The correct answers are A, C, and E . The Implementation Meeting is not merely another presentation session; it is the point where management and the project team review the preliminary VM report, determine the disposition of each value alternative, establish action plans for accepted alternatives, obtain implementation commitments, and set timeframes for review and implementation. ( )

The VM facilitator and study team members should participate because they understand the technical basis, assumptions, cost comparisons, performance effects, and risk considerations behind the proposals. Therefore, they are needed to answer cost-impact questions , because accepted alternatives often depend on capital cost, operating cost, life-cycle cost, and implementation-cost implications. They are also needed to respond to technical questions , since the proposal write-ups include descriptions, sketches, assumptions, calculations, vendor information, performance data, and possible negative factors. ( )

They should also address the level of effort required for implementation , because implementation requires action steps, responsibilities, timing, resources, and follow-through. Option B is less appropriate because formal presentation occurs in the Presentation Phase. Option D is not the main purpose; the meeting disposes developed value alternatives, not creates a new set of alternative proposals.

References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Meeting; Disposition of Value Alternatives; Cost Impact; Technical Clarification; Implementation Effort.