Within the ISACA Advanced in AI Risk framework, program management connects risk identification, control selection, treatment, monitoring, resilience, third-party oversight, and reporting to enterprise risk objectives. Dependence on a single proprietary AI environment can create vendor lock-in, making migration technically difficult, operationally disruptive, and expensive. Transparency and scalability are relevant concerns, but prohibitive switching costs are the central dependency risk. This makes option B, Prohibitive migration costs, the strongest answer. The other choices describe narrower technical, operational, performance, or administrative considerations and do not address the primary risk-management objective in the scenario as directly. A risk practitioner should select the response that most effectively reduces the stated exposure while preserving appropriate oversight, traceability, and alignment with organizational risk tolerance and business requirements.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit