Pass the CIPS CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M5 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Accepting gifts during a negotiation can createconflict of interestconcerns and may violate ethical standards. Best practice requires rejecting such offers to maintain transparency and objectivity in decision-making.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Win-lose approach is useful when the relationship with the other party (TOP) is short-term and once-off.

The question mentions 4 types of relationship:

Adversarial: Both seek to maximize position at the expense of the other. Almost no trust, communication and cooperation. These suppliers will probably provide non-core products or services with the buyer purchasing them on a one-off basis.

Outsourcing relationship: Use competent suppliers to manage non-core businesses previously done in-house. Require high level of trust and collaboration

Partnership: Both work closely on long term development by sharing information, technology and ideas.High level of trust with the aim to benefit both parties (win-win)

Strategic alliance: Both parties identify areas where they could collaborate to create mutual benefits

Among these 4 types of relationship, only adversarial is once-off. Then it is the correct answer.

Becoming a preferred customer to supplier's perspective can increase the purchaser's leverage in negotiation. Beside the size of buying organisation or its spend, the following may be sufficient to differentiate the buyer from other buying organisations:

- Simple procurement processes

- Simple contracting processes

- Clear and concise documentation

- Absence of onerous supplier terms and conditions (onerous supplier terms and conditions mean that obligations imposed on suppliers are greater than their gains)

- On-time payment: The reduction in hassle for both supplier and the buyer, if bills are paid on time, is significant. From the customer’s perspective it could also be the opener to agreeing preferential payment terms. A supplier may weigh up that payment on time at 60 days is worth taking, over the current 30-day terms that slip to 90 days and beyond.

- Transparent processes

- Ethical behavior

LO 1, AC 1.3

LO 2, AC 2.1

Personal poweris derived from an individual's unique qualities or expertise. It differs from positional power, which is based on job title or authority.Legitimate powerstems from an official position of authority, whileexpert poweris based on skills, knowledge, and credibility. These are both commonly used by procurement professionals to influence outcomes in negotiations.

“Expert power arises from experience, qualifications, or specialist knowledge that is recognised and respected by others. Legitimate power stems from a formal position or role within an organisation.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Sources of Power in Negotiation)

Note: Strategic and leverage power are more aligned with organisational positioning and external factors, not personal influence.

To achieve a win-win (integrative) negotiation, Sally should accept the 5% discount on the aftercare package (B), as it meets her objective for a total discount while respecting the supplier'slimitations. This approach demonstrates flexibility and is in line with CIPS principles on integrative negotiations, where both parties achieve value in different forms.

At the first stage of CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle (Understand need and develop a high-level specification), procurement professional mainly negotiate with internal stakeholders. They have a duty to proportionately and constructively challenge specification if there's genuine doubt over the need or how the need is expressed. This is called demand management. Their first duty is to the organisation's treasury, not to functional managers.

Demand management including: negotiation/challenge between procurement and internal stakeholders over the need/requirement/specification. Remember that in any process or product, the greatest opportunity for cost reduction is at the design stage.

Mark-up % = Profit ÷ Cost × 100. Here, profit is $80, cost is $160. So, (80 ÷ 160) × 100 = 50%. This differs from margin, which is profit ÷ selling price. Mark-up analysis helps buyers understand supplier pricing structures, detect hidden margins, and strengthen negotiation. By knowing whether a supplier is working with high or low mark-up levels, buyers can challenge prices more effectively or justify alternative offers. This analytical preparation supports objective negotiation rather than reliance on supplier claims.

Persistent late payment of the supplier’s invoices (A) and Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs with the supplier (B) are potential sources of conflict as they create dissatisfaction and imbalance in the relationship. According to CIPS materials:

Late payments (A) can strain the supplier’s cash flow, affecting their operational stability and leading to mistrust in the buyer.

Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs (B) can result in one party feeling exploited or unfairly treated, which undermines the collaborative spirit essential for long-term partnerships.

In contrast, requesting early supplier involvement, planning visits, or setting delivery dates are typically part of constructive relationship management practices and do not inherently lead to conflict.

Hypothetical questionsare used to explore scenarios or options without making a commitment. For example, asking "What if we were to increase the order volume?" encourages creative thinking and testing potential agreements without binding either party. This technique is valuable in theproposing and bargaining stagesof negotiation to explore trade-offs and build mutual solutions.