Pass the Google Google Cloud Certified Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/restricting-domains#setting_the_organization_policy

The domain restriction constraint is a type of list constraint. Google Workspace customer IDs can be added and removed from the allowed_values list of a domain restriction constraint. The domain restriction constraint does not support denying values, and an organization policy can't be saved with IDs in the denied_values list. All domains associated with a Google Workspace account listed in the allowed_values will be allowed by the organization policy. All other domains will be denied by the organization policy.

Storing secrets securely is crucial for maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of your applications. Here is how you can achieve this using Google Cloud Platform:

Encrypt the Secrets: Use Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) to encrypt your secrets. CMEK allows you to have greater control over the encryption keys used to protect your data. This ensures that even if the storage medium is compromised, the secrets remain protected by strong encryption.

Store in Cloud Storage: Store the encrypted secrets in Google Cloud Storage. Cloud Storage is a secure and scalable object storage service. By using encrypted storage, you can ensure that the secrets are securely stored and can only be accessed by authorized entities.

This method provides a secure and managed way to store secrets, ensuring that they are not exposed in plain text within your source code management system.

References

Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK)

Google Cloud Storage Security

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/packet-mirroring

Packet Mirroring clones the traffic of specified instances in your Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network and forwards it for examination. Packet Mirroring captures all traffic and packet data, including payloads and headers.

To maintain a historical record of what was running in Google Cloud Platform at any point in time, you should use Forseti Security to automate inventory snapshots. Forseti Security is an open-source toolkit that helps to automate security and compliance in GCP by taking inventory snapshots of GCP resources.

Step-by-Step:

Install Forseti Security:

Follow the installation guide to deploy Forseti Security on your GCP environment.

Configure Inventory:

Set up the inventory module in Forseti to capture and store snapshots of GCP resources.

Schedule Snapshots:

Use Forseti’s configuration to schedule regular inventory snapshots.

Access Historical Data:

Review and access historical records through Forseti’s dashboard or by querying the Forseti database.

Compliance and Monitoring: Use Forseti to ensure compliance and monitor changes over time.

https://gsuite.google.com/learn-more/security/security-whitepaper/page-1.html

Shared responsibility “Security of the Cloud” - GCP is responsible for protecting the infrastructure that runs all of the services offered in the GCP Cloud. This infrastructure is composed of the hardware, software, networking, and facilities that run GCP Cloud services.

To ensure that a Compute Engine instance does not have access to the internet or to any Google APIs or services, you need to disable the following settings:

Public IP: Disabling the public IP address ensures that the instance does not have a direct connection to the internet. Without a public IP address, the instance cannot be accessed from or communicate with the internet directly.

Private Google Access: Disabling Private Google Access ensures that the instance does not have access to Google APIs and services through the internal Google network. Private Google Access allows instances without a public IP to reach Google APIs and services using private IP addresses, but disabling it will block this path.

Disabling these settings will effectively isolate the instance from both the public internet and Google's internal API services.

References

Google Cloud VPC Documentation - Overview

Configuring Private Google Access

Compute Engine Network Overview

The problem describes an application with two Cloud Run services (Service A - frontend, Service B - backend) and requires setting up IAM with the principle of least privilege. Service A calls Service B.

Principle of Least Privilege: This principle dictates that each entity (in this case, a Cloud Run service) should only have the minimum permissions necessary to perform its function.

Separate Service Accounts for Separate Services: To adhere to the principle of least privilege, it's best practice to assign a unique service account to each distinct service or component. This ensures that a compromise of one service account does not grant excessive permissions across other services. Service A needs permissions to run itself and to invoke Service B. Service B only needs permissions to run itself.Extract Reference: "Assign a service account to a Cloud Run service. The service account acts as the identity for your service and determines what permissions your revisions have when executing requests. It is a best practice to grant each service account only the permissions that are required to run the specific service (principle of least privilege)." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/service-accounts)

Authentication for Cloud Run Services: When one Cloud Run service (caller) needs to invoke another Cloud Run service (callee), the caller must be authorized to do so. This is typically achieved by assigning the roles/run.invoker role on the callee service to the caller's service account.Extract Reference: "To allow a service to invoke another service, grant the roles/run.invoker role on the called service to the caller's service account." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/securing/service-to-service)

Let's evaluate the options:

A. Create a new service account with the permissions to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the new service account to call the backend. This violates the principle of least privilege by giving a single service account permissions for both services. If that service account were compromised, both services would be affected.

B. Create two separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A, and grant the other service account the permissions to execute service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the service account for service A to call the back-end. This aligns perfectly with least privilege. Service A gets its own identity, Service B gets its own identity. Service A's service account is then granted run.invoker permissions on Service B, allowing it to call the backend while Service B requires authentication. This is the recommended approach.

C. Use the Compute Engine default service account to run service A and service B. Require authentication for service B. Permit only the default service account to call the backend. The Compute Engine default service account often has broad permissions (e.g., editor role in its project). Using it violates the principle of least privilege and is generally discouraged for production applications due to the potential for excessive permissions.

D. Create three separate service accounts. Grant one service account the permissions to execute service A. Grant the second service account the permissions to run service B. Grant the third service account the permissions to communicate between both services A and B. Require authentication for service B. Call the back-end by authenticating with a service account key for the third service account. This introduces unnecessary complexity with a third service account just for communication. More critically, using a service account key for authentication is generally discouraged in Cloud Run environments where ADC (Application Default Credentials) can be used, as managing keys securely becomes an operational overhead and security risk. Cloud Run services automatically use their attached service accounts for authentication when making calls to other Google Cloud services, including other Cloud Run services.

Therefore, option B is the best solution, adhering to the principle of least privilege and Google Cloud best practices for Cloud Run service-to-service authentication.

To use customer-supplied encryption keys (CSEK) for encrypting data on Cloud Storage, follow these steps:

Generate an Encryption Key: Generate a 256-bit AES encryption key. This key should be base64-encoded.

sh

Copy code

openssl rand -base64 32

Upload Object with CSEK: Use the gsutil command-line tool to upload the object to Cloud Storage, specifying the location of the encryption key using the -o option.

gsutil -o "GSUtil:encryption_key=" cp [LOCAL_OBJECT_PATH] gs://[BUCKET_NAME]/

Verify Encryption: After uploading the object, you can verify that it is encrypted using the provided CSEK by checking the object's metadata.

gsutil stat gs://[BUCKET_NAME]/[OBJECT_NAME]

Key Management: Ensure that the encryption key is securely stored and managed. It should not be hard-coded in scripts or applications.

By using the gsutil tool and specifying the encryption key, you ensure that the object is encrypted using the customer-supplied encryption key during the upload process.

”This encryption method is reversible, which helps to maintain referential integrity across your database and has no character-set limitations.” https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/take-charge-of-your-data-how-tokenization-makes-data-usable-without-sacrificing-privacy

https://cloud.google.com/dlp/docs/pseudonymization

FPE provides fewer security guarantees compared to other deterministic encryption methods such as AES-SIV. For these reasons, Google strongly recommends using deterministic encryption with AES-SIV instead of FPE for all security sensitive use cases. Other methods like deterministic encryption using AES-SIV provide these stronger security guarantees and are recommended for tokenization use cases unless length and character set preservation are strict requirements—for example, for backward compatibility with a legacy data system.