Pass the Confluent Confluent Certified Developer CCDAK Questions and answers with CertsForce

In the Kafka Streams API, operations are classified as stateless or stateful based on whether they require maintaining local state stores. According to the official Kafka Streams documentation, stateless operations process each record independently, without storing or accessing prior records.

Filter is a stateless operation because it evaluates each record individually and decides whether to pass it downstream. It does not require any state or historical context.

GroupBy is also considered stateless because it merely repartitions the stream by assigning a new key and forwarding records to downstream processors. While it triggers the creation of an internal repartition topic, the GroupBy operation itself does not maintain a state store.

In contrast, Reduce is a stateful operation because it aggregates records over time and requires maintaining intermediate results in a state store. Similarly, Join operations are stateful because Kafka Streams must buffer and store records from one or both input streams or tables to perform the join within a defined time window.

Thus, the correct stateless operations are Filter and GroupBy, as documented in the Kafka Streams developer guide.

According to the official Apache Kafka producer metrics documentation, the I/O thread ratio and I/O thread wait ratio indicate how busy the producer’s network I/O thread is and how much time it spends waiting. When both metrics are low, it means the I/O thread is underutilized and not blocked on network operations.

This strongly suggests that the bottleneck is not network-related. If there were network latency or a bad data link (Option B), the I/O thread wait ratio would be high. Similarly, large batches (Option A) or compression (Option D) generally increase throughput and would result in higher I/O utilization.

An expensive or blocking callback function (for example, heavy logic in onCompletion()) executes in the producer’s sender thread context. Kafka documentation explicitly warns that slow callbacks can throttle producer throughput because they delay the processing of acknowledgements and subsequent sends.

Therefore, the most likely and documented cause of low producer throughput with low I/O utilization is expensive callback logic in the producer code.

=========================

With acks=all and min.insync.replicas=2, Kafka requires at least two in-sync replicas to acknowledge a write. If only one broker is alive, the condition fails, and NotEnoughReplicasException is thrown by the producer.

From Kafka Producer Exception Docs:

“NotEnoughReplicasException is thrown when the number of in-sync replicas is insufficient to satisfy acks=all with min.insync.replicas.”

NetworkException is generic and not raised here.

NotCoordinatorException is related to consumer group coordination.

NotLeaderForPartitionException is unrelated unless accessing an unassigned leader.

The ConsumerRebalanceListener lets you handle partition assignments and revocations during rebalances. This is critical for managing offsets, stateful processing, or external transactions.

From Kafka Consumer Rebalance Docs:

“Implementing ConsumerRebalanceListener allows your application to take action before and after partitions are reassigned.”

A is true: It lets your app react when partitions assigned to the consumer change.

B, C, and D are unrelated to consumer rebalancing directly.

Kafka Connect source connectors use the offset.storage.topic configuration parameter to define where to store offsets that track the connector's position in the source system (e.g., database, file, etc.).

From Kafka Connect Worker Configuration:

“offset.storage.topic specifies the topic in Kafka where the connector stores offsets for each source partition.”

This allows Kafka Connect to resume from the correct position on restart.

The other options (B–D) are not valid Kafka configs.

According to the official Apache Kafka Streams documentation, session windows are specifically designed to model periods of activity separated by gaps of inactivity. A session window groups events that occur close together in time and closes when no new events arrive within a defined inactivity gap.

In this use case, tracking user shopping cart behavior requires detecting when a user becomes inactive (for example, stops adding or removing items). Session windows naturally represent this pattern by creating a new window when activity resumes after a period of silence. This makes them ideal for modeling user sessions, cart abandonment detection, and inactivity analysis.

Hopping and tumbling windows (Options B and C) are fixed-time windows and are not well-suited for detecting inactivity, as they segment data based on clock time rather than behavior. Sliding windows are primarily used for continuous joins and do not explicitly model inactivity gaps.

Therefore, session windows are the correct and officially recommended choice for identifying periods of user inactivity in Kafka Streams applications.

=========================

If the application is CPU-bound and lagging, adding more consumers to the group will allow better parallel processing, especially since the topic has 4 partitions, allowing up to 4 active consumers.

From Kafka Consumer Group Docs:

“Kafka achieves parallelism by distributing partitions across consumers in a group. Adding consumers helps reduce lag if partitions are underutilized.”

B may help but requires repartitioning and coordination.

C or D affects how much data is polled, not how fast it’s processed.

A: Kafka batches store compression metadata in their headers, indicating how the batch was compressed.

B: Compression is controlled via the producer config compression.type, which defaults to none. Producers explicitly set Gzip or other formats.

From Kafka Producer Docs:

“Compression is done by the producer, and the type is stored in the message batch metadata. The broker does not recompress.”

C is false: messages are serialized before compression.

D is false: messages without keys are distributed across multiple partitions.

According to the official Apache Kafka documentation, log compaction is the mechanism used to retain only the latest record for each key in a topic. By setting cleanup.policy=compact, Kafka ensures that older records with the same key are eventually removed, leaving only the most recent value for each key.

This behavior is exactly suited for use cases such as tracking the current state of an entity, including GPS tracker locations, user profiles, or configuration data. In this scenario, the key (trackerId) uniquely identifies a tracker, and the value represents its most recent latitude and longitude.

Option B (retention.ms=infinite) retains all historical data, which contradicts the requirement. Option C (min.cleanable.dirty.ratio) controls when compaction runs, not what data is retained. Option D (retention.ms=0) would immediately delete all data and is unsafe.

Therefore, setting cleanup.policy=compact is the correct and officially documented solution to always retain the latest location per tracker.

=========================

To send failed records to a dead letter queue (DLQ), you must configure:

errors.tolerance=all: Tells the connector to not fail on errors but handle them (e.g., send to DLQ).

errors.deadletterqueue.topic.name=DLQ-Topic: Specifies the DLQ topic.

errors.deadletterqueue.context.headers.enable=true: Includes error context in message headers.

From Kafka Connect Error Handling Docs:

“Kafka Connect supports directing problematic records to a separate topic (DLQ) using errors.* configs. Headers can include failure metadata.”

Options D, E, F are related to logging, not DLQ behavior.