurance systems

C. Organizations that need to scale Agile across the Enterprise

D. Every large Enterprise that uses SAFe

Answer: B

The Large Solution SAFe configuration is for enterprises that are building large and complex solutions that typically require multiple Agile Release Trains (ARTs) and Suppliers, but do not require portfolio-level considerations1. This configuration is suitable for organizations that operate in an environment that requires compliance for complex, high-assurance systems, such as aerospace, defense, automotive, medical, and financial industries2. The Large Solution SAFe configuration includes a stronger focus on capturing requirements in the Solution Intent, coordinating multiple ARTs and Suppliers, and ensuring compliance with regulations and standards3. References: Large Solution - Scaled Agile Framework, Large Solution SAFe - Scaled Agile Framework, Different SAFe Configurations Explained | Inflectra

= The recommended final agenda item of PI Planning is taking the PI confidence vote. This is a simple and quick way to assess the level of confidence and commitment of the teams and stakeholders to the PI objectives and plan. The PI confidence vote is done by asking each team member and stakeholder to hold up one to five fingers, indicating their confidence level from low to high. The average score across the ART is calculated and displayed. If the score is below 3, the teams and stakeholders are asked to identify the top issues or risks that lower their confidence and propose mitigation actions. The confidence vote is repeated until the score reaches 3 or above, or the timebox expires. The confidence vote helps to surface and address potential impediments, foster alignment and accountability, and create a sense of ownership and empowerment for the PI plan. References: = PI Planning - Scaled Agile Framework, PI Confidence Vote - Scaled Agile Framework

= Alignment is one of the four core values of SAFe that represents the foundational beliefs that are key to SAFe’s effectiveness. Alignment helps everyone in the SAFe portfolio work toward a common direction and deliver value with speed and quality. One of the ways to create and maintain alignment in SAFe is to speak with a common language and understand your customer. Speaking with a common language means using consistent terms and definitions across the enterprise to avoid confusion and ambiguity. Understanding your customer means identifying their needs, preferences, and expectations, and delivering solutions that meet or exceed them. References: = Core Values - Scaled Agile Framework, SAFe Core Values - Scaled Agile Framework

A technical exploration enabler is a type of enabler that supports research, prototyping, and other activities needed to develop an understanding of customer needs, including the exploration of prospective solutions and evaluation of alternatives1. A technical exploration enabler can be demonstrated by showing the knowledge gained by the exploration, such as the results of experiments, the insights from data analysis, the feedback from customers or stakeholders, the lessons learned from failures, or the recommendations for future actions2. Showing the knowledge gained by the exploration helps to validate the assumptions and hypotheses, measure the value and feasibility of the solution, and inform the decision-making process3. The other options are not valid ways to demonstrate a technical exploration enabler, as they either do not reflect the purpose of the exploration, or imply that the exploration is not necessary or valuable. References: Enablers - Scaled Agile Framework, How can a technical exploration enabler be demonstrated?, Principle #4 - Build incrementally with fast, integrated learning cycles - Scaled Agile Framework

Iteration planning for Kanban teams is different from Scrum teams in that Kanban teams do not estimate their velocity, do not commit to service level agreements, and do not plan the Iteration in detail. Instead, Kanban teams use a flow-based process that allows them to pull work items from the backlog as they become available and deliver value continuously. However, Kanban teams still operate within the ART iteration cadence and often publish Iteration goals to align with the ART vision and objectives, as well as to communicate their priorities and dependencies to other teams and stakeholders. References: SAFe Team Kanban, Agile Iteration Planning Effectively

Respect for People is one of the four SAFe Core Values that guide the behaviors and actions of everyone participating in a SAFe portfolio. Respect for People means that everyone is valued and deserves respect, regardless of their role, background, or experience. It also means that everyone is empowered to contribute, learn, and grow within the organization. Respect for People involves coaching aspiring developers to grow their skillsets and fill new roles throughout the organization, as well as providing them with opportunities for feedback, recognition, and career development. Respect for People also fosters a culture of trust, collaboration, and psychological safety, where people can express their ideas, opinions, and concerns without fear of judgment or retaliation. References: Core Values - Scaled Agile Framework, Respect for People - Scaled Agile Framework

Guiding investments by horizon is one of the four Lean budget guardrails that describe the policies and practices for budgeting, spending, and governance for a specific portfolio. This guardrail helps ensure that the portfolio allocates its budget to solutions that reflect different time horizons and risk profiles, balancing near-term opportunities with long-term strategy and growth1. The portfolio-level guidance for investments by horizon is based on the four horizons model2, which categorizes solutions into four types: Horizon 0 (solutions that are being decommissioned), Horizon 1 (solutions that are mature and generate most of the current revenue), Horizon 2 (solutions that are emerging and have high growth potential), and Horizon 3 (solutions that are exploratory and have high uncertainty). Each value stream should allocate its budget to solutions in these horizons according to the portfolio’s vision and roadmap1. References: 1: Lean Budget Guardrails - Scaled Agile Framework2: Investment Horizons - Scaled Agile Framework