Pass the Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Associate SAA-C03 Questions and answers with CertsForce

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/InstanceStorage.html

Amazon Athena is the best choice for running one-time queries on streaming data. Although Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics provides an easy and familiar standard SQL language to analyze streaming data in real-time, it is designed for continuous queries rather than one-time queries[1]. On the other hand, Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows querying data in Amazon S3 using SQL. It is optimized for ad-hoc querying and is ideal for running one-time queries on streaming data[2].AWS Lake Formation uses as a central place to have all your data for analytics purposes (E). Athena integrate perfect with S3 and can makes queries (A).

Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora MySQL - this will let the DB scale on it's own; it'll scale automatically without needing adjustment. Create AMI of the web app and using a launch template - this will make the creating of any future instances of the app seamless. They can then be added to the auto scaling group which will save them money as it will scale up and down based on demand. Using a spot fleet to launch instances- This solves the "MOST cost-effective" portion of the question as spot instances come at a huge discount at the cost of being terminated at any time Amazon deems fit. I think this is why there's a bit of disagreement on this. While it's the most cost effective, it would be a terrible choice if amazon were to terminate that spot instance during a busy period.

**AWS PrivateLink provides private connectivity between VPCs, AWS services, and your on-premises networks, without exposing your traffic to the public internet**. AWS PrivateLink makes it easy to connect services across different accounts and VPCs to significantly simplify your network architecture. Interface **VPC endpoints**, powered by AWS PrivateLink, connect you to services hosted by AWS Partners and supported solutions available in AWS Marketplace. https://aws.amazon.com/privatelink/

Migrating to Amazon MQ reduces the overhead on the queue management. C and D are dismissed. Deciding between A and B means deciding to go for an AutoScaling group for EC2 or an RDS for Postgress (both multi- AZ). The RDS option has less operational impact, as provide as a service the tools and software required. Consider for instance, the effort to add an additional node like a read replica, to the DB. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazon-mq/latest/developer-guide/active-standby-broker-deployment.htmlhttps://aws.amazon.com/rds/postgresql/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/WindowsGuide/monitor-ami-events.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20you%20can%20create%20an%20EventBridge%20rule%20that%20detects%20when%20the%20AMI%20creation%20process%20has%20completed%20and%20then%20invokes%20an%20Amazon%20SNS%20topic%20to%20send%20an%20email%20notification%20to%20you.

Creating an Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) rule for the CreateImage API call and configuring the target as an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to send an alert when a CreateImage API call is detected will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus that makes it easy to connect applications together using data from your own applications, integrated Software as a Service (SaaS) applications, and AWS services. By creating an EventBridge rule for the CreateImage API call, the company can set up alerts whenever this operation is called within their account. The alert can be sent to an SNS topic, which can then be configured to send notifications to the company's email or other desired destination.

This approach ensures that the order creation and payment processing steps are separate and atomic. By sending the order information to an SQS FIFO queue, the payment service can process the order one at a time and in the order they were received. If the payment service is unable to process an order, it can be retried later, preventing the creation of multiple orders. The deletion of the message from the queue after it is processed will prevent the same message from being processed multiple times.

SSE-S3 - is free and uses AWS owned CMKs (CMK = Customer Master Key). The encryption key is owned and managed by AWS, and is shared among many accounts. Its rotation is automatic with time that varies as shown in the table here. The time is not explicitly defined.

SSE-KMS - has two flavors:

AWS managed CMK. This is free CMK generated only for your account. You can only view it policies and audit usage, but not manage it. Rotation is automatic - once per 1095 days (3 years),

Customer managed CMK. This uses your own key that you create and can manage. Rotation is not enabled by default. But if you enable it, it will be automatically rotated every 1 year. This variant can also use an imported key material by you. If you create such key with an imported material, there is no automated rotation. Only manual rotation.

SSE-C - customer provided key. The encryption key is fully managed by you outside of AWS. AWS will not rotate it.

This solution meets the requirements of moving data to an Amazon S3 bucket, encrypting the data when it is stored in the S3 bucket, and automatically rotating the encryption key every year with the least operational overhead. AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) is a service that enables you to create and manage encryption keys for your data. A customer managed key is a symmetric encryption key that you create and manage in AWS KMS. You can enable automatic key rotation for a customer managed key, which means that AWS KMS generates new cryptographic material for the key every year. You can set the S3 bucket’s default encryption behavior to use the customer managed KMS key, which means that any object that is uploaded to the bucket without specifying an encryption method will be encrypted with that key.

Option A is incorrect because using server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed encryption keys (SSE-S3) does not allow you to control or manage the encryption keys. SSE-S3 uses a unique key for each object, and encrypts that key with a master key that is regularly rotated by S3. However, you cannot enable or disable key rotation for SSE-S3 keys, or specify the rotation interval. Option C is incorrect because manually rotating the KMS key every year can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not meet the requirement of rotating the key every year if you forget or delay the rotationprocess. Option D is incorrect because encrypting the data with customer key material before moving the data to the S3 bucket can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not provide consistent encryption for all objects in the bucket. Creating a KMS key without key material and importing the customer key material into the KMS key can enable you to use your own source of random bits to generate your KMS keys, but it does not support automatic key rotation.

https://computingforgeeks.com/stream-logs-in-aws-from-cloudwatch-to-elasticsearch/

Reserved is cheaper than on demand the company has. And it's meet the availabilty (HA) requirement as to spot instance that can be disrupted at any time. PRICING BELOW. On-Demand: 0% There’s no commitment from you. You pay the most with this option. Reserved : 40%-60%1-year or 3-year commitment from you. You save money from that commitment. Spot 50%-90% Ridiculously inexpensive because there’s no commitment from the AWS side.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_manage_policies_scps_examples_vpc.html#example_vpc_2

Amazon Aurora is a fully managed, scalable, and highly available relational database service that is compatible with PostgreSQL. Migrating the database to Amazon Aurora would reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the database infrastructure and allow the company to focus on building and scaling the application. AWS Fargate is a fully managed container orchestrationservice that enables users to run containers without the need to manage the underlying EC2 instances. By using AWS Fargate with Amazon Elastic Container Service(Amazon ECS), the solutions architect can improve the scalability and efficiency of the web application and reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the underlying infrastructure.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to redesign the architecture to be highly available and use AWS managed solutions for hosting a web application with static content, PHP application, and Redis for user sessions.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk: Suitable for simplifying deployment but may not provide the desired flexibility and control for complex architectures.

AWS Lambda and API Gateway: Not ideal for hosting a stateful PHP application and handling static content.Adding complexity without significant benefit.

EC2 instance with ElastiCache and S3: Provides some high availability but involves managing EC2 instances, which increases operational overhead.

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This solution leverages fully managed AWS services for each component, ensuring high availability and scalability.

Best Solution:

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This combination of services meets the requirements for a highly available and managed solution, ensuring optimal performance and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: EC2 instances need to upload data to S3 without using the public internet, and on-premises servers need to consume this data.

Analysis of Options:

Interface VPC Endpoint for EC2: Not relevant for accessing S3.

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: Provides private connectivity from EC2 instances to S3 and from on-premises to AWS, ensuring compliance with the requirement to avoid public internet.

Transit Gateway and Site-to-Site VPN: Adds unnecessary complexity and does not provide the same level of performance as Direct Connect.

Proxy EC2 Instances with NAT Gateways: Increases complexity and costs compared to a direct connection using VPC endpoints and Direct Connect.

Best Solution:

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: This solution ensures secure, private data transfer both within AWS and between on-premises and AWS, meeting the compliance requirements effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The order processing system requires multiple independent validation steps, each handled by separate Lambda functions, with each function accessing only the subset of order information it needs. The system should be loosely coupled to accommodate future changes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon SQS with a new Lambda function for transformation: This involves additional complexity in creating and managing multiple SQS queues and an extra Lambda function for data transformation.

Amazon SNS with message filtering: While SNS supports message filtering, it is more suited for pub/sub messaging patterns rather than event-driven processing requiring fine-grained control over the data sent to each function.

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: EventBridge is designed for event-driven architectures, allowing for fine-grained control with input transformers that can modify and filter the event data sent to each target Lambda function, ensuring each function receives only the necessary information.

SQS with synchronous Lambda invocations: This approach adds unnecessary complexity with synchronous invocations and is not ideal for an event-driven, loosely coupled architecture.

Best Solution:

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: This option provides the most flexible, scalable, and loosely coupled architecture, enabling each Lambda function to receive only the required subset of data.

Requirement Analysis: The goal is to migrate from Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with minimal application code changes.

Babelfish for Aurora PostgreSQL: Babelfish allows Aurora PostgreSQL to understand SQL Server queries natively, reducing the need for application code changes.

AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT): This tool helps in converting the database schema from SQL Server to PostgreSQL.

AWS Database Migration Service (DMS): DMS can be used to migrate data from SQL Server to Aurora PostgreSQL seamlessly.

Combined Approach: Enabling Babelfish addresses the SQL query compatibility, while SCT and DMS handle the schema and data migration.

References

Babelfish for Aurora PostgreSQL:Babelfish Documentation

AWS SCT and DMS:AWS Database Migration Service

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs to scale throughput for uploading large files to S3 and downloading them to EC2 instances.

S3 Multipart Uploads: This method allows for the parallel upload of parts of a file, improving upload efficiency and reliability.

Parallel Fetching: Fetching multiple byte-ranges in parallel from S3 improves download performance.

Implementation:

For uploads, use the S3 multipart upload API to upload files in parallel.

For downloads, use the S3 API to request multiple byte-ranges concurrently.

Conclusion: These solutions effectively scale throughput and improve the performance of both uploads and downloads.

References

S3 Multipart Upload:Amazon S3 Multipart Upload

Parallel Fetching:S3 Byte-Range Fetches

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation