Pass the ISC ISC 2 Credentials CISSP Questions and answers with CertsForce

The best reason for writing an information security policy is to support information security governance. Information security governance is the process or the framework of establishing and enforcing the policies and standards for the protection and the management of the information and the systems within an organization, as well as for overseeing and evaluating the performance and the effectiveness of the information security program and the information security controls. Information security governance can provide some benefits for security, such as enhancing the visibility and the accountability of the information security program and the information security controls, preventing or detecting any unauthorized or improper activities or changes, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. Information security governance can involve various elements and roles, such as:

Information security strategy, which is the plan or the direction that defines and describes the objectives, scope, principles, and priorities of the information security program and the information security controls, as well as the alignment and the integration of the information security program and the information security controls with the business goals and the risk appetite of the organization.

Information security policy, which is the document or the statement that defines and describes the rules and the requirements for the protection and the management of the information and the systems within the organization, as well as the roles and the responsibilities of the information security stakeholders, such as the management, the staff, the customers, or the partners.

Information security standards, which are the documents or the specifications that define and describe the mandatory or the minimum criteria or the guidelines for the implementation and the operation of the information security program and the information security controls, as well as the alignment and the compliance of the information security program and the information security controls with the industry regulations or the best practices.

Information security procedures, which are the documents or the instructions that define and describe the specific tasks or the steps for the execution and the maintenance of the information security program and the information security controls, as well as the monitoring and the reporting of the performance and the effectiveness of the information security program and the information security controls.

Information security roles, which are the functions or the positions that are responsible for the design, the implementation, the operation, the evaluation, or the improvement of the information security program and the information security controls, such as the information security manager, the information security officer, the information security analyst, or the information security auditor.

Writing an information security policy is the best reason for writing an information security policy, as it is the foundation and the core of the information security governance process or framework, and it provides the guidance and the direction for the information security program and the information security controls, as well as for the information security stakeholders. Writing an information security policy can involve various tasks or duties, such as:

Defining and documenting the purpose, scope, objectives, and principles of the information security policy, and ensuring that they are consistent and aligned with the information security strategy and the business goals of the organization.

Defining and documenting the rules and the requirements of the information security policy, and ensuring that they are clear, concise, comprehensive, and relevant to the information and the systems that are being protected and managed by the organization.

Defining and documenting the roles and the responsibilities of the information security policy, and ensuring that they are assigned and communicated to the information security stakeholders, such as the management, the staff, the customers, or the partners, and that they are acknowledged and accepted by the information security stakeholders.

Reviewing and updating the information security policy, and ensuring that it is current and valid, and that it reflects and addresses any changes or issues that may affect the information security program and the information security controls, or the information and the systems that are being protected and managed by the organization.

To reduce the number of audit findings, to deter attackers, and to implement effective information security controls are not the best reasons for writing an information security policy, although they may be related or possible outcomes or benefits of writing an information security policy. To reduce the number of audit findings is an outcome or a benefit of writing an information security policy, as it implies that the information security policy has helped to improve the performance and the effectiveness of the information security program and the information security controls, as well as to comply with the industry regulations or the best practices, and that the information security policy has supported the audit and the compliance activities, by providing the evidence or the data that can validate or verify the information security program and the information security controls. However, to reduce the number of audit findings is not the best reason for writing an information security policy, as it is not the primary or the most important purpose or objective of writing an information security policy, and it may not be true or applicable for all information security policies. 

The greatest benefit of implementing a Role Based Access Control (RBAC) system is a considerably simpler provisioning process. Provisioning is the process of creating, modifying, or deleting the user accounts and access rights on a system or a network. Provisioning can be a complex and tedious task, especially in large or dynamic organizations that have many users, systems, and resources. RBAC is a type of access control model that assigns permissions to users based on their roles or functions within the organization, rather than on their individual identities or attributes. RBAC can simplify the provisioning process by reducing the administrative overhead and ensuring the consistency and accuracy of the user accounts and access rights. RBAC can also provide some benefits for security, such as enforcing the principle of least privilege, facilitating the separation of duties, and supporting the audit and compliance activities. Integration using Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), form-based user registration process, and integration with the organizations Human Resources (HR) system are not the greatest benefits of implementing a RBAC system, although they may be related or useful features. Integration using LDAP is a technique that uses a standard protocol to communicate and exchange information with a directory service, such as Active Directory or OpenLDAP. LDAP can provide some benefits for access control, such as centralizing and standardizing the user accounts and access rights, supporting the authentication and authorization mechanisms, and enabling the interoperability and scalability of the systems or the network. However, integration using LDAP is not a benefit of RBAC, as it is not a feature or a requirement of RBAC, and it can be used with other access control models, such as discretionary access control (DAC) or mandatory access control (MAC). Form-based user registration process is a technique that uses a web-based form to collect and validate the user information and preferences, such as name, email, password, or role. Form-based user registration process can provide some benefits for access control, such as simplifying and automating the user account creation, enhancing the user experience and satisfaction, and supporting the self-service and delegation capabilities. However, form-based user registration process is not a benefit of RBAC, as it is not a feature or a requirement of RBAC, and it can be used with other access control models, such as DAC or MAC. Integration with the organizations HR system is a technique that uses a software application or a service to synchronize and update the user accounts and access rights with the HR data, such as employee records, job titles, or organizational units. Integration with the organizations HR system can provide some benefits for access control, such as streamlining and automating the provisioning process, improving the accuracy and timeliness of the user accounts and access rights, and supporting the identity lifecycle management activities. However, integration with the organizations HR system is not a benefit of RBAC, as it is not a feature or a requirement of RBAC, and it can be used with other access control models, such as DAC or MAC. 

Anonymous proxies are servers that act as intermediaries between the user and the internet, hiding the user’s real IP address and allowing them to bypass network restrictions and access unauthorized websites. The best way to prevent users from visiting unauthorized websites using anonymous proxies is to block the IP address of known anonymous proxies on the firewall or router. This will prevent the user from establishing a connection with the proxy server and accessing the blocked content. Removing the anonymity from the proxy, analyzing IP traffic for proxy requests, or disabling the proxy server on the firewall are not effective ways to prevent future occurrences, as they do not address the root cause of the problem or require more resources and time to implement. References: The 17 Best Proxy Sites to Help You Browse Anonymously; Buy HTTP proxies and Socks5 | Anonymous Proxies; The Best Free Proxy Server List: Tested & Working! (2024).

From a security perspective, the assumption that must be made about input to an application is that it is untrusted. Untrusted input is any data or information that is provided by an external or an unknown source, such as a user, a client, a network, or a file, and that is not validated or verified by the application before being processed or used by the application. Untrusted input can pose a serious security risk for the application, as it can contain or introduce malicious or harmful content or commands, such as malware, viruses, worms, trojans, or SQL injection, that can compromise or damage the confidentiality, the integrity, or the availability of the application, or the data or the systems that are connected to the application. Therefore, from a security perspective, the assumption that must be made about input to an application is that it is untrusted, and that it should be treated with caution and suspicion, and that it should be subjected to various security controls or mechanisms, such as input validation, input sanitization, input filtering, or input encoding, before being processed or used by the application. Input validation is the process or the technique of checking or verifying that the input meets the expected or the required format, type, length, range, or value, and that it does not contain or introduce any invalid or illegal characters, symbols, or commands. Input sanitization is the process or the technique of removing or modifying any invalid or illegal characters, symbols, or commands from the input, or replacing them with valid or legal ones, to prevent or mitigate any potential attacks or vulnerabilities. Input filtering is the process or the technique of allowing or blocking the input based on a predefined or a configurable set of rules or criteria, such as a whitelist or a blacklist, to prevent or mitigate any unwanted or unauthorized input. Input encoding is the process or the technique of transforming or converting the input into a different or a standard format or representation, such as HTML, URL, or Base64, to prevent or mitigate any interpretation or execution of the input by the application or the system. It is tested, it is logged, and it is verified are not the assumptions that must be made about input to an application from a security perspective, although they may be related or possible aspects or outcomes of input to an application. It is tested is an aspect or an outcome of input to an application, as it implies that the input has been subjected to various tests or evaluations, such as unit testing, integration testing, or penetration testing, to verify or validate the functionality and the quality of the input, as well as to detect or report any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities in the input. However, it is tested is not an assumption that must be made about input to an application from a security perspective, as it is not a precautionary or a preventive measure to protect the application from untrusted input, and it may not be true or applicable for all input to an application. It is logged is an aspect or an outcome of input to an application, as it implies that the input has been recorded or stored in a log file or a database, along with other relevant information or metadata, such as the source, the destination, the timestamp, or the status of the input, to provide a trace or a history of the input, as well as to support the audit and the compliance activities. However, it is logged is not an assumption that must be made about input to an application from a security perspective, as it is not a precautionary or a preventive measure to protect the application from untrusted input, and it may not be true or applicable for all input to an application. It is verified is an aspect or an outcome of input to an application, as it implies that the input has been confirmed or authenticated by the application or the system, using various security controls or mechanisms, such as digital signatures, certificates, or tokens, to ensure the integrity and the authenticity of the input, as well as to prevent or mitigate any tampering or spoofing of the input. However, it is verified is not an assumption that must be made about input to an application from a security perspective, as it is not a precautionary or a preventive measure to protect the application from untrusted input, and it may not be true or applicable for all input to an application. 

Anonymizing the test subject’s data means removing or masking any personally identifiable information (PII) that could be used to identify or trace the individual. This can help to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the test subjects, as well as comply with the data protection laws and regulations of both countries. Processing the anonymized data in the US can also help to reduce the costs and risks of transferring the data across borders. Aggregating the data into one database in the US, processing it in the US but storing it in France, or sharing it with a third party could all pose potential privacy and security risks, as well as legal and ethical issues, for the organization and the test subjects. References: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 67; Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, Fifth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 62.

An advantage of an effective release control strategy from a configuration control standpoint is that it ensures that a trace for all deliverables is maintained and auditable. Release control is a process that manages the distribution and installation of software releases into the operational environment. Configuration control is a process that maintains the integrity and consistency of the software configuration items throughout the software development life cycle. An effective release control strategy can help to ensure that a trace for all deliverables is maintained and auditable, which means that the origin, history, and status of each software release can be tracked and verified. This can help to prevent unauthorized or incompatible changes, as well as to facilitate troubleshooting and recovery. Enforcing backward compatibility, ensuring no loss of functionality, and allowing for future enhancements are not advantages of release control from a configuration control standpoint, but from a functionality or performance standpoint. References: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 8: Software Development Security, page 969; Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, Fifth Edition, Chapter 7: Software Development Security, page 895.

 Risk tolerance is the factor that mandates the amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk. Risk tolerance is the degree of risk that an organization or an individual is willing to accept or bear, based on their objectives, expectations, and capabilities. Risk tolerance can be influenced by various factors, such as the organizational culture, the regulatory environment, the stakeholder interests, the cost-benefit analysis, and the risk appetite. Risk tolerance can help to determine the acceptable level of residual risk and the appropriate risk response for each risk scenario. Security controls are the measures or actions that are implemented to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, or to transfer, avoid, or accept the risk. Security controls can be classified into different types, such as administrative, technical, physical, preventive, detective, corrective, deterrent, or compensating. Security controls can also be categorized into different levels, such as management, operational, or technical. The amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk depend on the risk tolerance of the organization or the individual, as well as the risk assessment results and the security requirements. Security vulnerabilities, risk mitigation, and security staff are not the factors that mandate the amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk, although they are related or relevant concepts. Security vulnerabilities are the weaknesses or flaws in the assets, systems, or processes that can be exploited by the threats to cause harm or damage. Security vulnerabilities can increase the risk level and the need for security controls. Risk mitigation is the process of selecting and implementing the appropriate security controls to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, or to transfer, avoid, or accept the risk. Risk mitigation is based on the risk tolerance and the risk assessment results. Security staff are the personnel who are responsible for planning, implementing, maintaining, and monitoring the security controls and processes within an organization. Security staff can affect the quality and effectiveness of the security controls. 

Senior management has the primary responsibility to ensure that security objectives are aligned with organizational goals. Senior management is the highest level of authority and decision-making in an organization, and it sets the vision, mission, strategy, and objectives for the organization. Senior management is also responsible for establishing the security governance framework, which defines the roles, responsibilities, policies, standards, and procedures for security management. Senior management should ensure that the security function supports and enables the organizational goals, and that the security objectives are consistent, measurable, and achievable. Senior management should also provide adequate resources, guidance, and oversight for the security function, and communicate the security expectations and requirements to all stakeholders. The information security department, the audit committee, and all users have some roles and responsibilities in ensuring that security objectives are aligned with organizational goals, but they are not the primary ones. The information security department is responsible for implementing, maintaining, and monitoring the security controls and processes, and reporting on the security performance and incidents. The audit committee is responsible for reviewing and verifying the effectiveness and compliance of the security controls and processes, and providing recommendations for improvement. All users are responsible for following the security policies and procedures, and reporting any security issues or violations. 

The data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility for the information within an Information System (IS). The data owner is accountable for the security, quality, and integrity of the data, as well as for defining the classification, sensitivity, retention, and disposal of the data. The data owner must also approve or deny the access requests and periodically review the access rights. The security manager, the system owner, and the data processor are not accountable for the information within an IS, but they may have roles and responsibilities related to the security and operation of the IS. References: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 48; Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, Fifth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 40.

Section: Security Operations

 Penetration testing is a type of test that an organization performs in order to locate and target exploitable defects in its information systems and networks. Penetration testing simulates a real-world attack scenario, where a tester, also known as a penetration tester or ethical hacker, tries to find and exploit the vulnerabilities in the system or network, using the same tools and techniques as a malicious attacker. The goal of penetration testing is to identify the weaknesses and gaps in the security posture of the organization, and to provide recommendations and solutions to mitigate or eliminate them. Penetration testing can help the organization improve its security awareness, compliance, and resilience, and prevent potential breaches or incidents. 

A responsibility of a data steward is to ensure that data decisions and impacts are communicated to the organization. A data steward is a role or a function that is responsible for managing and maintaining the quality and the usability of the data within a specific data domain or a business area, such as finance, marketing, or human resources. A data steward can provide some benefits for data governance, which is the process of establishing and enforcing the policies and standards for the collection, use, storage, and protection of data, such as enhancing the accuracy and the reliability of the data, preventing or detecting errors or inconsistencies, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. A data steward can perform various tasks or duties, such as:

Defining and documenting the data elements, attributes, definitions, and rules within the data domain or the business area, and ensuring that they are consistent and aligned with the data governance policies and standards.

Monitoring and measuring the data quality and the data performance within the data domain or the business area, and identifying and resolving any data issues or problems, such as missing, inaccurate, or duplicate data.

Coordinating and collaborating with the data owners, the data custodians, the data users, and the data governance team, and ensuring that the data decisions and impacts are communicated and understood by the organization, such as the data requirements, the data changes, or the data risks.

Ensuring that data decisions and impacts are communicated to the organization is a responsibility of a data steward, as it can help to ensure the transparency and the accountability of the data governance process, as well as to facilitate the coordination and the cooperation of the data governance stakeholders, such as the data owners, the data custodians, the data users, and the data governance team. Ensuring alignment of the data governance effort to the organization, conducting data governance interviews with the organization, and documenting data governance requirements are not responsibilities of a data steward, although they may be related or possible tasks or duties. Ensuring alignment of the data governance effort to the organization is a responsibility of the data governance team, which is a group of experts or advisors who are responsible for defining and implementing the data governance policies and standards, as well as for overseeing and evaluating the data governance process and performance. Conducting data governance interviews with the organization is a task or a technique that can be used by the data governance team, the data steward, or the data auditor, to collect and analyze the information and the feedback about the data governance process and performance, from the data governance stakeholders, such as the data owners, the data custodians, the data users, or the data consumers. Documenting data governance requirements is a task or a technique that can be used by the data governance team, the data owner, or the data user, to specify and describe the needs and the expectations of the data governance process and performance, such as the data quality, the data security, or the data compliance.

Section: Security Operations

 Equipment is a direct monetary cost of a security incident. A direct monetary cost is a cost that can be easily measured and attributed to a specific security incident, such as the cost of repairing or replacing damaged or stolen equipment, the cost of hiring external experts or consultants, the cost of paying fines or penalties, or the cost of compensating the victims or customers. Equipment is a direct monetary cost of a security incident, as the security incident may cause physical or logical damage to the equipment, such as servers, computers, routers, or firewalls, or may result in the loss or theft of the equipment. The cost of equipment can be calculated by estimating the market value, the depreciation value, or the replacement value of the equipment, as well as the cost of installation, configuration, or integration of the equipment. Morale, reputation, and information are not direct monetary costs of a security incident, although they are important and significant costs. Morale is an indirect or intangible cost of a security incident, as it affects the psychological or emotional state of the employees, customers, or stakeholders, and may lead to lower productivity, satisfaction, or loyalty. Reputation is an indirect or intangible cost of a security incident, as it affects the public perception or image of the organization, and may result in loss of trust, confidence, or credibility. Information is an indirect or intangible cost of a security incident, as it affects the value or quality of the data or knowledge of the organization, and may result in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Indirect or intangible costs are costs that are difficult to measure or quantify, and may have long-term or hidden impacts on the organization.