Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CISM Questions and answers with CertsForce

The best thing to include in a business case when the return on investment (ROI) for an information security initiative is difficult to calculate is an estimated reduction in risk. Risk reduction is the expected benefit of implementing an information security initiative, as it reduces the likelihood and impact of threats and vulnerabilities that may affect the organization’s information assets and systems. By estimating the reduction in risk, the information security manager can demonstrate the value and benefits of the information security initiative to the organization’s performance, reputation, and competitiveness. The information security manager can also compare the estimated reduction in risk with the estimated cost of the information security initiative to determine its cost-effectiveness and feasibility. The other options are not the best thing to include in a business case, although they may be some inputs or outputs of the risk assessment process. A projected increase in maturity level is a potential outcome of implementing an information security initiative, as it improves the organization’s capabilities and processes for managing information security risks. However, it does not necessarily reflect the actual reduction in risk or the ROI of the information security initiative. A projected cost over time is a component of calculating the ROI of an information security initiative, as it reflects the total cost of ownership and maintenance of the initiative. However, it does not indicate the expected benefit or value of the initiative. An estimated increase in efficiency is a possible benefit of implementing an information security initiative, as it may enhance the organization’s productivity and performance. However, it may not be directly related to the reduction in risk or the ROI of the information security initiative.

The best course of action is to implement temporary remediation (B) to reduce exposure while a permanent fix is planned and approved. CISM emphasizes balancing risk reduction with business continuity. Immediate shutdown (C) or unilateral action (A) may disrupt business operations without proper authorization. Reporting the risk (D) is necessary but insufficient on its own. Temporary controls, such as access restrictions or additional monitoring, reduce risk while enabling informed decision-making by the business owner.

The primary role of an information security manager in a software development project is to assess and approve the security application architecture. The security application architecture is the design and structure of the software application that defines how the application components interact with each other and with external systems, and how the application implements the security requirements, principles, and best practices. The information security manager is responsible for ensuring that the security application architecture is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and guidelines, and that it meets the business objectives, functional specifications, and user expectations. The information security manager is also responsible for reviewing and evaluating the security application architecture for its completeness, correctness, consistency, and compliance, and for identifying and resolving any security issues, risks, or gaps. The information security manager is also responsible for approving the security application architecture before the software development project proceeds to the next phase, such as coding, testing, or deployment.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 80, page 742.

 = Creating a security policy for a global organization subject to varying laws and regulations is a challenging task, as it requires balancing the need for consistency, compliance, and flexibility. The best approach is to establish baseline standards for all locations that reflect the organization’s overall security objectives, principles, and requirements. These standards should be aligned with the organization’s mission, vision, values, and strategy, as well as with the applicable laws and regulations of each location. The baseline standards should also be reviewed and updated periodically to ensure their relevance and effectiveness. Additionally, supplemental standards can be added as required to address specific issues or risks that may arise in different locations or situations. Supplemental standards should be based on the best practices and lessons learned from the baseline standards, as well as on the feedback and input from the stakeholders of each location. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1001

The information security manager should first obtain legal guidance when there is a conflict between the organization’s information security policy and a local regulation, because this will help to understand the implications and consequences of the conflict, and to identify the possible options and solutions for resolving it. The information security manager should also consult with the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, and information owners, to determine the best course of action that aligns with the organization’s objectives, risk appetite, and compliance obligations. Enforcing the local regulation or the organization’s information security policy without legal guidance may expose the organization to legal liabilities, security risks, or operational disruptions. Obtaining an independent assessment of the regulation may be helpful, but it is not the first step to take.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 691; A Guide to ISACA CISM Domains & Domain 1: Information Security Governance2

A culture that supports security encourages behaviors that protect information assets.

“Organizational culture has a significant impact on how employees approach security, influencing their behavior and adherence to policies.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Security Culture*

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring the objectives of an information security framework are being met belongs to the board of directors, as they are accountable for the governance of the organization and the oversight of the information security strategy. The board of directors should ensure that the information security framework aligns with the business objectives, supports the business processes, and complies with the legal and regulatory requirements. The board of directors should also monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security framework and provide guidance and direction for its improvement.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Enterprise Governance, Subsection: Board of Directors, Page 18.

The main reason to involve stakeholders from various business units is to gain their acceptance and buy-in for the information security policy. The CISM Review Manual underlines that policies are more effective and enforceable when stakeholders understand and agree with them, which also aids in smooth policy implementation across the organization.

The ultimate goal of an anti-phishing campaign is to reduce the risk and impact of phishing attacks on the organization. Therefore, the most relevant and reliable indicator of the effectiveness of an anti-phishing campaign is the decreased number of incidents that have occurred as a result of phishing. This metric shows how well the employees have learned to recognize and report phishing emails, and how well the security controls have prevented or mitigated the damage caused by phishing.

References = Five Ways to Achieve a Successful Anti-Phishing Campaign; Don’t click: towards an effective anti-phishing training. A comparative literature review; CISA, NSA, FBI, MS-ISAC Publish Guide on Preventing Phishing Intrusions

The best step to address the situation of losing a smartphone that contains sensitive information is to remotely wipe the device, which means erasing all the data on the device and restoring it to factory settings. Remotely wiping the device can prevent unauthorized access to the sensitive information and protect the organization from data breaches or leaks. Remotely wiping the device can be done through services such as Find My Device for Android or Find My iPhone for iOS, or through mobile device management (MDM) solutions. The other options, such as disabling the user’s access, terminating the device connectivity, or escalating to the user’s management, may not be effective or timely enough to secure the sensitive information on the device. References:

https://www.security.org/resources/protect-data-lost-device/

https://support.google.com/android/answer/6160491?hl=en

https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/locate-lock-erase-how-to-find-lost-android-phone

The primary focus of a status report on the information security program to senior management is to demonstrate that the risk to the organization’s information assets is managed at the desired level, in alignment with the business objectives and risk appetite. This can be achieved by providing relevant and meaningful metrics, indicators, and trends that show the performance, effectiveness, and value of the information security program, as well as the current and emerging risks and the corresponding mitigation strategies. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

= After a ransomware incident, the most important concern for the information security manager is to identify the root cause of the incident and prevent it from happening again. The root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic process of finding and eliminating the underlying factors that led to the incident, such as vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, human errors, or malicious actions. Without performing a RCA, the organization may not be able to address the root cause and may face the same or similar incidents in the future, which could result in more damage, costs, and reputational loss. Therefore, the information security manager should prioritize the RCA over other concerns, such as meeting the SLA, RTO, or notification requirements, which are important but secondary to the RCA.

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 254-2551; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, QID 4202

A business impact analysis (BIA) best enables an organization to establish restoration priorities (B). In CISM, the primary purpose of a BIA is to identify critical business processes, assess the impact of disruptions over time, and determine which functions must be restored first to minimize business impact. Restoration priorities are derived from factors such as maximum tolerable downtime, recovery time objectives (RTOs), and recovery point objectives (RPOs), all of which are key BIA outputs.

Total cost of ownership (A) is a financial analysis concept unrelated to continuity planning. Annualized loss expectancy (C) is an output of quantitative risk analysis, not a BIA. Recovery methods (D) are defined after restoration priorities are established and are part of business continuity and disaster recovery planning. CISM emphasizes that the BIA provides the business-driven foundation upon which recovery strategies and methods are later selected.

By clearly defining restoration priorities, the BIA ensures that continuity planning aligns with business objectives, risk appetite, and operational resilience requirements.

The best course of action is to review the business unit’s function against the policy (D). According to CISM governance principles, persistent policy violations often indicate a misalignment between policy requirements and business operations, rather than willful noncompliance. CISM emphasizes that information security policies must be aligned with business objectives, operational realities, and risk appetite to be effective and enforceable.

Before escalating to sanctions (A) or reporting noncompliance (C), the information security manager should determine whether the policy is clearly understood, practical to implement, and supported by appropriate standards and procedures. Revising the policy to accommodate violations (B) without analysis weakens governance and may increase risk. By reviewing the business unit’s function against the policy, the security manager can identify root causes such as unclear requirements, missing procedures, inadequate training, or legitimate business constraints requiring approved exceptions or compensating controls.

CISM stresses a root-cause and business-aligned approach to governance issues, ensuring that enforcement actions are justified, proportional, and supported by management intent.

Stakeholder requirements are the most important to include in an information security strategy, as they reflect the business needs, objectives, and expectations of the organization and its key stakeholders. Stakeholder requirements also help to align the information security strategy with the enterprise governance and the organizational culture. Risk register, industry benchmarks, and regulatory requirements are important inputs for the information security strategy, but they are not the most important to include.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 321; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.12