Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CGEIT Questions and answers with CertsForce

Qualitative risk assessmentis most appropriate when reliable quantitative data is unavailable or too costly to gather. In such cases, qualitative methods (like risk matrices or expert judgment) provide valuable input based on impact and likelihood without requiring precise numerical data.

This approach is especially useful in new or evolving domains (e.g., cybersecurity or AI) where historical data may be lacking.

A business continuity plan (BCP) relies on clear roles and responsibilities to ensure effective execution during a disruption. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that defined roles are the most critical component for BCP success, as they ensure accountability and coordination.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 3: Risk Optimization):"The most important element for executing a business continuity plan is the definition of roles and responsibilities. Clear roles ensure that all stakeholders know their duties during a disruption, enabling rapid and coordinated response." (Approximate reference: Domain 3, Section on Business Continuity Planning)

Defined roles (option A) are essential to ensure that the BCP is actionable, with individuals assigned to specific tasks, such as communication, recovery, or coordination.

Why not the other options?

B. Replicated systems: Systems are important but useless without people to manage them during a crisis.

C. A risk register: A risk register identifies risks but does not ensure BCP execution.

D. Budget allocation: Funding supports BCP development but is not the most critical for execution.

Outsourcing decisions require a clear understanding of the financial and operational implications. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition advises that conducting a cost-benefit analysis is the first step to evaluate whether outsourcing non-core IT processes aligns with enterprise objectives.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 5: Benefits Realization):"Before outsourcing IT processes, the enterprise should conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess the financial, operational, and strategic implications. This analysis determines whether outsourcing delivers value and supports business objectives." (Approximate reference: Domain 5, Section on Outsourcing Decisions)

Conducting a cost-benefit analysis for outsourcing (option D) provides the data needed to make an informed decision, comparing costs, risks, and benefits of outsourcing versus in-house management.

Why not the other options?

A. Update resource allocation policies: Policy updates follow the decision to outsource, based on the analysis.

B. Issue a formal request for proposal (RFP) to outsourcing vendors: Issuing an RFP is premature without confirming that outsourcing is viable.

C. Establish service-level metrics for outsourced activities: Metrics are defined after deciding to outsource and selecting a vendor.

A data protection impact assessment (DPIA) is designed to identify and mitigate risks to data privacy. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition states that the primary objective of a DPIA is to analyze how business processes affect data privacy, particularly for personal data.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 3: Risk Optimization):"The primary objective of a data protection impact assessment is to identify and analyze how business processes, systems, or projects may impact the privacy of personal data. This helps ensure compliance with data protection regulations and mitigates privacy risks." (Approximate reference: Domain 3, Section on Data Privacy and Compliance)

Identifying and analyzing how data privacy might be affected by business processes (option A) is the core purpose of a DPIA, aligning with regulatory requirements like GDPR.

Why not the other options?

B. To evaluate the quality and integrity of personal data stored in an enterprise: Data quality is a separate concern, not the focus of a DPIA.

C. To estimate the value created by personal data as it progresses through its life cycle: Value estimation is a business analysis, not a DPIA objective.

D. To ensure key business processes and related data interfaces are documented: Documentation may be a byproduct, but it is not the primary objective.

Critical success factors (CSFs)are the specific conditions or variables that are essential for achieving business objectives. Effective KPIs must align with these CSFs to ensure they measure what truly matters to project and business success.

KRIs relate to risk, and while important, they serve a different purpose. Future-state architecture and portfolio principles guide strategy, butCSFs provide the foundational context for performance measurement.

Alignment with the enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworkis the top priority when developing IT risk management policies. This ensures that IT risk is not managed in a silo but is integrated into the broader enterprise risk posture, decision-making processes, and governance.

While corporate culture and best practices are influential, and goals and objectives shape strategy,only the ERM framework provides the structured foundation for aligning IT risk with enterprise-wide risk management.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Governance of Enterprise IT domain, covers the governance of information assets, including their management across the entire lifecycle (creation, storage, use, archival, disposal). A life cycle approach ensures that information assets are managed systematically to align with business needs, reduce risks, and optimize resources.

Option D: Overall costs are optimized is the greatest benefit. By governing information assets through their lifecycle, enterprises can minimize costs associated with storage, maintenance, and compliance (e.g., avoiding penalties for improper data retention). For example, the approach identifies redundant data for deletion, optimizes storage solutions, and ensures cost-effective compliance with regulations. The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s BAI09-Managed Assets, which emphasizes lifecycle management to achieve cost efficiency.

Option A: Information availability is improved is a benefit, but it’s not the greatest, as availability is just one aspect of governance (e.g., via access controls).

Option B: Operational costs are maintained is inaccurate, as the goal is to reduce, not merely maintain, costs.

Option C: Compliance with regulatory requirements is ensured is a significant benefit, but cost optimization encompasses compliance (e.g., avoiding fines) and other savings, making it broader.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s focus on asset management and the CGEIT domain’s emphasis on cost-effective governance. Cost optimization is a recurring theme in ISACA’s frameworks for lifecycle management.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT (focus on information asset management).

COBIT 2019, BAI09-Managed Assets.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of lifecycle management), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

A periodic service provider audit is a process of conducting an independent and objective assessment of the service provider’s performance, quality, compliance, and security in relation to the agreed service level agreement (SLA) and the enterprise’s expectations and requirements. A periodic service provider audit can help provide quality of service oversight by:

Verifying and validating the service provider’s claims and credentials, and ensuring that they meet the contractual obligations and standards

Identifying and evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the service provider’s services, processes, and controls

Detecting and reporting any issues, gaps, or risks that may affect the quality of service delivery or the enterprise’s objectives and value

Recommending and implementing corrective and preventive actions to address and resolve the issues, gaps, or risks

Monitoring and measuring the outcomes and effectiveness of the corrective and preventive actions, and ensuring their alignment with the SLA

This is because IT is a key enabler and driver of business strategy, and it needs to understand and align with the strategic vision, goals, and priorities of the enterprise1. By ensuring IT has knowledgeable representation and is included in the strategic planning process, the enterprise can:

Leverage IT’s expertise and insights to identify and evaluate the opportunities and challenges of the strategy change1

Ensure IT’s readiness and capability to support and execute the strategy change1

Avoid any gaps or misalignments between IT and business expectations and requirements1

Foster a collaborative and supportive relationship between IT and business stakeholders1

B. Increase the IT budget and approve an IT staff level increase to ensure resource availability for the strategy change. This is not the first step to prepare for the change in the enterprise’s board of directors’ strategy, as it may be premature or unnecessary to do so without a clear understanding and agreement of the scope, impact, and implications of the strategy change. Increasing the IT budget and staff level may also create inefficiencies or wastages if they are not aligned with the actual needs and priorities of the strategy change2.

C. Initiate an IT service awareness campaign to business system owners and implement service level agreements (SLAs). This is not the first step to prepare for the change in the enterprise’s board of directors’ strategy, as it may not be relevant or effective to do so without a clear definition and communication of the strategy change. Initiating an IT service awareness campaign and implementing SLAs are more related to the delivery and management of IT services, rather than the planning and alignment of IT strategy3.

D. Outsource both IT operations and IT development and implement controls based on a standardized framework. This is not the first step to prepare for the change in the enterprise’s board of directors’ strategy, as it may introduce new risks and challenges for IT governance, such as loss of control, dependency, compatibility, security, compliance, and cost issues4. Outsourcing both IT operations and development may also reduce the involvement and ownership of IT in the strategic planning process, which could affect its alignment and responsiveness to the strategy change4. Outsourcing should be carefully considered and evaluated based on the specific needs and circumstances of the enterprise, and should be complemented by a robust governance and management framework4.

The best way to address the risk associated with new IT investments is to integrate security requirements at the beginning of projects. This means that security is considered as a key factor in the planning, design, development and testing phases of IT projects. By doing so, organizations can ensure that security is built into the IT solutions, rather than added as an afterthought. This can help to prevent or reduce security vulnerabilities, breaches, incidents and costs. Integrating security requirements at the beginning of projects is also consistent with the IT risk management frameworks that recommend a proactive and preventive approach to IT risk management12. References := Proactive IT Risk Management in an Era of Emerging Technologies, IT Risk Management Process & Frameworks

Ensuring that IT project selections meet business requirements requires direct involvement of business stakeholders to align projects with enterprise goals. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that business participation in project selection is critical to achieving strategic alignment.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 4: Strategic Management):"Business participation in the selection of IT projects is essential to ensure that projects are aligned with enterprise business requirements and deliver value. Engaging business stakeholders in the decision-making process fosters alignment and prioritization of initiatives that support strategic goals." (Approximate reference: Domain 4, Section on Project Portfolio Management)

Business participation in the selection of IT projects (option B) ensures that projects are chosen based on business needs, increasing the likelihood of delivering value and meeting requirements.

Why not the other options?

A. Development of an enterprise architecture (EA): EA provides a framework but does not directly ensure business requirements are met in project selection.

C. Implementation of project stage gates: Stage gates control project execution, not the initial selection process.

D. Creation of thorough business cases prior to IT project selection: Business cases are important, but they are a tool used during selection, which requires business participation to be effective.

After receiving recommendations, thefirst logical step is to evaluate the feasibility—this includes assessing alignment with strategic goals, resource availability, risk tolerance, and operational impact.

Implementing or planning without a feasibility assessment may result in impractical or misaligned actions.

Assigning information risk to a department without designating an individual owner is most likely to have a negative impact on accountability for information risk ownership. This lack of individual accountability can lead to ambiguities in responsibility, making it difficult to ensure that appropriate risk management actions are taken and followed up on. When an individual owner is clearly identified, it establishes direct responsibility and accountability, improving the effectiveness of risk management practices. While the scenarios described in the other options present challenges, the absence of a specific individual owner represents a fundamental weakness in establishing clear accountability for managing information risk.

Managing resources as part of the portfolio strategy would best help to ensure the appropriate allocation of IT resources to support an enterprise’s mission. This is because the portfolio strategy aligns the IT investments with the business goals and priorities, and ensures that the IT resources are allocated to the most valuable and strategic initiatives. By managing resources at the portfolio level, the enterprise can optimize the use of its IT resources across multiple programs and projects, and avoid resource conflicts, shortages, or wastages. A resource strategy as part of program management, prioritizing program requirements based on existing resources,and resource planning for each IT project are all useful practices, but they are not sufficient to ensure the appropriate allocation of IT resources at the enterprise level. They may only focus on the resource needs and constraints of specific programs or projects, and may not consider the overall alignment and optimization of IT resources with the enterprise’s mission. References := IT Portfolio Management: A Practitioner’s Guide - ISACA, Resource Allocation Done Right: Best Practices for 2022 & Beyond, A Complete Guide to Resource Allocation in Projects - Float

Requiring the business to help define IT goals is the best way to establish alignment between business and IT when the IT department has been operating independently of business concerns. This collaborative approach ensures that IT initiatives are directly linked to business objectives, facilitating strategic alignment and ensuring that IT supports and enhances business operations. While IT defining business objectives, business funding IT services, and both defining risks are important, the foundational step for alignment is integrating business perspectives into the definition of IT goals.