Pass the Isaca Isaca Certification CGEIT Questions and answers with CertsForce

The best way for a CIO to ensure that the work of IT employees is aligned with approved IT directives is to include relevant IT goals in individual performance objectives. This means that the CIO should communicate the IT vision, mission, strategy and objectives to the IT staff and link them to their personal and professional development plans. By doing so, the CIO can motivate the IT employees to work toward the desired outcomes, monitor their progress and performance, provide feedback and recognition, and address any issues or gaps. Including relevant IT goals in individual performance objectives can also help to align the IT employees with the business needs and expectations, foster a culture of accountability and collaboration, and improve the quality and value of IT services12. References := How to Align Employee Performance With Organizational Goals, The Importance And Challenges Of Employee Alignment

Theprimary objective of outcome measuresis tomonitor whether the strategy is achieving its intended results. These measures evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the strategy after implementation, helping guide course corrections and value realization.

While clarifying strategy and governance are important,outcome measures are specifically about tracking success and performance results.

 The next course of action in response to the CIO’s concern is to assess the risk associated with the device. This means that the CIO should evaluate the potential impact and likelihood of security threats posed by the device, such as data leakage, unauthorized access, malware infection, or privacy violation. The CIO should also consider the benefits and drawbacks of allowing or banning such devices, such as productivity, innovation, user satisfaction, or compliance. A risk assessment can help the CIO to make an informed decision based on facts and evidence, rather than assumptions or emotions. A risk assessment can also provide a basis for defining a risk mitigation strategy, updating the acceptable use policy, or researchingcompetitor usage of similar devices. References := 10 security risks of wearables | CSO Online, Wearable Devices are on the Rise, Presenting New Security Risks, Common privacy and security vulnerabilities in wearable devices, Wearables Device Data Security & Protection | Voler Systems

Themost critical factor in aligning IT and enterprise resource managementis ensuring thatIT resources are mapped to business priorities. This guarantees that resource allocation supports strategic objectives and delivers maximum value.

Without this alignment, IT efforts may be misdirected, underutilized, or not supporting enterprise goals—even if sourcing and monitoring are in place.

The correct approach is toagree on target maturity levels in response to need—this ensures that the maturity level supports enterprise objectives, risk appetite, and strategic priorities. The maturity should be fit-for-purpose, rather than arbitrarily benchmarked or driven solely by cost or strengths.

While competitor benchmarks and cost considerations can provide insight, they are secondary to ensuring that the governance processes meetspecific business and governance needs.

 A root cause analysis is the first step to identify the factors that are causing the loss of top talent and to devise appropriate solutions. A SWOT analysis, an incentive and retention program, and an aggressive talent acquisition program are possible outcomes of a root cause analysis, but they are not the first action to take. References := CGEIT Review Manual, 7th Edition, page 103.

When enterprise strategy changes, themost important action for the CIO is to review the portfolio of current and planned IT projectsto ensure alignment with the new strategic direction. This ensures that resources are being allocated to initiatives that support updated goals and that outdated or misaligned projects are reevaluated.

Performance plans and historical budgets offer context butdo not directly enable strategic realignment.

This is because enterprise risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing and able to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It reflects the organization’s risk culture, strategy, and values. When implementing an emerging technology with unclear regulatory and compliance requirements, the organization should consider its risk appetite and tolerance, as well as the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of the technology. The organization should also assess the likelihood and severity of the regulatory and compliance risks, and implement appropriate controls and mitigation measures to manage them within acceptable levels.

Some of the sources that support this answer are:

1: This source provides a comprehensive guide on how to navigate the hype and risk of emerging technologies. It suggests that organizations should define their risk appetite and tolerance for adopting emerging technologies, and conduct a balanced risk and benefit assessment before making any decisions.

2: This source discusses the challenges and best practices for mitigating emerging technology risk. It recommends that organizations should align their emerging technology strategy with their enterprise risk appetite, and establish a governance framework that covers the identification, evaluation, response, and monitoring of emerging technology risks.

3: This source defines enterprise risk appetite and explains its importance for effective risk management. It also provides some guidance on how to develop, communicate, and monitor enterprise risk appetite statements.

The executive team consists of the senior leaders of the enterprise, such as the CEO, CFO, COO, etc. They are responsible for setting the vision, mission, goals, and strategy of the enterprise, andfor overseeing its performance and governance. The CIO is part of the executive team and should align the IT strategic plan with the enterprise business objectives. Therefore, the CIO would be most effective by starting the interview process with the executive team, as they can provide the most relevant and authoritative input on the enterprise’s direction, priorities, challenges, and expectations. The executive team can also help the CIO gain support and approval for the IT strategic plan from other stakeholders, such as the internal auditors, senior IT managers, and business process owners. References: ISACA, Reporting Cybersecurity Risk to the Board of Directors, page 81. ISACA, Performance Measurement Metrics for IT Governance, page 1

Corporate culture is the most influential driver of ethical decision-making. It shapes the behavior, attitudes, and values of individuals and determines whether ethical frameworks like codes of conduct and training programs are truly effective in practice.

While control environments and training reinforce behavior, the culture sets the tone from the top, influencing whether ethics are embraced or bypassed.

This is because KPIs are measurable values that indicate how well the IT governance framework is achieving its objectives and delivering value to the business1. By evaluating KPI results, the organization can:

Monitor and review the IT governance framework’s progress, performance, quality, and outcomes

Highlight the IT governance framework’s achievements, challenges, and opportunities

Demonstrate the alignment of the IT governance framework with the business strategy, goals, and priorities

Provide recommendations and feedback for the IT governance framework’s improvement and adjustment

Evaluating KPI results can provide a comprehensive and objective overview of the IT governance framework’s effectiveness and impact.

The other options, developing a business case for the program portfolio, benchmarking the IT governance framework to industry best practice, and reviewing results of IT audit reports are not as effective as evaluating KPI results for assessing the effectiveness of a newly established IT governance framework. They are more related to the design and implementation of the IT governance framework, rather than its evaluation. They may also be too narrow or subjective for assessing the IT governance framework’s effectiveness, as they may not cover all aspects or perspectives of the IT governance framework. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

Resistance from business leaders indicates a lack of alignment between IT decisions and business priorities. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition emphasizes that collaboration with business stakeholders is critical to ensure that IT portfolio decisions reflect business objectives, especially when resources are constrained.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 4: Strategic Management):"When faced with resource constraints, the CIO should collaborate with business stakeholders to prioritize the IT portfolio based on business objectives. This ensures that limited resources are allocated to initiatives that deliver the greatest value and alignment with enterprise goals." (Approximate reference: Domain 4, Section on Portfolio Management)

Collaborating with the business to prioritize the IT portfolio (option D) directly addresses the resistance by involving business leaders in decision-making, ensuring that IT services align with their priorities and reducing conflict.

Why not the other options?

A. Engage an external consultant to document IT’s alignment with the business: An external consultant may provide insights but does not address the immediate need for collaboration and buy-in from business leaders.

B. Perform a cost-benefit analysis and communicate results: While analysis is useful, it does not involve business leaders in the prioritization process, which is key to resolving resistance.

C. Reallocate budget from maintenance projects in the portfolio: Reallocation is a unilateral action that may exacerbate resistance if not done in collaboration with the business.

Earned value management (EVM) is a project management technique that integrates scope, schedule, and cost to measure project performance and progress. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition highlights that EVM’s greatest advantage is its ability to provide a clear, quantifiable measure of project progress that stakeholders can easily understand.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 5: Benefits Realization):"Earned value management provides a standardized, easy-to-understand measure of project progress by comparing planned value, earned value, and actual costs. This enables stakeholders to assess whether a project, such as a blockchain implementation, is on track to deliver expected benefits." (Approximate reference: Domain 5, Section on Project Performance Measurement)

Providing a measure of project progress that is easy to understand (option B) is the greatest advantage, as EVM offers clear metrics (e.g., cost variance, schedule variance) that help executives and stakeholders gauge the success of blockchain projects for IT contracts management.

Why not the other options?

A. It automates project progress reporting to business executives: EVM is not an automated reporting tool; it requires data collection and analysis.

C. It eliminates potential risks related to project earnings: EVM identifies variances but does not eliminate risks.

D. It enables accurate forecasts of the number of blocks to be completed: EVM measures progress in terms of value, not specific technical outputs like blockchain blocks.

Facilitating the adoption of an IT governance program in an enterprise requires addressing the behavioral and cultural aspects of change. This approach recognizes that the success of such a program depends not only on the structural and strategic elements but also on how well the people within the organization accept and adapt to the changes. Addressing cultural aspects involves engaging stakeholders, fostering a governance mindset, and overcoming resistance to change, thereby ensuring a smoother and more effective implementation. While defining roles, building business cases, and communicating strategies are critical, they must be complemented by efforts to manage the human side of change.

Implementing a business intelligence (BI) tool requires integrating data from multiple enterprise applications, and the greatest challenge is often ensuring that data definitions and mappings are consistent and accurate. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition notes that data integration, particularly defining and mapping data sources, is a critical hurdle in BI projects due to varying data formats, structures, and semantics across systems.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 5: Benefits Realization):"The success of business intelligence initiatives depends heavily on the quality and consistency of data. Data definition and mapping from disparate enterprise applications is often the greatest challenge, as inconsistencies in data formats, structures, and meanings can lead to inaccurate insights and project delays." (Approximate reference: Domain 5, Section on Data Management for BI)

Data definition and mapping sources from applications (option D) is the greatest challenge because it involves resolving differences in how data is structured, labeled, and interpreted across systems, which is foundational to BI success.

Why not the other options?

A. Interface issues between enterprise and BI applications: Interface issues are technical but typically less challenging than data mapping, as they can often be addressed with middleware or APIs.

B. The need for staff to be trained on the new BI tool: Training is a manageable challenge that occurs post-implementation and is not as critical as data integration.

C. Large volumes of data fed from enterprise applications: While large data volumes pose a challenge, modern BI tools are designed to handle big data, making data mapping the more significant issue.