Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CISM Questions and answers with CertsForce

The correct answer is D because adequate funding demonstrates that senior management is actively supporting the information security strategy with the resources required for implementation and sustainability. A strategy cannot be effective unless it is backed by budget, staffing, tools, training, governance support, and operational capability. Key performance indicators help measure progress, but they do not by themselves prove management commitment. A comprehensive awareness program is valuable, but it may exist without broad strategic support. An efficient incident response program is important, but it represents one part of the overall security program. In CISM, senior management commitment is reflected through sponsorship, direction, resource allocation, accountability, and continuous support. Funding is especially important because it enables security initiatives to be executed and maintained over time. Without adequate resources, even a well-designed strategy may fail. Therefore, adequate funding for the information security program is the best indicator of ongoing senior management commitment.

The most effective way to determine the alignment of an information security program with the business strategy is D. Engage business process owners. This is because business process owners are the key stakeholders who are responsible for defining, executing, and monitoring the business processes that support the organization’s mission, vision, and goals. By engaging them, the information security manager can understand their needs, expectations, and challenges, and ensure that the information security program is aligned with their requirements and objectives. Engaging business process owners can also help to establish trust, collaboration, and communication between the information security function and the business units, and foster a culture of security awareness and accountability.

Business process owners are the key stakeholders who are responsible for defining, executing, and monitoring the business processes that support the organization’s mission, vision, and goals. By engaging them, the information security manager can understand their needs, expectations, and challenges, and ensure that the information security program is aligned with their requirements and objectives. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.2, page 201; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 78, page 20

Residual risk is the risk that remains after implementing risk mitigation actions. It is the most valuable component for senior management because it helps them to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of risk management and make informed decisions about risk acceptance, transfer or avoidance. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.3.41

The information security manager should do FIRST invoke the organization’s incident response plan, which is a predefined set of procedures and guidelines for handling security incidents in a timely and effective manner. The incident response plan should include the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team, the communication protocols and channels, the escalation and reporting procedures, and the documentation and evidence collection requirements. By invoking the incident response plan, the information security manager can ensure that the incident is properly contained, analyzed, resolved, and reported, and that the appropriate stakeholders are informed and involved. The other options are not the first actions that the information security manager should take, as they are part of the communication process that follows the incident response plan. Setting up communication channels for the target audience, determining the needs and requirements of each audience, and creating a comprehensive singular communication are all important steps for communicating effectively with the board, regulatory agencies, and the media, but they are not the first priority in the event of a security incident. The information security manager should first follow the incident response plan to manage the incident and its impact, and then communicate the relevant information to the target audience according to the plan. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 2261; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1012

Determining the needs and requirements of each audience should be the FIRST step in developing materials to update the board, regulatory agencies, and the media about a security incident. This is because different audiences have different expectations, interests, and concerns regarding the incident and its impact. By understanding the needs and requirements of each audience, the information security manager can tailor the communication materials to address them effectively and appropriately. This will also help to avoid confusion, misinformation, or misinterpretation of the incident details and response actions

The service desk is often the first point of contact for users. If trained properly, they can quickly recognize signs of an incident and escalate it, triggering the incident response process promptly.

This early detection and escalation are essential for minimizing damage and response time.

“Training frontline support staff ensures timely detection and escalation of incidents, which is critical for effective containment.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Roles and Responsibilities*

 The most appropriate time to conduct a disaster recovery test would be after the business continuity plan (BCP) has been updated, as it ensures that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is aligned with the current business requirements, objectives, and priorities. The BCP should be updated regularly to reflect any changes in the business environment, such as new threats, risks, processes, technologies, or regulations. The disaster recovery test should validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the DRP, as well as identify any gaps, issues, or improvement opportunities123. References =

1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2114

2: CISM Practice Quiz, question 1042

3: Business Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery Testing, section “Testing the Plan”

 Reviewing the results of the vendor’s independent control reports is the best way to assess the risk associated with using a SaaS vendor because it provides an objective and reliable evaluation of the vendor’s security controls and practices. Independent control reports, such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001, are conducted by third-party auditors who verify the vendor’s compliance with industry standards and best practices. These reports can help the customer identify any gaps or weaknesses in the vendor’s security posture and determine the level of assurance and trust they can place on the vendor.

Verifying that information security requirements are included in the contract is a good practice, but it does not provide sufficient assurance that the vendor is actually meeting those requirements. The contract may also have limitations or exclusions that reduce the customer’s rights or remedies in case of a breach or incident.

Requesting customer references from the vendor is not a reliable way to assess the risk associated with using a SaaS vendor because the vendor may only provide positive or biased references that do not reflect the true experience or satisfaction of the customers. Customer references may also not have the same security needs or expectations as the customer who is conducting the assessment.

Requiring vendors to complete information security questionnaires is a useful way to gather information about the vendor’s security policies and procedures, but it does not provide enough evidence or verification that the vendor is actually implementing and maintaining those policies and procedures. Information security questionnaires are also subject to the vendor’s self-reporting and interpretation, which may not be accurate or consistent. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 144

SaaS Security Risk and Challenges - ISACA1

SaaS Security Checklist & Assessment Questionnaire | LeanIX2

Risk Assessment Guide for Microsoft Cloud3

 = Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining the policies, standards, frameworks, and best practices that guide the information security program of an organization. Information security governance helps to ensure that the information security program meets the needs of the business by aligning it with the organization’s risk appetite, objectives, and strategy. Information security governance also helps to coordinate and integrate various assurance functions, such as risk management, compliance, audit, and incident response, to provide a holistic view of the information security posture. Information security governance is essential for achieving a positive return on investment (ROI) from information security investments, as well as for enhancing the trust and confidence of internal and external stakeholders. References = CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Introduction to Information Security Management, Section 1.1: Overview of Information Security Management1. CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 1: Introduction to Information Security Management, Section 1.1: Overview of Information Security Management2. CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, Domain 1: Information Security Governance, Task Statement 1.1, p. 193.

Information security governance is MOST important to have in place to help ensure an organization’s cybersecurity program meets the needs of the business. This is because information security governance provides the strategic direction, oversight and accountability for the cybersecurity program. It also ensures that the program aligns with the business objectives, risk appetite and compliance requirements of the organization. Information security governance involves defining roles and responsibilities, establishing policies and standards, setting goals and metrics, allocating resources and monitoring performance of the cybersecurity program.

 Maintaining a chain of custody is the most important step when conducting a forensic investigation, as this ensures that the evidence is preserved, protected, and documented from the time of collection to the time of presentation in court. A chain of custody provides a record of who handled the evidence, when, where, why, and how, and prevents any tampering, alteration, or loss of the evidence. A chain of custody also establishes the authenticity, reliability, and admissibility of the evidence in legal proceedings. Analyzing system memory, documenting analysis steps, and capturing full system images are also important, but not as important as maintaining a chain of custody, as they do not guarantee the integrity and validity of the evidence. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1701; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 332; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 183

The best first step is to assess the control state to determine why it is ineffective and whether adjustments, replacements, or compensating controls are needed.

“Regularly assess the effectiveness of security controls to ensure they are providing the intended level of protection.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Control Monitoring and Assessment*

ISACA practice questions stress that assessing the control state comes before taking further action.

 The eradication phase of incident response is the stage where the incident response team documents and performs the actions required to remove the threat that caused the incident1. This phase involves identifying and eliminating the root cause of the incident, such as malware, compromised accounts, unauthorized access, or misconfigured systems2. The eradication phase also involves restoring the affected systems to a secure state, deleting any malicious files or artifacts, and verifying that the threat has been completely removed2. The eradication phase is the first step in returning a compromised environment to its proper state2. The other phases of incident response are:

Preparation: The phase where the incident response team prepares for potential incidents by defining roles, responsibilities, procedures, tools, and resources1.

Detection and analysis: The phase where the incident response team identifies and prioritizes the incidents based on their severity, impact, and urgency1.

Containment: The phase where the incident response team isolates the affected systems or networks to prevent the spread of the incident and minimize the damage1.

Recovery: The phase where the incident response team restores the normal operations of the systems or networks, and implements any necessary changes or improvements to prevent recurrence1.

Post-incident review: The phase where the incident response team evaluates the effectiveness of the incident response process, identifies the lessons learned, and provides recommendations for improvement1. References = 3: Critical Incident Stress Management: CISM Implementation Guidelines 2: What is the Eradication Phase of Incident Response? - RSI Security 1: Incident Response Models - ISACA

 A snapshot is a point-in-time copy of the state of a virtual machine (VM) that can be used to restore the VM to a previous state in case of a security incident or a disaster. A snapshot can capture the VM’s disk, memory, and device configuration, allowing for a quick and easy recovery of the VM’s data and functionality. Snapshots can also be used to create backups, clones, or replicas of VMs for testing, analysis, or migration purposes. Snapshots are a common service offering in Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) models, where customers can provision and manage VMs on demand from a cloud service provider (CSP). A CSP that offers the capability to take snapshots of VMs can assist customers when recovering from a security incident by providing them with the following benefits12:

Faster recovery time: Snapshots can reduce the downtime and data loss caused by a security incident by allowing customers to quickly revert their VMs to a known good state. Snapshots can also help customers avoid the need to reinstall or reconfigure their VMs after an incident, saving time and resources.

Easier incident analysis: Snapshots can enable customers to perform online or offline analysis of their VMs after an incident, without affecting the production environment. Customers can use snapshots to examine the VM’s disk, memory, and logs for evidence of compromise, root cause analysis, or forensic investigation. Customers can also use snapshots to test and validate their incident response plans or remediation actions before applying them to the production VMs.

Enhanced security posture: Snapshots can improve the security posture of customers by enabling them to implement best practices such as backup and restore, disaster recovery, and business continuity. Snapshots can help customers protect their VMs from accidental or malicious deletion, corruption, or modification, as well as from environmental or technical disruptions. Snapshots can also help customers comply with regulatory or contractual requirements for data retention, availability, or integrity. References = What is Disaster Recovery as a Service? | CSA - Cloud Security Alliance, What Is Cloud Incident Response (IR)? CrowdStrike

 Single sign-on (SSO) is a technology that allows users to access multiple applications or services with one set of credentials, such as a username and password. The primary advantage of SSO is that it increases the efficiency of access management, as it reduces the need for users to remember and enter multiple passwords for different applications or services. SSO also simplifies the user experience, as they can log in once and access multiple resources without having to switch between different windows or tabs. SSO can also improve the security of related applications, as it reduces the risk of password compromise or phishing attacks. However, SSO does not strengthen user passwords or support multiple authentication mechanisms by itself. It is a complementary technology that enhances the security and convenience of access management. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 991

The primary advantage of single sign-on (SSO) is that it increases the efficiency of access management. With SSO, users only need to remember one set of credentials to access all of their applications, rather than having to remember multiple usernames and passwords for each application. This simplifies the user experience and helps to reduce the amount of time spent managing access to multiple applications. Additionally, SSO can also increase the security of related applications, as users are not sharing the same credentials across multiple applications, and it can also support multiple authentication mechanisms, such as biometric authentication.

 According to the CISM Review Manual, an organization’s security posture is the overall condition of its information security, which is determined by the effectiveness of its security program and the alignment of its security objectives with its business goals. To understand the security posture, the senior leadership needs to have a holistic view of the security risks and the actions taken to address them. Therefore, assessing the progress of risk mitigation efforts is the most important activity for the senior leadership, as it provides them with the information on how well the security program is performing and whether it is meeting the expected outcomes. Evaluating the results of the most recent incident response test, reviewing the number of reported security incidents, and ensuring established security metrics are reported are all useful activities for the senior leadership, but they are not sufficient to understand the security posture. They only provide partial or isolated information on the security performance, which may not reflect the overall security condition or the alignment with the business objectives. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1, Information Security Governance, pages 28-29.

The first thing that an information security manager should do upon confirming a privileged user’s unauthorized modifications to a security application is to enforce the security configuration and require the change to be reverted. This is because the unauthorized modification may have compromised the security of the application and the data it protects, and may have violated the security policies and standards of the organization. By enforcing the security configuration and requiring the change to be reverted, the information security manager can restore the security posture of the application and prevent further unauthorized modifications.

The primary advantage of performing black-box control tests as opposed to white-box control tests is that they simulate real-world attacks. Black-box control tests are a software testing methodology in which the tester analyzes the functionality of an application without a thorough knowledge of its internal design. Conversely, in white-box control tests, the tester is knowledgeable of the internal design of the application and analyzes it during testing. By performing black-box control tests, the tester can mimic the perspective and behavior of an external attacker who does not have access to the source code or the implementation details of the application. This way, the tester can evaluate how the application responds to different inputs and scenarios, and identify any vulnerabilities or errors that may affect its functionality or security. The other options are not the primary advantage of performing black-box control tests, although they may be some benefits or drawbacks depending on the context. Causing fewer potential production issues is not necessarily true, as black-box control tests may still introduce errors or disruptions to the application if not performed carefully. Requiring less IT staff preparation is not always true, as black-box control tests may still require a lot of planning and documentation to ensure adequate test coverage and quality. Identifying more threats is not necessarily true, as black-box control tests may miss some threats that are hidden in the internal logic or structure of the application.