Pass the Microsoft Microsoft Certified: Security Compliance and Identity Fundamentals SC-900 Questions and answers with CertsForce

In Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, the built-in Compliance score and assessments are designed for ongoing, risk-based monitoring of your organization’s compliance posture. Microsoft’s SCI materials describe Compliance Manager as a solution that “helps you track, improve, and demonstrate your compliance posture” by mapping regulations and standards to improvement actions and assessments. The experience is not a one-time or periodic snapshot; it is intended to be continuous. As you implement controls, provide evidence, or when automated tests record results, “your score is updated as you complete actions,” reflecting current progress toward data protection and regulatory requirements.

Assessments in Compliance Manager persist over time and are maintained through continuous evaluation: actions can be automatically tested when supported (for example, configuration-based controls in Microsoft 365) or manually assessed on an ongoing basis by compliance teams. This design enables organizations to prioritize and remediate issues as they arise, rather than waiting for monthly or quarterly reviews. Because of this continuous scoring and reassessment model, Compliance Manager assesses compliance data continually for an organization, providing near real-time insight into control effectiveness and residual risk across standards such as GDPR, ISO 27001, and NIST frameworks.

In Microsoft Purview Information Protection, pre-trained (Microsoft-provided) trainable classifiers are designed to automatically recognize specific categories of content by learning from examples rather than relying only on patterns or keywords. Microsoft’s guidance explains that trainable classifiers “look for data by learning from examples,” and that Microsoft supplies a catalog of “pre-trained classifiers that you can use immediately in your tenant.” The documentation explicitly lists content types these classifiers can recognize, including “Resumes,” along with other categories such as Source code, Threat and harassment, and more. Because they’re already trained by Microsoft, you can use them “to identify and classify items across SharePoint, OneDrive, and Exchange,” and then take actions such as auto-labeling or enforcing DLP policies based on the classifier match.

By contrast, Content explorer is a reporting tool that lets you view where sensitive info types/labels were found; it doesn’t identify resumes on its own. Activity explorer shows events like DLP policy matches over time. eDiscovery is used for legal hold, search, and review, not for semantic content identification. Therefore, to identify documents that are employee resumes, the correct Microsoft compliance feature is the pre-trained (Microsoft-provided) trainable classifier for Resumes.

Microsoft Entra Conditional Access (CA) evaluates signals from the user, device, location, and risk to make access decisions. The platform explicitly notes that CA decisions occur after primary sign-in: “Conditional Access policies are enforced after the first-factor authentication has been completed.” This means a user must successfully present their initial credentials (e.g., password, Windows Hello, FIDO2) before the CA engine evaluates policy logic. Therefore, the statement that CA is evaluated before a user is authenticated is not correct.

Regarding scoping, CA can target ordinary and privileged identities. The assignment options allow administrators to aim policies at users, groups, and directory roles: “You can include or exclude users and groups… [and] include or exclude specific Azure AD directory roles from a Conditional Access policy.” Because Global Administrator is a directory role, policies can be applied to those accounts (with Microsoft’s best-practice guidance to maintain at least one excluded break-glass account to prevent lockout).

For signals/conditions, CA supports device platform filtering. The documented device platform condition states: “This condition is based on the operating system platform of the device… iOS, Android, Windows, macOS (and others).” Administrators commonly use this to require different controls (like MFA or compliant device) based on Android or iOS.

Putting these together:

CA can apply to Global Administrators (Yes).

CA is evaluated after first-factor authentication (No to “before”).

Device platform (e.g., Android/iOS) is a valid CA signal (Yes).

For Azure data services such as Azure SQL Managed Instance, Microsoft provides threat detection and protection through Microsoft Defender for Cloud (via Microsoft Defender for SQL). Microsoft documentation states that Defender for Cloud “provides advanced threat protection for your SQL resources,” including Azure SQL Database and Azure SQL Managed Instance, by “continuously monitoring for anomalous activities and potential SQL injection, brute force, and exploitation attempts.” When enabled, the plan “generates security alerts when suspicious activities are detected,” and these alerts can be surfaced in Defender for Cloud, forwarded to Microsoft Sentinel, or integrated with workflows for response. Microsoft Secure Score is a security posture metric, application security groups are for network segmentation in Azure, and Azure Bastion provides secure RDP/SSH over TLS—none of these deliver database-specific threat detection. Therefore, to provide threat detection for Azure SQL Managed Instance, you use Microsoft Defender for Cloud (Defender for SQL).

Azure Firewall is a managed, cloud-based network security service designed to secure traffic inside and across Azure Virtual Networks. Microsoft describes Azure Firewall as a stateful firewall that “protects Azure Virtual Network resources” by enforcing network and application rules, central logging, and threat intelligence–based filtering. Because it is deployed into a VNet/subnet (often as the hub in a hub-and-spoke), it directly governs East/West and North/South flows to workloads such as Azure virtual machines and platform services reachable through the VNet, using DNAT/SNAT and rule collections. Microsoft guidance highlights capabilities to “centrally create, enforce, and log application and network connectivity policies across subscriptions and virtual networks,” and to filter traffic for peered VNets, branch connections (VPN/ExpressRoute), and internet traffic. These capabilities explicitly map to protecting Azure virtual networks and the VMs and subnets inside them. In contrast, Azure AD users, Exchange Online inboxes, and SharePoint Online sites are SaaS/identity resources protected by Microsoft Entra controls, Exchange/SharePoint security, and Purview/Defender for Office 365—not by a VNet firewall. Therefore, the Azure Firewall–protectable resource types among the options are Azure virtual machines and Azure virtual networks.

Microsoft’s Conditional Access (part of Microsoft Entra ID) evaluates multiple signals to make access decisions. The official description lists typical signals such as “user or group membership, IP location information, device state, application, and real-time risk.” The device state element explicitly refers to conditions like “compliant or hybrid Azure AD joined devices,” allowing policies that grant or block access—or require extra controls—based on whether a device meets compliance/registration requirements.

Regarding evaluation timing, Microsoft’s guidance states that Conditional Access “policies are enforced after the first-factor authentication is completed.” This means the engine needs the user’s primary sign-in context (who the user is and how they authenticated) to evaluate the conditions and then decide whether to allow, block, or require additional controls. Therefore, the statement that policies apply before first factor is not correct.

Finally, Conditional Access includes grant controls such as “Require multi-factor authentication,” and policies can be scoped to specific cloud apps or actions. As a result, you can target a particular application and require MFA when a user attempts to access it, satisfying application-specific risk mitigation while preserving user productivity.

Microsoft’s sensitivity labels (Microsoft Purview Information Protection) support user-driven labeling: “Users can manually apply sensitivity labels to files and emails” and organizations can also configure automatic or recommended labeling. This confirms that end users are permitted to choose a label themselves when policy allows. Microsoft also clarifies the cardinality for items: “A document or email can have only a single sensitivity label applied to it at a time.” Therefore, applying multiple sensitivity labels to the same file is not supported (labels are mutually exclusive on a given item). In addition to classification, labels can enforce protection and visual markings: “When you configure a sensitivity label, you can add protection settings such as encryption and content marking (headers, footers, and watermarks).” Word, Excel, and PowerPoint honor these content markings, so a label can automatically stamp a watermark on a Word document while embedding the label metadata for persistent protection. Together, these authoritative statements from Microsoft’s SCI documentation establish the correct responses: Yes (manual application), No (only one label per file), and Yes (labels can apply watermarks).

Azure Blueprints allow cloud architects and central IT to define a repeatable set of Azure resources and governance artifacts—including Azure Policy assignments, role assignments (RBAC), resource groups, and ARM/Bicep templates—and then deploy them consistently across subscriptions. Microsoft’s guidance describes Blueprints as a way to “orchestrate the deployment of various resource templates and other artifacts” to establish standards, patterns, and compliance for environments at scale. This is distinct from Azure Policy, which evaluates and enforces configuration but does not package multi-artifact environments; Microsoft Sentinel and Defender are security analytics/protection services rather than provisioning frameworks. Thus, for consistent provisioning across multiple subscriptions, the prescribed solution is Azure Blueprints.

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 is the Microsoft 365 solution designed to protect users from threats delivered through email and collaboration workloads. SCI training material explains that Defender for Office 365 protects Exchange Online, Microsoft Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive for Business by detecting and blocking malware, phishing, and other advanced attacks that use messages and shared content as the delivery channel.

A key capability is Safe Links, which specifically protects against malicious URLs. When a user receives an email, Teams chat message, or channel post that contains a hyperlink, Safe Links scans and rewrites that URL. At the moment the user clicks, the link is checked again; if it is identified as malicious or leads to a known phishing or malware-hosting site, access is blocked and a warning page is shown. This time-of-click protection is emphasized in Microsoft’s security documentation as a primary defense against weaponized links in email and collaborative communications.

By comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity focuses on detecting identity-related threats in on-premises Active Directory, Defender for Endpoint protects devices and endpoints, and Defender for Cloud Apps secures SaaS applications and shadow IT. None of these are the primary solution for blocking malicious links in email, chats, and channels. Therefore, the correct choice is Microsoft Defender for Office 365.