Pass the IIBA Certification of Capability in Business Analysis CCBA Questions and answers with CertsForce

According to the BABOK Guide, elicitation scope is the set of information that needs to be discovered or confirmed through elicitation activities3. Understanding the elicitation scope can assist the BA with the elicitation activity by determining when elicitation is complete4. This means that the BA can stop eliciting information when he or she has obtained enough information to meet the elicitation scope. This can help avoid over-elicitation or under-elicitation of information. References: BABOK Guide, CCBA Practice Test

Requirements architecture is the tool that can be used by the BA to assess the impact of the change of developing an additional product as part of the project. Requirements architecture is the structure of requirements that defines their scope, boundaries, relationships, dependencies, assumptions, constraints, prioritization, traceability, and quality. Requirements architecture can help to assess the impact of change by identifying how a change in one requirement affects other requirements or solution components. References: : BABOK Guide v3, Section 7.1 : BABOK Guide v3, Section 7.1.2

Quantitative performance measure is being practiced by the software development company that evaluates solutions against the number of defects reported in the testing phase. Quantitative performance measures are those that use numerical values or statistics to assess the performance of a solution or an organization. They can help to measure aspects such as quality, efficiency, productivity, profitability, customer satisfaction, etc. The number of defects is a quantitative measure of quality that indicates how well a solution meets its specifications and expectations. References: : Quantitative Performance Measures

Sample size is the number of observations or data points that are used to measure the performance of a solution. Sample size is an important consideration for the BA to obtain reliable and valid information, as it affects the accuracy, precision, and confidence of the results. A larger sample size can reduce the sampling error and increase the representativeness of the population, but it may also increase the cost and time of data collection. A smaller sample size can save resources and time, but it may also introduce bias and uncertainty in the results. Therefore, the BA should determine the appropriate sample size based on the purpose, scope, and quality criteria of the performance measurement12. The other options are not directly related to the data collection process, although they may influence the analysis and interpretation of the data. References:

1: BABOK® Guide v3, Chapter 7: Solution Evaluation, Section 7.3: Analyze Performance Measures

2: Business Analysis Expert Certification, CCBA® | IIBA®

The project team should consult with the business owner to discuss possible trade-offs when prioritizing requirements. Trade-offs are compromises or concessions that are made to balance conflicting or competing factors or criteria. Trade-offs can help to resolve disagreements or disputes among stakeholders regarding the relative importance or urgency of requirements. Requirements are conditions or capabilities that a stakeholder needs or wants from a solution.

The other options are incorrect because:

Option A is incorrect because changing the priority of the requirements by performing a ranking is not a collaborative technique, but an analytical technique. Ranking is a method of assigning scores or values to requirements based on predefined criteria or scales. Ranking can help to compare and order requirements according to their significance or relevance for a solution, but it does not involve stakeholder input or feedback.

Option C is incorrect because implementing the requirements that the project team considers important is not a collaborative technique, but an authoritative technique. Authoritative techniques are based on the power or influence of a single person or group over others. Authoritative techniques can help to expedite or simplify the decision-making process, but they may not reflect the consensus or agreement of all stakeholders.

Option D is incorrect because executing the requirements that the business owner identified is not a collaborative technique, but an authoritative technique. Authoritative techniques are based on the power or influence of a single person or group over others. Authoritative techniques can help to expedite or simplify the decision-making process, but they may not reflect the consensus or agreement of all stakeholders.

References:

BABOK Guide v3, section 10.43: Prioritization

CCBA Exam Questions, question 6

 The requirements attribute that the BA should assign to allow cost implications to be assessed is complexity. This is because complexity is a measure of how difficult, intricate, or involved a requirement or a solution is. Complexity can have an impact on the cost of implementing or maintaining a requirement or a solution by affecting the effort, time, resources, or skills needed. Assigning complexity to the requirements can help to estimate and compare the cost implications of different requirements or solutions, especially for a project with financial constraints. The other options are not as relevant or useful as complexity. References:

BABOK Guide, section 4.2.4: Structure Requirements

CCBA Practice Test, question 109

According to the BABOK® Guide, a waterfall approach is a sequential project life cycle that consists of distinct phases, such as initiation, planning, analysis, design, construction, testing, implementation, and maintenance. Each phase has a defined set of activities, deliverables, and exit criteria that must be completed before moving to the next phase. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have a clear and stable scope, well-defined requirements, and minimal changes or uncertainty. In this scenario, a new contract requires a thorough level of documentation to be developed and maintained with planned phases of reviews and authorized sign offs. This implies that the project has a high degree of formality, control, and documentation, which fits the characteristics of a waterfall approach. References:

[BABOK® Guide], section 2.5: Plan Business Analysis Approach

CCBA Exam Questions & Answers with Explanations, question 418

 To ensure a shared understanding of requirements, the BA must determine the format to present the requirements to the SMEs attending the workshop. The format of presenting requirements refers to how the requirements are expressed and communicated to different stakeholders. The format can be textual, graphical, tabular, or a combination of these3. The BA should choose a format that is appropriate for the type, level, and complexity of the requirements, as well as the preferences and expectations of the SMEs. The format should also facilitate feedback, validation, and verification of the requirements. References: 3: BABOK Guide v3, Section 4.5

According to the BABOK® Guide, a business analyst (BA) should assess the capability gaps between the current and the future state of the organization, and determine the scope of the change required to achieve the desired outcomes. A capability gap is the difference between what an organization can do and what it needs or wants to do. To assess the capability gaps, the BA should evaluate the current capabilities of the organization, such as the processes, systems, people, and resources, and identify the areas that are affected by the business need or problem. In this scenario, the BA is working on an effort to upgrade a system to take advantage of new technology. Most of the end users with the business knowledge and IT staff with technical knowledge of the system are no longer with the company. This means that the BA has limited sources of information about the current state of the system and its users. Therefore, the BA should evaluate the number of business areas impacted by the system upgrade, as this can help the BA to better understand the extent of the effort required to implement the change. The BA can use techniques such as document analysis, observation, or reverse engineering to gather information about the current system and its users, and to identify the stakeholders, requirements, and risks involved in the system upgrade. References:

[BABOK® Guide], section 5.1: Assess Capability Gaps

CCBA Exam Questions & Answers with Explanations, question 421

An interface analysis is a technique to identify and specify the information that is exchanged across system boundaries. It helps to ensure that the data captured by the new product is compatible with the existing downstream applications. A vendor assessment, a process and data model, and constraints and dependencies are not the first things to consider in this scenario. References: BABOK Guide v3, page 352; CCBA Mock Test, question 1

Elicitation workshops are a technique that involves bringing together a group of stakeholders to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements for a project. Elicitation workshops require careful planning, preparation, and facilitation to ensure that the objectives are met and the outcomes are documented. Elicitation workshops also depend on the participation and collaboration of the relevant stakeholders, especially the subject matter experts who have the knowledge and expertise on the project domain.

If the business analyst has set up a number of elicitation workshops with key subject matter experts on a new project, and one of them has not responded to any invitations, the business analyst should proceed with the first workshop and capture the non-response as a project issue for the project manager to address. This is the best course of action because it allows the business analyst to continue with the planned elicitation activities and avoid delays or disruptions to the project schedule. It also ensures that the non-response is communicated and escalated to the appropriate authority, who can take the necessary actions to resolve the issue and ensure the involvement and input of the legal SME in the future workshops.

References: BABOK Guide v3, page 54; CCBA Mock Test, question 6

The business need originated from external drivers, which are factors outside the control of the organization that influence its goals, objectives, and strategies. In this case, the external driver is the new country’s market and language, which requires the bank to adapt its mobile application to meet the needs and expectations of the potential customers. By providing local language support for the app, the bank can increase its competitive advantage and customer satisfaction in the new country.

References: The answer is based on the BABOK® Guide, which is a key resource for the CCBA® certification. Specifically, it relates to the Strategy Analysis knowledge area, where identifying business needs is a key task for the business analyst12. It also relates to the Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring knowledge area, where the BA should consider the external drivers and their impacts on the business analysis approach

 The predictive approach provides the appropriate level of formality for this project. The predictive approach is a method of planning and managing projects that follows a predefined and sequential process. The predictive approach aims to define the scope, requirements, and deliverables of the project upfront and minimize changes during the implementation. The predictive approach is suitable for projects that have a clear and stable vision, well-understood requirements, and low uncertainty or risk.

The other options are incorrect because:

Option B is incorrect because the reactive approach does not provide the appropriate level of formality for this project. The reactive approach is a method of planning and managing projects that responds to changes and issues as they arise. The reactive approach does not follow a predefined or sequential process, but adapts to the changing needs and expectations of the stakeholders. The reactive approach is suitable for projects that have a vague or evolving vision, unclear or changing requirements, and high uncertainty or risk.

Option C is incorrect because the proactive approach does not provide the appropriate level of formality for this project. The proactive approach is a method of planning and managing projects that anticipates and prevents potential problems or opportunities before they occur. The proactive approach involves identifying, analyzing, and mitigating risks, as well as enhancing benefits and value. The proactive approach is suitable for projects that have a complex or dynamic environment, multiple or conflicting stakeholder interests, and significant impacts or dependencies.

Option D is incorrect because the adaptive approach does not provide the appropriate level of formality for this project. The adaptive approach is a method of planning and managing projects that delivers the solution in increments or iterations. The adaptive approach involves frequent feedback, collaboration, and testing to ensure that the solution meets the stakeholder needs and expectations. The adaptive approach is suitable for projects that have an emergent or innovative vision, flexible or variable requirements, and moderate uncertainty or risk.

References:

BABOK Guide v3, section 3.2: Plan Business Analysis Approach

CCBA Exam Questions, question 21

The BA should resolve differences of opinion among the accountants to develop the correct set of requirements. This is because resolving differences of opinion is a technique that involves identifying and addressing conflicts or disagreements among stakeholders regarding their needs, expectations, or preferences. Resolving differences of opinion can help to achieve a consensus on the requirements and ensure that they reflect the best interests of the stakeholders. The other options are not as relevant or necessary as resolving differences of opinion. References:

BABOK Guide, section 10.20: Resolve Differences of Opinion

CCBA Practice Test, question 118

The user story “As a customer service representative, I need to enter my time on the mobile application so that I can leave work to pick up my sick daughter from school” is not aligned with the existing scope of the project, which is to support external customers and broaden the organization’s brand and increase customer engagement. This user story is focused on the internal staff and their convenience, rather than the external customers and their needs. Therefore, the BA must suggest that the story be included with a change to solution scope or be removed, as it may not add value to the project or the stakeholders. The BA should evaluate the alignment of the user stories with the existing scope by using the scope statement, the business case, and the business objectives as the reference points1. The other options are not the best techniques that the BA should use to evaluate the alignment of the user stories with the existing scope, as they may not address the issue of scope creep or misalignment. Adding the functionality to the list of requirements may increase the complexity, cost, and risk of the project, without delivering the expected benefits. Asking the product owner to rank the user story against the existing product backlog may not resolve the conflict or inconsistency between the user story and the scope statement. Reviewing the business objectives and determining the potential value may not be sufficient to justify the inclusion of the user story, as it may still contradict the scope statement or the business case. References:

1: Scope Statement: Definition, Benefits and Examples

: Business Case: Definition, Benefits and Examples

: Business Objectives: Definition, Benefits and Examples