After a project review meeting, a key stakeholder tells another stakeholder they do not trust the project status report. The second stakeholder approaches the project manager and mentions the conversation. What should the project manager do?
A.
Request the sponsor ask the key stakeholder to be attentive during the project review meeting
B.
Schedule a meeting with the key stakeholder to address the issue and obtain direct feedback
C.
Email the status report to all stakeholders and ask them to review and provide feedback
D.
Present the status report in a chart and assume everyone understands the report
A trust concern about status reporting is a stakeholder engagement and transparency issue that should be handled directly and constructively. The project manager should schedule a meeting with the key stakeholder (B) to understand the specific reasons for distrust—data accuracy, reporting frequency, unclear metrics, perceived bias, missing context, or inconsistent performance interpretation. Direct feedback enables the PM to clarify misunderstandings, validate facts, and adjust reporting methods (e.g., include objective KPIs like SPI/CPI where appropriate, add trend data, define RAG criteria, or align reporting cadence). Asking the sponsor to intervene (A) is premature and can escalate conflict unnecessarily. Mass-emailing the report for feedback (C) broadens the issue without addressing the root concern and may create noise or defensiveness. Switching to a chart and assuming comprehension (D) ignores the trust gap; visualizations help only if stakeholders agree on definitions and data sources. Addressing the concern one-on-one restores credibility, improves communication, and strengthens stakeholder relationships—essential for sustained project support.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit