Within the ISACA Advanced in AI Risk framework, governance decisions should align AI use with policy, accountability, stakeholder expectations, risk appetite, and applicable legal or ethical obligations. Mapping AI project outcomes to enterprise performance metrics ties investment to measurable organizational value. An inventory improves visibility and workforce metrics measure only one dimension, while a narrow focus on quantifiable benefits can miss strategic value. This makes option C, Mapping AI project outcomes to enterprise performance metrics, the strongest answer. The other choices describe narrower technical, operational, performance, or administrative considerations and do not address the primary risk-management objective in the scenario as directly. A risk practitioner should select the response that most effectively reduces the stated exposure while preserving appropriate oversight, traceability, and alignment with organizational risk tolerance and business requirements.