Pass the CompTIA CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Input validation is a technique that checks the user input for any malicious or unexpected data before processing it by the web application. Input validation can prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, which exploit the vulnerability of a web application to execute malicious scripts in the browser of a victim. XSS attacks can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the web application and its users. Input validation can be implemented on both the client-side and the server-side, but server-side validation is more reliable and secure. Input validation can use various methods, such as whitelisting, blacklisting, filtering, escaping, encoding, and sanitizing the input data. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide with over 500 Practice Test Questions: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, Chapter 2, page 70. CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 3.2, page 11. Application Security – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 3.2

Code repositories are a common source of unintentional corporate credential leakage, especially in cloud environments. Developers may accidentally commit and push sensitive information, such as API keys, passwords, and other credentials, to public or poorly secured repositories. These credentials can then be accessed by unauthorized users, leading to security breaches. Ensuring that repositories are properly secured and that sensitive data is never committed is critical for protecting against this type of leakage.

References =

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course Content: Domain 03 Security Architecture​.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide: Chapter on Threats and Vulnerability Management​.

Deploying a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution allows for efficient log aggregation, correlation, and analysis across an organization’s infrastructure, providing real-time security insights.References: Security+ SY0-701 Course Content​, Security+ SY0-601 Book​.

The correct answer is C. Password, authentication token, thumbprint. This combination of authentication factors satisfies the manager’s goal of implementing multifactor authentication that uses something you know, something you have, and something you are.

Something you know is a type of authentication factor that relies on the user’s knowledge of a secret or personal information, such as a password, a PIN, or a security question. A password is a common example of something you know that can be used to access a VPN12

Something you have is a type of authentication factor that relies on the user’s possession of a physical object or device, such as a smart card, a token, or a smartphone. An authentication token is a common example of something you have that can be used to generate a one-time password (OTP) or a code that can be used to access a VPN12

Something you are is a type of authentication factor that relies on the user’s biometric characteristics, such as a fingerprint, a face, or an iris. A thumbprint is a common example of something you are that can be used to scan and verify the user’s identity to access a VPN12

The best answer is A. Peer review requirements.

The question asks about information security policies related to the software development methodology. At the policy and governance level, a CISO is most likely to document broad secure development requirements that apply across the organization. Peer review requirements fit this well because they establish a formal development control to help ensure code quality, reduce security flaws, and support secure software development practices.

Peer review is a common secure development requirement because it helps detect:

coding errors

insecure logic

poor implementation of security controls

accidental exposure of sensitive functionality

Why the other options are less appropriate:

B. Multifactor authenticationMFA is a security control, but it is not specifically tied to documenting the software development methodology itself.

C. Branch protection testsBranch protection is more of a technical repository or version control configuration detail than a high-level policy requirement.

D. Secrets management configurationsSecrets management is important, but configurations are typically procedural or technical implementation details rather than the most likely policy language a CISO would include in methodology documentation.

From a Security+ perspective, governance documents usually define secure coding expectations, review processes, and oversight requirements, making peer review requirements the best answer.

The company should implement a certificate revocation list, or CRL. Smart-card authentication commonly relies on certificates issued to users. When employees leave, their certificates must be revoked so those credentials can no longer be trusted. A CRL is published by a certificate authority and lists certificates that should no longer be accepted before their normal expiration date. A CA issues and manages certificates, but the specific missing control is revocation checking. A TPM stores cryptographic material on a device and does not revoke user certificates. A CSR is used to request a certificate, not disable one. An HSM protects cryptographic keys, but it does not prevent former employees from using still-valid smart-card certificates.

================

Google hacking is the correct passive reconnaissance activity. Passive reconnaissance collects information without directly interacting with the target’s systems in a way that is likely to trigger alerts. Google hacking uses search engines and advanced search operators to discover publicly indexed information, such as exposed documents, login pages, metadata, directories, or sensitive files. DNS zone transfers require querying the target’s DNS infrastructure and are considered active reconnaissance. Vulnerability scanning sends probes to target systems and is also active. Social engineering interacts with people and attempts to manipulate them, so it is not passive technical reconnaissance. In a penetration test, Google hacking is a classic OSINT method because it gathers public information without touching the target network directly.

================

When the government bans a vendor, the legal concern is sanctions—laws that restrict purchasing, using, or importing products from certain companies or countries. The general counsel’s job is to ensure the organization is not violating federal restrictions, export controls, trade compliance laws, or sanctions lists such as OFAC or government procurement bans.

Security+ SY0-701 notes that legal and regulatory compliance is a critical part of risk management, especially when handling prohibited vendors or technologies. Continued use of banned devices could expose the organization to legal penalties, fines, or federal investigation.

Data sovereignty (B) refers to data storage location laws, not hardware bans. Cost of replacement (C) is an operational concern, not a legal one. Loss of license (D) typically applies to software, not network hardware.

Therefore, the general counsel’s primary concern is A: Sanctions.

 Sanitization is the process of removing sensitive data from a storage device or a system before it is disposed of or reused. Sanitization can be done by using software tools or hardware devices that overwrite the data with random patterns or zeros, making it unrecoverable. Sanitization is different from destruction, which is the physical damage of the storage device to render it unusable. Sanitization is also different from enumeration, which is the identification of network resources or devices, and inventory, which is the tracking of assets and their locations. The policy of securely wiping hard drives before sending decommissioned systems to recycling is an example of sanitization, as it ensures that no confidential data can be retrieved from the recycled devices. References = Secure Data Destruction – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 2.7, video at 1:00; CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 387.

Wiping involves securely erasing data by overwriting the hard drive, ensuring the information is unrecoverable. It is cost-effective compared to physical destruction methods like shredding.

=================

Benchmarks provide standardized security configuration baselines or templates (such as CIS Benchmarks) for systems including firewalls. Using benchmarks helps MSSPs apply consistent and secure configurations across many clients efficiently.

SNMP (A) is for network device management, Netflow (C) is for traffic analysis, and SCAP (D) is a framework for vulnerability and compliance management but not directly for template creation.

Benchmarks are fundamental for configuration management in Security Operations【6:Chapter 14†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

A false positive is a result that indicates a vulnerability or a problem when there is none. In this case, the vulnerability scanning report shows that the telnet service on port 23 is open and uses an insecure network protocol. However, the security analyst performs a test using nmap and a script that checks for telnet encryption support. The result shows that the telnet server supports encryption, which means that the data transmitted between the client and the server can be protected from eavesdropping. Therefore, the reported vulnerability is a false positive and does not reflect the actual security posture of the server. The security analyst should verify the encryption settings of the telnet server and client and ensure that they are configured properly3. References: 3: Telnet Protocol - Can You Encrypt Telnet?

Preparation is the phase in the incident response process when a security analyst reviews roles and responsibilities, as well as the policies and procedures for handling incidents. Preparation also involves gathering and maintaining the necessary tools, resources, and contacts for responding to incidents. Preparation can help a security analyst to be ready and proactive when an incident occurs, as well as to reduce the impact and duration of the incident.

Some of the activities that a security analyst performs during the preparation phase are:

Defining the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team members, such as the incident manager, the incident coordinator, the technical lead, the communications lead, and the legal advisor.

Establishing the incident response plan, which outlines the objectives, scope, authority, and procedures for responding to incidents, as well as the escalation and reporting mechanisms.

Developing the incident response policy, which defines the types and categories of incidents, the severity levels, the notification and reporting requirements, and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders.

Creating the incident response playbook, which provides the step-by-step guidance and checklists for handling specific types of incidents, such as denial-of-service, ransomware, phishing, or data breach.

Acquiring and testing the incident response tools, such as network and host-based scanners, malware analysis tools, forensic tools, backup and recovery tools, and communication and collaboration tools.

Identifying and securing the incident response resources, such as the incident response team, the incident response location, the evidence storage, and the external support.

Building and maintaining the incident response contacts, such as the internal and external stakeholders, the law enforcement agencies, the regulatory bodies, and the media.

Cyber insurance is a type of insurance that covers the financial losses and liabilities that result from cyberattacks, such as data breaches, ransomware, denial-of-service, phishing, or malware. Cyber insurance can help a company recover from the costs of restoring data, repairing systems, paying ransoms, compensating customers, or facing legal actions. Cyber insurance is one of the possible strategies that a company can use to address the items listed on the risk register. A riskregister is a document that records the identified risks, their probability, impact, and mitigation strategies for a project or an organization. The four common risk mitigation strategies are:

Accept: The company acknowledges the risk and decides to accept the consequences without taking any action to reduce or eliminate the risk. This strategy is usually chosen when the risk is low or the cost of mitigation is too high.

Transfer: The company transfers the risk to a third party, such as an insurance company, a vendor, or a partner. This strategy is usually chosen when the risk is high or the company lacks the resources or expertise to handle the risk.

Mitigate: The company implements controls or measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk. This strategy is usually chosen when the risk is moderate or the cost of mitigation is reasonable.

Avoid: The company eliminates the risk by changing the scope, plan, or design of the project or the organization. This strategy is usually chosen when the risk is unacceptable or the cost of mitigation is too high.

By purchasing cyber insurance, the company is transferring the risk to the insurance company, which will cover the financial losses and liabilities in case of a cyberattack. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Transfer. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-701), Chapter 8: Governance, Risk, and Compliance, page 377. Professor Messer’s CompTIA SY0-701 Security+ Training Course, Section 8.1: Risk Management, video: Risk Mitigation Strategies (5:37).

Blackmail is the correct motivation because the attacker is coercing the employee by threatening to release sensitive personal files. The attacker is not simply seeking money directly, so financial gain is not the best description. Revenge would involve retaliation for a perceived grievance, but the scenario describes coercion. Espionage involves stealing information for political, corporate, or strategic advantage, which is not the primary driver here. This is a social engineering and insider-risk scenario because an external attacker pressures an internal employee into performing malicious activity. Security+ expects candidates to recognize attacker motivations such as financial gain, ideology, espionage, revenge, and blackmail based on the pressure or incentive being used.