Pass the APMG-International Better Business Cases Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions and answers with CertsForce

No, because the regulations are an externally imposed parameter or constraint.

No, because dependencies should NOT be recorded within the Strategic Outline Case.

Yes, because any actions or developments required by others should be considered if the success of the project is dependent upon them.

Yes, because success of the project is dependent upon compliance with these regulations.

Should be rejected as over-ambitious.

Delivers against one or more of the critical success factors.

Will represent a benchmark for Value For Money throughout the appraisal process.

Supports one or more of the Spending Objectives.

Incorrectly identified as a Scoping Solution.

Amend entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be confirmed within the OBC.

Delete entry 1, because schools and universities will be responsible for the delivery of the benefits.

No change to entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be revisited and re-affirmed within the FBC.

Amend entry 2, because the project manager is responsible for benefits realization.

No change to entry 2, because this is appropriate to this section.

Strategic fit and business needs.

Potential Value For Money.

Supply side capacity and capability.

Potential affordability.

Potential achievability.

The Financial Appraisal shows that this scheme is unaffordable.

At the end of Year 6, E6 million of the initial spending costs will have been recovered.

The surplus Income forecast in Year 1 is sufficient to cover the deficit forecast in Year 2.

The revenue budget should show how long it will take for the surplus income to cover the initial cost of building the new campus.

If expenditure and income continue at the same rate, each subsequent year should return a surplus of £1 million.

The addition of a new campus will be matched by plans to downsize elsewhere.

Constant prices have been used to estimate lifecycle costs in the value for money appraisal.

The 3 local government authorities have formed a partnership known as the Western Area Learning Consortium.

The option provides an increase in the progression to higher-level learning.

The cost of maintaining and adapting Pittville High School will be removed by closing the school.

No, because the anticipated benefits will remain the same.

No, because the sale price of the site is an opportunity cost which is irrelevant to the Economic Appraisal.

Yes, because the FBC must be re-submitted for re-approval if the costs vary significantly.

Yes, because the FBC should be based on accurate Economic Appraisals for all options.

This is a Service Scope option NOT a Service Solution option.

Delivers against one or more of the critical success factors.

Supports one or more of the Spending Objectives.

Will represent a benchmark for Value For Money throughout the appraisal process.

This is the LEA's preference and therefore the preferred option.

No, because inflation should be included as a cost in the Financial Appraisal.

No, because any increase in cost should be dealt with as an issue.

Yes, because any cost increase could threaten the affordability of a scheme.

Yes, because any risk that might affect the financial viability of a scheme should be closely managed.