Pass the CrowdStrike CCCS CCCS-203b Questions and answers with CertsForce

When remediation capacity is limited,CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityemphasizesrisk-based prioritizationfocused onactual exposurerather than theoretical severity alone.

Filtering vulnerabilities bycontainer running statusallows teams to identify which vulnerable images areactively running and exposed, particularly those that arepublic-facing. Remediating vulnerabilities in running containers first reduces real-world risk immediately, while dormant or unused images can be addressed later.

CVSS scores and CVE age do not account for exploit accessibility or operational exposure. Taking the business offline is impractical and unnecessary when targeted remediation can significantly reduce risk.

Therefore, the correct and CrowdStrike-aligned approach is tofilter by container running status, makingOption Dthe correct answer.

A primary benefit of CrowdStrike’s cloud security suite is that it provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention across cloud workloads, identities, containers, and control planes.

Falcon Cloud Security unifies CSPM, workload protection, container security, identity protection, and detection and response into a single platform. This integration allows organizations to detect misconfigurations, prevent risky deployments, monitor runtime activity, and respond to threats using shared context and intelligence.

Other options describe isolated capabilities or services that are not the core value proposition of the platform. Therefore, the correct answer is Provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention.

In CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, exclusions for cloud scans are designed to be precise and scalable so that organizations can safely reduce noise without weakening overall security coverage. According to CrowdStrike best practices,tagsare the recommended and supported criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

Tags are metadata labels applied to cloud resources (such as AWS accounts, instances, or services) and are commonly used for ownership, environment classification (for example, dev, test, or prod), or application grouping. By using tags as exclusion criteria, security teams can dynamically control which resources are excluded from scans without relying on static identifiers. This is especially important in cloud environments where resources are frequently created, modified, or terminated.

Exclusions based onaccounts,regions, orservicesare broader in scope and can unintentionally exclude large portions of the environment, increasing the risk of blind spots. Tag-based exclusions allow CrowdStrike Falcon to maintain least-privilege security principles by excluding only explicitly labeled resources.

Because Falcon continuously evaluates cloud resources, tag-based exclusions automatically apply to newly created assets that inherit the same tag, ensuring consistent policy enforcement. For these reasons, CrowdStrike documentation and operational guidance identifyTagas the correct and most effective criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

InCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, configuration policy breaches aligned to regulatory and security frameworks such asNISTare tracked asIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs). These findings represent deviations from best-practice configurations and compliance benchmarks.

To provide an auditable list of NIST-related configuration violations, the correct location isExport Cloud Posture – Indicators of misconfiguration. This export includes detailed records of misconfigured resources, associated benchmarks (NIST, CIS, etc.), affected cloud accounts, severity, and remediation guidance. It is specifically designed to support internal and external audit requirements.

Cloud Indicators of Attack focus on threat activity, not compliance. Remediation status reports focus on fix progress rather than raw policy violations. The Cloud Posture dashboard provides a high-level summary but does not deliver the detailed, exportable list required for audits.

Therefore,Export Cloud Posture – Indicators of misconfigurationis the correct and documented source.

Visibility intoAWS IAM controls, includingrestricted use of AWS CloudShell (CIS IAM 1.20), is provided throughCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security posture managementusingIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs). These checks continuously evaluate cloud resources againstindustry-standard benchmarks, including theCIS Foundations Benchmarks for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

CrowdStrike maintainsprebuilt, managed IOM policiesthat are automatically updated to reflect the latest CIS guidance. Leveraging existing IOM policies ensures immediate coverage without the operational risk or overhead of creating and maintaining custom rules. These policies assess IAM configurations, permissions usage, service access controls, and policy enforcement related to CloudShell usage.

IOAs are designed for runtime behavioral detections and are not suitable for posture or configuration validation. Creating custom IOMs is unnecessary for CIS-aligned controls because CrowdStrike already provides validated, benchmark-mapped policies maintained by CrowdStrike security research.

Therefore,leveraging existing IOM policiesis the correct and recommended approach to maintaincontinuous, benchmark-aligned visibilityacross multi-cloud environments.

When registering an individual AWS account in CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security using the Falcon UI, therecommended and supported method is AWS CloudFormation. CrowdStrike provides a prebuilt CloudFormation template that automates the creation of required AWS resources, including IAM roles, permissions, and trust relationships needed for secure, read-only API access.

Using CloudFormation ensures the deployment isconsistent, auditable, and aligned with AWS best practices. It minimizes human error by automatically configuring the correct permissions required for Falcon to collect configuration, identity, and resource metadata from AWS. This method also simplifies lifecycle management—resources can be updated or removed cleanly by managing the CloudFormation stack.

Other options are not recommended for this use case.AWS Configis a native AWS compliance service but does not handle Falcon onboarding.Terraform scriptsmay be used in advanced or large-scale automation scenarios, but they are not the default or recommended approach for single-account registration in the Falcon UI.Bash scriptslack governance, validation, and repeatability.

Therefore, when registering a single AWS account through the Falcon console,AWS CloudFormationis the correct and CrowdStrike-recommended method.

To confirm whether malware exists within a container image, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security directs investigators to reviewImage detection findings. These findings are generated during container image assessments, where Falcon performs deep inspection of image layers, binaries, and embedded artifacts.

Image detection findings include indicators of known malware, suspicious executables, malicious scripts, and other threats identified through CrowdStrike’s threat intelligence and detection engines. Because container images are often reused across environments, identifying malware at the image level is critical to preventing widespread propagation.

Other options do not directly confirm malware within an image.Drift indicatorsrelate to changes in a running container compared to its original image, not malware embedded in the image itself.Container alertsare typically runtime detections triggered by behavior during execution.Container misconfigurationsfocus on insecure settings rather than malicious code.

By reviewing image detection findings, security teams can identify infected images early, remediate by rebuilding clean images, and prevent deployment through policy enforcement mechanisms such as the Kubernetes Admission Controller. Therefore, the correct investigation path for suspected malware in a container image isImage detection findings.

TheCloud Asset InventoryinCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityprovides a centralized, normalized view ofall compute assetsacrossAWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, regardless of whether they aremanaged or unmanagedby the Falcon sensor.

This inventory aggregates metadata from cloud provider APIs and Falcon telemetry to present unified visibility into virtual machines, cloud instances, container hosts, and workloads. Security teams can filter assets by cloud provider, account, region, operating system, sensor status, and risk posture, making it essential for multi-cloud environments.

Other dashboards serve specialized purposes: the Image Assessment Dashboard focuses on container images, the Compliance Dashboard maps findings to regulatory frameworks, and Application Security Posture Inventory focuses on application-level risk. None of these provide thefull compute asset viewrequired for cross-cloud operational awareness.

Therefore,Cloud Asset Inventoryis the correct location for maintaining visibility across complex, multi-cloud environments.

When registering an AWS account with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, enabling real-time visibility and detection is recommended to improve overall security posture. This ensures continuous monitoring of cloud activity, identities, and resources rather than relying solely on periodic posture assessments.

Real-time detection allows Falcon to identify risky behavior, misconfigurations, and attack techniques as they occur, reducing dwell time and improving response effectiveness. The other options are not registration-specific security enhancements within Falcon.

Therefore, the correct answer is Real-time visibility and detection.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security performs agentless cloud security posture management (CSPM) by integrating directly with cloud service providers such as AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform using native APIs. This approach allows Falcon to continuously assess cloud configurations, permissions, networking, storage, and identity controls without deploying sensors or agents.

By default, CrowdStrike configures cloud account scans to runevery 4 hours. This scan frequency is designed to strike a balance between near-real-time visibility and efficient API usage across cloud providers. Cloud environments are highly dynamic, with frequent changes to configurations, IAM policies, and services. A four-hour scan interval ensures that new misconfigurations or risky changes—such as overly permissive roles, exposed storage, or insecure network rules—are identified quickly enough to reduce exposure time.

Scanning more frequently could introduce unnecessary API throttling or operational overhead, while less frequent scans could delay detection of critical security gaps. The four-hour interval is therefore CrowdStrike’s recommended default for maintaining continuous visibility while preserving cloud provider performance and stability.

This default interval can be adjusted in certain scenarios, but unless explicitly changed,every 4 hoursis the standard scan cadence applied to AWS, Azure, and GCP environments.